A Randomized Comparison of Non-Channeled GlidescopeTM Titanium Versus Channeled KingVisionTM Videolaryngoscope for Orotracheal Intubation in Obese Patients with BMI > 35 kg·m-2
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
MZCZ-DRO-VFN64165
Ministerstvo Zdravotnictví Ceské Republiky
PubMed
33260374
PubMed Central
PMC7759911
DOI
10.3390/diagnostics10121024
PII: diagnostics10121024
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Glidescope TitaniumTM laryngoscope, King VisionTM laryngoscope, channeled blade, non-channeled blade, obesity, videolaryngoscopy,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Videolaryngoscopes may improve intubating conditions in obese patients. A total of 110 patients with a body mass index > 35 kg∙m-2 were prospectively randomized to tracheal intubation using non-channeled Glidescope Titanium or channeled King Vision videolaryngoscope. The primary outcome was the time to tracheal intubation. Secondary outcomes included: total success rate, number of attempts, the quality of visualization, peri-procedural and post-proceduralcomplications. Time to the first effective breath was shorter with the King Vision (median; 95% CI)-36; 34-39 s vs. 42; 40-50 in the Glidescope group (p = 0.007). The total success rate was higher in the Glidescope group-100% vs. 89.1% (p = 0.03). There was a higher incidence of moderate and difficult laryngoscopy in the King Vision group. No difference was recorded in first attempt success rates, total number of attempts, use of additional maneuvers, intraoperative trauma, or any significant decrease in SpO2 during intubation. No serious complications were noted and the incidence of postoperative complaints was without difference. Although tracheal intubation with King Vision showed shorter time to the first breath, total success was higher in the Glidescope group, and all but one patients where intubation failed with the KingVision were subsequently intubated with the Glidescope.
Department of Anaesthesia Antrim Area Hospital Antrim BT41 2RL UK
Medical Faculty Masaryk University 625 00 Brno Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Hales C.M., Carroll M.D., Fryar C.D., Ogden C.L. Prevalence of Obesity and Severe Obesity among Adults: United States 2017–2018. National Center for Health Statistics; Hyattsville, MD, USA: 2020. NCHS Data Brief, no. 360. PubMed
Marques A., Peralta M., Naia A., Loureiro N., de Matos M.G. Prevalence of adult overweight and obesity in 20 European countries, 2014. Eur. J. Public Health. 2018;28:295–300. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckx143. PubMed DOI
Abdelaal M., le Roux C.W., Docherty N.G. Morbidity and mortality associated with obesity. Ann. Transl. Med. 2017;5:161. doi: 10.21037/atm.2017.03.107. PubMed DOI PMC
Kristensen M.S. Airway management and morbid obesity. Eur. J. Anaesthesiol. 2010;27:923–927. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833d91aa. PubMed DOI
Juvin P., Lavaut E., Dupont H., Lefevre P., Demetriou M., Dumoulin J.L., Desmonts J.M. Difficult tracheal intubation is more common in obese than in lean patients. Anesth. Analg. 2003;97:595–600. doi: 10.1213/01.ANE.0000072547.75928.B0. PubMed DOI
Yumul R., Elvir-Lazo O.L., White P.F., Sloninsky A., Kaplan M., Kariger R., Naruse R., Parker N., Pham C., Zhang X., et al. Comparison of three video laryngoscopy devices to direct laryngoscopy for intubating obese patients: A randomized controlled trial. J. Clin. Anesth. 2016;31:71–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2015.12.042. PubMed DOI
Marrel J., Blanc C., Frascarolo P., Magnusson I. Videolaryngoscopy improves intubation condition in morbidly obese patients. Eur. J. Anesthesiol. 2007;24:1045–1049. doi: 10.1017/S0265021507000889. PubMed DOI
Andersen L.H., Rovsing L., Olsen K.S. GlideScope videolaryngoscope vs. Macintosh direct laryngoscope for intubation of morbidly obese patients: A randomized trial. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2011;55:1090–1097. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2011.02498.x. PubMed DOI
Yousef G.T., Abdalgalil D.A., Ibrahim T.H. Orotracheal intubation of morbidly obese patients, comparison of GlideScope video laryngoscope and the LMA CTrach with direct laryngoscopy. Anesth. Essays Res. 2012;6:174–179. doi: 10.4103/0259-1162.108304. PubMed DOI PMC
