Birches are generally known for their high genetic and morphological variability, which has resulted in the description of many species. Ojców birch was described in 1809 by Willibald Suibert Joseph Gottlieb Besser in Poland. Since then, several studies assessing its taxonomy were conducted. Today, various authors present Ojców birch at different taxonomic ranks. In Czechia, the Ojców birch is classified a critically endangered taxon and confirmed at one locality consisting of several tens of individuals. However, before a strategy for its conservation can be applied, we consider it necessary to assess the taxonomic position of the endangered Czech population and to evaluate its relationship to the original Polish population. This study aimed to evaluate the morphometric and genetic variability between populations of B. ×oycoviensis in Poland and the Czechia and their relationship to regional populations of B. pendula, one of the putative parental species of the Ojców birch. Altogether, 106 individuals were sampled, including the holotype of B. szaferi, the second putative parental species of B. ×oycoviensis, received from the herbarium of W. Szafer, which is deposited at the Institute of Botany in Kraków. Morphological analyses identified differences in leaves between B. ×oycoviensis and B. pendula. However, no significant differences were found in genome size between selected taxa/working units except for B. pendula sampled in Czechia. The identified difference of the Czech population of B. pendula is probably caused by population variability. Genetic variability between all the taxa under comparison, regardless of their origin, was also very low; only the benchmark taxa (B. nana and B. humilis) clearly differed from all samples analyzed. The results indicate minute morphological and negligible genetic variability between the Czech and Polish populations of B. ×oycoviensis. In light of our results, the classification of B. ×oycoviensis as B. pendula var. oycoviensis seems more accurate than all hitherto presented alternatives (e.g. B. ×oycoviensis as a separate species).

Department of Silviculture Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Suchdol Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Järvinen P, Palmé A, Orlando Morales L, Lännenpää M, Keinanen M, Sopanen T, et al. Phylogenetic relationships of Betula species (Betulaceae) based on nuclear ADH and chloroplast matK sequences. Am J Bot. 2004;91: 1834–1845. 10.3732/ajb.91.11.1834 PubMed DOI

Ashburner K, McAllister HA. The Genus Betula: A taxonomic revision of Birches. Richmond, Surrey: Kew Publishing; 2013.

Anamthawat-Jónsson K, Thórsson AT. Natural hybridisation in birch: triploid hybrids between Betula nana and B. pubescens. Plant Cell Tissue Organ Cult. 2003;75: 99–107. 10.1023/a:1025063123552 DOI

Thórsson AT, Pálsson S, Sigurgeirsson A, Anamthawat-Jonsson K. Morphological variation among Betula nana (diploid), B. pubescens (tetraploid) and their triploid hybrids in Iceland. Ann Bot. 2007;99: 1183–1193. PubMed PMC

Schenk MF, Thienpont C-N, Koopman WJM, Gilissen LJWJ, Smulders MJM. Phylogenetic relationships in Betula (Betulaceae) based on AFLP markers. Tree Genet Genomes. 2008;4: 911–924. 10.1007/s11295-008-0162-0 DOI

Furlow JJ. The genera of Betulaceae in the southeastern United States. J Arnold Arboretum. 1990;71: 1–67. 10.5962/bhl.part.24925 DOI

Grimm GW, Renner SS. Harvesting Betulaceae sequences from GenBank to generate a new chronogram for the family. Bot J Linn Soc. 2013;172: 465–477.

Willdenow CL. Caroli a Linné Species plantarum: exhibentes plantas rite cognitas, ad genera relatas, cum differentiis specificis, nominibus trivialibus, synonymis selectis, locis natalibus, secundum systema sexuale digestas. 4., post R. Berlin: Impensis G.C. Nauk; 1805. 10.5962/bhl.title.727 DOI

Fiek E. Resultate der Durchforschung der schlesischen Phanerogamenflora im Jahre 1887 Jahres-Bericht der Schlesischen Gesellschaft für Vaterländische Cultur, vol 65 Breslau, Poland: Aderholz, G. P.; 1888. pp. 310–339.

