PURPOSE: Microwave ablation (MWA) is a clinically established modality for treatment of lung tumors. A challenge with existing application of MWA, however, is local tumor progression, potentially due to failure to establish an adequate treatment margin. This study presents a robust simulation-based treatment planning methodology to assist operators in comparatively assessing thermal profiles and likelihood of achieving a specified minimum margin as a function of candidate applied energy parameters. METHODS: We employed a biophysical simulation-based probabilistic treatment planning methodology to evaluate the likelihood of achieving a specified minimum margin for candidate treatment parameters (i.e., applied power and ablation duration for a given applicator position within a tumor). A set of simulations with varying tissue properties was evaluated for each considered combination of power and ablation duration, and for four different scenarios of contrast in tissue biophysical properties between tumor and normal lung. A treatment planning graph was then assembled, where distributions of achieved minimum ablation zone margins and collateral damage volumes can be assessed for candidate applied power and treatment duration combinations. For each chosen power and time combination, the operator can also visualize the histogram of ablation zone boundaries overlaid on the tumor and target volumes. We assembled treatment planning graphs for generic 1, 2, and 2.5 cm diameter spherically shaped tumors and also illustrated the impact of tissue heterogeneity on delivered treatment plans and resulting ablation histograms. Finally, we illustrated the treatment planning methodology on two example patient-specific cases of tumors with irregular shapes. RESULTS: The assembled treatment planning graphs indicate that 30 W, 6 min ablations achieve a 5-mm minimum margin across all simulated cases for 1-cm diameter spherical tumors, and 70 W, 10 min ablations achieve a 3-mm minimum margin across 90% of simulations for a 2.5-cm diameter spherical tumor. Different scenarios of tissue heterogeneity between tumor and lung tissue revealed 2 min overall difference in ablation duration, in order to reliably achieve a 4-mm minimum margin or larger each time for 2-cm diameter spherical tumor. CONCLUSIONS: An approach for simulation-based treatment planning for microwave ablation of lung tumors is illustrated to account for the impact of specific geometry of the treatment site, tissue property uncertainty, and heterogeneity between the tumor and normal lung.

Department of Circuit Theory Czech Technical University Prague Prague Czech Republic

Department of Clinical Sciences Kansas State University Manhattan KS 66506 USA

Department of Computing Faculty of Science Silpakorn University Thailand

Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering Kansas State University Manhattan KS 66506 USA

PhenoMapper LLC San Jose CA 95112 USA

Zobrazit více v PubMed

de Baere T, Tselikas L, Catena V, Buy X, Deschamps F, Palussière J. Percutaneous thermal ablation of primary lung cancer. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2016;97(10):1019–1024. PubMed

Wolf FJ, Grand DJ, Machan JT, DiPetrillo TA, Mayo-Smith WW, Dupuy DE. Microwave ablation of lung malignancies: effectiveness, CT findings, and safety in 50 patients. Radiology. 2008;247(3):871–879. 10.1148/radiol.2473070996 PubMed DOI

Sidoff L, Dupuy DE. Clinical experiences with microwave thermal ablation of lung malignancies. Int J Hyperthermia. 2017;33(1):25–33. PubMed

Boskovic T, Stanic J, Pena-Karan S, et al. Pneumothorax after transthoracic needle biopsy of lung lesions under CT guidance. J Thorac Dis. 2014;6:S99. PubMed PMC

Izaaryene J, Cohen F, Souteyrand P, et al. Pathological effects of lung radiofrequency ablation that contribute to pneumothorax, using a porcine model. Int J Hyperthermia. 2017;1–4. PubMed

Chaddha U, Hogarth DK, Murgu S. Bronchoscopic ablative therapies for malignant central airway obstruction and peripheral lung tumors. Ann Am Thorac Soc. Published online June 13, 2019;16:1220–1229. PubMed

Sebek J, Kramer S, Rocha R, et al. Bronchoscopically delivered microwave ablation in an in vivo porcine lung model. ERJ Open Res. 2020;6. 10.1183/23120541.00146-2020 PubMed DOI PMC

