Reading students' faces and their body language, checking their worksheets, and keeping eye contact is a key trait of teacher competence. The new technology of mobile eye-tracking provides researchers with possibilities to explore teaching from the viewpoint of teacher gaze, but also introduces many new method questions. This study had the primary aim to investigate teachers´ attention distribution over space: the number and durations of several types of their gazes, and how their gaze depends on the factors of students´ gender, achievement, and position in the classroom. Results show that teacher gaze was distributed unevenly across both space and time. Teachers looked at the most-watched students 3-8 times more often than at the least-watched ones. Students sitting in the first row and the middle section received significantly more gaze than those sitting outside this zone. All three teachers made more single gaze visits - looking at the students but making no eye contact - than mutual gazes or student material gazes. The three teachers' gaze distribution also varied substantially from lesson to lesson. Our results are important for understanding teacher behavior in real classrooms, but also point to the relevance of appropriate method design in future classroom studies with eye-tracking.

Department of Educational Sciences HUME Lab Experimental Humanities Laboratory Masaryk University Czech Republic

Institute for Research in School Education Masaryk University Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Adams, R., & Biddle, B. (1970). The classroom scene. Realities of teaching. Holt, Rinehart & Winston.

Andersen, J. F. (1979). Teacher Immediacy as a Predictor of Teaching Effectiveness. Annals of the International Communication Association, 3(1), 543–559. 10.1080/23808985.1979.11923782 DOI

Aukrust, V. G. V. (2008). Boys’ and girls’ conversational participation across four grade levels in Norwe-gian classrooms: Taking the floor or being given the floor? Gender and Education, 20(3), 237–252. 10.1080/09540250802000413 DOI

Bellù, J. G., & Liberati, P. Describing income in-equality: Theil index and entropy class indexes. FAO EASYPol. 2006;051. Available from: http://www.fao.org/docs/up/easypol/445/theil_index_051en.pdf

Birmingham, E., Bischof, W. F., & Kingstone, A. (2009). Get real! Resolving the debate about equivalent so-cial stimuli. Visual Cognition, 17(6-7), 904–924. 10.1080/13506280902758044 DOI

Blomberg, G., Stürmer, K., & Seidel, T. (2011). How pre-service teachers observe teaching on video: Ef-fects of viewers’ teaching subjects and the sub-ject of the video. Teaching and Teacher Education, 27(7), 1131–1140. 10.1016/j.tate.2011.04.008 DOI

Breed, G., & Colaiuta, V. (1974). Looking, blinking, and sitting: Nonverbal dynamics in the classroom. Journal of Communication, 24(2), 75–81. 10.1111/j.1460-2466.1974.tb00371.x PubMed DOI

Brophy, J. E., & Good, T. L. (1970). Teachers communication of differential expectations for childrens class-room performance: Some behavioral data. Journal of Educational Psychology, 61(5), 365–374. 10.1037/h0029908 DOI

Caproni, V., Levine, D., Oneal, E., Mcdonald, P., & Garwood, G. (1977). Seating Position, Instructors Eye Contact Availability, and Student Participation in a Small Seminar. The Journal of Social Psychology, 103(2), 315–316. 10.1080/00224545.1977.9713335 DOI

Cary, M. S. (1978). The Role of Gaze in the Initiation of Conversation. Social Psychology, 41(3), 269-271. 10.2307/3033565 DOI

Chaikin, A. L., Sigler, E., & Derlega, V. J. (1974). Nonverbal mediators of teacher expectancy effects. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 30(1), 144–149. 10.1037/h0036738 DOI

Chen, F. S., Minson, J. A., Schöne, M., & Heinrichs, M. (2013). In the eye of the beholder: Eye contact increases resistance to persuasion. Psychological Science, 24(11), 2254–2261. 10.1177/0956797613491968 PubMed DOI

Cortina, K. S., Miller, K. F., Mckenzie, R., & Epstein, A. (2015). Where Low and High Inference Data Converge: Validation of CLASS Assessment of Mathemat-ics Instruction Using Mobile Eye Tracking with Expert and Novice Teachers. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(2), 389–403. 10.1007/s10763-014-9610-5 DOI

Csibra, G., & Gergely, G. (2009). Natural pedagogy. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(4), 148–153. 10.1016/j.tics.2009.01.005 PubMed DOI

DeWall, C. N., & Maner, J. K. (2008). High Status Men (but Not Women) Capture the Eye of the Beholder. Evolutionary Psychology, 6(2), 147470490800600. 10.1177/147470490800600209 DOI

Dessus, P., Cosnefroy, O., & Luengo, V. (2016). “Keep Your Eyes on ‘em all!”: A Mobile Eye-Tracking Analysis of Teachers’ Sensitivity to Students. Adaptive and Adaptable Learning Lecture Notes in Computer Science.

