Traumatic Injuries Detected during Post-Mortem Slaughterhouse Inspection as Welfare Indicators in Poultry and Rabbits

. 2021 Sep 06 ; 11 (9) : . [epub] 20210906

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid34573576

Grantová podpora
Project No. 213/2021/FVHE Internal Grant Agency of the University of Veterinary Sciences Brno

The findings of traumatic injuries during post-mortem inspection in slaughterhouses reflect the level of pre-slaughter handling of animals at the farm and during transport to the slaughterhouse. The prevalence of traumatic injuries was monitored in poultry (1,089,406,687 broiler chickens, 20,030,744 laying hens, 1,181,598 turkeys, 37,690 geese, 28,579,765 ducks) and rabbits (1,876,929) originating from farms in the Czech Republic and slaughtered in slaughterhouses in the Czech Republic between 2010 and 2019. The greatest incidence of traumatic injuries was found in laying hens (2.80%) and rabbits (1.52%); while the overall incidence of trauma was less than 0.5% in other species and categories. The results show that the current rearing conditions and/or pre-slaughter handling of poultry and rabbits particularly affect the limbs; traumatic findings were significantly (p < 0.01) more frequent on the limbs than on the trunk in all species studied. In poultry, traumatic findings on the trunk were orders of magnitude lower to negligible, so the focus should be on preventing injuries to the limbs. In rabbits, the difference was less pronounced, and many injuries were found on both limbs (0.83%) and trunk (0.69%). Our results emphasize the need to reconsider both housing and pre-slaughter handling methods to determine minimum standards for the protection of rabbits, which are still lacking in European legislation.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Huneau-Salaün A., Stärk K., Mateus A., Lupo C., Lindberg A., Le Bouquin-Leneveu S. Contribution of Meat Inspection to the surveillance of poultry health and welfare in the European Union. Epidemiol. Infect. 2015;143:2459–2472. doi: 10.1017/S0950268814003379. PubMed DOI PMC

Weeks C.A., Tuyttens F.A.M., Grandin T. Poultry handling and transport. In: Grandin T., editor. Livestock Handling and Transport. 5th ed. CABI Publishing; Oxon, UK: 2019. pp. 404–426.

Meluzzi A., Fabbri C., Folegatti E., Sirri F. Survey of chicken rearing conditions in Italy: Effects of litter quality and stocking density on productivity, foot dermatitis and carcase injuries. Br. Poult. Sci. 2008;49:257–264. doi: 10.1080/00071660802094156. PubMed DOI

Kittelsen K.E., Granquist E.G., Kolbjørnsen Ø., Nafstad O., Moe R.O. A comparison of post-mortem findings in broilers dead-on-farm and broilers dead-on-arrival at the abattoir. Poult. Sci. 2015;94:2622–2629. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev294. PubMed DOI

Cockram M.S., Dulal K.J. Injury and mortality in broilers during handling and transport to slaughter. Can. J. Anim. Sci. 2018;98:416–432. doi: 10.1139/cjas-2017-0076. DOI

Knierim U., Gocke A. Effect of catching broilers by hand or machine on rates of injuries and dead-on-arrivals. Anim. Welf. 2003;12:63–73.

Delezie E., Lips D., Lips R., Decuypere E. Is the mechanization of catching broilers a welfare improvement? Anim. Welf. 2006;15:141–147.

