Animals can evoke a wide range of emotions helping us to choose a quick and appropriate reaction towards them: approach or avoidance in general. This work has focused on disgust evoked by amphibians in humans as well as perceived beauty. Due to the high morphological variability of recent amphibian taxa, we examined humans' cognitive categorisation of 101 amphibian photos and the effect of stimuli characteristics on disgust evaluation or beauty perception of individual groups/species. We also explored how respondents' characteristics, e.g. gender, age and disgust sensitivity (DS-R) influence the disgust and beauty evaluation of picture stimuli on a 7-point Likert scale. The scores of disgust and beauty evaluation were strongly negatively correlated, representing the opposite ends of a single axis, further referred to as the index of preference. The most preferred amphibians belonged to anurans, whereas the least preferred ones were mostly worm-like, legless and small-eyed caecilians. Additional analyses of morphologically diverse anurans showed that species with a round body shape, short forelegs, small eyes, warts, pink and grey colouration, or dark and dull colouration were perceived as disgusting or ugly. The effect of gender and age were only marginal; however, people with higher disgust sensitivity rated amphibians as more disgusting and less beautiful, which might support the hypothesis of a possible disgust involvement in animal fears and phobias. This topic has implications not only for the nature conservation decisions of globally endangered amphibians but also for understanding the evolution of disgust and its generalisation to harmless animals.

Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Viničná 7 128 43 Prague Czech Republic

National Institute of Mental Health Topolová 748 250 67 Klecany Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Behav Res Ther. 1999 Mar;37(3):273-80 PubMed

J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 May;76(5):805-19 PubMed

Behav Res Ther. 2000 Aug;38(8):753-62 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2001 May 22;98(11):6227-32 PubMed

Psychol Rev. 2001 Jul;108(3):483-522 PubMed

J Exp Psychol Gen. 2001 Sep;130(3):466-78 PubMed

Neuroimage. 2002 Jun;16(2):331-48 PubMed

Comp Med. 2002 Jun;52(3):265-8 PubMed

Psychol Rev. 2003 Jan;110(1):145-72 PubMed

Appetite. 2003 Aug;41(1):31-41 PubMed

Dis Aquat Organ. 2003 Jun 20;55(1):65-7 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2003 Oct 28;100(22):12792-7 PubMed

Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2003 Aug;78(3):385-407 PubMed

Proc Biol Sci. 2004 May 7;271 Suppl 4:S131-3 PubMed

Emotion. 2004 Sep;4(3):233-50 PubMed

Science. 2004 Dec 3;306(5702):1783-6 PubMed

J Hum Evol. 2006 Jul;51(1):1-35 PubMed

Science. 2006 Jul 7;313(5783):48 PubMed

Psychol Assess. 2007 Sep;19(3):281-97 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 16;104(42):16598-603 PubMed

Emotion. 2007 Nov;7(4):691-6 PubMed

Cognition. 2008 May;107(2):581-602 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 12;105 Suppl 1:11466-73 PubMed

Evolution. 2008 Nov;62(11):2742-59 PubMed

Clin Psychol Rev. 2009 Feb;29(1):34-46 PubMed

Biol Lett. 2009 Feb 23;5(1):51-4 PubMed

Science. 2009 Feb 27;323(5918):1179-80 PubMed

Psychol Bull. 2009 Mar;135(2):303-21 PubMed

J Pers Soc Psychol. 2009 Jul;97(1):103-22 PubMed

Dev Sci. 2010 Jan 1;13(1):221-8 PubMed

Behav Res Ther. 1991;29(1):91-4 PubMed

PLoS One. 2010 Sep 07;5(9):e12568 PubMed

Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2011 Apr;35(5):1219-36 PubMed

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Feb 12;366(1563):389-401 PubMed

J Evol Biol. 2009 May;22(5):1046-56 PubMed

Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2011 Dec 12;366(1583):3453-65 PubMed

J Ethnobiol Ethnomed. 2012 Feb 08;8:8 PubMed

Neuroimage. 2012 May 15;61(1):289-94 PubMed

Semin Cell Dev Biol. 2013 Jun-Jul;24(6-7):553-61 PubMed

PLoS One. 2013 May 15;8(5):e63110 PubMed

Conserv Biol. 2014 Oct;28(5):1195-205 PubMed

Evol Psychol. 2015 Apr 29;13(2):339-59 PubMed

Conserv Biol. 2016 Feb;30(1):82-91 PubMed

J Gen Psychol. 2016;143(2):101-15 PubMed

Front Neurosci. 2017 Feb 17;11:67 PubMed

Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 16;9:333 PubMed

Naturwissenschaften. 2018 Nov 28;105(11-12):69 PubMed

Front Psychol. 2018 Dec 11;9:2439 PubMed

Animals (Basel). 2019 May 14;9(5):null PubMed

Toxicon. 1978;16(2):163-88 PubMed

Br J Psychol. 1994 Nov;85 ( Pt 4):541-54 PubMed

Behav Res Ther. 1994 Jan;32(1):57-63 PubMed

Behav Res Ther. 1998 Jul-Aug;36(7-8):735-50 PubMed

The Ultimate List of the Most Frightening and Disgusting Animals: Negative Emotions Elicited by Animals in Central European Respondents

Venomous snakes elicit stronger fear than nonvenomous ones: Psychophysiological response to snake images