The aspects of facial attractiveness have been widely studied, especially within the context of evolutionary psychology, which proposes that aesthetic judgements of human faces are shaped by biologically based standards of beauty reflecting the mate quality. However, the faces of primates, who are very similar to us yet still considered non-human, remain neglected. In this paper, we aimed to study the facial attractiveness of non-human primates as judged by human respondents. We asked 286 Czech respondents to score photos of 107 primate species according to their perceived "beauty." Then, we analyzed factors affecting the scores including morphology, colors, and human-likeness. We found that the three main primate groups were each scored using different cues. The proportions of inner facial features and distinctiveness are cues widely reported to affect human facial attractiveness. Interestingly, we found that these factors also affected the attractiveness scores of primate faces, but only within the Catarrhines, i.e., the primate group most similar to humans. Within this group, human-likeness positively affected the attractiveness scores, and facial extremities such as a prolonged nose or exaggerated cheeks were considered the least attractive. On the contrary, the least human-like prosimians were scored as the most attractive group. The results are discussed in the context of the "uncanny valley," the widely discussed empirical rule.

RP3 Applied Neurosciences and Brain Imaging National Institute of Mental Health Klecany Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Akaike H. (1998). “Information theory and an extension of the maximum likelihood principle,” in DOI

Archer J., Monton S. (2011). Preferences for infant facial features in pet dogs and cats. DOI

Bonner L., Burton A. M. (2004). 7–11-year-old children show an advantage for matching and recognizing the internal features of familiar faces: evidence against a developmental shift. PubMed DOI

Borgi M., Cogliati-Dezza I., Brelsford V., Meints K., Cirulli F. (2014). Baby schema in human and animal faces induces cuteness perception and gaze allocation in children. PubMed DOI PMC

Borkenau P., Brecke S., Möttig C., Paelecke M. (2009). Extraversion is accurately perceived after a 50-ms exposure to a face. DOI

Burleigh T. J., Schoenherr J. R., Lacroix G. L. (2013). Does the uncanny valley exist? An empirical test of the relationship between eeriness and the human likeness of digitally created faces. DOI

Calvo M. G., Nummenmaa L. (2016). Perceptual and affective mechanisms in facial expression recognition: an integrative review. PubMed DOI

Campbell R., Walker J., Baron-Cohen S. (1995). The development of differential use of inner and outer face features in familiar face identification. DOI

Cicchetti D. V. (1994). Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. DOI

Coetzee V., Faerber S. J., Greeff J. M., Lefevre C. E., Re D. E., Perrett D. I. (2012). African perceptions of female attractiveness. PubMed DOI PMC

DeBruine L. M. (2005). Trustworthy but not lust-worthy: context-specific effects of facial resemblance. PubMed DOI PMC

Deffenbacher K. A., Vetter T., Johanson J., O’Toole A. J. (1998). Facial aging, attractiveness, and distinctiveness. PubMed DOI

Diamond R., Carey S. (1986). Why faces are and are not special: an effect of expertise. PubMed DOI

Dixson A. F. (2012). DOI

Dufour V., Petit O. (2010). Recognition of monkey faces by monkey experts. DOI

Ekman P., Friesen W. V. (1986). A new pan-cultural facial expression of emotion. DOI

Elia I. E. (2013). A foxy view of human beauty: implications of the farm fox experiment for understanding the origins of structural and experiential aspects of facial attractiveness. PubMed DOI

Elliot A. J., Niesta Kayser D., Greitemeyer T., Lichtenfeld S., Gramzow R. H., Maier M. A., et al. (2010). Red, rank, and romance in women viewing men. PubMed DOI

Ellis H. D., Shepherd J. W., Davies G. M. (1979). Identification of familiar and unfamiliar faces from internal and external features: some implications for theories of face recognition. PubMed DOI

Fink B., Grammer K., Matts P. J. (2006). Visible skin color distribution plays a role in the perception of age, attractiveness, and health in female faces. DOI

