Persistence of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in Field Soil in Central Europe
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
Grantová podpora
No. CZ.02.1.01/0.0/0.0/16_025/0007314
European Regional Development Fund
IGA-ZF/2019-DP004
Internal Grant Agency of Mendel University in Brno
PubMed
33805636
PubMed Central
PMC8001034
DOI
10.3390/microorganisms9030591
PII: microorganisms9030591
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- PCR, Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris, brassicas, detection, nested real-time PCR, persistence, soil,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (Xcc) is a bacterium that causes black rot of crucifers. The greatest losses of brassica crop production usually result from seed-borne infection, but carry-over of inoculum in field soil may also be possible. The aim of this study was to monitor persistence of Xcc in field soil in central Europe using a conventional PCR assay with hrpF primers and a two-step nested real-time PCR assay using Zur primers. The work has demonstrated that nested real-time PCR can be used to improve the analytical sensitivity for detection of Xcc in soil compared to conventional PCR, and that Xcc may persist in soil for up to two years following an infected brassica crop in central European climatic conditions.
Department of Fruit Science Mendel University in Brno Valticka 337 691 44 Lednice Czech Republic
Mendeleum Institute of Genetics Mendel University in Brno Valticka 334 691 44 Lednice Czech Republic
Plant Health Solutions Ltd 20 Beauchamp Road Warwick CV34 5NU UK
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Williams P.H. Black rot: A continuing threat to world crucifers. Plant Dis. 1980;64:736–742. doi: 10.1094/PD-64-736. DOI
Agrios G.N. Plant Pathology. 5th ed. Department of Plant Pathology, University of Florida; Gainesville, FL, USA: 2005. pp. 653–654.
Alvarez A.M. Mechanisms of Resistance to Plant Diseases. Springer; Dordrecht, The Netherlands: 2000. Black rot of crucifers; pp. 21–52.
Mansfield J., Genin S., Magori S., Citovsky V., Sriariyanum M., Ronald P., Dow M.A., Verdier V., Beer S.V., Machado M.A., et al. Top 10 plant pathogenic bacteria in molecular plant pathology. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2012;13:614–629. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00804.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Vicente J.G., Holub E.B. Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris (cause of black rot of crucifers) in the genomic era is still a worldwide threat to brassica crops. Mol. Plant Pathol. 2013;14:2–18. doi: 10.1111/j.1364-3703.2012.00833.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Cook A.A., Walker J.C., Larson R.H. Studies on the disease cycle of black rot of crucifers. Phytopathology. 1952;42:162.
Schaad N.W., Sitterly W.R., Humaydan H. Relationship of incidence of seedborne Xanthomonas campestris to black rot of crucifers. Plant Dis. 1980;64:91. doi: 10.1094/PD-64-91. DOI
Schaad N.W., Dianese J.C. Cruciferous weeds as sources of inoculum of Xanthomonas campestris in black rot of crucifers. Phytopathology. 1981;71:1215–1220. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-71-1215. DOI
Schaad N.W., White W.C. Survival of Xanthomonas campestris in soil. Phytopathology. 1974;64:1518–1520. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-64-1518. DOI
Alvarez A.M., Cho J.J. Black rot of cabbage in Hawaii: Inoculum source and disease incidence. Phytopathology. 1978;68:1456–1459. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-68-1456. DOI
Köhl J., Vlaswinkel M., Groenenboom-de Haas B.H., Kastelein P., Van Hoof R.A., Van der Wolf J.M., Krijger M. Survival of pathogens of Brussels sprouts (Brassica oleracea Gemmifera Group) in crop residues. Plant Pathol. 2011;60:661–670. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2010.02422.x. DOI
Schultz T., Gabrielson R.L. Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in Western Washington crucifer seed fields: Occurrence and survival. Phytopathology. 1986;76:1306–1309. doi: 10.1094/Phyto-76-1306. DOI
Dzhalilov F.S., Tiwari R.D. Soil and cabbage plant debris as infection sources of black rot. Arch. Phytopathol. Pflanzenschutz. 1995;29:383–386. doi: 10.1080/03235409509383130. DOI
Zhao Y., Damicone J.P., Bender C.L. Detection, survival, and sources of inoculum for bacterial diseases of leafy crucifers in Oklahoma. Plant. Dis. 2002;86:883–888. doi: 10.1094/PDIS.2002.86.8.883. PubMed DOI
Silva J.C., Silva Júnior T.A.F., Soman J.M., Tomasini T.D., Sartori M.M.P., Maringoni A.C. Survival of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in the phyllosphere and rhizosphere of weeds. Plant. Pathol. 2017;66:1517–1526. doi: 10.1111/ppa.12682. DOI
Koenraadt H., Van Bilsen J.G.P.M., Roberts S.J. Comparative test of four semi-selective agar media for the detection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in brassica seeds. Seed Sci. Technol. 2005;33:115–125. doi: 10.15258/sst.2005.33.1.12. DOI
Berg T., Tesoriero L., Hailstones D.L. PCR-based detection of Xanthomonas campestris pathovars in Brassica seed. Plant. Pathol. 2005;54:416–427. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-3059.2005.01186.x. DOI
Eichmeier A., Penazova E., Pokluda R., Vicente J.G. Detection of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris through a real-time PCR assay targeting the Zur gene and comparison with detection targeting the hrpF gene. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 2019;155:891–902. doi: 10.1007/s10658-019-01820-0. DOI
Vicente J.G., Conway J., Roberts S.J., Taylor J.D. Identification and origin of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris races and related pathovars. Phytopathology. 2001;91:492–499. doi: 10.1094/PHYTO.2001.91.5.492. PubMed DOI
Walkley A., Black I.A. An examination of the Degtjareff method for determining soil organic matter, and a proposed modification of the chromic acid titration method. Soil Sci. 1934;37:29–38. doi: 10.1097/00010694-193401000-00003. DOI
Klika J., Novak V., Gregor A. Exercise on Phytocenology, Ecology, Climatology and soil Science. ČSAV; Prague, Czech Republic: 1954.
