Background: Empirical soundness and international robustness of the PID5BF+M, a shortened version of the PID-5 developed for simultaneous evaluation of maladaptive personality traits in the DSM-5 AMPD and ICD-11 models for personality disorders, was recently confirmed in 16 samples from different countries. Because the modified PID5BF+ scale (36 items) was extracted from the complete 220-item PID-5, an independent evaluation of psychometric properties of a stand-alone PID5BF+M is still missing. Objectives: The present study evaluated the validity and reliability of the 36-item PID5BF+M in comparison with the extracted version from the original PID-5. It also assessed associations between the Borderline Pattern qualifier and trait domain qualifiers. Methods: Two non-clinical samples meeting the inclusion criteria were employed in the study. Sample 1 (n = 614) completed the 220-item PID-5; Sample 2 (n = 1,040) completed the independent 36-item PID5BF+M. Participants were from all 14 regions of the Czech Republic. The Borderline Pattern qualifier was evaluated using a shortened IPDEQ screener. Results: The proposed latent structure of the independent PID5BF+M was confirmed, with an exception of the Disinhibition domain. The results confirmed good internal consistency and test-retest reliability of the measure, as well as some support for the measurement invariance of the independent PID5BF+M in comparison with the extracted version from the original PID-5. Significant associations between the Negative affectivity, Disinhibition, and Psychoticism qualifiers and the IPDEQ items for the emotionally unstable personality disorder of both impulsive and borderline types confirmed good predictive validity of the PID5BF+M in pursuing borderline psychopathology within the ICD-11 model. Conclusions: The independent PID5BF+M was found to be a valid and reliable tool for evaluation of the ICD-11 trait model. However, the Disinhibition domain deserves further investigation in clinical samples as well as in international community samples.

Department of Addictology General University Hospital Prague and 1st Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czechia

Research Centre for Toxic Compounds in the Environment Faculty of Science Masaryk University Brno Czechia

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Krueger RF, Hobbs KA. An overview of the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders. Psychopathology. (2020) 53:126–32. 10.1159/000508538 PubMed DOI PMC

Widiger TA, Simonsen E. Alternative dimensional models of personality disorder: finding a common ground. J Personal Disord. (2005) 19:110–30. 10.1521/pedi.19.2.110.62628 PubMed DOI

Bach B, Sellbom M, Skjernov M, Simonsen E. ICD-11 and DSM-5 personality trait domains capture categorical personality disorders: finding a common ground. Aust New Zeal J Psychiatry. (2018) 52:425–34. 10.1177/0004867417727867 PubMed DOI

Bach B, First MB. Application of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders. BMC Psychiatry. (2018) 18:351. 10.1186/s12888-018-1908-3 PubMed DOI PMC

Krueger RF, Derringer J, Markon KE, Watson D, Skodol AE. Initial construction of a maladaptive personality trait model and inventory for DSM-5. Psychol Med. (2012) 42:1879–90. 10.1017/S0033291711002674 PubMed DOI PMC

Thimm JC, Jordan S, Bach B. The personality inventory for DSM-5 short form (PID-5-SF): psychometric properties and association with big five traits and pathological beliefs in a Norwegian population. BMC Psychol. (2016) 4:61. 10.1186/s40359-016-0169-5 PubMed DOI PMC

Bach B, Maples-Keller JL, Bo S, Simonsen E. The alternative DSM-5 personality disorder traits criterion: a comparative examination of three self-report forms in a Danish population. Personal Disord. (2016) 7:124–35. 10.1037/per0000162 PubMed DOI

Riegel KD, Ksinan AJ, Samankova D, Preiss M, Harsa P, Krueger RF. Unidimensionality of the Personality inventory for DSM-5 facets: evidence from two Czech-speaking samples. Personality and Mental Health. (2018) 12:281–97. 10.1002/pmh.1423 PubMed DOI

Oltmanns JR, Widiger TA. A self-report measure for the ICD-11 dimensional trait model proposal: the Personality inventory for ICD-11. Psychol Assess. (2018) 30:154–69. 10.1037/pas0000459 PubMed DOI PMC