Yuan H-B, Wang X-Y, Sun J-Y, et al. Flexible bronchoscopy-guided microwave ablation in peripheral porcine lung: a new minimally-invasive ablation. Transl Lung Cancer Res. 2019;8(6):787–796. PubMed PMC

Dupuy DE. Image-guided thermal ablation of lung malignancies. Radiology. 2011;260(3):633–655. PubMed

Alexander ES, Xiong L, Baird GL, Fernando H, Dupuy DE. CT densitometry and morphology of radiofrequency-ablated stage IA non-small cell lung cancer: results from the American College of Surgeons Oncology Group Z4033 (Alliance) Trial. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2020;31(2):286–293. PubMed PMC

Koethe Y, Xu S, Velusamy G, Wood BJ, Venkatesan AM. Accuracy and efficacy of percutaneous biopsy and ablation using robotic assistance under computed tomography guidance: a phantom study. Eur Radiol. 2014;24:723–730. PubMed PMC

Liang L, Cool D, Kakani N, Wang G, Ding H, Fenster A. Development of a Multi-objective Optimized Planning Method for Microwave Liver Tumor Ablation. In: International Conference on Medical Image Computing and Computer-Assisted Intervention. Springer; 2019:110–118.

Liang L, Cool D, Kakani N, Wang G, Ding H, Fenster A. Automatic radiofrequency ablation planning for liver tumors with multiple constraints based on set covering. IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2020;39 (5):1459–1471. PubMed

Liang L, Cool D, Kakani N, Wang G, Ding H, Fenster A. Multiple objective planning for thermal ablation of liver tumors. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2020;15(11):1775–1786. PubMed

Lyons GR, Pua BB. Ablation planning software for optimizing treatment: challenges, techniques, and applications. Tech Vasc Interv Radiol. 2019;22:21–25. PubMed

Marcelin C, Leiner J, Nasri S, et al. In vivo percutaneous microwave ablation in kidneys: correlation with ex vivo data and ablation work. Diagn Interv Imaging. 2018;99(1):3–8. PubMed

Berber E The first clinical application of planning software for laparoscopic microwave thermosphere ablation of malignant liver tumours. HPB. 2015;17:632–636. PubMed PMC

Deshazer G, Merck D, Hagmann M, Dupuy DE, Prakash P. Physical modeling of microwave ablation zone clinical margin variance. Med Phys. 2016;43:1764–1776. PubMed

Huang S, Cai W, Han S, et al. Differences in the dielectric properties of various benign and malignant thyroid nodules. Med Phys. Published online October 29, 2021;48(2):760–769. PubMed

Zhang R, Wu S, Wu W, et al. Computer-assisted needle trajectory planning and mathematical modeling for liver tumor thermal ablation: A review. Math Biosci Eng. 2019;16(5):4846–4872. PubMed

van Oostenbrugge TJ, Heidkamp J, Moche M, et al. Validation of a web-based planning tool for percutaneous cryoablation of renal tumors. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2020;43:1661–1670. PubMed PMC

Yeniaras E, Fuentes DT, Fahrenholtz SJ, et al. Design and initial evaluation of a treatment planning software system for MRI-guided laser ablation in the brain. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2014;9(4):659–667. PubMed

Fuentes D, Cardan R, Stafford RJ, Yung J, Dodd GD, Feng Y. High-fidelity computer models for prospective treatment planning of radiofrequency ablation with in vitro experimental correlation. J Vasc Interv Radiol JVIR. 2010;21(11):1725–1732. PubMed PMC

Luo M, Larson PS, Martin AJ, Miga MI. Accounting for deformation in deep brain stimulation surgery with models: comparison to interventional magnetic resonance imaging. IEEE Trans Biomed Eng Published online; 2020;67:2934–2944. PubMed PMC

Rossmann C, Rattay F, Haemmerich D. Platform for patient-specific finite-element modeling and application for radiofrequency ablation. Vis Image Process Comput Biomed. 2012;1. 10.1615/visualizimageproccomputatbiomed.2012004898 DOI

Voglreiter P, Mariappan P, Pollari M, et al. RFA guardian: comprehensive simulation of radiofrequency ablation treatment of liver tumors. Sci Rep. 2018;8:787. PubMed PMC

