Digital PCR can provide improved BCR-ABL1 detection in chronic myeloid leukemia patients in deep molecular response and sensitivity of standard quantitative methods using EAC assays
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
33778144
PubMed Central
PMC7985703
DOI
10.1016/j.plabm.2021.e00210
PII: S2352-5517(21)00010-X
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- BCR-ABL1 monitoring, CML, chronic myeloid leukemia, Chronic myeloid leukemia, Digital PCR, EAC, Europe Against Cancer, FPR, false positivity rate, GeneXpert BCR-ABL Monitor assay, IS, international scale, LOB, limit of blank, LOD, limit of detection, MR, molecular response, NTC, no template control, RT-qPCR, RT-qPCR, reverse-transcription quantitative PCR, TKI, tyrosine kinase inhibitors, cDNA, complementary DNA, dPCR, digital PCR, pDNA, plasmid DNA, qPCR, quantitative PCR,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BCR-ABL1 molecular detection using quantitative PCR (qPCR) methods is the golden standard of chronic myeloid leukemia (CML) monitoring. However, due to variable sensitivity of qPCR assays across laboratories, alternative methods are tested. Digital PCR (dPCR) has been suggested as a robust and reproducible option. Here we present a comparison of droplet dPCR with routinely used reverse-transcription qPCR (RT-qPCR) and automated GeneXpert systems. Detection limit of dPCR was above 3 BCR-ABL1 copies, although due to background amplification the resulting sensitivity was 0.01% BCR-ABL1 (MR4.0). Nevertheless, in comparison with GeneXpert, dPCR categorized more than 50% of the patients into different MR groups, showing a potential for improved BCR-ABL1 detection.
Centre of Molecular Biology and Gene Therapy University Hospital Brno Czech Republic
Institute of Hematology and Blood Transfusion Prague Czech Republic
Internal Haematology and Oncology Clinic University Hospital Brno Czech Republic
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Sasaki K., Strom S.S., O’Brien S., Jabbour E., Ravandi F., Konopleva M., Borthakur G., Pemmaraju N., Daver N., Jain P., Pierce S., Kantarjian H., Cortes J.E. Relative survival in patients with chronic-phase chronic myeloid leukaemia in the tyrosine-kinase inhibitor era: analysis of patient data from six prospective clinical trials. Lancet Haematol. 2015;2 doi: 10.1016/S2352-3026(15)00048-4. e186–e193. PubMed DOI PMC
Saußele S., Richter J., Hochhaus A., Mahon F.X. The concept of treatment-free remission in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2016;30:1638–1647. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.115. PubMed DOI PMC
Cross N.C.P., White H.E., Müller M.C., Saglio G., Hochhaus A. Standardized definitions of molecular response in chronic myeloid leukemia. Leukemia. 2012;26:2172–2175. doi: 10.1038/leu.2012.104. PubMed DOI
Hughes T., Deininger M., Hochhaus A., Branford S., Radich J., Kaeda J., Baccarani M., Cortes J., Cross N.C.P., Druker B.J., Gabert J., Grimwade D., Hehlmann R., Kamel-Reid S., Lipton J.H., Longtine J., Martinelli G., Saglio G., Soverini S., Stock W., Goldman J.M. Monitoring CML patients responding to treatment with tyrosine kinase inhibitors: review and recommendations for harmonizing current methodology for detecting BCR-ABL transcripts and kinase domain mutations and for expressing results. Blood. 2006;108:28–37. doi: 10.1182/blood-2006-01-0092. PubMed DOI PMC
Hindson C.M., Chevillet J.R., Briggs H.A., Gallichotte E.N., Ruf I.K., Hindson B.J., Vessella R.L., Tewari M. Absolute quantification by droplet digital PCR versus analog real-time PCR. Nat. Methods. 2013;10:1003–1005. doi: 10.1038/nmeth.2633. PubMed DOI PMC
