Focusing on one group of animals can bring interesting results regarding our attitudes toward them and show the key features that our evaluation of such animals is based on. Thus, we designed a study of human perception of all reptiles focusing on the relationship between perceived fear, disgust, and aesthetic preferences and differences between snakes and other reptiles. Two sets containing 127 standardized photos of reptiles were developed, with one species per each subfamily. Respondents were asked to rate the animals according to fear, disgust, and beauty on a seven-point Likert scale. Evaluation of reptile species shows that people tend to perceive them as two clearly distinct groups based on their similar morphotype. In a subset of lizards, there was a positive correlation between fear and disgust, while disgust and fear were both negatively correlated with beauty. Surprisingly, a positive correlation between fear and beauty of snakes was revealed, i.e., the most feared species also tend to be perceived as beautiful. Snakes represent a distinct group of animals that is also reflected in the theory of attentional prioritization of snakes as an evolutionary relevant threat.

Department of Zoology Faculty of Science Charles University Viničná 7 128 43 Prague Czech Republic

National Institute of Mental Health Topolová 748 250 67 Klecany Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Rieppel O. Turtles as diapsid reptiles. Nature. 1996;384:453. doi: 10.1038/384453a0. DOI

Lyson T.R., Sperling E.A., Heimberg A.M., Gauthier J.A., King B.L., Peterson K.J. MicroRNAs support a turtle+ lizard clade. Biol. Lett. 2011;8:104–107. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0477. PubMed DOI PMC

Chiari Y., Cahais V., Galtier N., Delsuc F. Phylogenomic analyses support the position of turtles as the sister group of birds and crocodiles (Archosauria) BMC Biol. 2012;10:65. doi: 10.1186/1741-7007-10-65. PubMed DOI PMC

Linnæus C. Systema Naturæ per Regna Tria Naturæ, Secundum Classes, Ordines, Genera, Species, cum Characteribus, Differentiis, Synonymis, Locis. Tomus I. Editio Decima, Reformata. Laurentii Salvii, Holmiæ; Stockholm, Sweden: 1758. pp. 1–4.824p

Berlin B. Ethnobiological Classification: Principles of Categorization of Plants and Animals in Traditional Societies. Volume 185 Princeton University Press; New Jersey, NY, USA: 2014.

Uetz P., Freed P., Hosek J. The Reptile Database. [(accessed on 14 November 2018)]; Available online: http://www.reptile-database.org.

Bonnet X., Shine R., Lourdais O. Taxonomic chauvinism. Trends Ecol. Evol. 2002;17:1–3. doi: 10.1016/S0169-5347(01)02381-3. DOI

Troudet J., Grandcolas P., Blin A., Vignes-Lebbe R., Legendre F. Taxonomic bias in biodiversity data and societal preferences. Sci. Rep. 2017;7:9132. doi: 10.1038/s41598-017-09084-6. PubMed DOI PMC

Clark J.A., May R.M. Taxonomic bias in conservation research. Science. 2002;297:191–192. doi: 10.1126/science.297.5579.191b. PubMed DOI

Böhm M., Collen B., Baillie J.E., Bowles P., Chanson J., Cox N., Rhodin A.G. The conservation status of the world’s reptiles. Biol. Conserv. 2013;157:372–385. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2012.07.015. DOI

Alves R., Santana G., Almeida W., Neto N.L., Vieira W. Reptiles used for medicinal and magic religious purposes in Brazil. Appl. Herpetol. 2009;6:257–274. doi: 10.1163/157075409X432913. DOI

Schlegel J., Rupf R. Attitudes towards potential animal flagship species in nature conservation: A survey among students of different educational institutions. J. Nat. Conserv. 2010;18:278–290. doi: 10.1016/j.jnc.2009.12.002. DOI

Alves R.R.N., Vieira K.S., Santana G.G., Vieira W.L.S., Almeida W.O., Souto W.M.S., Pezzuti J.C.B. A review on human attitudes towards reptiles in Brazil. Environ. Monit. Assess. 2012;184:6877–6901. doi: 10.1007/s10661-011-2465-0. PubMed DOI