Fink B., Grammer K., Thornhill R. (2001). Human ( PubMed DOI

Fink B., Matts P. J., D’Emiliano D., Bunse L., Weege B., Röder S. (2012). Colour homogeneity and visual perception of age, health and attractiveness of male facial skin. PubMed DOI

Fink B., Penton-Voak I. (2002). Evolutionary psychology of facial attractiveness. DOI

Finstermeier K., Zinner D., Brameier M., Meyer M., Kreuz E., Hofreiter M., et al. (2013). A mitogenomic phylogeny of living primates. PubMed DOI PMC

Fisher M. L. (2004). Female intrasexual competition decreases female facial attractiveness. PubMed DOI PMC

Fridlund A. J. (1994).

Frisby C. M. (2006). “Shades of beauty”: examining the relationship of skin color to perceptions of physical attractiveness. PubMed DOI

Frynta D., Landová E., Lišková S. (2014). “Animal beauty, cross-cultural perceptions,” in

Frynta D., Lišková S., Bültmann S., Burda H. (2010). Being attractive brings advantages: the case of parrot species in captivity. PubMed DOI PMC

Frynta D., Marešová E., Landová E., Lišková S., Šimková O., Tichá I., et al. (2009). “Are animals in zoos rather conspicuous than endangered?,” in

Frynta D., Šimková O., Lišková S., Landová E. (2013). Mammalian collection on Noah’s ark: the effects of beauty, brain and body size. PubMed DOI PMC

Ge L., Anzures G., Wang Z., Kelly D. J., Pascalis O., Quinn P. C., et al. (2008). An inner face advantage in children’s recognition of familiar peers. PubMed DOI PMC

Ge L., Zhang H., Wang Z., Quinn P. C., Pascalis O., Kelly D., et al. (2009). Two faces of the other-race effect: recognition and categorisation of Caucasian and Chinese faces. PubMed DOI

Geissmann T., Groves C. P., Roos C. (2004). The

Gordon A. D. (2006). Scaling of size and dimorphism in primates II: macroevolution. DOI

Gothard K. M., Brooks K. N., Peterson M. A. (2009). Multiple perceptual strategies used by macaque monkeys for face recognition. PubMed DOI

Grammer K., Thornhill R. (1994). Human ( PubMed DOI

Halberstadt J., Rhodes G. (2000). The attractiveness of nonface averages: implications for an evolutionary explanation of the attractiveness of average faces. PubMed DOI

Halberstadt J., Rhodes G. (2003). It’s not just average faces that are attractive: computer-manipulated averageness makes birds, fish, and automobiles attractive. PubMed DOI

Hallgren K. A. (2012). Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: an overview and tutorial. PubMed DOI PMC

Hancock P. J., Little A. C. (2011). Adaptation may cause some of the face caricature effect. PubMed DOI

Hanson D. (2005). “Expanding the aesthetic possibilities for humanoid robots,” in

Haxby J. V., Hoffman E. A., Gobbini M. I. (2000). The distributed human neural system for face perception. PubMed DOI

Hecht J., Horowitz A. (2015). Seeing dogs: human preferences for dog physical attributes. DOI

Hughes K. D., Higham J. P., Allen W. L., Elliot A. J., Hayden B. Y. (2015). Extraneous color affects female macaques’ gaze preference for photographs of male conspecifics. PubMed DOI PMC

Jones B. C., DeBruine L. M., Main J. C., Little A. C., Welling L. L., Feinberg D. R., et al. (2010). Facial cues of dominance modulate the short-term gaze-cuing effect in human observers. PubMed DOI PMC

Jones B. C., Little A. C., Burt D. M., Perrett D. I. (2004). When facial attractiveness is only skin deep. PubMed DOI

Jones D., Hill K. (1993). Criteria of facial attractiveness in five populations. PubMed DOI

Kay R. F., Plavcan J. M., Glander K. E., Wright P. C. (1988). Sexual selection and canine dimorphism in New World monkeys. PubMed DOI