Doherty-Sneddon, G., Bruce, V., Bonner, L., Longbotham, S., & Doyle, C. (2002). Development of gaze aversion as disengagement from visual information. Developmental Psychology, 38(3), 438–445. 10.1037/0012-1649.38.3.438 PubMed DOI

Doyle, W. (1977). Learning the Classroom Environment: An Ecological Analysis. Journal of Teacher Education, 28(6), 51–55. 10.1177/002248717702800616 DOI

Erden, F., & Wolfgang, C. (2004). An exploration of the differences in prekindergarten, kindergarten, and first grade teachers’ beliefs related to discipline when dealing with male and female students. Early Child Development and Care, 174(1), 3–11. 10.1080/0300443032000103098 DOI

Ergin, A., & Birol, C. (2005). Eğitimde iletişim. Anı Yayıncılık.

Exline, R. V., & Winters, L. C. (1965). Affective relations and mutual glances in dyads. In Tomkins S. & Izzard C. (Eds.),. Affect, Cognition and Personality (pp. 319–330). Springer International Publishing.

Falck-Ytter, T., Thorup, E., & Bölte, S. (2015). Brief report: Lack of processing bias for the objects other people attend to in 3-year-olds with autism. Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders, 45(6), 1897–1904. 10.1007/s10803-014-2278-4 PubMed DOI PMC

Feldman, R. S. (1976). Nonverbal disclosure of teacher deception and interpersonal affect. Journal of Educational Psychology, 68(6), 807–816. 10.1037/0022-0663.68.6.807 DOI

Foulsham, T., Cheng, J. T., Tracy, J. L., Henrich, J., & Kingstone, A. (2010). Gaze allocation in a dynamic situation: Effects of social status and speaking. Cognition, 117(3), 319–331. 10.1016/j.cognition.2010.09.003 PubMed DOI

Francis B. Boys, girls, and achievement ad-dressing the classroom issues. London: Routled-geFalmer; 2000.

Fry, R., & Smith, G. F. (1975). The Effects of Feedback and Eye Contact on Performance of a Digit-Coding Task. The Journal of Social Psychology, 96(1), 145–146. 10.1080/00224545.1975.9923275 DOI

Frymier, A. B. (1994). A model of immediacy in the classroom. Communication Quarterly, 42(2), 133–144. 10.1080/01463379409369922 DOI

Gallup, A. C., Hale, J. J., Sumpter, D. J. T., Garnier, S., Kacelnik, A., Krebs, J. R., & Couzin, I. D. (2012). Visual attention and the acquisition of information in human crowds. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 109(19), 7245–7250. 10.1073/pnas.1116141109 PubMed DOI PMC

Garrahy, D. A. (2001). Three Third-Grade Teachers Gen-der-Related Beliefs and Behavior. The Elementary School Journal, 102(1), 81–94. 10.1086/499694 DOI

Gerpott, F. H., Lehmann-Willenbrock, N., Silvis, J. D., & Vugt, M. V. (2018). In the eye of the beholder? An eye-tracking experiment on emergent leadership in team interactions. The Leadership Quarterly, 29(4), 523–532. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2017.11.003 DOI

Gibson, J. J., & Pick, A. D. (1963). Perception of another person’s looking behavior. The American Journal of Psychology, 76(3), 386–394. 10.2307/1419779 PubMed DOI

Glenberg, A. M., Schroeder, J. L., & Robertson, D. A. (1998). Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering. Memory & Cognition, 26(4), 651–658. 10.3758/BF03211385 PubMed DOI

Good, T. L., Sikes, J. N., & Brophy, J. E. (1973). Effects of teacher sex and student sex on classroom inter-action. Journal of Educational Psychology, 65(1), 74–87. 10.1037/h0034816 DOI

Good, T. L., Cooper, H. M., & Blakey, S. L. (1980). Classroom interaction as a function of teacher expectations, student sex, and time of year. Journal of Educational Psychology, 72(3), 378–385. 10.1037/0022-0663.72.3.378 DOI

Good, T. L., & Findley, M. J. (1985). Sex role expectations and achievement. In Dusek J. B. (Ed.),. Teacher ex-pectations (pp. 32–56). Erlbaum.