Ceriaco L.M. Human attitudes towards herpetofauna: The influence of folklore and negative values on the conservation of amphibians and reptiles in Portugal. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2012;8:8. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-8-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Alves R.R. Relationships between fauna and people and the role of ethnozoology in animal conservation. Ethnobiol. Conserv. 2012;1:1–69. doi: 10.15451/ec2012-8-1.2-1-69. DOI

Alves RR N., Souto WM S. Ethnozoology: A brief introduction. Ethnobiol. Conserv. 2015;4:1–13. doi: 10.15451/ec2015-1-4.1-1-13. DOI

Bertrand H. Contribution à l'étude de l'herpétologie et de l'ethnoherpétologie en Anjou—A study on the herpetology and ethnoherpetology of Anjou province (France) Bull. Soc. Herpétol. Fr. 1997;82–83:51–62.

Alves R.R.N., Alves R.R.N., Pereira Filho G.A., Vieira K.S., Souto W.M.S., Mendonça L.E.T., Montenegro P.F.G.P., Vieira W.L.S. A zoological catalogue of hunted reptiles in the semiarid region of Brazil. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2012;8:27. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-8-27. PubMed DOI PMC

Fernandes-Ferreira H., Mendonca S.V., Cruz R.L., Borges-Nojosa D.M., Nobrega Alves R.R. Hunting of herpetofauna in montane, coastal, and dryland areas of Northeastern Brazil. Herpetol. Conserv. Biol. 2013;8:652–666.

Mendonça L.E.T., Vieira W.L.S., Alves R.R.N. Caatinga Ethnoherpetology: Relationships between herpetofauna and people in a semiarid region. Amphib. Rept. Conserv. 2014;8:24–32. doi: 10.1163/156853095X00125. DOI

Wagler R. The association between preservice elementary teacher animal attitude and likelihood of animal incorporation in future science curriculum. Int. J. Environ. Sci. Educ. 2010;5:353–375.

Batt S. Human attitudes towards animals in relation to species similarity to humans: A multivariate approach. Biosci. Horiz. 2009;2:180–190. doi: 10.1093/biohorizons/hzp021. DOI

IUCN Red list. [(accessed on 21 March 2019)]; Available online: https://www.iucnredlist.org/resources/summary-statistics/

Borgi M., Cirulli F. Attitudes toward animals among kindergarten children: Species preferences. Anthrozoös. 2015;28:45–59. doi: 10.2752/089279315X14129350721939. DOI

Alves R.R., Silva V.N., Trovão D.M., Oliveira J.V., Mourão J.S., Dias T.L., Vieira W.L. Students’ attitudes toward and knowledge about snakes in the semiarid region of Northeastern Brazil. J. Ethnobiol. Ethnomed. 2014;10:30. doi: 10.1186/1746-4269-10-30. PubMed DOI PMC

Frynta D., Šimková O., Lišková S., Landová E. Mammalian collection on Noah’s ark: The effects of beauty, brain and body size. PLoS ONE. 2013;8:e63110. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0063110. PubMed DOI PMC

Landová E., Poláková P., Rádlová S., Janovcová M., Bobek M., Frynta D. Beauty ranking of mammalian species kept in the Prague Zoo: Does beauty of animals increase the respondents’ willingness to protect them? Sci. Nat. 2018;105:69. doi: 10.1007/s00114-018-1596-3. PubMed DOI

Lišková S., Frynta D. What determines bird beauty in human eyes? Anthrozoös. 2013;26:27–41. doi: 10.2752/175303713X13534238631399. DOI

Lišková S., Landová E., Frynta D. Human preferences for colorful birds: Vivid colors or pattern? Evol. Psychol. 2015;13:147470491501300203. PubMed

Frynta D., Lišková S., Bültmann S., Burda H. Being attractive brings advantages: the case of parrot species in captivity. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e12568. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0012568. PubMed DOI PMC

Ekman P., Cordaro D. What is meant by calling emotions basic. Emot. Rev. 2011;3:364–370. doi: 10.1177/1754073911410740. DOI

Woody S.R., Teachman B.A. Intersection of disgust and fear: Normative and pathological views. Clin. Psychol. Sci. Pract. 2000;7:291–311. doi: 10.1093/clipsy.7.3.291. DOI

Oaten M., Stevenson R.J., Case T.I. Disgust as a disease-avoidance mechanism. Psychol. Bull. 2009;135:303. doi: 10.1037/a0014823. PubMed DOI

