The welfare of cattle, pigs, sheep and goats was assessed by measuring trauma detected during veterinary postmortem inspection at slaughterhouses. The subject of this evaluation were all bovine, porcine, ovine and caprine animals slaughtered at Czech slaughterhouses in the monitored period, i.e., a total of 1,136,754 cows, 257,912 heifers, 1,015,541 bulls, 104,459 calves, 586,245 sows, 25,027,303 finisher pigs, 123,191 piglets, 22,815 ewes, 114,264 lambs, 1348 does and 5778 kids. The data on the numbers of traumatic findings were obtained retrospectively from a national veterinary database collecting data from slaughterhouse postmortem examinations. The results showed that findings of trauma were observed at a low frequency in the studied species. Injuries were detected most frequently in cows (1.71%). In contrast, no findings associated with the presence of trauma were recorded in does and kids. From the viewpoint of trauma localization, findings on the limbs were more frequent than findings on the body (p < 0.01). The only exceptions to this were lambs, does and kids, for which there was no statistically significant difference between findings on the limbs and the body (p = 1.00). The results show that housing system (bedding, the presence of slats, floor hardness), transport of animals to the slaughterhouse (moving animals to the vehicle, loading ramps, floors in transport vehicles and the transport of animals itself) and design of the slaughterhouse (unloading ramps, passageways and slaughterhouse floors) have a greater impact on the limbs than the bodies of animals in the majority of species. A difference was also demonstrated in the occurrence of findings of trauma in the limbs and body (p < 0.01) between culled adult animals and fattened animals, namely in cattle and pigs. A difference (p < 0.01) between ewes and lambs was found only in the occurrence of traumatic injury to the limbs. The results showed that fattened animals are affected by the risk of trauma to a lesser extent than both culled adult animals and young animals. Statistically significant differences (p < 0.01) were also found between the studied species and categories of animals. The category most affected from the viewpoint of injury both to the limbs and body was cows. In contrast to cows that are typically reared indoors, the low frequency of traumatic findings was found in small ruminants and in bulls, i.e., animals typically reared outdoors. Assumedly, access to pasture may be beneficial considering the risk of traumatic injury.

Department of Animal Protection and Welfare and Veterinary Public Health Faculty of Veterinary Hygiene and Ecology University of Veterinary Sciences Brno 612 42 Brno Czech Republic

Department of Public Veterinary Medicine and Animal Welfare University of Veterinary Medicine and Pharmacy in Kosice 041 81 Kosice Slovakia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Velarde A., Dalmau A. Animal Welfare Assessment at Slaughter in Europe: Moving from Inputs to Outputs. Meat Sci. 2012;92:244–251. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.04.009. PubMed DOI

Losada-Espinosa N., Villarroel M., Maria G.A., Miranda-de la Lama G.C. Pre-slaughter cattle welfare indicators for use in commercial abattoirs with voluntary monitoring systems: A systematic review. Meat Sci. 2018;138:34–48. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2017.12.004. PubMed DOI

Abeni F., Bertoni G. Main causes of poor welfare in intensively reared dairy cows. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2009;8:45–66. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.45. DOI

Gregory N.G. Physiology and Behaviour of Animal Suffering. 1st ed. Blackwell Science; Oxford, UK: 2004. pp. 131–182.

Lambooij E., Hulsegge B., Klont R.E., Winkelman-Goedhart H.A., Reimert H.G.M., Kranen R.W. Effects of housing conditions of slaughter pigs on some post mortem muscle metabolites and pork quality characteristics. Meat Sci. 2004;66:855–862. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2003.08.007. PubMed DOI

Broom D.M. Behaviour and welfare in relation to pathology. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006;97:73–83. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2005.11.019. DOI

Aaslyng M.D., Brandt P., Blaabjerg L., Støier S. Assessment and incidence of skin damage in slaughter pigs; Proceedings of the 59th International Congress of Meat Science and Technology; Izmir, Turkey. 18–23 August 2013.

