The Prognostic Association of Prostate MRI PI-RADS™ v2 Assessment Category and Risk of Biochemical Recurrence after Definitive Local Therapy for Prostate Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Meta-Analysis, Systematic Review
Grant support
K08 CA237872
NCI NIH HHS - United States
- Keywords
- magnetic resonance imaging, prostatic neoplasms, prognosis,
- MeSH
- Brachytherapy MeSH
- Risk Assessment methods MeSH
- Kallikreins blood MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Neoplasm Recurrence, Local blood diagnosis epidemiology prevention & control MeSH
- Magnetic Resonance Imaging * MeSH
- Prostatic Neoplasms blood diagnosis epidemiology therapy MeSH
- Prognosis MeSH
- Prostate diagnostic imaging radiation effects surgery MeSH
- Prostatectomy MeSH
- Prostate-Specific Antigen blood MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Meta-Analysis MeSH
- Systematic Review MeSH
- Names of Substances
- Kallikreins MeSH
- KLK3 protein, human MeSH Browser
- Prostate-Specific Antigen MeSH
PURPOSE: Although the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System™ version 2 (PI-RADS™ v2) is a reliable diagnostic tool for significant prostate cancer, less is known about the prognostic significance of the structured reporting scheme for estimating oncologic outcomes after treatment. We aimed to synthesize the available evidence regarding the association of PI-RADS v2 score and risk of biochemical recurrence (BCR) among patients undergoing primary definitive treatment for prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We systematically queried the PubMed® and Web of Science™ databases to identify studies addressing the association between the PI-RADS v2 and treatment outcomes. We included studies through November 2020 that assessed the independent prognostic significance of PI-RADS v2. After assessing risk of bias and quality, we conducted a formal meta-analysis to estimate the pooled effects of prostate magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) classification on the risk of BCR. RESULTS: We identified 9 and 7 eligible studies including 2,274 and 1,215 patients for the systematic review and meta-analysis, respectively. Eight were conducted in the context of radical prostatectomy and 1 post-radiation. Among patients treated with radical prostatectomy, higher PI-RADS v2 scores were significantly associated with risk of BCR (pooled HR 3.06, 95% CI 2.16-4.33; p <0.01). There was no significant heterogeneity among studies. For all studies, PI-RADS v2 score remained significantly associated with BCR (pooled HR 3.19, 95% CI 2.28-4.45; p <0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Prostate MRI findings assessed with the PI-RADS v2 classification were independently associated with risk of BCR after definitive local therapy, primarily based on data from radical prostatectomy. These findings support the prognostic significance of MRI, in addition to its role in prostate cancer diagnosis.
Department of Radiology and Biomedical Imaging Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology La Croix du Sud Hospital Quint Fonsegrives France
Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland
Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas Texas
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York New York
Department of Urology Yale School of Medicine New Haven Connecticut
Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria
Working Group for Diagnostic Imaging in Urology Austrian Association of Urology Vienna Austria
References provided by Crossref.org