This paper aims to address the information gap on the influence of socio-demographic factors on access and utilization of Assistive Technology (AT) among children with disabilities in Malawi. Thus, it contributes towards the realization of the recommendations of the UN Convention on the Rights of Persons with disabilities and the development of a framework for creating an effective national AT policy. The paper used two statistically matched datasets, namely, the 2017 survey on Living conditions among persons with disabilities in Malawi and the 2015-16 Malawi Demographic and Health survey. Logistic regression and structural equation modeling techniques were utilized to assess the influence of socio-demographic factors on the use of AT among children with disabilities. The results indicate that there is a high level of unmet need for AT among young children aged 2 to 9 and those living in urban areas. The results further indicate that children with multiple disabilities have lower odds (OR = 0.924) of using AT for personal mobility compared to children with a single functional difficulty. These results entail that AT needs for children with multiple disabilities are not adequately addressed. Therefore, when developing policies on AT, younger children and those with multiple disabilities need to be specifically targeted.

Assisting Living and Learning Institute Department of Psychology Maynooth University W23 F2K8 Maynooth Ireland

Centre for Social Research University of Malawi Zomba Malawi

Olomouc University Social Health Institute Palacký University 779 00 Olomouc Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Eide A.H., Mannan H., Khogali M., Van Rooy G., Swartz L., Munthali A., Hem K.-G., MacLachlan M., Dyrstad K. Perceived barriers for accessing health services among individuals with disability in four African countries. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0125915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0125915. PubMed DOI PMC

Parette P., Scherer M. Assistive technology use and stigma. Educ. Train. Dev. Disabil. 2004;1:217–226.

World Health Organization Assistive Technology. [(accessed on 25 August 2020)]; Available online: https://www.who.int/news-room/fact-sheets/detail/assistive-technology.

Khasnabis C., Mirza Z., MacLachlan M. Opening the GATE to inclusion for people with disabilities. Lancet. 2015;10010:2229–2230. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01093-4. PubMed DOI

Tebbutt E., Brodmann R., Borg J., MacLachlan M., Khasnabis C., Horvath R. Assistive products and the sustainable development goals (SDGs) Glob. Health. 2016;12:79. doi: 10.1186/s12992-016-0220-6. PubMed DOI PMC

Mji G., Edusei A. An introduction to a special issue on the role of assistive technology in social inclusion of persons with disabilities in Africa: Outcome of the fifth African Network for Evidence-to-Action in Disability conference. Afr. J. Disabil. 2019;8 doi: 10.4102/ajod.v8i0.681. PubMed DOI PMC

Osam J.A., Opoku M.P., Dogbe J.A., Nketsia W., Hammond C. The use of assistive technologies among children with disabilities: The perception of parents of children with disabilities in Ghana. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2019;8:1–8. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2019.1673836. PubMed DOI

Ndiku Makewa L., Mutie J. Assistive Technology for Managing Learners with Special Needs in Makueni County, Kenya. JRIIE. 2018;2

Abiatal L.K., Howard G.R. Constructivist Assistive Technology in a Mathematics Classroom for the Deaf: Going Digital at a Rural Namibian Primary School; Proceedings of the South African Institute of Computer Scientists and Information Technologists; Skukuza, South Africa. 17–18 September 2019; pp. 1–9.

Borg J.B.-B., Khasnabis C., Mitra G., Myhill W., Raja D. Assistive Technology for Children with Disabilities: Creating Opportunities for Education, Inclusion and Participation—A Discussion Pape. WHO; Geneva, Switzerland: 2015.

Matter R.A., Eide A.H. Access to assistive technology in two Southern African countries. Bmc Health Serv. Res. 2018;18:1–10. doi: 10.1186/s12913-018-3605-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Mwaijande V.T. Access to Education and Assistive Devices for Children with Physical Disabilities in Tanzania. Oslo and Akershus University College; Oslo, Norway: 2014.

Adebisi R.O., Liman N.A., Longpoe P.K. Using Assistive Technology in Teaching Children with Learning Disabilities in the 21st Century. J. Educ. Pract. 2015;6:14–20.

Eide A.H., Munthali A. Living conditions among persons with disabilities in Malawi. Natl. Represent. Surv. 2017 doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.19303.09128. DOI

Loeb M., Eide A.H. Living Conditions among People with Activity Limitations in Malawi. A National Representative Study. SINTEF; Trondheim, Norway: 2004. SINTEF Rapport.

