In this paper, we map navigational needs and preferences of patients and visitors to evaluate the appropriateness of a smartphone navigation application in the hospital in contrast to other, more traditional navigational cues. We test the effects of sociodemographic variables (age, gender, education) on wayfinding strategies and preferences of respondents (using chi2 tests). Empirical research is based on the survey among 928 patients/visitors of the Vítkovice Hospital in Ostrava, Czechia. We found a relatively weak association between gender and wayfinding-no major differences between men and women in navigational preferences were found. Age was the most important predictor of wayfinding. Respondents in the over-60-year age group were characteristic of a lower interest in changes of the navigational system and low willingness to use mobile applications for navigation-people between 41 years and 60 years were the biggest supporters of changes. Correspondingly, demand for improvement of navigation (including a mobile application) was positively correlated with educational level.

AGEL a s Jungmannova 28 17 Nové Město 110 00 Praha 1 Czech Republic

AGEL Research and Training Institute Mathonova 291 1 Krasice 796 04 Prostějov Czech Republic

Department of Social Geography and Regional Development Faculty of Science University of Ostrava Chittussiho 10 710 00 Ostrava Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Devlin A.S. Wayfinding in healthcare facilities: Contributions from environmental psychology. Behav. Sci. (Basel) 2014;4:423–436. doi: 10.3390/bs4040423. PubMed DOI PMC

Wolstenholme D., Cobb M., Bowen S., Wright P.C., Dearden A. Design Led Service Improvement for Older People. Australas. Med. J. AMJ. 2010;3:465–470. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2010.377. DOI

Hölscher C., Meilinger T., Vrachliotis G., Brösamle M., Knauff M. Up the down staircase: Wayfinding strategies in multi-level buildings. J. Environ. Psychol. 2006;26:284–299. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.002. DOI

Anagnostopoulos G.G., Deriaz M., Gaspoz J.M., Konstantas D., Guessous I. Navigational needs and requirements of hospital staff: Geneva University Hospitals case study. Int. Conf. Indoor Position. Indoor Navig. IPIN 2017. 2017;2017:1–8. doi: 10.1109/IPIN.2017.8115958. DOI

Mollerup P. Wayshowing in hospital. Australas. Med. J. 2009;2:112–114. doi: 10.4066/AMJ.2009.85. DOI

Hölscher C., Büchner S.J., Meilinger T., Strube G. Adaptivity of wayfinding strategies in a multi-building ensemble: The effects of spatial structure, task requirements, and metric information. J. Environ. Psychol. 2009;29:208–219. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2008.05.010. DOI

Harris M.A., Wolbers T. How age-related strategy switching deficits affect wayfinding in complex environments. Neurobiol. Aging. 2014;35:1095–1102. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2013.10.086. PubMed DOI

Lawton C.A. Gender and regional differences in spatial referents used in direction giving. Sex Roles. 2001;44:321–337. doi: 10.1023/A:1010981616842. DOI

Souza R.F., Martins L.B. Studies in Systems, Decision and Control. Volume 202. Springer International Publishing; Berlin, Germany: 2019. Wayfinding of people with disability and reduced mobility in the urban space; pp. 775–783.

Davies C., Pederson E. Proceedings of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) Volume 2205. Springer; Berlin, Germany: 2001. Grid patterns and cultural expectations in urban wayfinding; pp. 400–414.

Gu D., Li J., Li X., Liang C. Visualizing the knowledge structure and evolution of big data research in healthcare informatics. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2017;98:22–32. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2016.11.006. PubMed DOI

Ding B., Liu W., Tsai S.B., Gu D., Bian F., Shao X. Effect of patient participation on nurse and patient outcomes in inpatient healthcare. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2019;16:1344. doi: 10.3390/ijerph16081344. PubMed DOI PMC

Tian J., Li H., Chen R. The emerging of smart citizen concept under smart city environment. Proc. Int. Conf. Electron. Bus. 2018;2018:739–742.