Jennings L.J., George D., Czech J., Yu M., Joseph L. Detection and quantification of BCR-ABL1 fusion transcripts by droplet digital PCR. J. Mol. Diagn. 2014;16:174–179. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2013.10.007. PubMed DOI
Alikian M., Whale A.S., Akiki S., Piechocki K., Torrado C., Myint T., Cowen S., Griffiths M., Reid A.G., Apperley J., White H., Huggett J.F., Foroni L. RT-qPCR and RT-digital PCR: a comparison of different platforms for the evaluation of residual disease in chronic myeloid leukemia. Clin. Chem. 2017;63:525–531. doi: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.262824. PubMed DOI
Franke G.-N., Maier J., Wildenberger K., Cross M., Frank O., Giles F., Hochhaus A., Dietz C.T., Müller M.C., Niederwieser D., Lange T. Quantification of BCR-ABL with digital PCR results in a significantly lower rate of deep molecular responses when compared to RT-qPCR in CML patients treated in the ENEST1st trial. Blood. 2015;126 doi: 10.1182/blood.v126.23.135.135. 135–135. DOI
Franke G.-N., Maier J., Cross M., Tzonev S., Shelton D., Wildenberger K., Niederwieser D., Lange T. EHA Learning Center. 2017. A high sensitivity high specificity digital PCR assay for BCR-ABL. DOI
Maier J., Lange T., Cross M., Wildenberger K., Niederwieser D., Franke G.-N. Optimized digital droplet PCR for BCR-ABL. J. Mol. Diagnostics. 2019;21:27–37. doi: 10.1016/j.jmoldx.2018.08.012. PubMed DOI
White H.E., Matejtschuk P., Rigsby P., Gabert J., Lin F., Wang Y.L., Branford S., Mu M.C., Beaufils N., Beillard E., Colomer D., Dvorakova D., Ehrencrona H., Goh H., El Housni H., Jones D., Kairisto V., Kamel-reid S., Kim D. Establishment of the first world Health organization international genetic reference panel for quantitation of BCR-ABL mRNA establishment of the first world Health organization international genetic reference panel for quantitation of BCR-ABL mRNA. Blood. 2012;116:111–118. doi: 10.1182/blood-2010-06-291641. PubMed DOI
Marum J.E., Branford S. Current developments in molecular monitoring in chronic myeloid leukemia. Ther. Adv. Hematol. 2016;7:237–251. doi: 10.1177/2040620716657994. PubMed DOI PMC
Cross N.C.P., White H.E., Ernst T., Welden L., Dietz C., Saglio G., Mahon F.X., Wong C.C., Zheng D., Wong S., Wang S.S., Akiki S., Albano F., Andrikovics H., Anwar J., Balatzenko G., Bendit I., Beveridge J., Boeckx N., Cerveira N., Cheng S.M., Colomer D., Czurda S., Daraio F., Dulucq S., Eggen L., El Housni H., Gerrard G., Gniot M., Izzo B., Jacquin D., Janssen J.J.W.M., Jeromin S., Jurcek T., Kim D.W., Machova-Polakova K., Martinez-Lopez J., McBean M., Mesanovic S., Mitterbauer-Hohendanner G., Mobtaker H., Mozziconacci M.J., Pajič T., Pallisgaard N., Panagiotidis P., Press R.D., Qin Y.Z., Radich J., Sacha T., Touloumenidou T., Waits P., Wilkinson E., Zadro R., Müller M.C., Hochhaus A., Branford S. Development and evaluation of a secondary reference panel for BCR-ABL1 quantification on the International Scale. Leukemia. 2016;30:1844–1852. doi: 10.1038/leu.2016.90. PubMed DOI PMC
Andersen R.F., Pallisgaard N. Exceeding MR5.0 sensitivity in routine BCR-ABL1 analysis using multiplex digital PCR. Blood. 2014;124 doi: 10.1182/blood.V124.21.4540.4540. 4540–4540. DOI
Folta A., Jurcek T., Kubesova B., Zackova D., Mayer J., Jeziskova I. A comparison of two standardized quantitative RT-PCRs with CE IVD kit for digital PCR in CML patients with different level of BCR-ABL1 transcripts. Blood. 2019;134:1646. doi: 10.1182/blood-2019-125551. DOI
Enjeti A., Granter N., Ashraf A., Fletcher L., Branford S., Rowlings P., Dooley S. A longitudinal evaluation of performance of automated BCR-ABL1 quantitation using cartridge-based detection system. Pathology. 2015;47:570–574. doi: 10.1097/PAT.0000000000000293. PubMed DOI PMC