Harley S., More S., Boyle L., Connell N.O., Hanlon A. Good animal welfare makes economic sense: Potential of pig abattoir meat inspection as a welfare surveillance tool. Ir. Vet. J. 2012;65:11. doi: 10.1186/2046-0481-65-11. PubMed DOI PMC

Van Staaveren N., Teixeira D., Hanlon A., Boyle L. The effect of mixing entire male pigs prior to transport to slaughter on behaviour, welfare and carcass lesions. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:e0122841. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122841. PubMed DOI PMC

Strappini A., Metz J.H.M., Gallo C., Frankena K., Vargas R., De Freslon I., Kemp B. Bruises in culled cows: When, where and how are they inflicted? Animal. 2012;7:485–491. doi: 10.1017/S1751731112001863. PubMed DOI

Miranda-de la Lama G.C., Villarroel M., Maria G.A. Livestock transport from the perspective of the pre-slaughter logistic chain: A review. Meat Sci. 2014;98:9–20. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.04.005. PubMed DOI

Paranhos da Costa M.J.R., Huertas S.M., Gallo C., Dalla Costa O.A. Strategies to promote farm animal welfare in Latin America and their effects on carcass and meat quality traits. Meat Sci. 2012;92:221–226. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2012.03.005. PubMed DOI

Strappini A., Frankena K., Metz J.H.M., Gallo C., Kemp B. Characteristics of bruises in carcasses of cows sourced from farms or from livestock markets. Animal. 2012;6:502–509. doi: 10.1017/S1751731111001698. PubMed DOI

Broom D., Corke M. Effects of disease on farm animal welfare. Acta Vet. Brno. 2002;71:133–136. doi: 10.2754/avb200271010133. DOI

Miranda-de la Lama G.C., Villarroel M., Maria G.A. Behavioural and physiological profiles following exposure to novel environment and social mixing in lambs. Small Ruminant Res. 2012;103:158–163. doi: 10.1016/j.smallrumres.2011.08.007. DOI

Simova V., Vecerek V., Passantino A., Voslarova E. Pre-transport factors affecting the welfare of cattle during road transport for slaughter—A review. Acta Vet. Brno. 2016;85:303–318. doi: 10.2754/avb201685030303. DOI

Minka N.S., Ayo J.O. Effects of loading behaviour and road transport stress on traumatic injuries in cattle transported by road during the hot-dry season. Livest. Sci. 2007;107:91–95. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2006.10.013. DOI

Guardia M.D., Estany J., Balasch S., Oliver M.A., Gispert M., Diestre A. Risk assessment of skin damage due to pre-slaughter conditions and RYR1 gene in pigs. Meat Sci. 2009;81:745–751. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2008.11.020. PubMed DOI

Broom D. Causes of poor welfare in large animals during transport. Vet. Res. Commun. 2003;27:515–518. doi: 10.1023/B:VERC.0000014210.29852.9a. PubMed DOI

Gallo C., Lizondo G., Knowles T.G. Effects of journey and lairage time on steers transported to slaughter in Chile. Vet. Rec. 2003;152:361–364. doi: 10.1136/vr.152.12.361. PubMed DOI

Ruiz-de-la-Torre J.L., Velarde A., Diestre A., Gispert M., Hall S.J., Broom D.M., Manteca X. Effects of vehicle movements during transport on the stress responses and meat quality of sheep. Vet. Rec. 2001;148:227–229. doi: 10.1136/vr.148.8.227. PubMed DOI

Gade P.B., Christensen L. Effect of different stocking densities during transport on welfare and meat quality in Danish slaughter pigs. Meat Sci. 1998;48:237–247. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(97)00098-3. PubMed DOI