Komori M., Kawamura S., Ishihara S. (2009). Averageness or symmetry: which is more important for facial attractiveness? PubMed DOI

Kościński K. (2007). Facial attractiveness: general patterns of facial preferences. DOI

Landová E., Bakhshaliyeva N., Janovcová M., Peléšková Š, Suleymanova M., Polák J., et al. (2018). Association between fear and beauty evaluation of snakes: cross-cultural findings. PubMed DOI PMC

Landová E., Marešová J., Šimková O., Cikánová V., Frynta D. (2012). Human responses to live snakes and their photographs: evaluation of beauty and fear of the king snakes. DOI

Lee K., Byatt G., Rhodes G. (2000). Caricature effects, distinctiveness, and identification: testing the face-space framework. PubMed DOI

Lei R. (2008). DOI

Leutenegger W., Kelly J. T. (1977). Relationship of sexual dimorphism in canine size and body size to social, behavioral, and ecological correlates in anthropoid primates. DOI

Lindenfors P., Tullberg B. S. (1998). Phylogenetic analyses of primate size evolution: the consequences of sexual selection. DOI

Lišková S., Frynta D. (2013). What determines bird beauty in human eyes? DOI

Lišková S., Landová E., Frynta D. (2015). Human preferences for colorful birds: vivid colors or pattern? PubMed DOI

Little A. C., Hancock P. J. (2002). The role of masculinity and distinctiveness in judgments of human male facial attractiveness. PubMed DOI

Little A. C., Jones B. C., DeBruine L. M. (2011). Facial attractiveness: evolutionary based research. PubMed DOI PMC

Little A. C., Jones B. C., DeBruine L. M., Feinberg D. R. (2008). Symmetry and sexual dimorphism in human faces: interrelated preferences suggest both signal quality. DOI

Little A. C., Jones B. C., Penton-Voak I. S., Burt D. M., Perrett D. I. (2002). Partnership status and the temporal context of relationships influence human female preferences for sexual dimorphism in male face shape. PubMed DOI PMC

Lovich J. E., Gibbons J. W. (1992). A review of techniques for quantifying sexual size dimorphism. PubMed

MacDorman K. F., Green R. D., Ho C. C., Koch C. T. (2009). Too real for comfort? Uncanny responses to computer generated faces. PubMed DOI PMC

Marešová J., Landová E., Frynta D. (2009). What makes some species of milk snakes more attractive to humans than others? PubMed DOI

Matts P. J., Fink B., Grammer K., Burquest M. (2007). Color homogeneity and visual perception of age, health, and attractiveness of female facial skin. PubMed DOI

Maurer D., Le Grand R., Mondloch C. J. (2002). The many faces of configural processing. PubMed DOI

Mauro R., Kubovy M. (1992). Caricature and face recognition. PubMed DOI

Mayor M. I., Sommer J. A., Houck M. L., Zaonarivelo J. R., Wright P. C., Ingram C., et al. (2004). Specific status of DOI

McGraw K. O., Wong S. P. (1996). Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. DOI

Michel C., Caldara R., Rossion B. (2006). Same-race faces are perceived more holistically than other-race faces. DOI

Mitchell W. J., Szerszen K. A. Sr., Lu A. S., Schermerhorn P. W., Scheutz M., MacDorman K. F. (2011). A mismatch in the human realism of face and voice produces an uncanny valley. PubMed DOI PMC

Mittermeier R. A., Louis E. E., Richardson M., Schwitzer C., Langrand O., Rylands A. B., et al. (2010).

Mitteroecker P., Gunz P., Windhager S., Schaefer K. (2013). A brief review of shape, form, and allometry in geometric morphometrics, with applications to human facial morphology. DOI

Mori M., MacDorman K. F., Kageki N. (2012). The uncanny valley [from the field]. DOI

Oksanen J., Blanchet F. G., Friendly M., Kindt R., Legendre P., McGlinn D., et al. (2017).

