Aesthetic preferences for animals correspond with the species' presence in the worldwide zoos and influence the conservation priorities. Here, we investigated the relationship between the willingness of respondents to protect mammals and some attributed characteristics such as their aesthetic beauty. Further, several methodological aspects of measuring mammalian beauty were assessed. Animal beauty was associated not only with the respondents' willingness to protect the species but also with its attributed dangerousness and usefulness. We found that the most preferred animals were carnivores and ungulates, whilst smaller species of rodents and afrosoricids were unpopular. The main characteristics determining that an animal will be ranked as beautiful were complex fur pattern and body shape. We demonstrated that the position of mammalian species along the 'beauty' axis is surprisingly stable, no matter the form (illustrations vs photographs), context of stimulus presentation (several number of stimuli per family vs one randomly selected species per family), or the method of beauty evaluation (relative order vs Likert's scale).

Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Prague Viničná 7 128 44 Prague 2 Czech Republic

National Institute of Mental Health Topolová 748 250 67 Klecany Czech Republic

The Prague zoological garden U Trojského zámku 3 120 171 00 Prague 7 Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

PLoS One. 2013 May 15;8(5):e63110 PubMed

Zoo Biol. 2011 Sep-Oct;30(5):566-9 PubMed

Science. 2000 May 12;288(5468):985-8 PubMed

Evol Psychol. 2015 Apr 29;13(2):339-59 PubMed

J Theor Biol. 1981 Nov 21;93(2):363-85 PubMed

Conserv Biol. 2008 Jun;22(3):624-35 PubMed

Conserv Biol. 2016 Feb;30(1):82-91 PubMed

Genetics. 2010 Jan;184(1):267-75 PubMed

PLoS One. 2010 Sep 07;5(9):e12568 PubMed

Am J Primatol. 2004 Jan;62(1):1-13 PubMed

Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 16;9:333 PubMed

Theory Biosci. 2009 Nov;128(4):227-35 PubMed

J Comp Psychol. 2008 Nov;122(4):335-43 PubMed

Tutor Quant Methods Psychol. 2012;8(1):23-34 PubMed

Evol Psychol. 2014 May 28;12(3):534-48 PubMed

Science. 2012 Nov 30;338(6111):1157-8 PubMed

PLoS One. 2013 Dec 11;8(12):e80311 PubMed

Science. 2011 Mar 18;331(6023):1390-1 PubMed

PLoS One. 2007 Mar 14;2(3):e296 PubMed

Are vipers prototypic fear-evoking snakes? A cross-cultural comparison of Somalis and Czechs

Animals evoking fear in the Cradle of Humankind: snakes, scorpions, and large carnivores

The Ultimate List of the Most Frightening and Disgusting Animals: Negative Emotions Elicited by Animals in Central European Respondents

Human evaluation of amphibian species: a comparison of disgust and beauty

Human Attitude toward Reptiles: A Relationship between Fear, Disgust, and Aesthetic Preferences

Snakes Represent Emotionally Salient Stimuli That May Evoke Both Fear and Disgust