Opportunities and challenges for monitoring terrestrial biodiversity in the robotics age
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
40404926
PubMed Central
PMC12148927
DOI
10.1038/s41559-025-02704-9
PII: 10.1038/s41559-025-02704-9
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Biodiversity * MeSH
- Delphi Technique MeSH
- Environmental Monitoring * methods instrumentation MeSH
- Robotics * methods MeSH
- Conservation of Natural Resources * methods MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
With biodiversity loss escalating globally, a step change is needed in our capacity to accurately monitor species populations across ecosystems. Robotic and autonomous systems (RAS) offer technological solutions that may substantially advance terrestrial biodiversity monitoring, but this potential is yet to be considered systematically. We used a modified Delphi technique to synthesize knowledge from 98 biodiversity experts and 31 RAS experts, who identified the major methodological barriers that currently hinder monitoring, and explored the opportunities and challenges that RAS offer in overcoming these barriers. Biodiversity experts identified four barrier categories: site access, species and individual identification, data handling and storage, and power and network availability. Robotics experts highlighted technologies that could overcome these barriers and identified the developments needed to facilitate RAS-based autonomous biodiversity monitoring. Some existing RAS could be optimized relatively easily to survey species but would require development to be suitable for monitoring of more 'difficult' taxa and robust enough to work under uncontrolled conditions within ecosystems. Other nascent technologies (for instance, new sensors and biodegradable robots) need accelerated research. Overall, it was felt that RAS could lead to major progress in monitoring of terrestrial biodiversity by supplementing rather than supplanting existing methods. Transdisciplinarity needs to be fostered between biodiversity and RAS experts so that future ideas and technologies can be codeveloped effectively.
AI Lab ApS Maden 3 Aarhus 5 Denmark
Amphibian and Reptile Conservation Boscombe UK
Animal Rural and Environmental Sciences Nottingham Trent University Nottinghamshire UK
Applied Ecology Research Group School of Life Sciences Anglia Ruskin University Cambridge UK
Bristol Robotics Laboratory UWE Bristol Bristol UK
British Antarctic Survey Natural Environment Research Council High Cross Cambridge UK
Butterfly Conservation Manor Yard East Lulworth UK
Centre for Conservation and Restoration Science Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh UK
Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Penicuik UK
Centre for Environmental Policy Imperial College London London UK
Conservation Ecology Group Department of Biosciences Durham University Durham UK
Department of Biological Sciences Royal Holloway University of London Egham UK
Department of Biological Sciences University of New Hampshire Durham NH USA
Department of Biology and Centre d'Études Nordiques University of Moncton Moncton Canada
Department of Computing Imperial College London London UK
Department of Ecological Dynamics Leibniz Institute for Zoo and Wildlife Research IZW Berlin Germany
Department of Ecology and Evolutionary Biology University of Colorado Boulder CO USA
Department of Engineering Harper Adams University Newport UK
Department of Geography and Environmental Sciences Northumbria University Newcastle upon Tyne UK
Department of Integrative Biology University of South Florida St Petersburg FL USA
Department of Integrative Biology University of Texas at Austin Austin TX USA
Department of Life Sciences Imperial College London London UK
Department of Life Sciences Imperial College London Silwood Park Campus Ascot UK
Department of Plant Sciences University of California Davis Davis CA USA
Department of Urban and Rural Development Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Uppsala Sweden
Department of Zoology University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
Digital Ecology Limited Bristol UK
Ecology and Biodiversity Utrecht University Utrecht The Netherlands
Fauna and Flora The David Attenborough Building Cambridge UK
Greenhood Nepal Kathmandu Nepal
HUTAN SWD Kota Kinabalu Malaysia
Insect Robotics Group School of Informatics University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
Institute of Science and Environment University of Cumbria Carlisle UK
Institute of Zoology Zoological Society of London Regent's Park London UK
Intelligent Robotics Group Department of Computer Science Aberystwyth University Aberystwyth UK
Istituto Italiano di Tecnologia Bioinspired Soft Robotics Laboratory Genoa Italy
Lincoln Centre for Autonomous Systems University of Lincoln Lincoln UK
Mechanical Engineering Department University College London London UK
Research Department of Genetics Evolution and Environment University College London London UK
Rothamsted Research Harpenden UK
Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
Royal Botanic Gardens Kew Millennium Seed Bank Wakehurst Place Ardingly UK
RSPB Centre for Conservation Science Cambridge UK
Sabah Landscape Programme WWF Malaysia Kota Kinabalu Malaysia
School of Biological and Behavioural Sciences Queen Mary University of London London UK
School of Biological and Environmental Sciences Liverpool John Moores University Liverpool UK
School of Biological Sciences University of Bristol Bristol UK
School of Biological Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich Research Park Norwich UK
School of Biological Sciences University of Edinburgh Edinburgh UK
School of Biological Sciences University of Reading Reading UK
School of Biological Sciences Waipapa Taumata Rau University of Auckland Auckland New Zealand
School of Computing Engineering and the Built Environment Edinburgh Napier University Edinburgh UK
School of Computing University of Kent Canterbury UK
School of Electronic and Electrical Engineering University of Leeds Leeds UK
School of Engineering Mathematics and Physics University of Kent Canterbury UK
School of Engineering Mathematics and Technology University of Bristol Bristol UK
School of Environmental Sciences University of East Anglia Norwich UK
School of Environmental Sciences University of Liverpool Liverpool UK
School of Geography Earth and Environmental Sciences University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
School of Geography University of Nottingham Nottingham UK
School of Life and Environmental Sciences Deakin University Melbourne Burwood Campus Australia
School of Life Sciences University of Sussex Brighton UK
School of Mathematical and Computer Sciences Heriot Watt University Edinburgh UK
School of Natural and Environmental Sciences Newcastle University Newcastle UK
School of Natural Sciences University of Lincoln Lincoln UK
School of Science Western Sydney University Penrith New South Wales Australia
Scotland's Rural College Aberdeen UK
Southeast Asia Rainforest Research Partnerships Kota Kinabalu Malaysia
Synthotech Ltd Milner Court Hornbeam Square Harrogate UK
UK Centre for Ecology and Hydrology Wallingford UK
UKCEH Lancaster Environment Centre Bailrigg UK
Wageningen Environmental Research Wageningen University and Research Wageningen The Netherlands
See more in PubMed
Navarro, L. M. et al. Monitoring biodiversity change through effective global coordination.
