Animals are ancestrally important stimuli for humans who pay disproportional attention to animal objects and exhibit an outstanding ability to categorize animal species, especially those most relevant to them. Humans as well as other primates perceive snakes as ambivalent stimuli that elicit unspecific arousal and attention. We assessed human aesthetic preferences toward milk snakes, the traditional model for studies of Batesian mimicry. The genus is fairly uniform in size and shape, but includes a great variety of color forms; some possessing aposematic patterns while others being rather cryptic. This provides an opportunity to test which features are responsible for positive aesthetic evaluation of the species. We asked the respondents to rank 34 pictures of milk snakes according to perceived beauty. The sets (whole bodies, heads, and skin fragments) covered most of naturally occurring variation in milk snake appearance. While ranking the beauty, the respondents spontaneously classified the species according to two dimensions. In each set, one of the dimensions corresponds to perceived beauty. The respondents' ranking revealed several distinct clusters of species instead of a continuous gradient. The species clustered in a similar way irrespective of evaluated set. One dimension of the ranking associated with the relative representation of red color and the number of transversal stripes, the other corresponded to a low proportion of red and a high proportion of black color. When the whole body of the snake is evaluated, aposematic coloration contributes to its perceived beauty. In conclusion, humans showed a surprising ability to classify milk snake patterns; they repeatedly formed the same distinct groups of species, thus completing a process that resembles unsupervised categorization.

Department of Zoology Charles University Vinicná 7 CZ 128 44 Prague Czech Republi

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Nature. 1996 Jul 11;382(6587):156-8 PubMed

Am J Primatol. 2005 Dec;67(4):447-61 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1987 Apr;84(8):2545-9 PubMed

Genome Res. 1999 Jul;9(7):629-38 PubMed

Behav Res Ther. 2002 Aug;40(8):911-22 PubMed

Am Nat. 2003 Oct;162(4):377-89 PubMed

Cognition. 2008 May;107(2):581-602 PubMed

Physiol Behav. 2007 Sep 10;92(1-2):180-5 PubMed

Science. 1975 Feb 28;187(4178):759-60 PubMed

Behav Res Ther. 2008 Jan;46(1):114-21 PubMed

Behav Brain Sci. 1997 Jun;20(2):167-79; discussion 179-228 PubMed

Psychol Rev. 2004 Oct;111(4):960-83 PubMed

J Hum Evol. 2006 Jul;51(1):1-35 PubMed

Biol Psychiatry. 2002 Nov 15;52(10):927-37 PubMed

J R Soc Interface. 2006 Feb 22;3(6):71-85 PubMed

Nature. 2004 Sep 2;431(7004):63-6 PubMed

J Behav Ther Exp Psychiatry. 2006 Dec;37(4):283-98 PubMed

Science. 1981 Sep 11;213(4513):1207-12 PubMed

Am J Phys Anthropol. 2006 Apr;129(4):601-8 PubMed

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Oct 16;104(42):16598-603 PubMed

News Physiol Sci. 2002 Jun;17:93-8 PubMed

Evolution. 1993 Feb;47(1):227-235 PubMed

Curr Biol. 1999 Jul 1;9(13):665-71 PubMed

Psychol Sci. 2008 Mar;19(3):284-9 PubMed

Oecologia. 1996 Jun;106(4):461-463 PubMed

Anim Cogn. 2008 Apr;11(2):349-58 PubMed

Evolution. 1997 Jun;51(3):1011-1014 PubMed

Are vipers prototypic fear-evoking snakes? A cross-cultural comparison of Somalis and Czechs

Animals evoking fear in the Cradle of Humankind: snakes, scorpions, and large carnivores

Emotional Reaction to Fear- and Disgust-Evoking Snakes: Sensitivity and Propensity in Snake-Fearful Respondents

Snakes Represent Emotionally Salient Stimuli That May Evoke Both Fear and Disgust

Judging Others by Your Own Standards: Attractiveness of Primate Faces as Seen by Human Respondents

Beauty ranking of mammalian species kept in the Prague Zoo: does beauty of animals increase the respondents' willingness to protect them?

Association Between Fear and Beauty Evaluation of Snakes: Cross-Cultural Findings

Human preferences for colorful birds: Vivid colors or pattern?

Being attractive brings advantages: the case of parrot species in captivity