Schumann C, Rieder C, Haase S, et al. Interactive multi-criteria planning for radiofrequency ablation. Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg. 2015;10 (6):879–889. PubMed

Sebek J, Albin N, Bortel R, Natarajan B, Prakash P. Sensitivity of microwave ablation models to tissue biophysical properties: A first step toward probabilistic modeling and treatment planning. Med Phys. 2016;43 (5):2649–2661. PubMed

Joines WT, Zhang Y, Li C, Jirtle RL. The measured electrical propertiesof normal and malignant human tissues from 50 to 900 MHz. Med Phys. 1994;21(4):547–550. PubMed

Yu X, Sun Y, Cai K, et al. Dielectric properties of normal and metastatic lymph nodes ex vivo from lung cancer surgeries. Bioelectromagnetics. 2020;41:148–155. PubMed

Pearce JA. Models for thermal damage in tissues: processes and applications. Crit Rev Biomed Eng. 2010;38:1–20. PubMed

Kaye EA, Cornelis FH, Petre EN, et al. Volumetric 3D assessment of ablation zones after thermal ablation of colorectal liver metastases to improve prediction of local tumor progression. Eur Radiol. 2019;29:2698–2705. PubMed PMC

Sebek J, Curto S, Bortel R, Prakash P. Analysis of minimally invasive directional antennas for microwave tissue ablation. Int J Hyperthermia. 2017;33(1):51–60. PubMed

Faridi P, Keselman P, Fallahi H, Prakash P. Experimental assessment of microwave ablation computational modeling with MR thermometry. Med Phys 2020;47:3777–3788. PubMed PMC

Jarrard J, Wizeman B, Brown RH, Mitzner W. A theoretical model of the application of RF energy to the airway wall and its experimental validation. Biomed Eng OnLine. 2010;9(1):81. 10.1186/1475-925x-9-81 PubMed DOI PMC

Hasgall PA, Neufeld E, Gosselin MC, et al. IT’IS Database for thermal and electromagnetic parameters of biological tissues. Published online. 2012.

Sebek J, Bortel R, Prakash P. Broadband lung dielectric properties over the ablative temperature range: experimental measurements and parametric models. Med Phys. 2019;46(10):4291–4303. PubMed PMC

Hall SK, Ooi EH, Payne SJ. Cell death, perfusion and electrical parameters are critical in models of hepatic radiofrequency ablation. Int J Hyperthermia. 2015;31(5):538–550. PubMed PMC

Kawai T, Kaminou T, Sugiura K, et al. Creation of a tumor-mimic model using a muscle paste for radiofrequency ablation of the lung. Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol. 2009;32:296–302. PubMed

Lambrechts D, Wauters E, Boeckx B, et al. Phenotype molding of stromal cells in the lung tumor microenvironment. Nat Med. 2018;24:1277–1289. PubMed

Ma S-H, Le H-B, Jia B-H, et al. Peripheral pulmonary nodules: Relationship between multi-slice spiral CT perfusion imaging and tumor angiogenesis and VEGF expression. BMC Cancer. 2008;8(1):186. 10.1186/1471-2407-8-186 PubMed DOI PMC

Chu LL, Knebel RJ, Shay AD, et al. CT perfusion imaging of lung cancer: benefit of motion correction for blood flow estimates. Eur Radiol. 2018;28:5069–5075. PubMed

Armato SG, McLennan G, Bidaut L, et al. The lung image database consortium (LIDC) and image database resource initiative (IDRI): a completed reference database of lung nodules on CT scans. Med Phys. 2011;38:915–931. PubMed PMC

Liu Z, Ahmed M, Weinstein Y, Yi M, Mahajan RL, Goldberg SN. Characterization of the RF ablation-induced ‘oven effect’: the importance of background tissue thermal conductivity on tissue heating. Int J Hyperthermia. 2006;22(4):327–342. PubMed

Liu D, Brace CL. Evaluation of tissue deformation during radiofrequency and microwave ablation procedures: influence of output energy delivery. Med Phys. 2019;46(9):4127–4134. PubMed PMC