Bethancourt-Garcia J.A., Vaz R.Z., Vaz F.N., Silva W.B., Pascoal L.L., Mendonça F.S., da Vara C.C., Nunez A.J.C., Restle J. Pre-slaughter factors affecting the incidence of severe bruising in cattle carcasses. Livest. Sci. 2019;222:41–48. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2019.02.009. DOI

Huertas S., Eerdenburg F., Gil A., Piaggio J. Prevalence of carcass bruises as an indicator of welfare in beef cattle and the relation to the economic impact. Vet. Med. Sci. 2015;1:9–15. doi: 10.1002/vms3.2. PubMed DOI PMC

Knowles T.G., Warriss P.D., Brown S.N., Kestin S.C. Long distance transport of export lambs. Vet. Rec. 1994;134:107–110. doi: 10.1136/vr.134.5.107. PubMed DOI

Knowles T.G., Warriss P.D., Brown S.N., Kestin S.C., Rhind S.M., Edwards J.E., Anil M.H., Dolan S.K. Long distance transport of lambs and the time needed for subsequent recovery. Vet. Rec. 1993;133:286–293. doi: 10.1136/vr.133.12.286. PubMed DOI

Dalla Costa F.A., Lopes L.S., Dalla Costa O.A. Effects of the Truck suspension system on animal welfare, carcass and meat quality traits in pigs. Animals. 2017;7:5. doi: 10.3390/ani7010005. PubMed DOI PMC

Cockram M.S., Lee R.A. Some preslaughter factors affecting the occurrence of bruising in sheep. Br. Vet. J. 1991;147:120–125. doi: 10.1016/0007-1935(91)90101-R. PubMed DOI

Fraqueza M.J., Roseiro L.C., Almeida J., Matias E., Santos C., Randall J.M. Effects of lairage temperature and holding time on pig behaviour and on carcass and meat quality. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1998;60:317–330. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(98)00156-7. DOI

Warriss P.D. The handling of cattle pre-slaughter and its effects on carcass and meat quality. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 1990;28:171–186. doi: 10.1016/0168-1591(90)90052-F. DOI

Gispert M., Faucitano L., Oliver M.A., Guàrdia M.D., Coll C., Siggens K., Harvey K., Diestre A. A survey of pre-slaughter conditions, halothane gene frequency, and carcass and meat quality in five spanish pig commercial abattoirs. Meat Sci. 2000;55:97–106. doi: 10.1016/S0309-1740(99)00130-8. PubMed DOI

Faucitano L., Schaefer A.L. Welfare of Pigs. 1st ed. Wageningen Academic Publishers; Wageningen, The Netherlands: 2008. pp. 197–215.

Grandin T. The design and construction of facilities for handling cattle. Livest. Prod. Sci. 1997;49:103–119. doi: 10.1016/S0301-6226(97)00008-0. DOI

Romero M.H., Uribe-Velasquez L.F., Sanchez J.A., Miranda-de la Lama G.C. Risk Factors influencing bruising and high muscle pH in Colombian cattle carcasses due to transport and pre-slaughter operations. Meat Sci. 2013;95:256–263. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2013.05.014. PubMed DOI

Vecerek V., Voslarova E., Semerad Z., Passantino A. The health and welfare of pigs from the perspective of post mortem findings in slaughterhouses. Animals. 2020;10:825. doi: 10.3390/ani10050825. PubMed DOI PMC

Nanni Costa L., Lo Fiego D., Tassone F., Russo V. The relationship between carcass bruising in bulls and behaviour observed during pre-slaughter phases. Vet. Res. Com. 2006;30:379–381. doi: 10.1007/s11259-006-0086-9. DOI

Strappini A.C., Metz J.H.M., Gallo C.B., Kemp B. Origin and assessment of bruises in beef cattle at slaughter. Animal. 2009;3:728–736. doi: 10.1017/S1751731109004091. PubMed DOI

Strappini A.C., Frankena K., Metz J.H.M., Gallo B., Kemp B. Prevalence and risk factors for bruises in Chilean bovine carcasses. Meat Sci. 2010;86:859–864. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.07.010. PubMed DOI