Hoshijima H., Denawa Y., Tominaga A., Nakamura C., Shiga T., Nagasaka H. Videolaryngoscope versus Macintosh laryngoscope for tracheal intubation in adults with obesity: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J. Clin. Anesth. 2018;44:69–75. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2017.11.008. PubMed DOI
Schulz K.F., Altman D.G., Moher D., CONSORT Group CONSORT 2010 statement: Updated guidelines for reporting parallel group randomised trials. BMC Med. 2010;8:18. doi: 10.1186/1741-7015-8-18. PubMed DOI PMC
Piaggio G., Elbourne D.R., Pocock S.J., Evans S.J., Altman D.G., CONSORT Group Reporting of noninferiority and equivalence rnadomized trials: Extension of the CONSORT 2010 statement. JAMA. 2012;308:2594–2604. doi: 10.1001/jama.2012.87802. PubMed DOI
Nightingale C.E., Margarson M.P., Shearer E., Redman J.W., Lucas D.N., Cousins J.M., Fox W.T., Kennedy N.J., Venn P.J., Skues M., et al. Peri-operative management of the obese surgical patient 2015. Anaesthesia. 2015;70:859–876. PubMed PMC
Frerk C., Mitchell V.S., McNarry A.F., Mendonca C., Bhagrath R., Patel A., O’Sullivan E.P., Woodall N.M., Ahmad I. Difficult Airway Society 2015 guidelines for management of unanticipated difficult intubation in adults. Br. J. Anaesth. 2015;115:827–848. doi: 10.1093/bja/aev371. PubMed DOI PMC
Yentis S.M., Lee D.J. Evaluation of an improved scoring system for the grading of direct laryngoscopy. Anaesthesia. 1998;53:1041–1044. doi: 10.1046/j.1365-2044.1998.00605.x. PubMed DOI
Adnet F., Borron S.W., Racine S.X., Clemessy J.L., Fournier J.L., Plaisance P., Lapandry C. The intubation difficulty scale (IDS). Proposal and evaluation of a new score characterizing the complexity of endotracheal intubation. Anesthesiology. 1997;87:1290–1297. doi: 10.1097/00000542-199712000-00005. PubMed DOI
Ydemann M., Rovsing L., Lindekaer A.L., Olsen K.S. Intubation of the morbidly obese patients: GlideScope® vs. FastrachTM. Acta Anaesthesiol. Scand. 2012;56:755–761. doi: 10.1111/j.1399-6576.2012.02693.x. PubMed DOI
Maassen R., Lee R., Hermans B., Marcus M., van Zundert A. A comparison of three videolaryngoscopes: The Macintosh blade reduces, but does not replace, routine stylet use for intubation in morbidly obese patients. Anesth. Analg. 2009;109:1560–1565. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0b013e3181b7303a. PubMed DOI
Abdelmalak B.B., Bernstein E., Egan C., Abdallah R., You J., Sessler D.I., Doyle D.J. GlideScope® vs flexible fibreoptic scope for elective intubation in obese patients. Anaesthesia. 2011;66:550–555. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2011.06659.x. PubMed DOI
Cagnazzi E., Mosca A., Pe F., Togazzari T., Manenti O., Mittemperger F., Raffetti E., Donato F., Latronico N. Near-zero difficult tracheal intubation and tracheal intubation failure rate with the “Besta Airway Algorithm” and “Glidescope in morbidly obese” (GLOBE) Minerva Anestesiol. 2016;82:966–973. PubMed
Ander F., Magnuson A., Berggren L., Ahlstrand R., de Leon A. Time-to-intubation in obese patients. A randomized study comparing direct laryngoscopy and videolaryngoscopy in experienced anesthetists. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017;83:906–913. PubMed
Sahajanandan R., Dhanyee A.S., Gautam A.K. A comparison of King Vision video laryngoscope with CMAC D-blade in obese patients with anticipated difficult airway in tertiary hospital in India—Randomized controlled study. J. Anaesthesiol. Clin. Pharmacol. 2019;35:363–367. PubMed PMC
Kleine-Brueggeney M., Greif R., Schoettker P., Savoldelli G.L., Nabecker S., Theiler L.G. Evaluation of six videolaryngoscopes in 720 patients with a simulated difficult airway: A multicentre randomized controlled trial. Br. J. Anaesth. 2016;116:670–679. doi: 10.1093/bja/aew058. PubMed DOI
Aziz M.F., Brambrink A.M., Healy D.W., Willett A.W., Shanks A., Tremper T., Jameson L., Ragheb J., Biggs D.A., Paganelli W.C., et al. Success of intubation rescue techniques after failed direct laryngoscopy in adults. A retrospective comparative analysis from the multicenter perioperative outcomes group. Anesthesiology. 2016;125:656–666. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000001267. PubMed DOI
Aziz M.F., Abrons R.O., Cattano D., Bayman E.O., Swanson D.E., Hagberg C.A., Todd M.M., Brambrink A.M. First-attempt intubation success of video laryngoscopy in patients with anticipated difficult direct laryngoscopy: A multicenter randomized controlled trial comparing the C-MAC D-Blade versus the Glide Scope in a mixed provider and diverse patient population. Anesth. Analg. 2016;120:740–750. PubMed