Domin K. Betula atrata Domin, nová bříza z Českomoravské vysočiny. Rozpr České Akad věd a umění. 1927;36: 1–10.

Sýkora T. Taxonomie a rozšíření bříz okruhu Betula alba v Českém masivu. Zprávy Československé Bot Společnosti. 1983;18: 1–14.

Besser WSJG. Primitiae florae Galiciae Austriacae utriusque: encheiridion ad conncinatum, Pars 2. Wien: Sumtibus Ant. Doll; 1809.

Jentys-Szaferowa J. Rodzina Betulaceae Flora Polska 2. Kraków: Polska Akademia Nauk; 1921. pp. 3–17.

Jentys-Szaferowa J. Brzoza ojcowska (Betula oycoviensis Bess.). Historia i charakterystyka gatunku. Rocz Pol Tow Dendrol. 1928;2: 69–88.

Jentys-Szaferowa J, Bialobrzeska M, Truchanowicz J, Wieckowska I. The second decade of investigations on Betula oycoviensis Bess. Fragm Florist Geobot. 1974;20: 203–242.

Szwabowicz A. Microsporogenesis of Betula oycoviensis Bess. and of its progeny. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 1976;45: 169–184. 10.5586/asbp.1976.016 DOI

Pawłowska L. Flavonoids III. Flavonoids of Betula oycoviensis. Acta Soc Bot Pol. 1980;49: 311–320.

Staszkiewicz J. Brzoza ojcowska (Betula oycoviensis Bess.) na górze Skiełek w Beskidzie Wyspowym. http://www.brzozanaskielku.republika.pl. 2013;

Staszkiewicz J. Betula szaferi–A new species of the genus Betula L. from Poland [Internet]. Acta Societatis Botanicorum Poloniae. 1986. pp. 361–366. 10.5586/asbp.1986.033 DOI

Rutkowski L. Klucz do oznaczania roślin naczyniowych Polski niżowej. 2nd ed Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN; 2018.

Vašut RJ. Betula L.–bříza In: Kaplan Z, editor. Klíč ke květeně České Republiky. Praha: Academia; 2019. p. 1172.

Kříž Z. Betula L.–Bříza In: Hejný S, Slavík B, editors. Květena České republiky II. Praha: Academia; 2003. pp. 36–46.

Korczyk A. Rozmieszczenie geograficzne brzozy ojcowskiej (Betula oycoviensis Bess.). Ochr Przyr. 1967;32: 133–170.

Staszkiewicz J, Wójcicki JJ. “Betula ×oycoviensis” Besser in the environs of Kraków (S. Poland). Veröffentlichungen des Geobot Institutes der Eidgenössische Tech Hochschule, Stift Rübel, Zürich. 1992;107: 94–97.

Olshanskyi I., Shyian NM, Tarieiev AS. Types of Betula (Betulaceae) names described from Ukraine, kept in the National Herbarium of Ukraine (KW). Ukr Bot J. 2016;73: 401–403. 10.15407/ukrbotj73.04.401 DOI

Staszkiewicz J. The birches Betula ×oycoviensis and Betula szaferi in the Beskid Wyspowy mountain range. Chrońmy Przyr Ojczystą. 1985;41: 36–41.

Baláš M, Kuneš I, Gallo J, Rašáková N. Review on Betula oycoviensis and foliar morphometry of the species in Volynĕ, Czech Republic. Dendrobiology. 2016;76: 117–125. 10.12657/denbio.076.011 DOI

Jentys-Szaferowa J. Badania systematyczno-doświadczalne nad Betula oycoviensis Besser. Rocz Sekc Dendrol Pol Tow Bot. 1967;2: 5–56.

Gardiner AS, Jeffers JNR. Analysis of the collective species Betula alba L. on the basis of leaf measurements. Silvae Genet. 1962;11: 125–176.