Curtis V., De Barra M., Aunger R. Disgust as an adaptive system for disease avoidance behaviour. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2011;366:389–401. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2010.0117. PubMed DOI PMC

Rozin P., Fallon A.E. A perspective on disgust. Psychol. Rev. 1987;94:23. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.94.1.23. PubMed DOI

Rozin P., Haidt J., Fincher K. From oral to moral. Science. 2009;323:1179–1180. doi: 10.1126/science.1170492. PubMed DOI

Cisler J.M., Olatunji B.O., Lohr J.M. Disgust, fear, and the anxiety disorders: A critical review. Clin. Psychol. Rev. 2009;29:34–46. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2008.09.007. PubMed DOI PMC

Marzillier S., Davey G. Anxiety and disgust: Evidence for a unidirectional relationship. Cogn. Emot. 2005;19:729–750. doi: 10.1080/02699930441000436. DOI

Davey G.C. Disgust: The disease-avoidance emotion and its dysfunctions. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci. 2011;366:3453–3465. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2011.0039. PubMed DOI PMC

Lindner G. Proceedings of the 17th Working Meeting of the IUCN-SSC Crocodile Specialist Group. The International Union for Conservation of Nature and Natural Resources (IUCN); Gland, Switzerland: 2004. Crocodile management—Kakadu National Park; pp. 41–51.

Caldicott D.G., Croser D., Manolis C., Webb G., Britton A. Crocodile attack in Australia: An analysis of its incidence and review of the pathology and management of crocodilian attacks in general. Wild. Environ. Med. 2005;16:143–159. doi: 10.1580/1080-6032(2005)16[143:CAIAAA]2.0.CO;2. PubMed DOI

McGregor J. Crocodile crimes: People versus wildlife and the politics of postcolonial conservation on Lake Kariba, Zimbabwe. Geoforum. 2005;36:353–369. doi: 10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.06.007. DOI

The Snake Database. [(accessed on 17 March 2019)]; Available online: http://snakedatabase.org.

Headland T.N., Greene H.W. Hunter—Gatherers and other primates as prey, predators, and competitors of snakes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2011;108:E1470–E1474. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1115116108. PubMed DOI PMC

Murphy J.C., Henderson R.W. Tales of Giant Snakes: A Historical Natural History of Anacondas and Pythons. Krieger Publishing Company; Malabar, FL, USA: 1997.

Öhman A., Mineka S. Fears, phobias, and preparedness: Toward an evolved module of fear and fear learning. Psychol. Rev. 2001;108:483. doi: 10.1037/0033-295X.108.3.483. PubMed DOI

Isbell L.A. The Fruit, the Tree, and the Serpent. Harvard University Press; Cambridge, MA, USA: 2009.

Öhman A., Mineka S. The malicious serpent: Snakes as a prototypical stimulus for an evolved module of fear. Curr. Direct. Psychol. Sci. 2003;12:5–9. doi: 10.1111/1467-8721.01211. DOI

Maddison D.R. African origin of human mitochondrial DNA reexamined. Syst. Zool. 1991;40:355–363. doi: 10.2307/2992327. DOI

Ke Y., Su B., Song X., Lu D., Chen L., Li H., Xiao C. African origin of modern humans in East Asia: A tale of 12,000 Y chromosomes. Science. 2001;292:1151–1153. doi: 10.1126/science.1060011. PubMed DOI

Öhman A., Flykt A., Esteves F. Emotion drives attention: detecting the snake in the grass. J. Exp. Psychol. Gen. 2001;130:466. doi: 10.1037/0096-3445.130.3.466. PubMed DOI

Flykt A., Caldara R. Tracking fear in snake and spider fearful participants during visual search: A multi-response domain study. Cogn. Emot. 2006;20:1075–1091. doi: 10.1080/02699930500381405. DOI

Soares S.C., Lindström B., Esteves F., Öhman A. The hidden snake in the grass: Superior detection of snakes in challenging attentional conditions. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e114724. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0114724. PubMed DOI PMC

Soares S.C., Esteves F., Lundqvist D., Öhman A. Some animal specific fears are more specific than others: Evidence from attention and emotion measures. Behav. Res. Ther. 2009;47:1032–1042. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2009.07.022. PubMed DOI

