Development and external validation of the Psychosis Metabolic Risk Calculator (PsyMetRiC): a cardiometabolic risk prediction algorithm for young people with psychosis
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, validační studie
Grantová podpora
MR/L010305/1
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
MR/N027078/1
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
MC_U120097115
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
Wellcome Trust - United Kingdom
MR/M006727/1
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
DRF-2018-11-ST2-018
Department of Health - United Kingdom
MC_PC_17213
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
MR/S037675/1
Medical Research Council - United Kingdom
PubMed
34087113
PubMed Central
PMC8211566
DOI
10.1016/s2215-0366(21)00114-0
PII: S2215-0366(21)00114-0
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- algoritmy * MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- kardiometabolické riziko * MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metabolický syndrom diagnóza MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- psychotické poruchy * diagnóza MeSH
- reprodukovatelnost výsledků MeSH
- Check Tag
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- mladý dospělý MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- validační studie MeSH
BACKGROUND: Young people with psychosis are at high risk of developing cardiometabolic disorders; however, there is no suitable cardiometabolic risk prediction algorithm for this group. We aimed to develop and externally validate a cardiometabolic risk prediction algorithm for young people with psychosis. METHODS: We developed the Psychosis Metabolic Risk Calculator (PsyMetRiC) to predict up to 6-year risk of incident metabolic syndrome in young people (aged 16-35 years) with psychosis from commonly recorded information at baseline. We developed two PsyMetRiC versions using the forced entry method: a full model (including age, sex, ethnicity, body-mass index, smoking status, prescription of a metabolically active antipsychotic medication, HDL concentration, and triglyceride concentration) and a partial model excluding biochemical results. PsyMetRiC was developed using data from two UK psychosis early intervention services (Jan 1, 2013, to Nov 4, 2020) and externally validated in another UK early intervention service (Jan 1, 2012, to June 3, 2020). A sensitivity analysis was done in UK birth cohort participants (aged 18 years) who were at risk of developing psychosis. Algorithm performance was assessed primarily via discrimination (C statistic) and calibration (calibration plots). We did a decision curve analysis and produced an online data-visualisation app. FINDINGS: 651 patients were included in the development samples, 510 in the validation sample, and 505 in the sensitivity analysis sample. PsyMetRiC performed well at internal (full model: C 0·80, 95% CI 0·74-0·86; partial model: 0·79, 0·73-0·84) and external validation (full model: 0·75, 0·69-0·80; and partial model: 0·74, 0·67-0·79). Calibration of the full model was good, but there was evidence of slight miscalibration of the partial model. At a cutoff score of 0·18, in the full model PsyMetRiC improved net benefit by 7·95% (sensitivity 75%, 95% CI 66-82; specificity 74%, 71-78), equivalent to detecting an additional 47% of metabolic syndrome cases. INTERPRETATION: We have developed an age-appropriate algorithm to predict the risk of incident metabolic syndrome, a precursor of cardiometabolic morbidity and mortality, in young people with psychosis. PsyMetRiC has the potential to become a valuable resource for early intervention service clinicians and could enable personalised, informed health-care decisions regarding choice of antipsychotic medication and lifestyle interventions. FUNDING: National Institute for Health Research and Wellcome Trust.
Birmingham Women's and Children's NHS Trust Early Intervention Service Birmingham UK
Institute for Mental Health University of Birmingham Birmingham UK
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Plana-Ripoll O, Pedersen CB, Agerbo E. A comprehensive analysis of mortality-related health metrics associated with mental disorders: a nationwide, register-based cohort study. Lancet. 2019;394:1827–1835. PubMed
Firth J, Siddiqi N, Koyanagi A. The Lancet Psychiatry Commission: a blueprint for protecting physical health in people with mental illness. Lancet Psychiatry. 2019;6:675–712. PubMed
Naylor C, Parsonage M, McDaid D, Knapp M, Fossey M, Galea A. The King's Fund and Centre for Mental Health; London: 2012. Long-term conditions and mental health: the cost of co-morbidities.