Oltmanns JR, Widiger TA. The five-factor personality inventory for ICD-11: a facet-level assessment of the ICD-11 trait model. Psychol Assess. (2020) 32:60–71. 10.1037/pas0000763 PubMed DOI PMC

Bach B, Kerber A, Aluja A, Bastiaens T, Keeley JW, Claes, et al. . International assessment of DSM-5 and ICD-11 personality disorder traits: toward a common nosology in DSM-5.1. Psychopathology. (2020) 53:179–88. 10.1159/000507589 PubMed DOI

Hansen SJ, Christensen S, Kongerslev MT, First MB, Widiger TA, Simonsen, et al. . Mental health professionals' perceived clinical utility of the ICD-10 vs. ICD-11 classification of personality disorders. Personal Ment Health. (2019) 13:84–95. 10.1002/pmh.1442 PubMed DOI

Blashfield RK, Intoccia V. Growth of the literature on the topic of personality disorders. Am J Psychiatry. (2000) 157:472–3. 10.1176/appi.ajp.157.3.472 PubMed DOI

Tyrer P, Mulder R, Kim YR, Crawford MJ. The development of the ICD-11 classification of personality disorders: An amalgam of science, pragmatism, and politics. Annu Rev Clin Psychol. (2019) 15:481–502. 10.1146/annurev-clinpsy-050718-095736 PubMed DOI

Morey LC, Skodol AE, Oldham JM. Clinician judgments of clinical utility: a comparison of DSM-IV-TR personality disorders and the alternative model for DSM-5 personality disorders. J Abnorm Psychol. (2014) 123:398–405. 10.1037/a0036481 PubMed DOI

Kerber A, Schultze M, Müller S, Rühling RM, Wright AG, Spitzer, et al. . Development of a short and ICD-11 compatible measure for DSM-5 maladaptive personality traits using ant colony optimization algorithms. Assessment. (2020) 28:1073191120971848. 10.31234/osf.io/rsw54 PubMed DOI PMC

Haslam N. The return of the anal character. Rev Gene Psychol. (2011) 15:351–60. 10.1037/a0025251 DOI

Watters CA, Bagby RM. A meta-analysis of the five-factor internal structure of the Personality inventory for DSM-5. Psychol Assess. (2018) 30:1255–60. 10.1037/pas0000605 PubMed DOI

Smith GT, McCarthy DM, Anderson KG. On the sins of short-form development. Psychol Assess. (2000) 12:102–11. 10.1037/1040-3590.12.1.102 PubMed DOI

Watters CA, Bagby RM, Sellbom M. Meta-analysis to derive an empirically based set of personality facet criteria for the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders. Personal Disord. (2019) 10:97–104. 10.1037/per0000307 PubMed DOI

Formanek T, Kagström A, Cermakova P, Csemy L, Mlada K, Winkler P. Prevalence of mental disorders and associated disability: results from the cross-sectional CZEch mental health study (CZEMS). Eur Psychiatry. (2019) 60:1–6. 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.05.001 PubMed DOI

Riegel KD, Preiss M, Ksinan AJ, Michalec J, Samankova D, Harsa P. Psychometric properties of the Czech version of the personality inventory for DSM-5: internal consistency, validity and discrimination capacity of the measure. Czechoslovak Psychology. (2017) 61:128–43. Available online at: https://psycnet.apa.org/record/2017-24130-002

Loranger AW, Janca A, Sartorius N. Assessment and Diagnosis of Personality Disorders: The ICD-10 International Personality Disorder Examination (IPDE). New York, NY: Cambridge University Press; (1997). 10.1017/CBO9780511663215 DOI

Keeley JW, Webb C, Peterson D, Roussin L, Flanagan EH. Development of a Response inconsistency scale for the Personality inventory for DSM-5. J Pers Assess. (2016) 98:351–9. 10.1080/00223891.2016.1158719 PubMed DOI