Jandak J., Pokorny E., Prax A. Půdoznalství. 3rd ed. Mendelova Univerzita v Brně; Brno, Czech Republic: 2010.
Zaujec A., Chlpik J., Nadassky J., Szombathova N., Tobiasova E. Pedológia a Základy Geológie. Slovak University of Agriculture; Nitra, Slovakia: 2009.
Eichmeier A., Baranek M., Pidra M. Analysis of genetic diversity and phylogeny of partial coat protein domain in Czech and Italian GFLV isolates. Plant. Prot. Sci. 2011;46:145–148. doi: 10.17221/10/2010-PPS. DOI
Eichmeier A., Cechova J., Penazova E. Genetic diversity of partial hrpF and Zur genes in populations of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in Brassica oleracea convar. capitata in the Czech Republic. Acta Hortic. 2015;1105:180–188. doi: 10.17660/ActaHortic.2015.1105.26. DOI
Cochran W.G. Estimation of bacterial densities by means of the “most probable number”. Biometrics. 1950;6:105–116. doi: 10.2307/3001491. PubMed DOI
Nielsen K.M., Johnsen P.J., Bensasson D., Daffonchio D. Release and persistence of extracellular DNA in the environment. Environ. Biosaf. Res. 2007;6:37–53. doi: 10.1051/ebr:2007031. PubMed DOI
England L.S., Holmes S.B., Trevors J.T. Persistence of viruses and DNA in soil. World J. Microbiol. Biotechnol. 1997;14:163–169. doi: 10.1023/A:1008865609698. DOI
Romanowski G., Lorenz M.G., Sayler G., Wackernagel W. Persistence of free plasmid DNA in soil monitored by various methods, including a transformation assay. Appl. Environ. Microbiol. 1992;58:3012–3019. doi: 10.1128/AEM.58.9.3012-3019.1992. PubMed DOI PMC
Wang F., Che R., Xu Z., Wang Y., Cui X. Assessing soil extracellular DNA decomposition dynamics through plasmid amendment coupled with real-time PCR. J. Soils Sediments. 2019;19:91–96. doi: 10.1007/s11368-018-2176-z. DOI
Kocks C.G., Ruissen M.A., Zadoks J.C., Duijkers M.G. Survival and extinction of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris in soil. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 1998;104:911–923. doi: 10.1023/A:1008685832604. DOI
Júnior T.S., Silva J.C., Gonçalves R.M., Soman J.M., Passos J.R., Maringoni A.C. Survival of Xanthomonas campestris pv. campestris associated with soil and cauliflower crop debris under Brazilian conditions. Eur. J. Plant. Pathol. 2020;156:399–411. doi: 10.1007/s10658-019-01888-8. DOI
Roberts S.J. Personal Communication. Plant Health Solutions Ltd.; Warwick, UK: 2020.
Pinches A., Pallent L.J. Rate and yield relationships in the production of xanthan gum by batch fermentations using complex and chemically defined growth media. Biotechnol. Bioeng. 1986;28:1484–1496. doi: 10.1002/bit.260281006. PubMed DOI
Max N., Wolf K., Spike B., Thiel E., Keilholz U. Minimal Residual Disease in Melanoma. Springer; Berlin/Heidelberg, Germany: 2001. Nested quantitative real time PCR for detection of occult tumor cells; pp. 25–31. PubMed
Takahashi T., Nakayama T. Novel technique of quantitative nested real-time PCR assay for Mycobacterium tuberculosis DNA. J. Clin. Microbiol. 2006;44:1029–1039. doi: 10.1128/JCM.44.3.1029-1039.2006. PubMed DOI PMC
Costa J., Mafra I., Kuchta T., Oliveira M.B.P. Single-tube nested real-time PCR as a new highly sensitive approach to trace hazelnut. J. Agric. Food Chem. 2012;60:8103–8110. doi: 10.1021/jf302898z. PubMed DOI
Zhang Y., Dai X., Ren Z., Lin H., Cao W., Ye X. A novel nested real-time polymerase chain reaction for Treponema pallidum DNA in syphilis biospecimens. Sex. Transm. Dis. 2019;46:41–46. doi: 10.1097/OLQ.0000000000000908. PubMed DOI
Ridout M.S. Three-stage designs for seed testing experiments. J. R Stat. Soc. Ser. C—Appl. Stat. 1995;44:153–162. doi: 10.2307/2986341. DOI