Langkabel N., Baumann M.P., Feiler A., Sanguankiat A., Fries R. Influence of two catching methods on the occurrence of lesions in broilers. Poult. Sci. 2015;94:1735–1741. doi: 10.3382/ps/pev164. PubMed DOI

Kittelsen K.E., Granquist E.G., Aunsmo A.L., Moe R.O., Tolo E. An evaluation of two different broiler catching methods. Animals. 2018;8:141. doi: 10.3390/ani8080141. PubMed DOI PMC

Nijdam E., Arens P., Lambooij E., Decuypere E., Stegeman J.A. Factors influencing bruises and mortality of broilers during catching, transport, and lairage. Poult. Sci. 2004;83:1610–1615. doi: 10.1093/ps/83.9.1610. PubMed DOI

Jacobs L., Delezie E., Duchateau L., Goethals K., Tuyttens F.A.M. Impact of the separate pre-slaughter stages on broiler chicken welfare. Poult. Sci. 2017;96:266–273. doi: 10.3382/ps/pew361. PubMed DOI

Saraiva S., Esteves A., Oliveira I., Mitchell M., Stilwell G. Impact of pre-slaughter factors on welfare of broilers. Vet. Anim. Sci. 2020;10:100146. doi: 10.1016/j.vas.2020.100146. PubMed DOI PMC

Kristensen H.H., Berry P.S., Tinker D.B. Depopulation systems for spent hens – a preliminary evaluation in the United Kingdom. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2001;10:172–177. doi: 10.1093/japr/10.2.172. DOI

Gerpe C., Stratmann A., Bruckmaier R., Toscano M.J. Examining the catching, carrying and crating process during depopulation of end of lay hens. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2021;30:100115. doi: 10.1016/j.japr.2020.100115. DOI

Knowles T.G., Wilkins L.J. The problem of broken bones during the handling of laying hens—A review. Poult. Sci. 1998;77:1798–1802. doi: 10.1093/ps/77.12.1798. PubMed DOI

Whitehead C.C. Overview of bone biology in the egg-laying hen. Poult. Sci. 2004;83:193–199. doi: 10.1093/ps/83.2.193. PubMed DOI

Clauer P.J. Leg and Foot Disorders in Domestic Fowl. Virginia Cooperative Extension, Virginia Polytechnic Institute and State University; Blacksburg, VA, USA: 2009. [(accessed on 15 June 2021)]. Available online: https://ucanr.edu/sites/poultry/files/246964.pdf.

Mohan Raj A.B., Grey T.C., Audsely A.R., Gregory N.G. Effect of electrical and gaseous stunning on the carcase and meat quality of broilers. Br. Poult. Sci. 1990;31:725–733. doi: 10.1080/00071669008417303. DOI

Kittelsen K.E., Granquist E.G., Vasdal G., Tolo E., Moe R.O. Effects of catching and transportation versus pre-slaughter handling at the abattoir on the prevalence of wing fractures in broilers. Anim. Welf. 2015;24:387–389. doi: 10.7120/09627286.24.4.387. DOI

Wilson J.G., Brunson C.C. The effects of handling and slaughter method on the incidence of hemorrhagic thighs in broilers. Poult. Sci. 1968;47:1315–1318. doi: 10.3382/ps.0471315. DOI

Joseph P., Schilling M.W., Williams J.B., Radhakrishnan V., Battula V., Christensen K., Vizzier-Thaxton Y., Schmidt T.B. Broiler stunning methods and their effects on welfare, rigor mortis, and meat quality. World Poult. Sci. J. 2013;69:99–112. doi: 10.1017/S0043933913000093. DOI

Turcsan Z., Szigeti J., Varga L., Farkas L., Birkas E., Turcsan J. The effects of electrical and controlled atmosphere stunning methods on meat and liver quality of geese. Poult. Sci. 2001;80:1647–1651. doi: 10.1093/ps/80.11.1647. PubMed DOI

Valkova L., Vecerek V., Voslarova E., Zavrelova V., Conte F., Semerad Z. The health and welfare of rabbits as indicated by post-mortem findings at the slaughterhouse. Animals. 2021;11:659. doi: 10.3390/ani11030659. PubMed DOI PMC

Voslarova E., Vecerek V., Bedanova I., Vecerkova L. Mortality in rabbits transported for slaughter. Anim. Sci. J. 2018;89:931–936. doi: 10.1111/asj.13002. PubMed DOI