Visagie S., Eide A.H., Mannan H., Schneider M., Swartz L., Mji G., Munthali A., Khogali M., van Rooy G., Hem K.-G. A description of assistive technology sources, services and outcomes of use in a number of African settings. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2017;12:705–712. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1244293. PubMed DOI

Smith E.M., Ebuenyi I.D., Kafumba J., Jamali-Phiri M., MacLachlan M., Munthali A. An overview of assistive technology products and services provided in Malawi. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2020;24:1–5. PubMed

Ebuenyi I.D., Smith E.M., Kafumba J., Jamili M.Z., Munthali A., MacLachlan M. Implementation of the Assistive Product List (APL) in Malawi through development of appropriate policy and systems: An Action Research Protocol. BMJ Open. 2020;10:e040281. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-040281. PubMed DOI PMC

Jamali-Phiri M., Kafumba J.A., MacLachlan M., Smith E.M., Ebuenyi I.D., Eide A.H., Munthali A. Addressing data deficiencies in assistive technology by using statistical matching methodology: A case study from Malawi. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2020;9:1–15. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2020.1861118. PubMed DOI

NSONM I. Malawi Demographic and Health Survey 2015–2016. National Statistical Office; Rockville, MD, USA: 2017.

D’Orazio M. Statistical Matching and Imputation of Survey Data with the Package StatMatch for the R Environment. R Package Vignette. [(accessed on 25 August 2020)];2011 Available online: Http://www.Cros-Portal.Eu/Sites/Default/Files//Stat._Matching__Statmatch.Pdf.

Moriarity C., Scheuren F. Statistical matching: A paradigm for assessing the uncertainty in the procedure. J. Off. Stat. 2001;17:407.

Donatiello G., D‘Orazio M., Frattarola D., Rizzi A., Scanu M., Spaziani M. Statistical matching of income and consumption expenditures. Int. J. Econ. Sci. 2014;3:50.

D’Orazio M. Statistical Matching and Imputation of Survey Data with StatMatch. Italian National Institute of Statistics; Rome, Italy: 2016.

D’Orazio M., Di Zio M., Scanu M. Old and new approaches in statistical matching when samples are drawn with complex survey designs; Proceedings of the 45th Riunione Scientifica della Societa’Italiana di Statistica; Padova, Italy. 15–18 June 2010; pp. 16–18.

Hosmer D.W., Lemeshow S. Applied Logistic Regression. Wiley; New York, NY, USA: 2000.

Mitchell M.N. Interpreting and Visualizing Regression Models Using Stata. Volume 5 Stata Press; College Station, TX, USA: 2012.

Kaye H.S., Yeager P., Reed M. Disparities in usage of assistive technology among people with disabilities. Assist. Technol. 2008;20:194–203. doi: 10.1080/10400435.2008.10131946. PubMed DOI

Zimmer Z., Chappell N.L. Mobility restriction and the use of devices among seniors. J. Aging Health. 1994;6:185–208. doi: 10.1177/089826439400600204. DOI

Yeung K.-T., Lin C.-H., Teng Y.-L., Chen F.-F., Lou S.-Z., Chen C.-L. Use of and self-perceived need for assistive devices in individuals with disabilities in Taiwan. PLoS ONE. 2016;11:e0152707. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152707. PubMed DOI PMC

Matter R., Harniss M., Oderud T., Borg J., Eide A.H. Assistive technology in resource-limited environments: A scoping review. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2017;12:105–114. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2016.1188170. PubMed DOI

Lersilp S., Putthinoi S., Lersilp T. Facilitators and barriers of assistive technology and learning environment for children with special needs. Occup. Ther. Int. 2018;2018:3705946. doi: 10.1155/2018/3705946. PubMed DOI PMC

Copley J., Ziviani J. Barriers to the use of assistive technology for children with multiple disabilities. Occup. Ther. Int. 2004;11:229–243. doi: 10.1002/oti.213. PubMed DOI

MacLachlan M., Scherer M.J. Systems thinking for assistive technology: A commentary on the GREAT summit. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2018;13:492–496. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1472306. PubMed DOI

MacLachlan M., Banes D., Bell D., Borg J., Donnelly B., Fembek M., Ghosh R., Gowran R.J., Hannay E., Hiscock D. Assistive technology policy: A position paper from the first global research, innovation, and education on assistive technology (GREAT) summit. Disabil. Rehabil. Assist. Technol. 2018;13:454–466. doi: 10.1080/17483107.2018.1468496. PubMed DOI