Hochkirch, A. et al. A multitaxon analysis of European red lists reveals major threats to biodiversity. PubMed PMC
Pardikes, N. A., Shapiro, A. M., Dyer, L. A. & Forister, M. L. Global weather and local butterflies: variable responses to a large-scale climate pattern along an elevational gradient. PubMed
Kallimanis, A. S. et al. Efficient biodiversity monitoring: which taxonomic level to study?
Thompson, W. L.
Marvin, S., While, A. H., Kovacic, M., Lockhart, A. & Macrorie R.
Schranz, M., Umlauft, M., Sende, M. & Elmenreich, W. Swarm robotic behaviours and current applications. PubMed PMC
Duckett, T., Pearson, S., Blackmore, S., & Grieve, B.
Richardson, R., et al.
Bergeles, C., Cruz Ruiz, A., Rodriguez y Baena, F. & Valdastri, P.
Verfuss, U. K. et al. A review of unmanned vehicles for the detection and monitoring of marine fauna. PubMed
Stephenson, P. J. Integrating remote sensing into wildlife monitoring for conservation.
Corcoran, E., Winsen, M., Sudholz, A. & Hamilton, G. Automated detection of wildlife using drones: synthesis, opportunities and constraints.
Besson, M. et al. Towards the fully automated monitoring of ecological communities. PubMed PMC
Mukherjee, N. et al. The Delphi technique in ecology and biological conservation: applications and guidelines.
Haidegger, T. et al. Robotics: enabler and inhibitor of the Sustainable Development Goals.
Brown, G. P. & Shine, R. Influence of weather conditions on activity of tropical snakes.
Angelini, F. et al. Robotic monitoring of habitats: the natural intelligence approach.
Malladi, M. V. R. et al. Tree instance segmentation and traits estimation for forestry environments exploiting LiDAR data collected by mobile robots. In
Lee, J., Hwangbo, J., Wellhausen, L., Koltun, V. & Hutter, M. Learning quadrupedal locomotion over challenging terrain. PubMed
Hamaza, S., Georgilas, I., Heredia, G., Ollero, A. & Richardson, T. Design, modelling, and control of an aerial manipulator for placement and retrieval of sensors in the environment.
Suryawanshi, K. et al. Estimating snow leopard and prey populations at large spatial scales.
Tsitsimpelis, I., Taylor, C. J., Lennox, B. & Joyce, M. J. A review of ground-based robotic systems for the characterization of nuclear environments.
Shang, J., Sattar, T., Chen, S., Bridge, B. & Madsen, O. Design of a climbing robot for inspecting aircraft wings and fuselage.
Miriyev, A., Stack, K. & Lipson, H. Soft material for soft actuators. PubMed PMC
Stokkeland, M., Klausen, K. & Johansen, T. A. Autonomous visual navigation of unmanned aerial vehicle for wind turbine inspection. In
Lam, T. L. & Xu, Y. A flexible tree climbing robot: Treebot-design and implementation. In
Chen, S. et al. Soft crawling robots: design, actuation, and locomotion.
Rus, D. & Tolley, M. Design, fabrication and control of soft robots. PubMed
Häusermann, D. et al. FireDrone: multi-environment thermally agnostic aerial robot.
Millner, N. et al. Exploring the opportunities and risks of aerial monitoring for biodiversity conservation.
Sandbrook, C. et al. Principles for the socially responsible use of conservation monitoring technology and data.
Laidre, M. E. Ruler of the atoll: the world’s largest land invertebrate.
Patel, M. & Reddy, M. N. Discovery of the world’s smallest terrestrial pteridophyte. PubMed PMC
Shenkin, A. et al. The world’s tallest tropical tree in three dimensions.
