Three-dimensional mixed longitudinal study of facial growth changes and variability of facial form in preschool children using stereophotogrammetry
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
STARS Program of Faculty of Science, Charles University in Prague
PubMed
33345464
DOI
10.1111/ocr.12461
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- 3D imaging, facial morphology, longitudinal growth, sexual dimorphism,
- MeSH
- fotogrammetrie * MeSH
- kefalometrie MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- longitudinální studie MeSH
- nos anatomie a histologie diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- obličej anatomie a histologie diagnostické zobrazování MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- zobrazování trojrozměrné * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- předškolní dítě MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVES: Since the normal, non-pathological facial growth in preschool children is not sufficiently reported, the aim was to follow growth changes of facial surface, sex differences and facial variability in preschool children using 3D stereophotogrammetry. SETTINGS AND SAMPLE POPULATION: Mixed longitudinal sample of healthy Caucasian preschool children without head and facial trauma or craniofacial anomalies from 3.4 to 6.7 years of age consisted of 25 girls and 17 boys. MATERIALS AND METHODS: 136 3D facial models from optical scanner Vectra 3D were evaluated by geometric morphometrics (CPC-DCA, PCA, per-vertex t test). RESULTS: In both sexes, the lower face was widened and elongated, and the prominences of the superciliary arches, lower orbital region, nose, lips and chin increased. Facial surface increments were more even in girls with a maximum between the fourth and fifth year of age, while in boys, there was the most intensive growth between fifth and sixth year of age. Sexual dimorphism was very stable during investigated period, only less statistically significant at the age of 3 years. Boys had more prominent lateral lower part of forehead, nose and lips than girls in every age category. CONCLUSIONS: The longitudinal growth of the face between third and sixth year of age was similar in both sexes, facial sex differences were found in terms of intensity, size and timing. Variability of facial form showed that boys' faces were larger on average and facial shape did not differ. The knowledge of facial growth is essential for diagnostics and clinical practice.
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Costello BJ, Rivera RD, Shand J, Mooney M. Growth and development considerations for craniomaxillofacial surgery. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2012;24(3):377-396.
Manlove AE, Romeo G, Venugopalan SR. Craniofacial growth: Current theories and influence on management. Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am. 2020;32(2):167-175.
Hönn M, Göz G. Reference values for craniofacial structures in children 4 to 6 years old: review of the literature. J Orofac Orthop. 2007;68(3):170-182.
Bulygina E, Mitteroecker P, Aiello L. Ontogeny of facial dimorphism and patterns of individual development within one human population. Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006;131(3):432-443.
Evteev A, Anikin A, Satanin A. Midfacial growth patterns in males from newborn to 5 years old based on computed tomography. Am J Hum Biol. 2018;30(4):e23132.
Brons S, Meulstee JW, Nada RM, et al. Uniform 3D meshes to establish normative facial averages of healthy infants during the first year of life. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(5):e0217267.
Yamada T, Mori Y, Minami K, Mishima K, Tsukamoto Y. Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology in normal Japanese children as control data for cleft surgery. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2002;39(5):517-526.
Tutkuviene J, Cattaneo C, Obertová Z, et al. Age- and se-related growth patterns of the craniofacial complex in European children aged 3-6 years. Ann Hum Biol. 2016;43(6):510-519.
Möller M, Schaupp E, Massumi-Möller N, Zeyher C, Godt A, Berneburg M. References values for three-dimensional surface cephalometry in children 3-6 years. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2012;15(2):103-116.
Krimmel M, Breidt M, Bacher M, et al. Three-dimensional normal facial growth from birth to age of 7 years. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2015;136(4):490e-501e.
Primozic J, Perinetti G, Contardo L, Ovsenik M. Facial soft tissue changes during the pre-pubertal and pubertal growth phase: a mixed longitudinal laser-scanning study. Eur J Orthod. 2017;39(1):52-60.
Kau CH, Richmond S. Three-dimensional analysis of facial morphology surface changes in untreated children from 12 to 14 years of age. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2008;134(6):751-760.
Toma AM, Zhurov AI, Playle R, Marshall D, Rosin PL, Richmond S. The assessment of facial variation in 4747 British school children. Eur J Orthod. 2012;34(6):655-664.
Koudelová J, Hoffmannová E, Dupej J, Velemínská J. Simulation of facial growth based on longitudinal data: age progression and age regression between 7 and 17 years of age using 3D surface data. PLoS ONE. 2019;14(2):e0212618.