Soares S.C. The lurking snake in the grass: Interference of snake stimuli in visually taxing conditions. Evol. Psychol. 2012;10 doi: 10.1177/147470491201000202. PubMed DOI

Van Strien J.W., Eijlers R., Franken IH A., Huijding J. Snake pictures draw more early attention than spider pictures in non-phobic women: Evidence from event-related brain potentials. Biol. Psychol. 2014;96:150–157. doi: 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2013.12.014. PubMed DOI

Isbell L.A. Snakes as agents of evolutionary change in primate brains. J. Hum. Evol. 2006;51:1–35. doi: 10.1016/j.jhevol.2005.12.012. PubMed DOI

LoBue V., DeLoache J.S. Detecting the snake in the grass: Attention to fear-relevant stimuli by adults and young children. Psychol. Sci. 2008;19:284–289. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02081.x. PubMed DOI

Öhman A., Soares S.C., Juth P., Lindström B., Esteves F. Evolutionary derived modulations of attention to two common fear stimuli: Serpents and hostile humans. J. Cogn. Psychol. 2012;24:17–32. doi: 10.1080/20445911.2011.629603. DOI

Van Le Q., Isbell L.A., Matsumoto J., Nguyen M., Hori E., Maior R.S., Nishijo H. Pulvinar neurons reveal neurobiological evidence of past selection for rapid detection of snakes. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2013;110:19000–19005. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1312648110. PubMed DOI PMC

Baynes-Rock M. Human perceptual and phobic biases for snakes: A review of the experimental evidence. Anthrozoös. 2017;30:5–18. doi: 10.1080/08927936.2017.1270584. DOI

Shibasaki M., Kawai N. Rapid detection of snakes by Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata): An evolutionarily predisposed visual system. J. Comp. Psychol. 2009;123:131–135. doi: 10.1037/a0015095. PubMed DOI

Kawai N., Koda H. Japanese monkeys (Macaca fuscata) quickly detect snakes but not spiders: Evolutionary origins of fear-relevant animals. J. Comp. Psychol. 2016;130:299–303. doi: 10.1037/com0000032. PubMed DOI

Bjerke T., Ødegårdstuen T.S., Kaltenborn B.P. Attitudes toward animals among Norwegian children and adolescents: Species preferences. Anthrozoös. 1998;11:227–235. doi: 10.2752/089279398787000544. DOI

Prokop P., Tunnicliffe S.D. Disgusting" Animals: Primary School Children’s Attitudes and Myths of Bats and Spiders. Euras. J. Math. Sci. Technol. Educ. 2008;4 doi: 10.12973/ejmste/75309. DOI

Randler C., Hummel E., Prokop P. Practical work at school reduces disgust and fear of unpopular animals. Soc. Anim. 2012;20:61–74. doi: 10.1163/156853012X614369. DOI

Polák J., Rádlová S., Janovcová M., Flegr J., Landová E., Frynta D. Scary and nasty beasts: A factor analysis and the role of fear and disgust in the perception of common phobic animals. Brit. J. Psychol. Under Review. PubMed

Reese A.M. Reptiles as food. Sci. Month. 1917;5:545–550.

Klemens M.W., Thorbjarnarson J.B. Reptiles as a food resource. Biodivers. Conserv. 1995;4:281–298. doi: 10.1007/BF00055974. DOI

Teachman B.A., Gregg A.P., Woody S.R. Implicit associations for fear-relevant stimuli among individuals with snake and spider fears. J. Abnormal Psychol. 2001;110:226. doi: 10.1037/0021-843X.110.2.226. PubMed DOI

Wikström J., Lundh L.G., Westerlund J., Högman L. Preattentive bias for snake words in snake phobia? Behav. Res. Ther. 2004;42:949–970. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2003.07.002. PubMed DOI

Thornhill R. Darwinian aesthetics informs traditional aesthetics. In: Voland E., Grammar K., editors. Evolutionary Aesthetics. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2003. pp. 9–35.

