Safety of cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of atrial fibrillation: First European results from the cryo AF Global Registry
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie
Grantová podpora
Medtronic
PubMed
33813746
DOI
10.1111/pace.14237
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- atrial fibrillation, catheter ablation, cryoballoon, predictors, safety,
- MeSH
- fibrilace síní chirurgie MeSH
- fluoroskopie MeSH
- kryochirurgie metody MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- recidiva MeSH
- registrace MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
BACKGROUND: Cryoballoon ablation for the treatment of patients with atrial fibrillation (AF) has been utilized in Europe for >15 years. OBJECTIVES: Report patient and procedural characteristics that influence the safety of cryoablation for the treatment of AF. METHODS: Patients enrolled in the prospective, multicenter Cryo AF Global Registry were treated at 38 European centers. Freedom from a ≥30s episode of AF/atrial flutter (AFL)/atrial tachycardia (AT) at 12-months and serious complications were analyzed. Univariate and multivariable models identified baseline patient and procedural characteristics that predicted a procedure-related complication. RESULTS: Of the 1418 subjects who completed an index procedure, the cohort was 62 ± 11 years of age, 37.7% female, and 72.2% paroxysmal AF (PAF). The mean procedure, left atrial dwell, and fluoroscopy times were 81 ± 34, 54 ± 25, and 14 ± 13 min, respectively. Among the 766 patients with 12-month follow-up, freedom from a ≥30 s AF/AFL/AT recurrence was 83.3% (95% CI: 79.8%-86.3%) and 71.6% (95% CI: 64.6%-77.4%) in patients with PAF and persistent AF. The serious procedure- and device-related adverse event rates were 4.7% and 2.0%. No baseline patient characteristic independently predicted a procedure-related adverse event; however, prolonged procedure duration (OR = 1.01 [95% CI: 1.00-1.01]), use of general anesthesia (OR = 1.71 [95% CI: 1.01-2.92]), and delivery of a cavotricuspid isthmus line (OR = 3.04 [95% CI: 1.01-9.20]) were each independently associated with the occurrence of a serious procedural safety event (all p < .05). CONCLUSIONS: Cryoballoon ablation is safe and effective in real-world use across a broad cohort of patients with AF.
Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien Frankfurt Germany
Centre Hospitalier Régional de la Citadelle Liège Belgium
Department of Cardiology Kepler University Hospital Linz Linz Austria
Gottsegen György Országos Kardiológiai Intézet Budapest Hungary
Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital Liverpool UK
Med Klinik 2 Universtätsklinikum Schleswig Holstein Campus Lübeck
Medical University of Łódź Central University Hospital Łódź Poland
Medtronic Inc Minneapolis Minnesota USA
Na Homolce Hospital Prague Czech Republic
Sana Klinikum Berlin Lichtenberg Klinik für Innere Medizin 2 Kardiologie Berlin Germany
Východoslovenský ústav srdcovych a cievnych chorôb a s Košice Slovakia
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Packer DL, Kowal RC, Wheelan KR, et al. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: first results of the North American Arctic Front (STOP AF) pivotal trial. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013;61(16):1713-1723.
Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, et al. Cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. N Engl J Med. 2016;374(23):2235-2245.
Su WW, Reddy VY, Bhasin K, et al. Cryoballoon ablation of pulmonary veins for persistent atrial fibrillation: results from the multicenter STOP Persistent AF trial. Heart Rhythm. 2020;S1547-5271(20):30603-2.
Boveda S, Metzner A, Nguyen DQ, et al. Single-procedure outcomes and quality-of-life improvement 12 months post-cryoballoon ablation in persistent atrial fibrillation: results from the multicenter CRYO4PERSISTENT AF trial. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2018;4(11):1440-1447.
Hoffmann E, Straube F, Wegscheider K, et al. Outcomes of cryoballoon or radiofrequency ablation in symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent atrial fibrillation. Europace. 2019;21(9):1313-1324.
Steinbeck G, Sinner MF, Lutz M, Müller-Nurasyid M, Kääb S, Reinecke H. Incidence of complications related to catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation and atrial flutter: a nationwide in-hospital analysis of administrative data for Germany in 2014. Eur Heart J. 2018;39(45):4020-4029.
Lee WC, Fang HY, Chen HC, et al. Additional cavotricuspid isthmus block ablation may not improve the outcome of atrial fibrillation ablation. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2019;42(11):1421-1428.
Romero J, Patel K, Briceno D, et al. Cavotricuspid isthmus line in patients undergoing catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation with or without history of typical atrial flutter: a meta-analysis. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(8):1987-1995.
Hindricks G, Potpara T, Dagres N, et al. ESC Scientific Document Group. 2020 ESC Guidelines for the diagnosis and management of atrial fibrillation developed in collaboration with the European Association of Cardio-Thoracic Surgery (EACTS). Eur Heart J. 2020;42(5):373-498.
Wasserlauf J, Knight BP, Li Z, et al. Moderate sedation reduces lab time compared to general anesthesia during cryoballoon ablation for af without compromising safety or long-term efficacy. Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2016;39(12):1359-1365.
Wasserlauf J, Kaplan RM, Walega DR, et al. Patient-reported outcomes after cryoballoon ablation are equivalent between moderate sedation and general anesthesia. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2020;31(7):1579-1584.
Kuck KH, Brugada J, Fürnkranz A, et al. Impact of female sex on clinical outcomes in the FIRE AND ICE trial of catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2018;11(5):e006204.
Samuel M, Almohammadi M, Tsadok MA, et al. Population-based evaluation of major adverse events after catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(12):1425-1433.
du Fay de Lavallaz J, Badertscher P, Kobori A, et al. Sex-specific efficacy and safety of cryoballoon versus radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation: An individual patient data meta-analysis. Heart Rhythm. 2020;17(8):1232-1240.
Michowitz Y, Rahkovich M, Oral H, et al. Effects of sex on the incidence of cardiac tamponade after catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: results from a worldwide survey in 34 943 atrial fibrillation ablation procedures. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2014;7(2):274-280.
Santangeli P, di Biase L, Pelargonio G, Natale A. Outcome of invasive electrophysiological procedures and gender: are males and females the same? J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2011;22:605-612.