Novel Classification for Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma to Better Risk-stratify Patients Eligible for Kidney-sparing Strategies: An International Collaborative Study
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
33773965
DOI
10.1016/j.euf.2021.03.018
PII: S2405-4569(21)00097-3
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Risk assessment, Transitional cell carcinoma, Ureteroscopy, Urologic neoplasms, Urologic surgical procedures, Urological diagnostic techniques,
- MeSH
- Carcinoma, Transitional Cell * pathology MeSH
- Kidney pathology surgery MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Urinary Bladder Neoplasms * pathology MeSH
- Ureteral Neoplasms * pathology surgery MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
BACKGROUND: The European Association of Urology risk stratification dichotomizes patients with upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC) into two risk categories. OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the predictive value of a new classification to better risk stratify patients eligible for kidney-sparing surgery (KSS). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This was a retrospective study including 1214 patients from 21 centers who underwent ureterorenoscopy (URS) with biopsy followed by radical nephroureterectomy (RNU) for nonmetastatic UTUC between 2000 and 2017. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: A multivariate logistic regression analysis identified predictors of muscle invasion (≥pT2) at RNU. The Youden index was used to identify cutoff points. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: A total of 811 patients (67%) were male and the median age was 71 yr (interquartile range 63-77). The presence of non-organ-confined disease on preoperative imaging (p < 0.0001), sessile tumor (p < 0.0001), hydronephrosis (p = 0.0003), high-grade cytology (p = 0.0043), or biopsy (p = 0.0174) and higher age at diagnosis (p = 0.029) were independently associated with ≥pT2 at RNU. Tumor size was significantly associated with ≥pT2 disease only in univariate analysis with a cutoff of 2 cm. Tumor size and all significant categorical variables defined the high-risk category. Tumor multifocality and a history of radical cystectomy help to dichotomize between low-risk and intermediate-risk categories. The odds ratio for muscle invasion were 5.5 (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-24.0; p = 0.023) for intermediate risk versus low risk, and 12.7 (95% CI 3.0-54.5; p = 0.0006) for high risk versus low risk. Limitations include the retrospective design and selection bias (all patients underwent RNU). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low-risk UTUC represent ideal candidates for KSS, while some patients with intermediate-risk UTUC may also be considered. This classification needs further prospective validation and may help stratification in clinical trial design. PATIENT SUMMARY: We investigated factors predicting stage 2 or greater cancer of the upper urinary tract at the time of surgery for ureter and kidney removal and designed a new risk stratification. Patients with low or intermediate risk may be eligible for kidney-sparing surgery with close follow-up. Our classification scheme needs further validation based on cancer outcomes.
Department of Genitourinary Oncology Moffitt Cancer Center Tampa FL USA
Department of Surgery Division of Urology McGill University Health Center Montreal Canada
Department of Urology Bichat Claude Bernard Hospital AP HP Paris Descartes University Paris France
Department of Urology Careggi Hospital University of Florence Florence Italy
Department of Urology Jagiellonian University Medical College Krakow Poland
Department of Urology Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
Department of Urology Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine Baltimore MD USA
Department of Urology MD Anderson Cancer Center Houston TX USA
Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology Seoul National University Hospital Seoul Korea
Department of Urology University Hospitals Leuven Leuven Belgium
Department of Urology University of Rennes Rennes France
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Uro Oncology University Hospital Cologne Cologne Germany
Division of Urology Virginia Commonwealth University Richmond VA USA
Instituto Valenciano de Oncologia Foundation Valencia Spain
Urology GRC 5 Predictive ONCO URO Pitié Salpêtrière Hospital AP HP Sorbonne University Paris France
References provided by Crossref.org