Geldart S., Maurer D., Carney K. Effects of eye size on adults’ aesthetic ratings of faces and 5-month-olds’ looking times. Perception. 1999;28:361–374. doi: 10.1068/p2885. PubMed DOI

Richards R. A new aesthetic for environmental awareness: Chaos theory, the beauty of nature, and our broader humanistic identity. J. Hum. Psychol. 2001;41:59–95. doi: 10.1177/0022167801412006. DOI

Jacobsen T., Schubotz R.I., Höfel L., Cramon DY V. Brain correlates of aesthetic judgment of beauty. Neuroimage. 2006;29:276–285. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2005.07.010. PubMed DOI

Woods B. Beauty and the beast: Preferences for animals in Australia. J. Tour. Stud. 2000;11:25.

Kühn S., Gallinat J. The neural correlates of subjective pleasantness. Neuroimage. 2012;61:289–294. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2012.02.065. PubMed DOI

Frynta D., Marešová J., Řeháková-Petrů M., Šklíba J., Šumbera R., Krása A. Cross-cultural agreement in perception of animal beauty: Boid snakes viewed by people from five continents. Hum. Ecol. 2011;39:829–834. doi: 10.1007/s10745-011-9447-2. DOI

Landová E., Bakhshaliyeva N., Janovcová M., Peléšková Š., Suleymanova M., Polák J., Frynta D. Association between fear and beauty evaluation of snakes: Cross-cultural findings. Front. Psychol. 2018;9:333. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00333. PubMed DOI PMC

Bitgood S., Patterson D. Principles of exhibit design. Visit. Behav. 1987;2:4–6.

Balmford A. Separating fact from artifact in analyses of zoo visitor preferences. Conserv. Biol. 2000;14:1193–1195. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.2000.99078.x. DOI

Sommer R. Semantic profiles of zoos and their animals. Anthrozoös. 2008;21:237–244. doi: 10.2752/175303708X332044. DOI

Moss A., Esson M. Visitor interest in zoo animals and the implications for collection planning and zoo education programmes. Zoo Biol. 2010;29:715–731. doi: 10.1002/zoo.20316. PubMed DOI

Czech B., Krausman P.R., Borkhataria R. Social construction, political power, and the allocation of benefits to endangered species. Conserv. Biol. 1998;12:1103–1112. doi: 10.1046/j.1523-1739.1998.97253.x. DOI

Stokes D.L. Things we like: Human preferences among similar organisms and implications for conservation. Hum. Ecol. 2007;35:361–369. doi: 10.1007/s10745-006-9056-7. DOI

Martín-López B., Montes C., Benayas J. The non-economic motives behind the willingness to pay for biodiversity conservation. Biol. Conserv. 2007;139:67–82. doi: 10.1016/j.biocon.2007.06.005. DOI

Frynta D., Marešová J., Landová E., Lišková S., Šimková O., Tichá I., Fuchs R. Are Animals in Zoos Rather Conspicuous than Endangered? Nova Science Publishers; New York, NY, USA: 2010.

Marešová J., Frynta D. Noah’s Ark is full of common species attractive to humans: The case of boid snakes in zoos. Ecol. Econ. 2008;64:554–558. doi: 10.1016/j.ecolecon.2007.03.012. DOI

Dietz J.M., Dietz L.A., Nagagata E.Y. Creative Conservation. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 1994. The effective use of flagship species for conservation of biodiversity: The example of lion tamarins in Brazil; pp. 32–49.

Walpole M.J., Leader-Williams N. Tourism and flagship species in conservation. Biodiv. Conserv. 2002;11:543–547. doi: 10.1023/A:1014864708777. DOI

Pyron R.A., Burbrink F.T., Wiens J.J. A phylogeny and revised classification of Squamata, including 4161 species of lizards and snakes. BMC Evol. Biol. 2013;13:93. doi: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-93. PubMed DOI PMC

Likert R.A. A technique for the development of attitudes. Arch. Psychol. 1932;140:5–55.

McGraw K.O., Wong S.P. Forming inferences about some intraclass correlation coefficients. Psychol. Methods. 1996;1:30. doi: 10.1037/1082-989X.1.1.30. DOI

Hallgren K.A. Computing inter-rater reliability for observational data: An overview and tutorial. Tutor. Quant. Methods Psychol. 2002;8:23. doi: 10.20982/tqmp.08.1.p023. PubMed DOI PMC

R Development Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2010.