Atkinson MD, Codling AN. A reliable method for distinguishing between Betula pendula and B. pubescens. Watsonia. 1986;16: 75–87.

Gill JA, Davy AJ. Variation and polyploidy within lowland populations of the Betula pendula/B. pubescens complex. New Phytol. 1983;94: 433–451.

Kuneš I, Linda R, Fér T, Karlík P, Baláš M, Ešnerová J, et al. Is Betula carpatica genetically distinctive? A morphometric, cytometric and molecular study of birches in the Bohemian Massif with a focus on Carpathian birch. PLoS One. 2019;14: 1–28. 10.1371/journal.pone.0224387 PubMed DOI PMC

Kulju KKM, Pekkinen M, Varvio S. Twenty-three microsatellite primer pairs for Betula pendula (Betulaceae). Mol Ecol Notes. 2004;4: 471–473. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00704.x DOI

Tsuda Y, Ueno S, Ranta J, Salminen K, Ide Y, Shinohara K, et al. Development of 11 EST-SSRs for Japanese white birch, Betula platyphylla var. japonica and their transferability to related species. Conserv Genet. 2009;10: 1385–1388. 10.1007/s10592-008-9701-3 DOI

Tsuda Y, Ueno S, Ide Y, Tsumura Y. Development of 14 EST-SSRs for Betula maximowicziana and their applicability to related species. Conserv Genet. 2009;10: 661–664. 10.1007/s10592-008-9608-z DOI

Hejtmánek J. K systematickému hodnocení Betula atrata Domin. Preslia. 1956;28: 245–249.

Franiel I. Problemy taksonomiczne Betula obscura (Betulaceae)—przegląd literatury. Fragm Florist Geobot Pol. 2009;16: 27–32.

Schneider CA, Rasband WS, Eliceiri KW. NIH Image to ImageJ: 25 years of image analysis. Nat Methods. 2012;9: 671–5. 10.1038/nmeth.2089 PubMed DOI PMC

Ešnerová J, Karlík P, Zahradník D, Koňasová T, Stejskal J, Baláš M, et al. Morfologická variabilita rodu bříza (Betula L.) v Krkonoších se zaměřením na tetraploidní zástupce. Zprávy Lesn výzkumu. 2012;57: 112–125.

Linda R, Kuneš I, Baláš M, Gallo J. Morphological variability between diploid and tetraploid taxa of the genus Betula L. in the Czech Republic. J For Sci. 2017;63: 531–537. 10.17221/105/2017-JFS DOI

Suda J, Pyšek P. Flow cytometry in botanical research: Introduction. Preslia. 2010;82: 1–2.

Otto F. DAPI staining of fixed cells for high-resolution flow cytometry of nuclear DNA. Methods Cell Biol. 1990;33: 105–10. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1707478 PubMed

Greilhuber J, Doležel J, Lysák MA, Bennett MD. The origin, evolution and proposed stabilization of the terms “genome size” and “C-value” to describe nuclear DNA contents. Ann Bot. 2005;95: 255–60. PubMed PMC

R Core Team. R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing [Internet]. Vienna, Austria; 2020. https://www.r-project.org/

Wickham H. ggplot2: Elegant Graphics for Data Analysis. Springer-Verlag; New York; 2016.

Koutecký P. MorphoTools: a set of R functions for morphometric analysis. Plant Syst Evol. 2015;301: 1115–1121. 10.1007/s00606-014-1153-2 DOI

Siegel S, Castellan NJ Jr.. Nonparametric statistics for the behavioral sciences, 2nd ed New York, NY, England: McGraw-Hill Book Company; 1988.