Anacta V.J.A., Schwering A. Men to the east and women to the right: Wayfinding with verbal route instructions. Lect. Notes Comput. Sci. (including Subser. Lect. Notes Artif. Intell. Lect. Notes Bioinformatics) 2010;6222 LNAI:70–84. doi: 10.1007/978-3-642-14749-4_9. DOI

Lawton C.A. Handbook of Gender Research in Psychology. Handb. Gend. Res. Psychol. 2010:317–341. doi: 10.1007/978-1-4419-1465-1. DOI

Ulrich S., Grill E., Flanagin V.L. Who gets lost and why: A representative cross-sectional survey on sociodemographic and vestibular determinants of wayfinding strategies. PLoS ONE. 2019;14:e0204781. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0204781. PubMed DOI PMC

Silber-Varod V., Blau I., Lis-Hacohen R. Gender in Shared Navigation: Men to Mars, Women to Venus? J. Comput. Inf. Syst. 2019;59:171–177. doi: 10.1080/08874417.2017.1326090. DOI

Iaria G., Palermo L., Committeri G., Barton J.J.S. Age differences in the formation and use of cognitive maps. Behav. Brain Res. 2009;196:187–191. doi: 10.1016/j.bbr.2008.08.040. PubMed DOI

Rodgers M.K., Sindone J.A., Moffat S.D. Effects of age on navigation strategy. Neurobiol. Aging. 2012;33:202.e15–202.e22. doi: 10.1016/j.neurobiolaging.2010.07.021. PubMed DOI PMC

Context Sensitive Navigation in Hospitals. [(accessed on 20 January 2021)]; Available online: https://dspace.cvut.cz/bitstream/handle/10467/60864/2013_Context-Sensitive-Navigation-in-Hospitals.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

Calderoni L., Ferrara M., Franco A., Maio D. Indoor localization in a hospital environment using Random Forest classifiers. Expert Syst. Appl. 2015;42:125–134. doi: 10.1016/j.eswa.2014.07.042. DOI

Farr A.C., Kleinschmidt T., Yarlagadda P., Mengersen K. Wayfinding: A simple concept, a complex process. Transp. Rev. 2012;32:715–743. doi: 10.1080/01441647.2012.712555. DOI

Kitchin R.M. Cognitive Maps: What are they and why study them? J. Environ. Manage. 1994;14:1–19. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(05)80194-X. DOI

Silverman I., Choi J. Non-Euclidean Navigational Strategies of Women: Compensatory Response or Evolved Dimorphism? Evol. Psychol. 2006;4:147470490600400. doi: 10.1177/147470490600400105. DOI

Lester A.W., Moffat S.D., Wiener J.M., Barnes C.A., Wolbers T. The Aging Navigational System. Neuron. 2017;95:1019–1035. doi: 10.1016/j.neuron.2017.06.037. PubMed DOI PMC

Coutrot A., Silva R., Manley E., de Cothi W., Sami S., Bohbot V.D., Wiener J.M., Hölscher C., Dalton R.C., Hornberger M., et al. Global Determinants of Navigation Ability. Curr. Biol. 2018;28:2861–2866. doi: 10.1016/j.cub.2018.06.009. PubMed DOI

Burns P.C. Navigation and the mobility of older drivers. J. Gerontol. Ser. B Psychol. Sci. Soc. Sci. 1999;54:49–55. doi: 10.1093/geronb/54B.1.S49. PubMed DOI

Wilkniss S.M., Korol D.L., Gold P.E., Jones M.G., Manning C.A. Age-related differences in an ecologically based study of route learning. Psychol. Aging. 1997;12:372–375. doi: 10.1037/0882-7974.12.2.372. PubMed DOI

Newman M.C., Kaszniak A.W. Spatial memory and aging: Performance on a human analog of the Morris water maze. Aging Neuropsychol. Cogn. 2000;7:86–93. doi: 10.1076/1382-5585(200006)7:2;1-U;FT086. DOI

Driscoll I., Hamilton D.A., Yeo R.A., Brooks W.M., Sutherland R.J. Virtual navigation in humans: The impact of age, sex, and hormones on place learning. Horm. Behav. 2005;47:326–335. doi: 10.1016/j.yhbeh.2004.11.013. PubMed DOI

Moffat S.D., Hampson E., Hatzipantelis M. Navigation in a “Virtual” Maze: Sex Differences and Correlation With Psychometric Measures of Spatial Ability in Humans. Evol. Hum. Behav. 1998;19:73–87. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(97)00104-9. DOI

Astur R.S., Ortiz M.L., Sutherland R.J. A characterization of performance by men and women in a virtual morris water task: A large and reliable sex difference. Behav. Brain Res. 1998;93:185–190. doi: 10.1016/S0166-4328(98)00019-9. PubMed DOI

Moffat S.D., Resnick S.M. Effects of age on virtual environment place navigation and allocentric cognitive mapping. Behav. Neurosci. 2002;116:851–859. doi: 10.1037/0735-7044.116.5.851. PubMed DOI

De Beni R., Pazzaglia F., Gardini S. The role of mental rotation and age in spatial perspective-taking tasks: when age does not impair perspective-taking performance. Appl. Cogn. Psychol. 2006;20:807–821. doi: 10.1002/acp.1229. DOI

Borella E., Meneghetti C., Ronconi L., De Beni R. Spatial abilities across the adult life span. Dev. Psychol. 2014;50:384–392. doi: 10.1037/a0033818. PubMed DOI

Kawamura T., Umezu K., Ohsuga A. Proceedings of the Lecture Notes in Computer Science (including subseries Lecture Notes in Artificial Intelligence and Lecture Notes in Bioinformatics) Volume 5061 LNCS. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2008. Mobile navigation system for the elderly—Preliminary experiment and evaluation; pp. 578–590.