Perry BI, McIntosh G, Weich S, Singh S, Rees K. The association between first-episode psychosis and abnormal glycaemic control: systematic review and meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2016;3:1049–1058. PubMed
Pillinger T, Beck K, Stubbs B, Howes OD. Cholesterol and triglyceride levels in first-episode psychosis: systematic review and meta-analysis. Br J Psychiatry. 2017;211:339–349. PubMed PMC
De Hert M, Detraux J, Vancampfort D. The intriguing relationship between coronary heart disease and mental disorders. Dialogues Clin Neurosci. 2018;20:31–40. PubMed PMC
Hippisley-Cox J, Coupland C, Brindle P. Development and validation of QRISK3 risk prediction algorithms to estimate future risk of cardiovascular disease: prospective cohort study. BMJ. 2017;357 PubMed PMC
Perry BI, Upthegrove R, Crawford O. Cardiometabolic risk prediction algorithms for young people with psychosis: a systematic review and exploratory analysis. Acta Psychiatr Scand. 2020;142:215–232. PubMed
Collins GS, Reitsma JB, Altman DG, Moons KG. Transparent Reporting of a multivariable prediction model for Individual Prognosis or Diagnosis (TRIPOD): the TRIPOD statement. Ann Intern Med. 2015;162:55–63. PubMed
Cardinal RN. Clinical records anonymisation and text extraction (CRATE): an open-source software system. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2017;17:50. PubMed PMC
Boyd A, Golding J, Macleod J. Cohort profile: the ‘children of the 90s’—the index offspring of the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Int J Epidemiol. 2013;42:111–127. PubMed PMC
Alberti KG, Eckel RH, Grundy SM. Harmonizing the metabolic syndrome: a joint interim statement of the International Diabetes Federation Task Force on Epidemiology and Prevention; National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute; American Heart Association; World Heart Federation; International Atherosclerosis Society; and International Association for the Study of Obesity. Circulation. 2009;120:1640–1645. PubMed
Steyerberg EW, Eijkemans MJ, Harrell FE, Jr, Habbema JD. Prognostic modelling with logistic regression analysis: a comparison of selection and estimation methods in small data sets. Stat Med. 2000;19:1059–1079. PubMed
Riley RD, Snell KI, Ensor J. Minimum sample size for developing a multivariable prediction model: part II—binary and time-to-event outcomes. Stat Med. 2019;38:1276–1296. PubMed PMC
Vickers AJ, Elkin EB. Decision curve analysis: a novel method for evaluating prediction models. Med Decis Making. 2006;26:565–574. PubMed PMC
Vickers AJ, van Calster B, Steyerberg EW. A simple, step-by-step guide to interpreting decision curve analysis. Diagn Progn Res. 2019;3:18. PubMed PMC
Fernandez-Abascal B, Suarez-Pinilla P, Cobo-Corrales C, Crespo-Facorro B, Suarez-Pinilla M. In- and outpatient lifestyle interventions on diet and exercise and their effect on physical and psychological health: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials in patients with schizophrenia spectrum disorders and first episode of psychosis. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021;125:535–568. PubMed
Isomaa B, Almgren P, Tuomi T. Cardiovascular morbidity and mortality associated with the metabolic syndrome. Diabetes Care. 2001;24:683–689. PubMed
Pillinger T, McCutcheon RA, Vano L. Comparative effects of 18 antipsychotics on metabolic function in patients with schizophrenia, predictors of metabolic dysregulation, and association with psychopathology: a systematic review and network meta-analysis. Lancet Psychiatry. 2020;7:64–77. PubMed PMC
Reinikainen J, Laatikainen T, Karvanen J, Tolonen H. Lifetime cumulative risk factors predict cardiovascular disease mortality in a 50-year follow-up study in Finland. Int J Epidemiol. 2015;44:108–116. PubMed
Osborn DP, Hardoon S, Omar RZ. Cardiovascular risk prediction models for people with severe mental illness: results from the prediction and management of cardiovascular risk in people with severe mental illnesses (PRIMROSE) research program. JAMA Psychiatry. 2015;72:143–151. PubMed PMC
Misiak B, Stanczykiewicz B, Laczmanski L, Frydecka D. Lipid profile disturbances in antipsychotic-naive patients with first-episode non-affective psychosis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Schizophr Res. 2017;190:18–27. PubMed
Murguia-Romero M, Jimenez-Flores JR, Sigrist-Flores SC. Plasma triglyceride/HDL-cholesterol ratio, insulin resistance, and cardiometabolic risk in young adults. J Lipid Res. 2013;54:2795–2799. PubMed PMC
Nordestgaard BG, Varbo A. Triglycerides and cardiovascular disease. Lancet. 2014;384:626–635. PubMed
Barnes TR, Drake R, Paton C. Evidence-based guidelines for the pharmacological treatment of schizophrenia: updated recommendations from the British Association for Psychopharmacology. J Psychopharmacol. 2020;34:3–78. PubMed
Hayes JF, Lundin A, Wicks S. Association of hydroxylmethyl glutaryl coenzyme A reductase inhibitors, L-type calcium channel antagonists, and biguanides with rates of psychiatric hospitalization and self-harm in individuals with serious mental illness. JAMA Psychiatry. 2019;76:382–390. PubMed PMC
Wolff RF, Moons KGM, Riley RD. PROBAST: a tool to assess the risk of bias and applicability of prediction model studies. Ann Intern Med. 2019;170:51–58. PubMed
Collins GS, Ogundimu EO, Altman DG. Sample size considerations for the external validation of a multivariable prognostic model: a resampling study. Stat Med. 2016;35:214–226. PubMed PMC