Good, T. L. (1997). Looking in classrooms. Longman.

Gower, R., & Walters, S. (1983). Teaching practice hand-book: a reference book for EFL teachers in training. Heinemann.

Hamlet, C. C., Axelrod, S., & Kuerschner, S. (1984). Eye contact as an antecedent to compliant behavior. Journal of Applied Behavior Analysis, 17(4), 553–557. 10.1901/jaba.1984.17-553 PubMed DOI PMC

Hartley, G., & Karinch, M. (2007). I Can Read You Like a Book: How to Spot the Messages and Emotions People Are Really Sending With Their Body Language. Career Press.

Hawkins, D. (2002). The informed vision: essays on learning and human nature. Algora Pub.

Helminen, T. M., Kaasinen, S. M., & Hietanen, J. K. (2011). Eye contact and arousal: The effects of stimulus duration. Biological Psychology, 88(1), 124–130. 10.1016/j.biopsycho.2011.07.002 PubMed DOI

Hietanen, J. K., Leppänen, J. M., Peltola, M. J., Linna-Aho, K., & Ruuhiala, H. J. (2008). Seeing direct and averted gaze activates the approach-avoidance motivational brain systems. Neuropsychologia, 46(9), 2423–2430. 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.02.029 PubMed DOI

Holland, E., Wolf, E. B., Looser, C., & Cuddy, A. (2017). Visual attention to powerful postures: People avert their gaze from nonverbal dominance displays. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 68, 60–67. 10.1016/j.jesp.2016.05.001 DOI

Holmqvist, K., & Andersson, R. (2017). Eye tracking: a comprehensive guide to methods, paradigms, and measures. Oxford University Press.

Howe, C., & Abedin, M. (2013). Classroom dialogue: A sys-tematic review across four decades of research. Cambridge Journal of Education, 43(3), 325–356. 10.1080/0305764X.2013.786024 DOI

Huang, L. (2011). Nonverbal Communication in College English Classroom Teaching. Journal of Language Teaching and Research., 2(4), 903–908.. 10.4304/jltr.2.4.903-908 DOI

Irvine, J. J. (1986). Teacher–student interactions: Effects of student race, sex, and grade level. Journal of Educational Psychology, 78(1), 14–21. 10.1037/0022-0663.78.1.14 DOI

Jones, S. M., & Dindia, K. (2004). A Meta-Analytic Perspec-tive on Sex Equity in the Classroom. Review of Educational Research, 74(4), 443–471. 10.3102/00346543074004443 DOI

Jong, C. (2017). Extending Equitable Practices in Teach-er Noticing: Commentary. Teacher Noticing: Bridging and Broadening Perspectives. Contexts, and Frameworks.

Just, M. A., & Carpenter, P. A. (1980). A theory of reading: From eye fixations to comprehension. Psychological Review, 87(4), 329–354. 10.1037/0033-295X.87.4.329 PubMed DOI

Kelley, D. H., & Gorham, J. (1988). Effects of immediacy on recall of information. Communication Education, 37(3), 198–207. 10.1080/03634528809378719 DOI

Kelly, A. (1988). Gender differences in teacher–pupil in-teractions: A meta-analytic review. Research in Education, 39(1), 1–23. 10.1177/003452378803900101 DOI

Kerssen-Griep, J., & Witt, P. L. (2012). Instructional Feed-back II: How Do Instructor Immediacy Cues and Facework Tactics Interact to Predict Student Motivation and Fairness Perceptions? Communication Studies, 63(4), 498–517. 10.1080/10510974.2011.632660 DOI

Kim WJ, Beyon JH, Lee IS, Kwon YJ. Gaze dif-ferences between expert and novice teachers in science classes. 한국과학교육학회지. 2012;32(9):1443-51.