Buil T., Maria G.A., Villarroel M., Liste G., Lopez M. Critical points in the transport of commercial rabbits to slaughter in Spain that could compromise animals’ welfare. World Rabbit Sci. 2004;12:269–279. doi: 10.4995/wrs.2004.566. DOI

Petracci M., Bianchi M., Biguzzi G., Cavani C. Preslaughter risk factors associated with mortality and bruising in rabbits. World Rabbit Sci. 2010;18:219–228. doi: 10.4995/wrs.2010.781. DOI

Trocino A., Xiccato G. Animal welfare in reared rabbits: A review with emphasis on housing systems. World Rabbit Sci. 2006;14:77–93. doi: 10.4995/wrs.2006.553. DOI

Verga M., Luzi F., Petracci M., Cavani C. Welfare aspects in rabbit rearing and transport. Ital. J. Anim. Sci. 2009;8:191–204. doi: 10.4081/ijas.2009.s1.191. DOI

De la Fuente J., Diaz M.T., Ibanez M., de Chavarri E.G. Physiological response of rabbits to heat, cold, noise and mixing in the context of transport. Anim. Welf. 2007;16:41–47.

Wang C., Liu Z.L., Xue J.J., Wang Y.M., Huang X.F., Wang Q.G. Effect of stocking density on growth performance, feather quality, carcass traits and muscle chemical component of geese from 49 to 70 days of age. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2019;28:1297–1304. doi: 10.3382/japr/pfz097. DOI

Yin L., Yang H., Xu L., Zhang J., Xing H., Wang Z. Feather performance, walking ability, and behavioral changes of geese in response to different stocking densities. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2017;196:108–112. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2017.06.017. DOI

Abrahamsson P., Tauson R. Aviary systems and conventional cages for laying hens: Effect on production, egg quality, health and bird location in three hybrids. Acta Agric. Scand. 1995;45:191–203. doi: 10.1080/09064709509415851. DOI

Tauson R. Furnished cages and aviaries: Production and health. World Poult. Sci. J. 2002;58:49–63. doi: 10.1079/WPS20020007. DOI

Leyendecker M., Hamann H., Hartung J., Kamphues J., Neumann U., Surie C., Distl O. Keeping laying hens in furnished cages and an aviary housing system enhance their bone stability. Br. Poult. Sci. 2005;46:536–544. doi: 10.1080/00071660500273094. PubMed DOI

Lay D.C., Fulton R.M., Hester P., Karcher D., Kjaer J., Mench J., Mullens B.A., Newberry R., Nicol C., O’Sullivan N., et al. Hen welfare in different housing systems. Poult. Sci. 2011;90:278–294. doi: 10.3382/ps.2010-00962. PubMed DOI

Fulton R.M. Health of commercial egg laying chickens in different housing systems. Avian Dis. 2019;63:420–426. doi: 10.1637/11942-080618-Reg.1. PubMed DOI

Krivankova T., Voslarova E., Vecerek V., Bedanova I., Blahova J., Chloupek J. Comparison of selected indices of internal environment and condition of laying hens kept in furnished cages and in aviaries. Anim. Sci. J. 2020;91:e13400. doi: 10.1111/asj.13400. PubMed DOI

Weeks C.A., Brown S.N., Richards G.J., Wilkins L.J., Knowles T.G. Levels of mortality in hens by end of lay on farm and in transit to slaughter in Great Britain. Vet. Rec. 2012;170:647. doi: 10.1136/vr.100728. PubMed DOI

Schorwerth A., Rottler S., Lee H.W., Schmidt P., Erhard M.H., Bergmann S. Comparative studies on the animal health of fattening rabbits kept in pen husbandry and a dual purpose cage system under practical conditions. Berl. Münchener Tierärztliche Wochenschr. 2019;132:532–549. doi: 10.2376/0005-9366-18073. DOI

Trocino A., Filiou E., Tazzoli M., Birolo M., Zufellatto A., Xiccato G. Effects of floor type, stocking density, slaughter age and gender on productive and qualitative traits of rabbits reared in collective pens. Animal. 2015;9:855–861. doi: 10.1017/S1751731114003188. PubMed DOI