Wigham E.E., Butterworth A., Wotton S. Assessing cattle welfare at slaughter—Why is it important and what challenges are faced? Meat Sci. 2018;145:171–177. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2018.06.010. PubMed DOI

Weeks C., McNally P., Warriss P. Influence of the design of facilities at auction markets and animal handling procedure on bruising in cattle. Vet. Rec. 2002;150:743–748. doi: 10.1136/vr.150.24.743. PubMed DOI

Harris M.K., Eastwood L.C., Boykin C.A., Arnold A.N., Gehring K.B., Hale D.S., Kerth C.R., Griffin D.B., Savell J.W., Belk K.E., et al. National Beef Quality Audit-2016: Transportation, mobility, live cattle, and carcass assessments of targeted producer-related characteristics that affect value of market cows and bulls, their carcasses, and associated by-products. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2017;1:570–584. doi: 10.2527/tas2017.0063. PubMed DOI PMC

Miranda-de la Lama G., Leyva I., Barreras-Serrano A., Perez-Linares C., Sanchez-Lopez E., Maria Levrino G., Fernando F.-S. Assessment of cattle welfare at a commercial slaughter plant in the northwest of Mexico. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2011;44:497–504. doi: 10.1007/s11250-011-9925-y. PubMed DOI

Jarvis A.M., Cockram M.S. Effects of handling and transport on bruising of sheep sent directly from farms to slaughter. Vet. Rec. 1994;135:523–527. doi: 10.1136/vr.135.22.523. PubMed DOI

Ison S.H., Clutton R.E., Di Giminiani P., Rutherford K.M.D. A review of pain assessment in pigs. Front. Vet. Sci. 2016;3 doi: 10.3389/fvets.2016.00108. PubMed DOI PMC

KilBride A., Gillman C., Green L. A cross sectional study of the prevalence, risk factors and population attributable fractions for limb and body lesions in lactating sows on commercial farms in England. BMC Vet. Res. 2009;5:30. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-5-30. PubMed DOI PMC

European Union Council Regulation (EC) No 1/2005 of 22 December 2004 on the protection of animals during transport and related operations and amending Directives 64/432/EEC and 93/119/EC and Regulation (EC) No 1255/97. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2005;L3:1–44.

European Union Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2019/627 of 15 March 2019 laying down uniform practical arrangements for the performance of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 2074/2005 as regards official controls. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2019;L131:51–100.

Zar J.H. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Inc.; Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: 1999.

Cruz-Monterrosa R.G., Resendiz-Cruz V., Rayas-Amor A.A., López M., la Lama G.C.M. Bruises in beef cattle at slaughter in Mexico: Implications on quality, safety and shelf life of the meat. Trop. Anim. Health Prod. 2017;49:145–152. doi: 10.1007/s11250-016-1173-8. PubMed DOI

Bueno L., Caldara F., Naas I., Salgado D., Garcia R., Almeida Paz I. Swine carcass condemnation in commercial slaughterhouses. Rev. MVZ Cordoba. 2013;18:3836–3842. doi: 10.21897/rmvz.155. DOI

Vecerkova L., Voslarova E., Vecerek V. Comparison of the welfare of laying hens, broiler chickens and turkeys in terms of bird health as surveyed during inspection in slaughterhouses. Acta Vet. Brno. 2019;88:243–248. doi: 10.2754/avb201988020243. DOI

Vecerek V., Vecerkova L., Voslarova E. Comparison of the frequency of patho-anatomic findings in laying hens with findings in broiler chickens and turkeys detected during post-mortem veterinary inspection. Poult. Sci. 2019;98:5385–5391. doi: 10.3382/ps/pez364. PubMed DOI

Valkova L., Vecerek V., Voslarova E., Zavrelova V., Conte F., Semerad Z. The health and welfare of rabbits as indicated by post-mortem findings at the slaughterhouse. Animals. 2021;11:659. doi: 10.3390/ani11030659. PubMed DOI PMC

