An international survey on AI in radiology in 1,041 radiologists and radiology residents part 1: fear of replacement, knowledge, and attitude

. 2021 Sep ; 31 (9) : 7058-7066. [epub] 20210320

Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid33744991

Grantová podpora
T32 EB009035 NIBIB NIH HHS - United States

Odkazy

PubMed 33744991
PubMed Central PMC8379099
DOI 10.1007/s00330-021-07781-5
PII: 10.1007/s00330-021-07781-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

OBJECTIVES: Radiologists' perception is likely to influence the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical practice. We investigated knowledge and attitude towards AI by radiologists and residents in Europe and beyond. METHODS: Between April and July 2019, a survey on fear of replacement, knowledge, and attitude towards AI was accessible to radiologists and residents. The survey was distributed through several radiological societies, author networks, and social media. Independent predictors of fear of replacement and a positive attitude towards AI were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 1,041 respondents from 54 mostly European countries. Most respondents were male (n = 670, 65%), median age was 38 (24-74) years, n = 142 (35%) residents, and n = 471 (45%) worked in an academic center. Basic AI-specific knowledge was associated with fear (adjusted OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.10-2.21, p = 0.01), while intermediate AI-specific knowledge (adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.80, p = 0.01) or advanced AI-specific knowledge (adjusted OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.90, p = 0.03) was inversely associated with fear. A positive attitude towards AI was observed in 48% (n = 501) and was associated with only having heard of AI, intermediate (adjusted OR 11.65, 95% CI 4.25-31.92, p < 0.001), or advanced AI-specific knowledge (adjusted OR 17.65, 95% CI 6.16-50.54, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Limited AI-specific knowledge levels among radiology residents and radiologists are associated with fear, while intermediate to advanced AI-specific knowledge levels are associated with a positive attitude towards AI. Additional training may therefore improve clinical adoption. KEY POINTS: • Forty-eight percent of radiologists and residents have an open and proactive attitude towards artificial intelligence (AI), while 38% fear of replacement by AI. • Intermediate and advanced AI-specific knowledge levels may enhance adoption of AI in clinical practice, while rudimentary knowledge levels appear to be inhibitive. • AI should be incorporated in radiology training curricula to help facilitate its clinical adoption.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Liu X, Faes L, Kale AU, et al. A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Digital Health. 2019;1:e271–e297. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30123-2. PubMed DOI

Jha S, Topol EJ. Adapting to artificial intelligence: radiologists and pathologists as information specialists. JAMA. 2016;316:2353–2354. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17438. PubMed DOI

Hinton G. Deep learning—a technology with the potential to transform health care. JAMA. 2018;320:1101–1102. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.11100. PubMed DOI

Nagendran M, Chen Y, Lovejoy CA, et al. Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies. BMJ. 2020;368:m689. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m689. PubMed DOI PMC

Wichmann J, Willemink M, De Cecco C. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in radiology: current state and considerations for routine clinical implementation. Invest Radiol. 2020;55:619–627. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000673. PubMed DOI

Willemink MJ, Noël PB. The evolution of image reconstruction for CT-from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:2185–2195. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5810-7. PubMed DOI PMC

Willemink MJ, Koszek WA, Hardell C, et al. Preparing medical imaging data for machine learning. Radiology. 2020;295:4–15. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192224. PubMed DOI PMC

Lincoln C, Chatterjee R, Willis M. Augmented radiology: looking over the horizon. Radiol Artif Intell. 2019;1:e180039. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2019180039. PubMed DOI PMC

Langlotz CP (2019) Will artificial intelligence replace radiologists? Radiol Artif Intell 1:3. 10.1148/ryai.2019190058 PubMed PMC

Tang A, Tam R, Cadrin-Chênevert A, et al. Canadian association of radiologists white paper on artificial intelligence in radiology. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2018;69:120–135. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2018.02.002. PubMed DOI

Rogers EM (1962) Diffusion of innovation. 4th Edition, Simon and Schuster, New York

Geis JR, Brady AP, Wu CC, et al. Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2019;70:329–334. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2019.08.010. PubMed DOI

Gong B, Nugent JP, Guest W, et al. Influence of artificial intelligence on Canadian medical students’ preference for radiology specialty: a national survey study. Acad Radiol. 2019;26:566–577. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.10.007. PubMed DOI

Collado-Mesa F, Alvarez E, Arheart K. The role of artificial intelligence in diagnostic radiology: a survey at a single radiology residency training program. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:1753–1757. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.12.021. PubMed DOI

Mukherjee S (2017) A.I. versus M.D. The New Yorker Annals of Medicine. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/03/ai-versus-md2017/04/03/ai-versus-md. Accessed 1 May 2020

Gallix B, Chong J. Artificial intelligence in radiology: who’s afraid of the big bad wolf? Eur Radiol. 2019;29:1637–1639. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5995-9. PubMed DOI

van Hoek J, Huber A, Leichtle A, et al. A survey on the future of radiology among radiologists, medical students and surgeons: students and surgeons tend to be more skeptical about artificial intelligence and radiologists may fear that other disciplines take over. Eur J Radiol. 2019;121:108742. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108742. PubMed DOI

Eltorai AEM, Bratt AK, Guo HH (2019) Thoracic radiologists’ versus computer scientists’ perspectives on the future of artificial intelligence in radiology. J Thorac Imaging PubMed

European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2019) Impact of artificial intelligence on radiology: a EuroAIM survey among members of the European Society of Radiology. Insights Imaging 10:105–103 PubMed PMC

Waymel Q, Badr S, Demondion X, et al. Impact of the rise of artificial intelligence in radiology: what do radiologists think? Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019;100:327–336. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.03.015. PubMed DOI

Pinto Dos Santos D, Giese D, Brodehl S, et al. Medical students’ attitude towards artificial intelligence: a multicentre survey. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:1640–1646. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5601-1. PubMed DOI

Coppola F, Faggioni L, Regge D et al (2021) Artificial intelligence: radiologists’ expectations and opinions gleaned from a nationwide online survey. Radiol Med 126:63–71. 10.1007/s11547-020-01205-y PubMed

Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, et al. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. International J Qual Health Care. 2003;15:261–266. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzg031. PubMed DOI

Ridley EL (2019) Survey assesses worldwide opinion on radiology AI. AuntMinnie.com. https://www.auntminnie.com/index.aspx?sec=log&itemID=125451. Accessed 1 May 2020

Ridley EL (2019) EuSoMII supports worldwide survey on radiology AI. AuntMinnieEurope.com. https://www.auntminnieeurope.com/index.aspx?sec=log&itemID=617377. Accessed 1 May 2020

Sedgwick P. Questionnaire surveys: sources of bias. BMJ. 2013;347:f5265–f5265. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5265. DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...