Wright S. Genetical structure of populations. Nature. 1950;166: 247–249. 10.1038/166247a0 PubMed DOI

Jombart T, Devillard S, Balloux F. Discriminant analysis of principal components: a new method for the analysis of genetically structured populations. BMC Genet. 2010;11: 94 10.1186/1471-2156-11-94 PubMed DOI PMC

Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics. 2000;155: 945–59. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10835412 PubMed PMC

Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: linked loci and correlated allele frequencies. Genetics. 2003;164: 1567–87. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12930761 PubMed PMC

Falush D, Stephens M, Pritchard JK. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data: dominant markers and null alleles. Mol Ecol Notes. 2007;7: 574–578. 10.1111/j.1471-8286.2007.01758.x PubMed DOI PMC

Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J. Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software structure: a simulation study. Mol Ecol. 2005;14: 2611–2620. 10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x PubMed DOI

Earl DA, vonHoldt BM. STRUCTURE HARVESTER: A website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour. 2012;4: 359–361. 10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7 DOI

Jakobsson M, Rosenberg NA. CLUMPP: A cluster matching and permutation program for dealing with label switching and multimodality in analysis of population structure. Bioinformatics. 2007;23: 1801–1806. PubMed

Rosenberg NA. DISTRUCT: A program for the graphical display of population structure. Mol Ecol Notes. 2004;4: 137–138. 10.1046/j.1471-8286.2003.00566.x DOI

Goudet J, Raymond M, de Meeüs T, Rousset F. Testing differentiation in diploid populations. Genetics. 1996;144: 1933–40. Available: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8978076 PubMed PMC

Jombart T. adegenet: a R package for the multivariate analysis of genetic markers. Bioinformatics. 2008;24: 1403–1405. PubMed

Jombart T, Ahmed I. adegenet 1.3–1: new tools for the analysis of genome-wide SNP data. Bioinformatics. 2011;27: 3070–3071. PubMed PMC

Kamvar ZN, Tabima JF, Grünwald NJ. Poppr: an R package for genetic analysis of populations with clonal, partially clonal, and/or sexual reproduction. PeerJ. 2014;2: e281 10.7717/peerj.281 PubMed DOI PMC

Kamvar ZN, Brooks JC, Grünwald NJ. Novel R tools for analysis of genome-wide population genetic data with emphasis on clonality. Front Genet. 2015;6 10.3389/fgene.2015.00208 PubMed DOI PMC

Goudet J, Jombart T. hierfstat: Estimation and Tests of Hierarchical F-Statistics [Internet]. 2015. https://cran.r-project.org/package=hierfstat

Zachos FE. Species Concepts in Biology: Historical Development, Theoretical Foundations and Practical Relevance [Internet]. Springer International Publishing; 2016.

Mallet J. Subspecies, Semispecies, Superspecies Encyclopedia of Biodiversity. Elsevier; 2007. pp. 1–5. 10.1016/B0-12-226865-2/00261-3 DOI

Kaplan Z. Klíč ke květeně České republiky. Prague: Academia; 2019.

Baláš M, Kuneš I, Linda R, Gallo J, Petrásek J. Výskyt jedinců s fenotypovým projevem břízy ojcovské na lokalitě Volyně u Výsluní [Occurrence of individuals showing the phenotypic traits of Oyców birch in the locality Volyně u Výsluní]. A set of specialized maps. Prague; 2019.

Biémont C. Genome size evolution: Within-species variation in genome size. Heredity (Edinb). 2008;101: 297–298. 10.1038/hdy.2008.80 PubMed DOI

Grulich V, Chobot K, editors. Červený seznam ohrožených druhů České republiky–cévnaté rostliny [Red List of Threatened Species of the Czech Republic–Vascular plants]. Příroda. 2017;35: 75–132.

Rivers M. European Red List of Trees [Internet]. IUCN, International Union for Conservation of Nature; 2019. 10.2305/IUCN.CH.2019.ERL.1.en

Shaw K, Stritch L, Rivers M, Roy S, Wilson B, Govaerts R. Betulaceae. Richmond, UK: Botanic Gardens Conservation International; 2014.