Kaluza M., Vecerek V., Voslarova E., Semerad Z., Passantino A. Incidence of characteristic findings during veterinary carcass inspections 2010–2019 in the Czech Republic and the relation to the level of health and welfare of individual classes of cattle. Animals. 2021;11:537. doi: 10.3390/ani11020537. PubMed DOI PMC

Kaluza M., Vecerek V., Voslarova E., Semerad Z., Passantino A. Assessing the standard of health and welfare in individual categories of cattle from the viewpoint of intravital pathological changes. Agriculture. 2020;10:619. doi: 10.3390/agriculture10120619. DOI

Vecerek V., Voslarova E., Semerad Z. Patho-anatomic findings in finisher pigs, sows, and piglets detected during veterinary slaughterhouse inspection. Acta Vet. Brno. 2020;89:341–347. doi: 10.2754/avb202089040341. DOI

Weary D.M., Taszkun I. Hock lesions and free-stall design. J. Dairy Sci. 2000;83:697–702. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(00)74931-9. PubMed DOI

Herskin M.S., Bonde M.K., Jørgensen E., Jensen K.H. Decubital shoulder ulcers in sows: A review of classification, pain and welfare consequences. Animal. 2011;5:757–766. doi: 10.1017/S175173111000203X. PubMed DOI

Bonde M., Toft N., Thomsen P.T., Sorensen J.T. Evaluation of sensitivity and specificity of routine meat inspection of Danish slaughter pigs using latent class analysis. Prev. Vet. Med. 2010;94:165–169. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2010.01.009. PubMed DOI

Quinn A.J., Boyle L.A., KilBride A.L., Green L.E. A cross-sectional study on the prevalence and risk factors for foot and limb lesions in piglets on commercial farms in Ireland. Prev. Vet. Med. 2015;119:162–171. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2015.02.016. PubMed DOI

Harley S., Boyle L., Connell N., More S., Teixeira D., Hanlon A. Docking the value of pigmeat? Prevalence and financial implications of welfare lesions in Irish slaughter pigs. Anim. Welf. 2014;23:275–285. doi: 10.7120/09627286.23.3.275. DOI

Petersen H.H., Nielsen E.O., Hassing A.-G., Ersboll A.K., Nielsen J.P. Prevalence of clinical signs of disease in Danish finisher pigs. Vet. Rec. 2008;162:377–382. doi: 10.1136/vr.162.12.377. PubMed DOI

Knock M., Carroll G.A. The potential of post-mortem carcass assessments in reflecting the welfare of beef and dairy cattle. Animals. 2019;9:959. doi: 10.3390/ani9110959. PubMed DOI PMC

Mendonca F.S., Vaz R.Z., Vaz F.N., Leal W.S., Silveira I.D.B., Restle J., Boligon A.A., Cardoso F.F. Causes of bruising in carcasses of beef cattle during farm, transport, and slaughterhouse handling in Brazil. Animal. 2019;90:288–296. doi: 10.1111/asj.13151. PubMed DOI

Voisinet B.D., Grandin T., Tatum J.D., O’Connor S.F., Struthers J. Feedlot cattle with calm temperaments have higher average daily gains than cattle with excitable temperaments. J. Anim. Sci. 1997;75:892–896. doi: 10.2527/1997.754892x. PubMed DOI

Eguinoa P., Brocklehurst S., Arana A., Mendizabal J.A., Vernon R.G., Purroy A. Lipogenic enzyme activities in different adipose depots of pirenaican and holstein bulls and heifers taking into account adipocyte size. J. Anim. Sci. 2003;81:432–440. doi: 10.2527/2003.812432x. PubMed DOI