O’Toole A. J., Price T., Vetter T., Bartlett J. C., Blanz V. (1999). 3D shape and 2D surface textures of human faces: the role of “averages” in attractiveness and age. DOI

Pascalis O., Bachevalier J. (1998). Face recognition in primates: a cross-species study. PubMed DOI

Pastorini J., Forstner M. R., Martin R. D. (2001). Phylogenetic history of sifakas (Propithecus: lemuriformes) derived from mtDNA sequences. PubMed DOI

Penton-Voak I. S., Pound N., Little A. C., Perrett D. I. (2006). Personality judgments from natural and composite facial images: more evidence for a “kernel of truth” in social perception. DOI

Perrett D. I., Burt D. M., Penton-Voak I. S., Lee K. J., Rowland D. A., Edwards R. (1999). Symmetry and human facial attractiveness. DOI

Perrett D. I., Lee K. J., Penton-Voak I., Rowland D., Yoshikawa S., Burt D. M., et al. (1998). Effects of sexual dimorphism on facial attractiveness. PubMed DOI

Perrett D. I., May K. A., Yoshikawa S. (1994). Facial shape and judgements of female attractiveness. PubMed DOI

Pothos E. M., Chater N. (2002). A simplicity principle in unsupervised human categorization. DOI

Pothos E. M., Close J. (2008). One or two dimensions in spontaneous classification: a simplicity approach. PubMed DOI

Ptáčková J., Landová E., Lišková S., Kubìna A., Frynta D. (2017). Are the aesthetic preferences towards snake species already formed in pre-school aged children? DOI

Purvis A. (1995). A composite estimate of primate phylogeny. PubMed DOI

R Development Core Team (2010).

Rádlová S., Viktorin P., Frynta D. (2016).

Rankin M., Borah G. L. (2003). Perceived functional impact of abnormal facial appearance. PubMed DOI

Re D. E., Whitehead R. D., Xiao D., Perrett D. I. (2011). Oxygenated-blood colour change thresholds for perceived facial redness, health, and attractiveness. PubMed DOI PMC

Rhodes G., Brennan S., Carey S. (1987). Identification and ratings of caricatures: implications for mental representations of faces. PubMed DOI

Rhodes G., Hickford C., Jeffery L. (2000). Sex-typicality and attractiveness: are supermale and superfemale faces super-attractive? PubMed DOI

Rhodes G., Tremewan T. (1996). Averageness, exaggeration, and facial attractiveness. DOI

Rhodes G., Yoshikawa S., Clark A., Lee K., McKay R., Akamatsu S. (2001). Attractiveness of facial averageness and symmetry in non-Western cultures: in search of biologically based standards of beauty. PubMed DOI

Rowe N. (1996).

Russell J. A. (1994). Is there universal recognition of emotion from facial expression? A review of the cross-cultural studies. PubMed DOI

Samson N., Fink B., Matts P. J. (2010). Visible skin condition and perception of human facial appearance. PubMed DOI

Santana S. E., Alfaro J. L., Alfaro M. E. (2012). Adaptive evolution of facial colour patterns in Neotropical primates. PubMed DOI PMC

Saygin A. P., Chaminade T., Ishiguro H., Driver J., Frith C. (2011). The thing that should not be: predictive coding and the uncanny valley in perceiving human and humanoid robot actions. PubMed DOI PMC

Scheib J. E., Gangestad S. W., Thornhill R. (1999). Facial attractiveness, symmetry and cues of good genes. PubMed DOI PMC

Seyama J. I., Nagayama R. S. (2007). The uncanny valley: effect of realism on the impression of artificial human faces. DOI

Sforza C., Laino A., D’Alessio R., Grandi G., Catti F., Ferrario V. F. (2007). Three-dimensional facial morphometry of attractive adolescent boys and girls. PubMed

Shrout P. E., Fleiss J. L. (1979). Intraclass correlations: uses in assessing rater reliability. PubMed DOI

Sobel I. (1978). Neighborhood coding of binary images for fast contour following and general binary array processing. DOI

Stadie W. C. (1919). The oxygen of the arterial and venous blood in pneumonia and its relation to cyanosis. PubMed DOI PMC

StatSoft (2010).

