There is a large body of evidence that exposure to simulated natural scenes has positive effects on emotions and reduces stress. Some studies have used self-reported assessments, and others have used physiological measures or combined self-reports with physiological measures; however, analysis of facial emotional expression has rarely been assessed. In the present study, participant facial expressions were analyzed while viewing forest trees with foliage, forest trees without foliage, and urban images by iMotions' AFFDEX software designed for the recognition of facial emotions. It was assumed that natural images would evoke a higher magnitude of positive emotions in facial expressions and a lower magnitude of negative emotions than urban images. However, the results showed only very low magnitudes of facial emotional responses, and differences between natural and urban images were not significant. While the stimuli used in the present study represented an ordinary deciduous forest and urban streets, differences between the effects of mundane and attractive natural scenes and urban images are discussed. It is suggested that more attractive images could result in more pronounced emotional facial expressions. The findings of the present study have methodological relevance for future research. Moreover, not all urban dwellers have the possibility to spend time in nature; therefore, knowing more about the effects of some forms of simulated natural scenes surrogate nature also has some practical relevance.

Faculty of Informatics and Management University of Hradec Králové Rokitanského 62 500 03 Hradec Králové Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Bowler D.E., Buyung-Ali L.M., Knight T.M., Pullin A.S. A Systematic Review of Evidence for the Added Benefits to Health of Exposure to Natural Environments. BMC Public Health. 2010;10:456. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-456. PubMed DOI PMC

Bratman G.N., Hamilton J.P., Daily G.C. The Impacts of Nature Experience on Human Cognitive Function and Mental Health: Nature Experience, Cognitive Function, and Mental Health. Ann. N. Y. Acad. Sci. 2012;1249:118–136. doi: 10.1111/j.1749-6632.2011.06400.x. PubMed DOI

McMahan E.A., Estes D. The Effect of Contact with Natural Environments on Positive and Negative Affect: A Meta-Analysis. J. Posit. Psychol. 2015;10:507–519. doi: 10.1080/17439760.2014.994224. DOI

Browning M.H.E.M., Mimnaugh K.J., van Riper C.J., Laurent H.K., LaValle S.M. Can Simulated Nature Support Mental Health? Comparing Short, Single-Doses of 360-Degree Nature Videos in Virtual Reality with the Outdoors. Front. Psychol. 2020;10:2667. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02667. PubMed DOI PMC

Lewinski P., den Uyl T.M., Butler C. Automated Facial Coding: Validation of Basic Emotions and FACS AUs in FaceReader. J. Neurosci. Psychol. Econ. 2014;7:227–236. doi: 10.1037/npe0000028. DOI

Calvo M.G., Nummenmaa L. Perceptual and Affective Mechanisms in Facial Expression Recognition: An Integrative Review. Cogn. Emot. 2016;30:1081–1106. doi: 10.1080/02699931.2015.1049124. PubMed DOI

Geiger M., Wilhelm O. Computerized Facial Emotion Expression Recognition. In: Baumeister H., Montag C., editors. Digital Phenotyping and Mobile Sensing. Springer International Publishing; Cham, Switzerland: 2019. pp. 31–44. Studies in Neuroscience, Psychology and Behavioral Economics.

Berman M.G., Jonides J., Kaplan S. The Cognitive Benefits of Interacting with Nature. Psychol. Sci. 2008;19:1207–1212. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9280.2008.02225.x. PubMed DOI

Johnsen S.Å.K., Rydstedt L.W. Active Use of the Natural Environment for Emotion Regulation. Eur. J. Psychol. 2013;9:798–819. doi: 10.5964/ejop.v9i4.633. DOI

Lee K.E., Williams K.J.H., Sargent L.D., Williams N.S.G., Johnson K.A. 40-Second Green Roof Views Sustain Attention: The Role of Micro-Breaks in Attention Restoration. J. Environ. Psychol. 2015;42:182–189. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2015.04.003. DOI

Martínez-Soto J., Gonzales-Santos L., Barrios F.A., Lena M.E.M.-L. Affective and Restorative Valences for Three Environmental Categories. Percept. Mot. Skills. 2014;119:901–923. doi: 10.2466/24.50.PMS.119c29z4. PubMed DOI

Staats H., Kieviet A., Hartig T. Where to Recover from Attentional Fatigue: An Expectancy-Value Analysis of Environmental Preference. J. Environ. Psychol. 2003;23:147–157. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00112-3. DOI

Akers A., Barton J., Cossey R., Gainsford P., Griffin M., Micklewright D. Visual Color Perception in Green Exercise: Positive Effects on Mood and Perceived Exertion. Environ. Sci. Technol. 2012;46:8661–8666. doi: 10.1021/es301685g. PubMed DOI

Bornioli A., Parkhurst G., Morgan P.L. Psychological Wellbeing Benefits of Simulated Exposure to Five Urban Settings: An Experimental Study from the Pedestrian’s Perspective. J. Transp. Health. 2018;9:105–116. doi: 10.1016/j.jth.2018.02.003. DOI

de Kort Y.A.W., Meijnders A.L., Sponselee A.A.G., IJsselsteijn W.A. What’s Wrong with Virtual Trees? Restoring from Stress in a Mediated Environment. J. Environ. Psychol. 2006;26:309–320. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2006.09.001. DOI

