An international survey on AI in radiology in 1,041 radiologists and radiology residents part 1: fear of replacement, knowledge, and attitude
Jazyk angličtina Země Německo Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
T32 EB009035
NIBIB NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
33744991
PubMed Central
PMC8379099
DOI
10.1007/s00330-021-07781-5
PII: 10.1007/s00330-021-07781-5
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Artificial intelligence, Diagnostic imaging, Radiology, Surveys and questionnaires,
- MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- průzkumy a dotazníky MeSH
- radiologie * MeSH
- radiologové MeSH
- strach MeSH
- umělá inteligence * MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVES: Radiologists' perception is likely to influence the adoption of artificial intelligence (AI) into clinical practice. We investigated knowledge and attitude towards AI by radiologists and residents in Europe and beyond. METHODS: Between April and July 2019, a survey on fear of replacement, knowledge, and attitude towards AI was accessible to radiologists and residents. The survey was distributed through several radiological societies, author networks, and social media. Independent predictors of fear of replacement and a positive attitude towards AI were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. RESULTS: The survey was completed by 1,041 respondents from 54 mostly European countries. Most respondents were male (n = 670, 65%), median age was 38 (24-74) years, n = 142 (35%) residents, and n = 471 (45%) worked in an academic center. Basic AI-specific knowledge was associated with fear (adjusted OR 1.56, 95% CI 1.10-2.21, p = 0.01), while intermediate AI-specific knowledge (adjusted OR 0.40, 95% CI 0.20-0.80, p = 0.01) or advanced AI-specific knowledge (adjusted OR 0.43, 95% CI 0.21-0.90, p = 0.03) was inversely associated with fear. A positive attitude towards AI was observed in 48% (n = 501) and was associated with only having heard of AI, intermediate (adjusted OR 11.65, 95% CI 4.25-31.92, p < 0.001), or advanced AI-specific knowledge (adjusted OR 17.65, 95% CI 6.16-50.54, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Limited AI-specific knowledge levels among radiology residents and radiologists are associated with fear, while intermediate to advanced AI-specific knowledge levels are associated with a positive attitude towards AI. Additional training may therefore improve clinical adoption. KEY POINTS: • Forty-eight percent of radiologists and residents have an open and proactive attitude towards artificial intelligence (AI), while 38% fear of replacement by AI. • Intermediate and advanced AI-specific knowledge levels may enhance adoption of AI in clinical practice, while rudimentary knowledge levels appear to be inhibitive. • AI should be incorporated in radiology training curricula to help facilitate its clinical adoption.
Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering Stanford University Stanford CA USA
Department of Medical Imaging Saint Joseph Hospital Paris France
Department of Radiology Elisabeth TweeSteden Ziekenhuis Tilburg The Netherlands
Department of Radiology IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria di Bologna Bologna Italy
Department of Radiology Motol University Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Department of Radiology Stanford University School of Medicine Stanford CA USA
Department of Radiology University Hospital of Cologne Cologne Germany
Department of Radiology University Medical Center Utrecht Utrecht The Netherlands
Department of Radiology University of British Columbia Vancouver Canada
Department of Radiology UT Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA
Department of Radiology UZ Leuven Leuven Belgium
Section of Radiology Ankara Golbasi Sehit Ahmet Ozsoy State Hospital Ankara Turkey
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Liu X, Faes L, Kale AU, et al. A comparison of deep learning performance against health-care professionals in detecting diseases from medical imaging: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Digital Health. 2019;1:e271–e297. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(19)30123-2. PubMed DOI
Jha S, Topol EJ. Adapting to artificial intelligence: radiologists and pathologists as information specialists. JAMA. 2016;316:2353–2354. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.17438. PubMed DOI
Hinton G. Deep learning—a technology with the potential to transform health care. JAMA. 2018;320:1101–1102. doi: 10.1001/jama.2018.11100. PubMed DOI
Nagendran M, Chen Y, Lovejoy CA, et al. Artificial intelligence versus clinicians: systematic review of design, reporting standards, and claims of deep learning studies. BMJ. 2020;368:m689. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m689. PubMed DOI PMC