Somma A, Borroni S, Kelley SE, Edens JF, Fossati A. Further evidence for the validity of a response inconsistency scale for the Personality inventory for DSM-5 in Italian community-dwelling adolescents, community-dwelling adults, clinical adults. Psychol Assess. (2018) 30:929–40. 10.1037/pas0000547 PubMed DOI

Bagby RM, Sellbom M. The validity and clinical utility of the personality inventory for DSM-5 response inconsistency scale. J Pers Assess. (2018) 100:398–405. 10.1080/00223891.2017.1420659 PubMed DOI

Lowmaster SE, Hartman MJ, Zimmermann J, Baldock ZC, Kurtz JE. Further validation of the response inconsistency scale for the Personality inventory for DSM-5. J Pers Assess. (2020) 102:743–50. 10.1080/00223891.2019.1674320 PubMed DOI

Muthén LK, Muthén BO. Mplus User's Guide. Eighth Edition. Los Angeles, CA: Muthén Muthén; (1998–2017).

Satorra A, Bentler PM. Ensuring positiveness of the scaled difference chi-square test statistic. Psychometrika. (2010) 75:243–8. 10.1007/s11336-009-9135-y PubMed DOI PMC

Cheung GW, Rensvold RB. Evaluating goodness-of-fit indexes for testing measurement invariance. Struct Equ Modeling. (2002) 9:233–55. 10.1207/S15328007SEM0902_5 DOI

Roskam I, Galdiolo S, Hansenne M, Massoudi K, Rossier J, Gicquel L, et al. . The psychometric properties of the French version of the personality inventory for DSM-5. PLoS ONE. (2015) 10:e0133413. 10.1371/journal.pone.0133413 PubMed DOI PMC

Pires R, Sousa Ferreira A, Gonçalves B, Henriques-Calado J, Paulino M. The Portuguese version of the personality inventory for the DSM-5 in a community and a clinical sample. Personal Ment Health. (2019) 13:40–52. 10.1002/pmh.1437 PubMed DOI

Bach B, Markon K, Simonsen E, Krueger RF. Clinical utility of the DSM-5 alternative model of personality disorders: six cases from practice. J Psychiatr Pract. (2015) 21:3–25. 10.1097/01.pra.0000460618.02805.ef PubMed DOI

American Psychiatric Association . Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, 5th edition. Arlington, VA: American Psychiatric Association; (2013). 10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596 DOI

World Health Organization . The ICD-10 Classification of Mental and Behavioral Disorders: Clinical Descriptions and Diagnostic Guidelines. Geneva: World Health Organization; (1992).

Bach B, Sellbom M, Kongerslev M, Simonsen E, Krueger RF, Mulder R. Deriving ICD-11 personality disorder domains from dsm-5 traits: initial attempt to harmonize two diagnostic systems. Acta Psychiatr Scand. (2017) 136:108–17. 10.1111/acps.12748 PubMed DOI

Rosenfeld H. Impasse and Interpretation. London: Tavistock; (1987).

Bateman AW. Thick- and thin-skinned organisations and enactment in borderline and narcissistic disorders. Int J Psychoanal. (1998) 79:13–25. PubMed

De Fruyt F, De Clercq B, De Bolle M, Wille B, Markon K, Krueger RF. General and maladaptive traits in a five-factor framework for DSM-5 in a University student sample. Assessment. (2013) 20:295–307. 10.1177/1073191113475808 PubMed DOI

Gore WL, Widiger TA. The DSM-5 dimensional trait model and five-factor models of general personality. J Abnorm Psychol. (2013) 122:816–21. 10.1037/a0032822 PubMed DOI

Ashton MC, Lee K, de Vries RE, Hendrickse J, Born MP. The maladaptive personality traits of the personality Inventory for DSM-5 (PID-5) in relation to the HEXACO personality factors and schizotypy/dissociation. J Pers Disord. (2012) 26:641–59. 10.1521/pedi.2012.26.5.641 PubMed DOI