Li J., Zhang J., Ding Y. Uncertain multiplicative language decision method based on group compromise framework for evaluation of mobile medical APPs in China. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 2020;17 doi: 10.3390/ijerph17082858. PubMed DOI PMC

Lawton C.A. Gender differences in way-finding strategies: Relationship to spatial ability and spatial anxiety. Sex Roles. 1994;30:765–779. doi: 10.1007/BF01544230. DOI

Montello D.R., Lovelace K.L., Golledge R.G., Self C.M. Sex-related differences and similarities in geographic and environmental spatial abilities. Ann. Assoc. Am. Geogr. 1999;89:515–534. doi: 10.1111/0004-5608.00160. DOI

Lawton C.A., Kallai J. Gender Differences in Wayfinding Strategies and Anxiety About Wayfinding: A Cross-Cultural Comparison. Sex Roles. 2002;47:389–401. doi: 10.1023/A:1021668724970. DOI

Coluccia E., Louse G. Gender differences in spatial orientation: A review. J. Environ. Psychol. 2004;24:329–340. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.08.006. DOI

Levine S.C., Foley A., Lourenco S., Ehrlich S., Ratliff K. Sex differences in spatial cognition: Advancing the conversation. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 2016;7:127–155. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1380. PubMed DOI

Liao H., Dong W. An exploratory study investigating gender effects on using 3D maps for spatial orientation in wayfinding. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2017;6:60. doi: 10.3390/ijgi6030060. DOI

Dong W., Zhan Z., Liao H., Meng L., Liu J. Assessing similarities and differences between males and females in visual behaviors in spatial orientation tasks. ISPRS Int. J. Geo-Inf. 2020;9:115. doi: 10.3390/ijgi9020115. DOI

Zhou Y., Cheng X., Zhu L., Qin T., Dong W., Liu J. How does gender affect indoor wayfinding under time pressure? Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2020;47:367–380. doi: 10.1080/15230406.2020.1760940. DOI

Carol A.L., Kevin A.M. Gender differences in pointing accuracy in computer-simulated 3D mazes. Sex Roles. 1999;40:73.

Malinowski J.C., Gillespie W.T. Individual differences in performance on a large-scale, real-world wayfinding task. J. Environ. Psychol. 2001;21:73–82. doi: 10.1006/jevp.2000.0183. DOI

Mendez-Lopez M., Fidalgo C., Osma J., Juan M.C. Wayfinding strategy and gender – testing the mediating effects of wayfinding experience, personality and emotions. Psychol. Res. Behav. Manag. 2020;13:119–131. doi: 10.2147/PRBM.S236735. PubMed DOI PMC

Coluccia E., Iosue G., Antonella Brandimonte M. The relationship between map drawing and spatial orientation abilities: A study of gender differences. J. Environ. Psychol. 2007;27:135–144. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.12.005. DOI

Galea L.A.M., Kimura D. Sex differences in route-learning. Pers. Individ. Dif. 1993;14:53–65. doi: 10.1016/0191-8869(93)90174-2. DOI

Lawton C.A., Charleston S.I., Zieles A.S. Individual- and gender-related differences in indoor wayfinding. Environ. Behav. 1996;28:204–219. doi: 10.1177/0013916596282003. DOI

Dabbs J.M., Chang E.L., Strong R.A., Milun R. Spatial Ability, Navigation Strategy, and Geographic Knowledge Among Men and Women. Evol. Hum. Behav. 1998;19:89–98. doi: 10.1016/S1090-5138(97)00107-4. DOI

Devlin A.S., Bernstein J. Interactive way-finding: Map style and effectiveness. J. Environ. Psychol. 1997;17:99–110. doi: 10.1006/jevp.1997.0045. DOI

Tlauka M., Brolese A., Pomeroy D., Hobbs W. Gender differences in spatial knowledge acquired through simulated exploration of a virtual shopping centre. J. Environ. Psychol. 2005;25:111–118. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2004.12.002. DOI