Wichmann J, Willemink M, De Cecco C. Artificial intelligence and machine learning in radiology: current state and considerations for routine clinical implementation. Invest Radiol. 2020;55:619–627. doi: 10.1097/RLI.0000000000000673. PubMed DOI
Willemink MJ, Noël PB. The evolution of image reconstruction for CT-from filtered back projection to artificial intelligence. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:2185–2195. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5810-7. PubMed DOI PMC
Willemink MJ, Koszek WA, Hardell C, et al. Preparing medical imaging data for machine learning. Radiology. 2020;295:4–15. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020192224. PubMed DOI PMC
Lincoln C, Chatterjee R, Willis M. Augmented radiology: looking over the horizon. Radiol Artif Intell. 2019;1:e180039. doi: 10.1148/ryai.2019180039. PubMed DOI PMC
Langlotz CP (2019) Will artificial intelligence replace radiologists? Radiol Artif Intell 1:3. 10.1148/ryai.2019190058 PubMed PMC
Tang A, Tam R, Cadrin-Chênevert A, et al. Canadian association of radiologists white paper on artificial intelligence in radiology. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2018;69:120–135. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2018.02.002. PubMed DOI
Rogers EM (1962) Diffusion of innovation. 4th Edition, Simon and Schuster, New York
Geis JR, Brady AP, Wu CC, et al. Ethics of artificial intelligence in radiology: summary of the joint European and North American multisociety statement. Can Assoc Radiol J. 2019;70:329–334. doi: 10.1016/j.carj.2019.08.010. PubMed DOI
Gong B, Nugent JP, Guest W, et al. Influence of artificial intelligence on Canadian medical students’ preference for radiology specialty: a national survey study. Acad Radiol. 2019;26:566–577. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2018.10.007. PubMed DOI
Collado-Mesa F, Alvarez E, Arheart K. The role of artificial intelligence in diagnostic radiology: a survey at a single radiology residency training program. J Am Coll Radiol. 2018;15:1753–1757. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.12.021. PubMed DOI
Mukherjee S (2017) A.I. versus M.D. The New Yorker Annals of Medicine. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2017/04/03/ai-versus-md2017/04/03/ai-versus-md. Accessed 1 May 2020
Gallix B, Chong J. Artificial intelligence in radiology: who’s afraid of the big bad wolf? Eur Radiol. 2019;29:1637–1639. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5995-9. PubMed DOI
van Hoek J, Huber A, Leichtle A, et al. A survey on the future of radiology among radiologists, medical students and surgeons: students and surgeons tend to be more skeptical about artificial intelligence and radiologists may fear that other disciplines take over. Eur J Radiol. 2019;121:108742. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2019.108742. PubMed DOI
Eltorai AEM, Bratt AK, Guo HH (2019) Thoracic radiologists’ versus computer scientists’ perspectives on the future of artificial intelligence in radiology. J Thorac Imaging PubMed
European Society of Radiology (ESR) (2019) Impact of artificial intelligence on radiology: a EuroAIM survey among members of the European Society of Radiology. Insights Imaging 10:105–103 PubMed PMC
Waymel Q, Badr S, Demondion X, et al. Impact of the rise of artificial intelligence in radiology: what do radiologists think? Diagn Interv Imaging. 2019;100:327–336. doi: 10.1016/j.diii.2019.03.015. PubMed DOI
Pinto Dos Santos D, Giese D, Brodehl S, et al. Medical students’ attitude towards artificial intelligence: a multicentre survey. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:1640–1646. doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5601-1. PubMed DOI
Coppola F, Faggioni L, Regge D et al (2021) Artificial intelligence: radiologists’ expectations and opinions gleaned from a nationwide online survey. Radiol Med 126:63–71. 10.1007/s11547-020-01205-y PubMed
Kelley K, Clark B, Brown V, et al. Good practice in the conduct and reporting of survey research. International J Qual Health Care. 2003;15:261–266. doi: 10.1093/intqhc/mzg031. PubMed DOI
Ridley EL (2019) Survey assesses worldwide opinion on radiology AI. AuntMinnie.com. https://www.auntminnie.com/index.aspx?sec=log&itemID=125451. Accessed 1 May 2020
Ridley EL (2019) EuSoMII supports worldwide survey on radiology AI. AuntMinnieEurope.com. https://www.auntminnieeurope.com/index.aspx?sec=log&itemID=617377. Accessed 1 May 2020
Sedgwick P. Questionnaire surveys: sources of bias. BMJ. 2013;347:f5265–f5265. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5265. DOI