Kingstone, A., Smilek, D., & Eastwood, J. D. (2008). Cognitive Ethology: A new approach for studying human cognition. British Journal of Psychology, 99(Pt 3), 317–340. 10.1348/000712607X251243 PubMed DOI

Kirshner, D., & Whitson, J. A. (1998). Obstacles to Under-standing Cognition As Situated. Educational Researcher, 27(8), 22–28. 10.3102/0013189X027008022 DOI

Kleinke, C. L. (1986). Gaze and eye contact: A research review. Psychological Bulletin, 100(1), 78–100. 10.1037/0033-2909.100.1.78 PubMed DOI

Knapp, M. L., & Hall, J. A.. Nonverbal communication in human interaction. Harcourt, Brace, Jo-vanovich: Fort Worth; 1992.

Laidlaw, K. E. W., Foulsham, T., Kuhn, G., & Kingstone, A. (2011). Potential social interactions are important to social attention. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 108(14), 5548–5553. 10.1073/pnas.1017022108 PubMed DOI PMC

Ledbury, R., White, I., & Darn, S. (2004, August). The importance of eye contact in the classroom. The Internet TESL Journal., 10(8), 11–21.

Manen, M. V. (2012). The Call of Pedagogy as the Call of Contact. Phenomenology & Practice, 6(2), 8–34. 10.29173/pandpr19859 DOI

Maner, J. K., DeWall, C. N., & Gailliot, M. T. (2008). Selective attention to signs of success: Social dominance and early stage interpersonal perception. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(4), 488–501. 10.1177/0146167207311910 PubMed DOI

Marx, A., Fuhrer, U., & Hartig, T. (1999, October). Effects of class-room seating arrangements on children’s ques-tionasking. Learning Environments Research, 2(3), 249–263. 10.1023/A:1009901922191 DOI

McCorskey, J. C., & McVetta, R. W. (1978). Classroom seat-ing arrangements: Instructional communication theory versus student preferences. Communication Education, 27(2), 99–111. 10.1080/03634527809378281 DOI

McCroskey, J. C., Richmond, V. P., Sallinen, A., Fayer, J. M., & Barraclough, R. A. (1995). A cross-cultural and multi-behavioral analysis of the relationship between nonverbal immediacy and teacher evaluation. Communication Education, 44(4), 281–291. 10.1080/03634529509379019 DOI

McIntyre, N. A., Mainhard, M. T., & Klassen, R. M. (2017). Are you looking to teach? Cultural, temporal and dynamic insights into expert teacher gaze. Learning and Instruction, 49, 41–53. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2016.12.005 DOI

McIntyre, N. A., & Foulsham, T. (2018, January 5). Scanpath analysis of expertise and culture in teacher gaze in real-world classrooms. Instructional Science, 46(3), 435–455. 10.1007/s11251-017-9445-x DOI

McIntyre, N. A., Jarodzka, H., & Klassen, R. M. (2019). Captur-ing teacher priorities: Using real-world eye-tracking to investigate expert teacher priorities across two cultures. Learning and Instruction, 60, 215–224. 10.1016/j.learninstruc.2017.12.003 DOI

McIntyre, N. A., Mulder, K. T., & Mainhard, M. T. (2020). Looking to relate: Teacher gaze and culture in student-rated teacher interpersonal behaviour. Social Psychology of Education, 23, 411–431. 10.1007/s11218-019-09541-2 DOI

Measor, L., & Sikes, P. J. (1992). Gender and education. Cassell & Mansell.

Mitchell, R. N., & Marin, K. A. (2015, December 10). Examining the use of a structured analysis framework to support pros-pective teacher noticing. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(6), 551–575. 10.1007/s10857-014-9294-3 DOI

Montello, D. R. (1988, June). Classroom seating location and its effect on course achievement, participation, and attitudes. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 8(2), 149–157. 10.1016/S0272-4944(88)80005-7 DOI

Mussard, S., Seyte, F., & Terraza, M. (2003). Decomposition of Gini and the Generalized Entropy Inequality Measures. Economic Bulletin, 4(7), 1–6.

Myhill, D. (2002). Bad Boys and Good Girls? Patterns of Interaction and Response in Whole Class Teach-ing. British Educational Research Journal, 28(3), 339–352. 10.1080/01411920220137430 DOI

Neill, S. R., & Caswell, C. (1993). Body language for compe-tent teachers. Routledge.