Wright AGC, Simms LJ. On the structure of personality disorder traits: conjoint analyses of the CAT-PD, PID-5, and NEO-PI-3 trait models. Personal Disord. (2014) 5:43–54. 10.1037/per0000037 PubMed DOI PMC

Anderson JL, Sellbom M, Salekin RT. Utility of the personality inventory for DSM-5-brief form (PID-5-BF) in the measurement of maladaptive personality and psychopathology. Assessment. (2018) 25:596–607. 10.1177/1073191116676889 PubMed DOI

Fossati A, Somma A, Borroni S, Markon KE, Krueger RF. The personality inventory for DSM-5 brief form: evidence for reliability and construct validity in a sample of community-dwelling italian adolescents. Assessment. (2017) 24:615–31. 10.1177/1073191115621793 PubMed DOI

Clark LA, Watson D. Constructing validity: Basic issues in objective scale development. Psychol Assessment. (1995) 7:309–319. 10.1037/1040-3590.7.3.309 DOI

Cortina JM. What is coefficient alpha? An examination of theory and applications. J Appl Psychol. (1993) 78:98–104. 10.1037/0021-9010.78.1.98 DOI

Cronbach LJ. Coefficient alpha and the internal structure of tests. Psychometrika. (1951) 16:297–334. 10.1007/BF02310555 DOI

Somma A, Krueger RF, Markon KE, Fossati A. The replicability of the personality inventory for DSM-5 domain scale factor structure in U.S. and non-U.S. samples: a quantitative review of the published literature. Psychol Assess. (2019) 31:861–77. 10.1037/pas0000711 PubMed DOI

Dhillon S, Bagby RM. The Internal and One-Week Retest Reliability of the PID−5 Domains and Facets. Toronto, ON: Department of Psychology, University of Toronto Scarborough; (2015).

Maples JL, Carter NT, Few LR, Crego C, Gore WL, Samuel B., et al. . Testing whether the DSM-5 personality disorder trait model can be measured with a reduced set of items: an item response theory investigation of the Personality inventory for DSM-5. Psychol Assess. (2015) 27:1195–210. 10.1037/pas0000120 PubMed DOI

Clarkin JF, Caligor E, Sowislo JF. An object relations model perspective on the alternative model for personality disorders (DSM-5). Psychopathology. (2020) 53:141–8. 10.1159/000508353 PubMed DOI PMC

Zimmermann J, Kerber A, Rek K, Hopwood CJ, Krueger RF. A brief but comprehensive review of research on the alternative DSM-5 model for personality disorders. Curr Psychiatry Rep. (2019) 21:92. 10.1007/s11920-019-1079-z PubMed DOI

Tyrer P, Crawford M, Mulder RT, Blashfield RK, Farnam A, Fossati A, et al. . The rationale for the reclassification of personality disorder in the 11th revision of the International Classification of Diseases (ICD-11). Personal Ment Health. (2011) 5:246–59. 10.1002/pmh.190 DOI

Mulder R, Tyrer P. Diagnosis and classification of personality disorders: novel approaches. Curr Opin Psychiatry. (2019) 32:27–31. 10.1097/YCO.0000000000000461 PubMed DOI

Pec O, Bob P, Simek J, Raboch J. Dissociative states in borderline personality disorder and their relationships to psychotropic medication. Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. (2018) 14:3253–7. 10.2147/NDT.S179091 PubMed DOI PMC

Philipsen A, Schmahl C, Lieb K. Naloxone in the treatment of acute dissociative states in female patients with borderline personality disorder. Pharmacopsychiatry. (2004) 37:196–9. 10.1055/s-2004-827243 PubMed DOI

Poreh AM, Rawlings D, Claridge G, Freeman JL, Faulkner C, Shelton C. The BPQ: a scale for the assessment of borderline personality based on DSM-IV criteria. J Pers Disord. (2006) 20:247–60. 10.1521/pedi.2006.20.3.247 PubMed DOI

Self-reported narcissistic traits in patients with addiction through the lens of the ICD-11 model for personality disorders