Lee T.L., Reinhardt C.D., Bartle S.J., Vahl C.I., Siemens M., Thomson D.U. Assessment of risk factors contributing to carcass bruising in fed cattle at commercial slaughter facilities. Transl. Anim. Sci. 2017;1:489–497. doi: 10.2527/tas2017.0055. PubMed DOI PMC

Bell M.J., Wall E., Russell G., Roberts D.J., Simm G. Risk factors for culling in Holstein-Friesian dairy cows. Vet. Rec. 2010;167:238–240. doi: 10.1136/vr.c4267. PubMed DOI

De Jong E., Appeltant R., Cools A., Beek J., Boyen F., Chiers K., Maes D. Slaughterhouse examination of culled sows in commercial pig herds. Livest. Sci. 2014;67:362–369. doi: 10.1016/j.livsci.2014.07.001. DOI

Zhao Y., Liu X., Mo D., Chen Q., Chen Y. Analysis of reasons for sow culling and seasonal effects on reproductive disorders in Southern Chi-na. Anim. Reprod. Sci. 2015;159:191–197. doi: 10.1016/j.anireprosci.2015.06.018. PubMed DOI

Mala G., Novak P. Vliv Welfare na Zdravi Hospodarskych Zvirat. [(accessed on 9 April 2021)]; Available online: https://www.ctpz.cz/vyzkum/vliv-welfare-na-zdravi-hospodarskych-zvirat-860.

Rutherford K.M.D., Langford F.M., Jack M.C., Sherwood L., Lawrence A.B., Haskell M.J. Hock injury prevalence and associated risk factors on organic and nonorganic dairy farms in the united kingdom. J. Dairy Sci. 2008;91:2265–2274. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0847. PubMed DOI

Drissler M., Gaworski M., Tucker C.B., Weary D.M. Freestall maintenance: Effects on lying behavior of dairy cattle. J. Dairy Sci. 2005;88:2381–2387. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(05)72916-7. PubMed DOI

Fulwider W.K., Grandin T., Garrick D.J., Engle T.E., Lamm W.D., Dalsted N.L., Rollin B.E. Influence of free-stall base on tarsal joint lesions and hygiene in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2007;90:3559–3566. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-793. PubMed DOI

Wechsler B., Schaub J., Friedli K., Hauser R. Behaviour and leg injuries in dairy cows kept in cubicle systems with straw bedding or soft lying mats. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2000;69:189–197. doi: 10.1016/S0168-1591(00)00134-9. PubMed DOI

Mowbray L., Vittie T., Weary D. Hock lesions and free-stall design: Effects of stall surface; Proceedings of the Fifth International Dairy Housing Conference; Fort Worth, TX, USA. 29–31 January 2003; St. Joseph, MI, USA: American Society of Agricultural Engineers; 2003.

Norring M., Manninen E., de Passille A.M., Rushen J., Munksgaard L., Saloniemi H. Effects of sand and straw bedding on the lying behavior, cleanliness, and hoof and hock injuries of dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2008;91:570–576. doi: 10.3168/jds.2007-0452. PubMed DOI

Telezhenko E., Lidfors L., Bergsten C. Dairy cow preferences for soft or hard flooring when standing or walking. J. Dairy Sci. 2007;90:3716–3724. doi: 10.3168/jds.2006-876. PubMed DOI

Rushen J., de Passille A.M. Effects of roughness and compressibility of flooring on cow locomotion. J. Dairy Sci. 2006;89:2965–2972. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72568-1. PubMed DOI

Haskell M.J., Rennie L.J., Bowell V.A., Bell M.J., Lawrence A.B. Housing System, milk production, and zero-grazing effects on lameness and leg injury in dairy cows. J. Dairy Sci. 2006;89:4259–4266. doi: 10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(06)72472-9. PubMed DOI

Gillman C.E., KilBride A.L., Ossent P., Green L.E. A cross-sectional study of the prevalence of foot lesions in post-weaning pigs and risks associated with floor type on commercial farms in England. Prev. Vet. Med. 2009;91:146–152. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.05.023. PubMed DOI