Noddings, N. (2003). Happiness and education. Cam-bridge. Cambridge University Press. 10.1017/CBO9780511499920 DOI

Ohrn, E. (1993). Gender, Influence and Resistance in School British Journal of Sociology of Education, 14(2), 147–158. 10.1080/0142569930140202 DOI

Otteson, J. P., & Otteson, C. R. (1980). Effect of Teachers Gaze on Children’s Story Recall. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 50(1), 35–42. 10.2466/pms.1980.50.1.35 DOI

Pease, A., & Pease, B. The definitive book of body language (Bantam hardcover ed.): The hidden meaning behind people's gestures and expres-sions. New York: Bantam; 2006.

Pedersen, D. M. (1977). Relationship of Ratings of Class-room Performance and Enjoyment with Seat Se-lection. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 45(2), 601–602. 10.2466/pms.1977.45.2.601 DOI

Pedersen, D. M. (1994). Personality and Classroom Seat-ing. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 78(3, suppl), 1355–1360. 10.2466/pms.1994.78.3c.1355 DOI

Phelps, F. G., Doherty-Sneddon, G., & Warnock, H. (2006). Helping children think: Gaze aversion and teaching. British Journal of Developmental Psychology, 24(3), 577–588. 10.1348/026151005X49872 DOI

Pollitt, L. Classroom Management. Tesol Course Articles; 2006. [cited 2020 Jan20]. Available from: http://www.tesolcourse.com

Prieto, L. P., Sharma, K., & Dillenbourg, P. (2015). Studying teacher orchestration load in technology-enhanced classrooms. In Conole G., Klobučar T., Rensing Ch., Konert J., & Lavoué E. (Eds.),. Design for teaching and learning in a networked world (pp. 268–281). Springer International Publishing. 10.1007/978-3-319-24258-3_20 DOI

Píšová M, Hanušová S, Kostková K, Janíková V, Najvar P, Tůma F. Učitel expert: jeho charak-teristiky a determinanty profesního rozvoje (na pozadí výuky cizích jazyků). Brno: Masarykova univerzita; 2012.

Raider-Roth, M. B., Albert, M. K., Bircann-Barkey, I., Gidseg, E., & Murray, T. (2008). Teaching boys: A relation-al puzzle. Teachers College Record, 110(2), 443–481.

Richmond, V. P., Gorham, J. S., & McCroskey, J. C. (1987). The relationship between selected immediacy beha-viors and cognitive learning. In Mclaughlin M. L. (Ed.),. Communication yearbook 10 (pp. 574–590). Sage.

Risko, E. F., Richardson, D. C., & Kingstone, A. (2016). Breaking the Fourth Wall of Cognitive Science. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 25(1), 70–74. 10.1177/0963721415617806 DOI

Rosenthal, R., & Jacobson, L. (1966). Teachers’ expectancies: Determinants of pupils’ IQ gains. Psychological Reports, 19(1), 115–118. 10.2466/pr0.1966.19.1.115 PubMed DOI

Sadker, M., Sadker, D., & Zittleman, K. R. (2009). Still failing at fairness: How gender bias cheats girls and boys in school and what we can do about it. Simon and Schuster.

Santagata, R. (2011). From teacher noticing to a frame-work for analyzing and improving classroom lessons. In Sherin M. S., Jacobs V. R., & Philipp R. A. (Eds.),. Mathematics teacher noticing (pp. 152–168). Routledge.

Schnitzerová, E., & Račková, E. (1995). Niektoré kvanti-tatívne charakteristiky pedagogickej interakcie. Psychológia a Patopsychológia Dieťaťa, 3, 293–301.

Schwebel, A. I., & Cherlin, D. L. (1972). Physical and social distancing in teacher-pupil relationships. Journal of Educational Psychology, 63(6), 543–550. 10.1037/h0034081 DOI

Segrin, C. (1993). The effects of nonverbal behavior on outcomes of compliance gaining attempts. Communication Studies, 44(3–4), 169–187. 10.1080/10510979309368393 DOI

Senju, A., & Johnson, M. H. (2009). The eye contact effect: Mechanisms and development. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 13(3), 127–134. 10.1016/j.tics.2008.11.009 PubMed DOI

Sherin, M. G., Russ, R. S., Sherin, B. L., & Colestock, A. (2008). Professional vision in action: An exploratory study. Issues in Teacher Education, 17(2), 27–46.