Nanda RS, Ghosh J. Longitudinal growth changes in the sagittal relationship of maxilla and mandible. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1995;107(1):79-90.
Toma AM, Zhurov AI, Playle R, Richmond S. A three-dimensional look for facial differences between males and females in a British-Caucasian sample aged 151/2 years old. Orthod Craniofac Res. 2008;11(3):180-185.
Ferrario VF, Sforza C, Poggio CE, Schmitz JH. Soft-tissue facial morphometry from 6 to adulthood: a three-dimensional growth study using a new modelling. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1999;103(3):768-778.
Farkas JG, Posnick JC, Hreczko TM. Growth patterns of the face: a morphometric study. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29(4):308-315.
Snodell SF, Nanda RS, Currier GF. A longitudinal cephalometric study of transverse and vertical craniofacial growth. Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 1993;104(5):471-483.
Nute SJ, Moss JP. Three-dimensional facial growth studied by optical surface scanning. J Orthod. 2000;27(1):31-38.
Dadáková M, Cagáňová V, Dupej J, Hoffmannová E, Borský J, Velemínská J. Three-dimensional evaluation of facial morphology in pre-school cleft patients following neonatal cheiloplasty. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2016;44(9):1109-1116.
Djordjevic J, Lewis BM, Donaghy CE, et al. Facial shape and asymmetry in 5-year-old children with repaired unilateral cleft lip and/or palate: an exploratory study using laser scanning. Eur J Orthod. 2014;36(5):497-505.
Jung J, Lee CH, Lee JW, Choi BJ. Three dimensional evaluation of soft tissue after orthognathic surgery. Head Face Med. 2018;14:21.
Software Morphome3cs II. http://www.morphome3cs.com/ Accessed September 5, 2020
Dupej J, Krajíček V, Velemínská J, Pelikán J. Statistical mesh Shape Analysis with Nonlandmark Nonrigid Registration. In: Eurographics Symposium on Geometry Processing, 2014.
Hutton TJ, Buxton BR, Hammond P.Dense surface point distribution models of the human face. Kauai, HI, USA: Proceedings of IEEE Workshop on Mathematical Methods in Biomedical Image Analysis; 2001, pp. 153-160.
Myronenko A, Song X. Point set registration: coherent point drift. IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell. 2010;32(12):2262-2275.
Peres-Neto PR, Jackson DA, Somers KM. How many principal components? stopping rules for determining the number of non-trivial axes revisited. Comput Stat Data Anal. 2005;49(4):974-997.
Plooij JM, Swennen GRJ, Rangel FA, et al. Evaluation of reproducibility and reliability of 3D soft tissue analysis using 3D stereophotogrammetry. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009;38(3):267-273.
Hennessy RJ, McLearie S, Kinsella A, Waddington JL. Facial surface analysis by 3D laser scanning and geometric morphometrics in relation to sexual dimorphism in cerebral-craniofacial morphogenesis and cognitive function. J Anat. 2005;207(3):283-295.
Velemínská J, Bigoni L, Krajíček V, et al. Surface facial modelling and allometry in relation to sexual dimorphism. Homo. 2012;63(2):81-93.
Schüler G. Head proportion and shape of the head of children between 2 and 7 years - results of the longitudinal study. Anthropol Anz. 2007;65(2):203-212.
Sforza C, Grandi G, De Menezes M, Tartaglia GM, Ferrario VF. Age- and sex- related changes in the normal human external nose. Forensic Sci Int. 2010;204(1-3):205.e1-205.e9.
Kesterke MJ, Raffensperger ZD, Heike CL, et al. Using the 3D facial norms database to investigate craniofacial sexual dimorphism in healthy children, adolescents, and adults. Biol Sex Differ. 2016;7:23.
Waitzman AA, Posnick JC, Armstrong DC, Pron GE. Craniofacial skeletal measurements based on computed tomography: Part I. Accuracy and reproducibility. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 1992;29(2):112-117.
Matthews HS, Penington AJ, Hardiman R, et al. Modelling 3D craniofacial growth trajectories for population comparison and classification illustrated using sex-differences. Sci Rep. 2018;8(1):4771.
Funamura JL, Sykes JM. Pediatric septorhinoplasty. Facial Plast Surg Clin North Am. 2014;22(4):503-508.
Buschang PH, Nass GG, Walker GF. Principal components of craniofacial growth for white Philadelphia males and females between 6 and 22 years of age. Am J Orthod. 1982;82(6):508-512.
Moss JP. The use of three-dimensional imaging in orthodontics. Eur J Orthod. 2006;28(5):416-425.