Martino M., Mattioli S., Farkas P., Szendro Z., dal Bosco A., Ruggeri S., Matics Z., Castellini C., Gerencser Z. Carcass traits and meat quality of growing rabbits in pens with and without different multilevel platforms. World Rabbit Sci. 2016;24:129–138. doi: 10.4995/wrs.2016.3922. DOI

Mohammed H., Nasr M. Growth performance, carcass traits, behaviour and welfare of New Zealand White rabbits housed in different enriched cages. Anim. Prod. Sci. 2017;57:1759–1766. doi: 10.1071/AN15865. DOI

European Union Commission implementing regulation (EU) 2019/627 of 15 March 2019 laying down uniform practical arrangements for the performance of official controls on products of animal origin intended for human consumption in accordance with Regulation (EU) 2017/625 of the European Parliament and of the Council and amending Commission Regulation (EC) No 2074/2005 as regards official controls. Off. J. Eur. Union. 2019;L131:51–100.

Zar J.H. Biostatistical Analysis. 4th ed. Prentice Hall, Inc.; Upper Saddle River, NJ, USA: 1999.

Vecerkova L., Voslarova E., Vecerek V. Comparison of the welfare of laying hens, broiler chickens and turkeys in terms of bird health as surveyed during inspection in slaughterhouses. Acta Vet. Brno. 2019;88:243–248. doi: 10.2754/avb201988020243. DOI

Petracci M., Bianchi M., Cavani C., Gaspari P., Lavazza A. Preslaughter mortality in broiler chickens, turkeys, and spent hens under commercial slaughtering. Poult. Sci. 2006;85:1660–1664. doi: 10.1093/ps/85.9.1660. PubMed DOI

Berg C., Yngvesson J., Nimmermark S., Sandstrom V., Algers B. Killing of spent laying hens using CO2 in poultry barns. Anim. Welf. 2014;23:445–457. doi: 10.7120/09627286.23.4.445. DOI

Eck S. Working Document on Minimum Standards for the Protection of Farm Rabbits. Committee on Agriculture and Rural Development, European Parliament, Brussels, B. 2016. [(accessed on 24 May 2021)]. Available online: https://www.europarl.europa.eu/doceo/document/AGRI-DT-582342_EN.pdf?redirect.

Gouveia K.G., Vaz-Pires P., da Costa P.M. Welfare assessment of broilers through examination of haematomas, foot-pad dermatitis, scratches and breast blisters at processing. Anim. Welf. 2009;18:43–48.

Stanciu N., Popescu-Miclosanu E., Tudorache M. Study regarding rabbit welfare intensively bred. Sci. Pap. Ser. D Anim. Sci. 2015;58:334–338.

Dorning J., Harris S. The Welfare of Farmed Rabbits in Commercial Production Systems. A Scientific Review. 2017. [(accessed on 15 August 2021)]. Available online: https://www.ciwf.org.uk/media/7430014/the-welfare-of-farmed-rabbits-in-commercial-production-systems-a-scientific-review-february-2017.pdf.

Dresher B. Deformations of vertebral column in breeding rabbits; Proceedings of the 6th World Rabbit Congress; Toulouse, France. 9–12 July 1996; pp. 417–421.

Valkova L., Vecerek V., Voslarova E., Kaluza M., Takacova D. The welfare of cattle, sheep, goats and pigs from the perspective of traumatic injuries detected at slaughterhouse postmortem inspection. Animals. 2021;11:1406. doi: 10.3390/ani11051406. PubMed DOI PMC

Prescott N.B., Berry S., Haslam S., Tinker D.B. Catching and crating turkeys: Effects on carcass damage, heart rate, and other welfare parameters. J. Appl. Poult. Res. 2000;9:424–432. doi: 10.1093/japr/9.3.424. DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...