Gillman C.E., Kilbride A.L., Ossent P., Green L.E. A cross-sectional study of the prevalence and associated risk factors for bursitis in weaner, grower and finisher pigs from 93 commercial farms in England. Prev. Vet. Med. 2008;83:308–322. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.09.001. PubMed DOI

Lensink J., Fernandez X., Giulio C., Florand L., Veissier I. The influence of farmers’ behavior on calves’ reactions to transport and quality of veal meat. J. Anim. Sci. 2001;79:642–652. doi: 10.2527/2001.793642x. PubMed DOI

Lensink J., Fernandez X., Boivin X., Pradel P., Neindre P., Veissier I. The Impact of gentle contacts on ease of handling, welfare, and growth of calves and on quality of veal meat. J. Anim. Sci. 2000;78:1219–1226. doi: 10.2527/2000.7851219x. PubMed DOI

Mabille G., Stien A., Tveraa T., Mysterud A., Brøseth H., Linnell J. Sheep farming and large carnivores: What are the factors influencing claimed losses? Ecosphere. 2015;6:82. doi: 10.1890/ES14-00444.1. DOI

Hansson I., Hamilton C., Ekman T., Forslund K. Carcass quality in certified organic production compared with conventional livestock production. J. Vet. Med. 2000;47:111–120. doi: 10.1046/j.1439-0450.2000.00313.x. PubMed DOI

Keeling L.J., Wallenbeck A., Larsen A., Holmgren N. Scoring tail damage in pigs: An Evaluation based on recordings at Swedish slaughterhouses. Acta Vet. Scand. 2012;54:32. doi: 10.1186/1751-0147-54-32. PubMed DOI PMC

Kritas S.K., Morrison R.B. Relationships between tail biting in pigs and disease lesions and condemnations at slaughter. Vet. Rec. 2007;160:149–152. doi: 10.1136/vr.160.5.149. PubMed DOI

Brocke A., Karnholz C., Madey-Rindermann D., Gauly M., Leeb C., Winckler C., Schrader L., Dippel S. Tail lesions in fattening pigs: Relationships with postmortem meat inspection and influence of a tail biting management tool. Animal. 2018;13:1–10. doi: 10.1017/S1751731118002070. PubMed DOI

Faucitano L. Causes of skin damage to pig carcasses. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2001;81:39–45. doi: 10.4141/A00-031. DOI

Averos X., Knowles T., Brown S., Warriss P.D., Gosálvez L.F. Factors affecting the mortality of pigs being transported to slaughter. Vet. Rec. 2008;163:386–390. doi: 10.1136/vr.163.13.386. PubMed DOI

Brandt P., Aaslyng M.D. Welfare measurements of finishing pigs on the day of slaughter: A review. Meat Sci. 2015;103:13–23. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2014.12.004. PubMed DOI

Driessen B., Van Beirendonck S., Buyse J. The impact of grouping on skin lesions and meat quality of pig carcasses. Animals. 2020;10:544. doi: 10.3390/ani10040544. PubMed DOI PMC

Wanda S., Schleicher C.K., Scheriau S., Köfer J. Austrian model approach to assess quality of post-mortem feedback-information systems in pigs; Proceedings of the 10th International Conference on the Epidemiology and Control of Biological, Chemical and Physical Hazards in Pigs and Pork; Portland, ME, USA. 9–12 September 2013.

Marques B.M.F.P.P., Bernardi M.L., Coelho C.F., Almeida M., Morales O.E., Mores T.J., Borowski S.M., Barcellos D.E.S.N. Influence of Tail biting on weight gain, lesions and condemnations at slaughter of finishing pigs. Pesq. Vet. Bras. 2012;32:967–974. doi: 10.1590/S0100-736X2012001000003. DOI

Traumatic Injuries Detected during Post-Mortem Slaughterhouse Inspection as Welfare Indicators in Poultry and Rabbits