Sherin, M. G., Jacobs, V. R., & Philipp, R. A. (Eds.). (2011). Mathematics teacher noticing. Seeing through teachers’ eyes. Routledge. 10.4324/9780203832714 DOI

Sherwood JV. Facilitative Effects of Gaze upon Learning. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 1987;6 4(3_suppl): 1275–8. 10.2466/pms.1987.64.3c.1275 DOI

Smith, T. J., & Mital, P. K. (2013). Attentional synchrony and the influence of viewing task on gaze behavior in static and dynamic scenes. Journal of Vision (Charlottesville, Va.), 13(8), 16. 10.1167/13.8.16 PubMed DOI

Snyder, D. W. (1998). Classroom Management for Stu-dent Teachers. Music Educators Journal, 84(4), 37–40.

Sommer, R. (1967). Classroom Ecology. The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science, 3(4), 489–503. 10.1177/002188636700300404 DOI

Sommer, R. (1969). Personal Space. Prentice-Hall.

Spender D. Invisible women. The schooling scandal. Trowbridge: Writers and Readers Pub-lishing; 1982.

Stake, J. E., & Katz, J. F. (1982). Teacher-Pupil Relationships in the Elementary School Classroom: Teacher-Gender and Pupil-Gender Differences. American Educational Research Journal, 19(3), 465–471. 10.3102/00028312019003465 DOI

Stires, L. (1980, June 1). Classroom Seating Location, Student Grades, and Attitudes. Environment and Behavior, 12(2), 241–254. 10.1177/0013916580122008 DOI

Stürmer, K., Seidel, T., Müller, K., Häusler, J., & Cortina, K. S. (2017). What is in the eye of preservice teachers while instructing? An eye-tracking study about attention processes in different teaching situa-tions. Zeitschrift für Erziehungswissenschaft, 20(S1), 75–92. 10.1007/s11618-017-0731-9 DOI

Totusek, P. F., & Staton-Spicer, A. Q. (1982). Classroom Seat-ing Preference as a Function of Student Perso-nality. Journal of Experimental Education, 50(3), 159–163. 10.1080/00220973.1982.11011818 DOI

Tsouroufli, M. (2002). Gender and Teachers Classroom Practice in a Secondary School in Greece. Gender and Education, 14(2), 135–147. 10.1080/09540250220133996 DOI

Walkoe, J. (2015). Exploring teacher noticing of student algebraic thinking in a video club. Journal of Mathematics Teacher Education, 18(6), 523–550. 10.1007/s10857-014-9289-0 DOI

Warrington, M., & Younger, M. (2000). The Other Side of the Gender Gap. Gender and Education, 12(4), 493–508. 10.1080/09540250020004126 DOI

Waxer, P. H. (1974). Therapist training in nonverbal communication. I: Nonverbal cues for depression. Journal of Clinical Psychology, 30(2), 215–218. 10.1002/1097-4679(197404)30:2<215::AID-JCLP2270300229>3.0.CO;2-Q PubMed DOI

Witt, P. L., Wheeless, L. R., & Allen, M. (2004). A me-ta‐analytical review of the relationship between teacher immediacy and student learning. Communication Monographs, 71(2), 184–207. 10.1080/036452042000228054 DOI

Wolff, C. E., Jarodzka, H., Bogert, N. V. D., & Boshui-zen, H. P. A. (2016). Teacher vision: Expert and novice teachers’ perception of problematic classroom management scenes. Instructional Science, 44(3), 243–265. 10.1007/s11251-016-9367-z DOI

WoolFolk, R. L., & Woolfolk, A. E. (1974). Nonverbal Teacher Behaviors: A Rejoinder. American Educational Research Journal, 11(3), 307–309. 10.3102/00028312011003307 DOI

Younger, M., & Warrington, M. (1996). Differential Achievement of Girls and Boys at GCSE: Some observations from the perspective of one school. British Journal of Sociology of Education, 17(3), 299–313. 10.1080/0142569960170304 DOI

Younger, M., Warrington, M., & Williams, J. (1999). The Gender Gap and Classroom Interactions: Reality and rhetoric? British Journal of Sociology of Education, 20(3), 325–341. 10.1080/01425699995290 DOI

Younger, M., Warrington, M., & McLellan, R. (2005). Raising boys’ achievements in secondary school: Issues, dilemmas and opportunities. Open University Press.

Eye tracking: empirical foundations for a minimal reporting guideline