Steckenfinger S. A., Ghazanfar A. A. (2009). Monkey visual behavior falls into the uncanny valley. PubMed DOI PMC

Stephen I. D., Scott I. M., Coetzee V., Pound N., Perrett D. I., Penton-Voak I. S. (2012). Cross-cultural effects of color, but not morphological masculinity, on perceived attractiveness of men’s faces. DOI

Stephen I. D., Smith M. J. L., Stirrat M. R., Perrett D. I. (2009). Facial skin coloration affects perceived health of human faces. PubMed DOI PMC

Stirrat M., Perrett D. I. (2010). Valid facial cues to cooperation and trust male facial width and trustworthiness. PubMed DOI

Tanaka J. W., Kiefer M., Bukach C. M. (2004). A holistic account of the own-race effect in face recognition: evidence from a cross-cultural study. PubMed DOI

Taubert J. (2009). Chimpanzee faces are ’special’ to humans. PubMed DOI

Thomaz C. E. (2012).

Thornhill R., Gangestad S. W. (1999). Facial attractiveness. PubMed DOI

Tinbergen N. (1951).

Tobiasen J. M. (1987). Social judgments of facial deformity. PubMed

Trujillo L. T., Jankowitsch J. M., Langlois J. H. (2014). Beauty is in the ease of the beholding: a neurophysiological test of the averageness theory of facial attractiveness. PubMed DOI PMC

Turati C., Macchi Cassia V., Simion F., Leo I. (2006). Newborns’ face recognition: role of inner and outer facial features. PubMed DOI

Valenzano D. R., Mennucci A., Tartarelli G., Cellerino A. (2006). Shape analysis of female facial attractiveness. PubMed DOI

Van den Berghe P. L., Frost P. (1986). Skin color preference, sexual dimorphism and sexual selection: a case of gene culture co-evolution? DOI

Waitt C., Gerald M. S., Little A. C., Kraiselburd E. (2006). Selective attention toward female secondary sexual color in male rhesus macaques. PubMed DOI

Waitt C., Little A. C., Wolfensohn S., Honess P., Brown A. P., Buchanan-Smith H. M., et al. (2003). Evidence from rhesus macaques suggests that male coloration plays a role in female primate mate choice. PubMed DOI PMC

Want S. C., Pascalis O., Coleman M., Blades M. (2003). Recognizing people from the inner or outer parts of their faces: developmental data concerning ‘unfamiliar’faces. DOI

Weston E. M., Friday A. E., Johnstone R. A., Schrenk F. (2004). Wide faces or large canines? The attractive versus the aggressive primate. PubMed DOI PMC

Wilson D. E., Reeder D. M. (eds) (2005).

Xu Y. (2005). Revisiting the role of the fusiform face area in visual expertise. PubMed DOI

Yoder A. D., Irwin J. A. (1999). Phylogeny of the Lemuridae: effects of character and taxon sampling on resolution of species relationships within Eulemur. PubMed DOI

Yovel G. (2016). Neural and cognitive face-selective markers: an integrative review. PubMed DOI

Zebrowitz L. A., Hall J. A., Murphy N. A., Rhodes G. (2002). Looking smart and looking good: facial cues to intelligence and their origins. DOI

Zelditch M. L., Swiderski D. L., Sheets H. D. (2012).

Zhang D., Zhao Q., Chen F. (2011). Quantitative analysis of human facial beauty using geometric features. DOI

Zhao Y., Zhen Z., Liu X., Song Y., Liu J. (2018). The neural network for face recognition: insights from an fMRI study on developmental prosopagnosia. PubMed DOI

Human evaluation of amphibian species: a comparison of disgust and beauty

Snakes Represent Emotionally Salient Stimuli That May Evoke Both Fear and Disgust