Havelková L., Hanus M. Map skills in education: A systematic review of terminology, methodology and influencing factors. Rev. Int. Geogr. Educ. Online. 2019;9:361–401. doi: 10.33403/rigeo.591094. DOI

Lloyd R.E., Bunch R.L. Individual differences in map reading spatial abilities using perceptual and memory processes. Cartogr. Geogr. Inf. Sci. 2005;32:33–46. doi: 10.1559/1523040053270774. DOI

Henrie R., Aron R., Nelson B., Poole D. Gender-Related Knowledge Variations Within Geography. Sex Roles. 1997;36 doi: 10.1023/A:1025618024694. DOI

Devlin A.S., Bernstein J. Interactive wayfinding: Use of cues by men and women. J. Environ. Psychol. 1995;15:23–38. doi: 10.1016/0272-4944(95)90012-8. DOI

Wilkening J., Fabrikant S.I. The Effect of Gender and Spatial Abilities on Map Use Preferences and Performance in Road Selection Tasks; Proceedings of the 25th International Cartographic Conference; Paris, France. 3 July 2011–8 July 2011.

Rice R.E., Katz J.E. Comparing internet and mobile phone usage: Digital divides of usage, adoption, and dropouts. Telecomm. Policy. 2003;27:597–623. doi: 10.1016/S0308-5961(03)00068-5. DOI

Liu X., Sun M., Li J. Research on gender differences in online health communities. Int. J. Med. Inform. 2018;111:172–181. doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2017.12.019. PubMed DOI

Hwang K.H., Chan-Olmsted S.M., Nam S.H., Chang B.H. Factors affecting mobile application usage: Exploring the roles of gender, age, and application types from behaviour log data. Int. J. Mob. Commun. 2016;14:256–272. doi: 10.1504/IJMC.2016.076285. DOI

Elias M.F., Elias P.K., D’agostino R.B., Silbershatz H., Wolf P.A. Role of age, education, and gender on cognitive performance in the framingham heart study: Community-based norms. Exp. Aging Res. 1997;23:201–235. doi: 10.1080/03610739708254281. PubMed DOI

Le Carret N., Lafont S., Letenneur L., Dartigues J.F., Mayo W., Fabrigoule C. The effect of education on cognitive performances and its implication for the constitution of the cognitive reserve. Dev. Neuropsychol. 2003;23:317–337. doi: 10.1207/S15326942DN2303_1. PubMed DOI

Picard D., Pry R. Does Knowledge of Spatial Configuration in Adults with Visual Impairments Improve with Tactile Exposure to a Small-scale Model of Their Urban Environment? J. Vis. Impair. Blind. 2009;103:199–209. doi: 10.1177/0145482X0910300403. DOI

Wiederholt W.C., Cahn D., Butters N.M., Salmon D.P., Kritz-Silverstein D., Barrett-Connor E. Effects of Age, Gender and Education on Selected Neuropsychological Tests in an Elderly Community Cohort. J. Am. Geriatr. Soc. 1993;41:639–647. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1993.tb06738.x. PubMed DOI

Proust-Lima C., Amieva H., Letenneur L., Orgogozo J.M., Jacqmin-Gadda H., Dartigues J.F. Gender and Education Impact on Brain Aging: A General Cognitive Factor Approach. Psychol. Aging. 2008;23:608–620. doi: 10.1037/a0012838. PubMed DOI

Ruzickova V., Kroupova K. Audiotactile Maps As a Facilitating Element in Spatial Orientation and Mobility. Soc. Integr. Educ. Proc. Int. Sci. Conf. 2020;4:120. doi: 10.17770/sie2020vol4.5090. DOI

AGEL Internal sources of Vítkovice hospital. 2020 Available online: www.agel.cz.

Brown M., Pinchin J., Valand R., Larkin C., Pattinson J., Benning K., Housley G., Hatton J., Shaw D., Syrysko P., et al. NightShift simulation to train newly qualified doctors in non-technical skills: a feasibility study. Futur. Hosp. J. 2016;3:94–98. doi: 10.7861/futurehosp.3-2-94. PubMed DOI PMC

Venkatesh V., Thong J., Xu X. Consumer Acceptance And Use Of Information Technology: Extending The Unified Theory Of Acceptance And Use Of Technology. MIS Q. 2012;36:157–178. doi: 10.2307/41410412. DOI

Morris M.G., Venkatesh V., Ackerman P.L. Gender and age differences in employee decisions about new technology: An extension to the theory of planned behavior. IEEE Trans. Eng. Manag. 2005;52:69–84. doi: 10.1109/TEM.2004.839967. DOI

Implementation of a navigation system: Economic verification in a local hospital