Wäldchen, J., Rzanny, M., Seeland, M. & Mäder, P. Automated plant species identification—trends and future directions. PubMed PMC
Wägele, J. W. et al. Towards a multisensory station for automated biodiversity monitoring.
Sugai, L. S. M., Silva, T. S. F., Ribeiro, J. W. & Llusia, D. Terrestrial passive acoustic monitoring: review and perspectives.
Wilson, A. D. Diverse applications of electronic-nose technologies in agriculture and forestry. PubMed PMC
Taberlet, P., Bonin, A., Zinger, L. & Coissac, E.
Aucone, E. et al. Drone-assisted collection of environmental DNA from tree branches for biodiversity monitoring. PubMed
Zinger, L. et al. DNA metabarcoding – need for robust experimental designs to draw sound ecological conclusions. PubMed
Jo, T. & Yamanaka, H. Fine-tuning the performance of abundance estimation based on environmental DNA (eDNA) focusing on eDNA particle size and marker length.
Mutanu, L., Gohil, J., Gupta, K., Wagio, P. & Kotonya, G. A review of automated bioacoustics and general acoustics classification research. PubMed PMC
Corva, D. M. et al. A smart camera trap for detection of endotherms and ectotherms. PubMed PMC
Fischer, S., Edwards, A. C., Garnett, S. T., Whiteside, T. G. & Weber, P. Drones and sound recorders increase the number of bird species identified: a combined surveys approach.
Kloepper, L. N. & Kinniry, M. Recording animal vocalizations from a UAV: bat echolocation during roost re-entry. PubMed PMC
Ratnayake, M. N., Dyer, A. G. & Dorin A. Towards computer vision and deep learning facilitated pollination monitoring for agriculture. In
Porcar-Castell, A. et al. Linking chlorophyll PubMed
Mo, M. & Bonatakis, K. Approaching wildlife with drones: using scientific literature to identify factors to consider for minimising disturbance.
Phillips, O. L., Nuñez, V. P. & Timaná, M. E. Tree mortality and collecting botanical vouchers in tropical forests.
Kelling, S. et al. Data-intensive science: a new paradigm for biodiversity studies.
Mansouri, Y. & Ali Babar, M. A review of edge computing: features and resource virtualization.
Sharma, K. & Gupta, K. Lossless data compression techniques and their performance. In
Badescu, A. & Cotofana, L. A wireless sensor network to monitor and protect tigers in the wild.
Bhadauria, D., Tekdas, O. & Isler, V. Robotic data mules for collecting data over sparse sensor fields.
Perez-Granados, C. BirdNET: applications, performance, pitfalls and future opportunities.
Löbl, I., Klausnitzer, B., Hartmann, M. & Krell, F.-T. The silent extinction of species and taxonomists – an appeal to science policymakers and legislators.
Johansson, Ö. et al. Identification errors in camera-trap studies result in systematic population overestimation. PubMed PMC
The IUCN Red List of Threatened Species. Version 2025-1
Wang, Y., Yao, Q., Kwok, J. & Ni, L. M. Generalizing from a few examples: a survey on few-shot learning.
Shorten, C. & Khoshgoftaar, T. M. A survey on image data augmentation for deep learning. PubMed PMC
Beery, S.
Luccioni, A. S. & Rolnick, D. Bugs in the data: how ImageNet misrepresents biodiversity.
Jawad, A. M. et al. Wireless power transfer with magnetic resonator coupling and sleep/active strategy for a drone charging station in smart agriculture.
Ramirez, J. P. & Hamaza, S. Multimodal locomotion: next generation aerial-terrestrial mobile robotics.
Notomista, G., Emam, Y. & Egerstedt, M. The SlothBot: a novel design for a wire-traversing robot.
Ravankar, A. & Ravankar, A. Distributed docking station system for mobile robots. In
Slate, A. J., Whitehead, K. A., Brownson, D. A. C. & Banks, C. E. Microbial fuel cells: an overview of current technology.
Ilyas, M. A. & Swingler, J. Piezoelectric energy harvesting from raindrop impacts.
Wu, C., Wang, A. C., Ding, W., Guo, H. & Wang, Z. L. Triboelectric nanogenerator: a foundation of the energy for the new era.
Huang, Y., Xu, D., Kan, J. & Li, W. Study on field experiments of forest soil thermoelectric power generation devices. PubMed PMC
Chu, S., Cui, Y. & Liu, N. The path towards sustainable energy. PubMed
Lee, M. H. et al. A biodegradable secondary battery and its biodegradation mechanism for eco-friendly energy storage systems. PubMed
Sethi, S. S., Kovac, M., Wiesemüller, F., Miriyev, A. & Boutry, C. M. Biodegradable sensors are ready to transform autonomous ecological monitoring. PubMed
Hughes, A. C. et al. Sampling biases shape our view of the natural world.
Carey, C. C. et al. Enhancing collaboration between ecologists and computer scientists: lessons learned and recommendations forward.
Pringle, S. et al. RAS for biodiversity monitoring modified Delphi.
Keith, D. A., Ferrer-Paris, J. R., Nicholson, E. & Kingsford, R. T. (eds).