The incidence and results of laser enhancement after cataract and refractive surgery with trifocal lens implantation
Jazyk angličtina Země Česko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
33542541
DOI
10.5507/bp.2021.010
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- cataract surgery, laser enhancement, refractive lens exchange, trifocal IOL,
- MeSH
- fakoemulzifikace * MeSH
- implantace nitrooční čočky metody MeSH
- incidence MeSH
- lasery MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- protézy - design MeSH
- refrakční vady * MeSH
- retrospektivní studie MeSH
- spokojenost pacientů MeSH
- zkalení zadního pouzdra čočky * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
PURPOSE: To evaluate the incidence of laser enhancement following cataract surgery and refractive lens exchange (RLE) with FineVision Micro F trifocal lens implantation (PhysIOL, Liège, Belgium). METHODS: Retrospective study of patients who had undergone cataract or RLE surgery and had received a FineVision Micro F intraocular lens. Laser enhancement of residual refractive error was determined. Visual acuity (VA) assessments were performed before and after surgery: uncorrected distance VA (UCDVA), best-corrected distance VA (BCDVA), uncorrected near VA (UCNVA), plus preoperative and postoperative spherical equivalent (SE) assessments. RESULTS: Of the 1129 eyes from 596 patients, 61 (5.4%) required laser enhancement to correct residual refractive error (by group: 30/679 eyes [4.4%] cataract; 31/450 eyes [6.9%] RLE). Eleven eyes received FemtoLASIK; 50 eyes received PRK. Mean UCDVA before laser enhancement was 0.26±0.19 logMAR and 0.24±0.14 in the FemtoLASIK and PRK groups, respectively. After laser enhancement, these were 0.04±0.05 logMAR and 0.13±0.19, respectively; BCDVA values were 0.00±0.00 logMAR in the FemtoLASIK group and 0.06±0.11 in the PRK group. Laser enhancement improved UCNVA (Jaeger) from 2-3 to 1-2 in both groups. Enhancement reduced preoperative SE of -0.39±0.99 D and -0.53±0.58 D (FemtoLASIK and PRK groups, respectively) to 0.24±0.36 D and 0.04±0.47 D. CONCLUSIONS: The FineVision Micro F trifocal lens is an effective solution for gaining increased spectacle independence. The incidence of residual refractive error requiring laser enhancement is low, and laser procedures are a safe and effective solution for improving the quality of vision and patient satisfaction. SYNOPSIS: Laser enhancement rates and outcomes were determined following cataract / refractive lens exchange surgery that used a trifocal IOL. Enhancement was safe and effective and rates were low (5.4%).
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Schallhorn SC, Venter JA, Teenan D, Schallhorn JM, Hettinger KA, Hannan SJ, Pelouskova M. Outcomes of excimer laser enhancements in pseudophakic patients with multifocal intraocular lens. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:765-76. DOI
Narvaez J, Zimmerman G, Stulting RD, Chang DH. Accuracy of intraocular lens power prediction using the Hoffer Q, Holladay 1, Holladay 2, and SRK/T formulas. J Cataract Refract Surg 2006;32:2050-53. DOI
Olsen T. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 1992;18:125-29. DOI
Norrby S. Sources of error in intraocular lens power calculation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008; 34:368-76. DOI
Fernandez-Buenaga R, Alio JL, Perez Ardoy AL, Quesada AL, Pinilla-Cortes L, Barraquer RI. Resolving refractive error after cataract surgery: IOL exchange, piggyback lens, or LASIK. J Refract Surg 2013;29:676-83. PubMed DOI
Kuo IC, O'Brien TP, Broman AT, Ghajarnia M, Jabbur NS. Excimer laser surgery for correction of ametropia after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 2005;31:21042110. DOI
Kohnen T. Multifocal IOL technology: a successful step on the journey toward presbyopia treatment. J Cataract Refract Surg 2008;34:2005. DOI
Woodward MA, Randleman JB, Stulting RD. Dissatisfaction after multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:992-97. DOI
Gundersen KG, Makari S, Ostenstad S, Potvin R. Retreatments after multifocal intraocular lens implantation: an analysis. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:365-71. DOI
Muftuoglu O, Prasher P, Chu C, Mootha VV, Verity SM, Cavanagh HD, Bowman RW, McCulley JP. Laser in situ keratomileusis for residual refractive errors after apodized diffractive multifocal intraocular lens implantation. J Cataract Refract Surg 2009;35:1063-71. DOI
Artola A, Ayala MJ, Claramonte P, Perez-Santonja JJ, Alio JL. Photorefractive keratectomy for residual myopia after cataract surgery. J Cataract Refract Surg 1999;25:1456-60. DOI
Fan YY, Sun CC, Chen HC, Ma DH. Photorefractive keratectomy for correcting residual refractive error following cataract surgery with premium intraocular lens implantation. Taiwan J Ophthalmol 2018;8:149-58. DOI
Moshirfar M, McCaughey MV, Santiago-Caban L. Corrective Techniques and Future Directions for Treatment of Residual Refractive Error Following Cataract Surgery. Expert Rev Ophthalmol 2014;9:529-37. PubMed DOI
Roszkowska AM, Urso M, Signorino GA, Spadea L, Aragona P. Photorefractive keratectomy after cataract surgery in uncommon cases: long-term results. Int J Ophthalmol 2018;11:612-15.
Gibbons A, Ali TK, Waren DP, Donaldson KE. Causes and correction of dissatisfaction after implantation of presbyopia-correcting intraocular lenses. Clin Ophthalmol 2016;10:1965-70. DOI
el-Agha MS, Johnston EW, Bowman RW, Cavanagh HD, McCulley JP. Excimer laser treatment of spherical hyperopia: PRK or LASIK? Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc 2000;98:59-66; discussion 66-59. PubMed