StatSoft Inc. Statistica (Data Analysis Software System), Version 9.1. [(accessed on 17 March 2019)]; Available online: http://www.statsoft.com/

Shrout P.E., Fleiss J.L. Intraclass correlations: Uses in assessing rater reliability. Psychol. Bull. 1979;86:420. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.86.2.420. PubMed DOI

Öhman A. Of snakes and faces: An evolutionary perspective on the psychology of fear. Scand. J. Psychol. 2009;50:543–552. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9450.2009.00784.x. PubMed DOI

Silva A. Dangerous snakes, deadly snakes and medically important snakes. J. Venom. Anim. Toxins Incl. Trop. Dis. 2013;19:26. doi: 10.1186/1678-9199-19-26. PubMed DOI PMC

Ducey S.D., Cooper J.S., Wadman M.C. Bitten by a Dragon. Wild. Environ. Med. 2016;27:291–293. doi: 10.1016/j.wem.2016.02.009. PubMed DOI

Pittenger J.B. Body proportions as information for age and cuteness: Animals in illustrated children’s books. Attent. Perc. Psychophys. 1990;48:124–130. doi: 10.3758/BF03207078. PubMed DOI

Masataka N., Hayakawa S., Kawai N. Human young children as well as adults demonstrate superior rapid snake detection when typical striking posture is displayed by the snake. PLoS ONE. 2010;5:e15122. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0015122. PubMed DOI PMC

Bar M., Neta M. Humans prefer curved visual objects. Psychol. Sci. 2006;17:645–648. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2006.01759.x. PubMed DOI

Bar M., Neta M. Visual elements of subjective preference modulate amygdala activation. Neuropsychologia. 2007;45:2191–2200. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2007.03.008. PubMed DOI PMC

Wegener J.E., Swoboda S., Hawlitschek O., Franzen M., Wallach V., Vences M., Glaw F. Morphological variation and taxonomic reassessment of the endemic Malagasy blind snake family Xenotyphlopidae. Spixiana. 2013;36:269–282.

Prokop P., Fančovičová J. The association between disgust, danger and fear of macroparasites and human behaviour. Acta Ethol. 2010;13:57–62. doi: 10.1007/s10211-010-0075-4. DOI

Kuplen M. Disgust and ugliness: A kantian perspective. Cont. Aesthet. 2011;9:10.

Korsmeyer C. Disgust and Aesthetics. Philos. Compass. 2012;7:753–761. doi: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00522.x. DOI

Rádlová S., Janovcová M., Polák J., Landová E., Frynta D. Emoce vyvolané zvířaty I: krásaa estetické preference (Emotion awared animals I: beauty and aesthetic preference) E-Psychologie. 2018;12:35–50. doi: 10.29364/epsy.324. DOI

Landová E., Marešová J., Šimková O., Cikánová V., Frynta D. Human responses to live snakes and their photographs: Evaluation of beauty and fear of the king snakes. J. Environ. Psychol. 2012;32:69–77. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2011.10.005. DOI

Davey G.C. Self-reported fears to common indigenous animals in an adult UK population: The role of disgust sensitivity. Brit. J. Psychol. 1994;85:541–554. doi: 10.1111/j.2044-8295.1994.tb02540.x. PubMed DOI

Why Are Some Snakes More Terrifying and What Is Behind the Fear?

Hooding cobras can get ahead of other snakes in the ability to evoke human fear

Are vipers prototypic fear-evoking snakes? A cross-cultural comparison of Somalis and Czechs

The bigger the threat, the longer the gaze? A cross-cultural study of Somalis and Czechs

Animals evoking fear in the Cradle of Humankind: snakes, scorpions, and large carnivores

Emotions triggered by live arthropods shed light on spider phobia

Specificity of spiders among fear- and disgust-eliciting arthropods: Spiders are special, but phobics not so much

The Ultimate List of the Most Frightening and Disgusting Animals: Negative Emotions Elicited by Animals in Central European Respondents

Venomous snakes elicit stronger fear than nonvenomous ones: Psychophysiological response to snake images

Emotional Reaction to Fear- and Disgust-Evoking Snakes: Sensitivity and Propensity in Snake-Fearful Respondents

Human evaluation of amphibian species: a comparison of disgust and beauty