Mayer F.S., Frantz C.M., Bruehlman-Senecal E., Dolliver K. Why Is Nature Beneficial?: The Role of Connectedness to Nature. Environ. Behav. 2009;41:607–643. doi: 10.1177/0013916508319745. DOI

Pilotti M., Klein E., Golem D., Piepenbrink E., Kaplan K. Is Viewing a Nature Video After Work Restorative? Effects on Blood Pressure, Task Performance, and Long-Term Memory. Environ. Behav. 2015;47:947–969. doi: 10.1177/0013916514533187. DOI

Snell T.L., McLean L.A., McAsey F., Zhang M., Maggs D. Nature Streaming: Contrasting the Effectiveness of Perceived Live and Recorded Videos of Nature for Restoration. Environ. Behav. 2019;51:1082–1105. doi: 10.1177/0013916518787318. DOI

Tabrizian P., Baran P.K., Smith W.R., Meentemeyer R.K. Exploring Perceived Restoration Potential of Urban Green Enclosure through Immersive Virtual Environments. J. Environ. Psychol. 2018;55:99–109. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvp.2018.01.001. DOI

van den Berg A.E., Koole S.L., van der Wulp N.Y. Environmental Preference and Restoration: (How) Are They Related? J. Environ. Psychol. 2003;23:135–146. doi: 10.1016/S0272-4944(02)00111-1. DOI

Browning M.H.E.M., Saeidi-Rizi F., McAnirlin O., Yoon H., Pei Y. The Role of Methodological Choices in the Effects of Experimental Exposure to Simulated Natural Landscapes on Human Health and Cognitive Performance: A Systematic Review. Environ. Behav. 2020;53:001391652090648. doi: 10.1177/0013916520906481. DOI

Chirico A., Ferrise F., Cordella L., Gaggioli A. Designing Awe in Virtual Reality: An Experimental Study. Front. Psychol. 2018;8:2351. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.02351. PubMed DOI PMC

Chirico A., Gaggioli A. When Virtual Feels Real: Comparing Emotional Responses and Presence in Virtual and Natural Environments. Cyberpsychol. Behav. Soc. Netw. 2019;22:220–226. doi: 10.1089/cyber.2018.0393. PubMed DOI

Felnhofer A., Kothgassner O.D., Schmidt M., Heinzle A.-K., Beutl L., Hlavacs H., Kryspin-Exner I. Is Virtual Reality Emotionally Arousing? Investigating Five Emotion Inducing Virtual Park Scenarios. Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2015;82:48–56. doi: 10.1016/j.ijhcs.2015.05.004. DOI

Higuera-Trujillo J.L., López-Tarruella Maldonado J., Llinares Millán C. Psychological and Physiological Human Responses to Simulated and Real Environments: A Comparison between Photographs, 360° Panoramas, and Virtual Reality. Appl. Ergon. 2017;65:398–409. doi: 10.1016/j.apergo.2017.05.006. PubMed DOI

Hartig T., Korpela K., Evans G.W., Gärling T. A Measure of Restorative Quality in Environments. Scand. Hous. Plan. Res. 1997;14:175–194. doi: 10.1080/02815739708730435. DOI

Pretty J., Peacock J., Sellens M., Griffin M. The Mental and Physical Health Outcomes of Green Exercise. Int. J. Environ. Health Res. 2005;15:319–337. doi: 10.1080/09603120500155963. PubMed DOI

Ulrich R.S. Natural Versus Urban Scenes: Some Psychophysiological Effects. Environ. Behav. 1981;13:523–556. doi: 10.1177/0013916581135001. DOI

Cacioppo J.T., Petty R.E., Losch M.E., Kim H.S. Electromyographic Activity over Facial Muscle Regions Can Differentiate the Valence and Intensity of Affective Reactions. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 1986;50:260–268. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.50.2.260. PubMed DOI

Chang C.-Y., Chen P.-K. Human Response to Window Views and Indoor Plants in the Workplace. Hort. Sci. 2005;40:1354–1359. doi: 10.21273/HORTSCI.40.5.1354. DOI

Chang C.-Y., Hammitt W.E., Chen P.-K., Machnik L., Su W.-C. Psychophysiological Responses and Restorative Values of Natural Environments in Taiwan. Landsc. Urban. Plan. 2008;85:79–84. doi: 10.1016/j.landurbplan.2007.09.010. DOI

Wei H., Hauer R.J., He X. A Forest Experience Does Not Always Evoke Positive Emotion: A Pilot Study on Unconscious Facial Expressions Using the Face Reading Technology. For. Policy Econ. 2021;123:102365. doi: 10.1016/j.forpol.2020.102365. DOI

Wei H., Ma B., Hauer R.J., Liu C., Chen X., He X. Relationship between Environmental Factors and Facial Expressions of Visitors during the Urban Forest Experience. Urban. For. Urban. Green. 2020;53:126699. doi: 10.1016/j.ufug.2020.126699. DOI

Ekman P., Friesen W.V. Measuring Facial Movement. J. Nonverbal. Behav. 1976;1:56–75. doi: 10.1007/BF01115465. DOI

Russell J.A., Mehrabian A. Evidence for a Three-Factor Theory of Emotions. J. Res. Pers. 1977;11:273–294. doi: 10.1016/0092-6566(77)90037-X. DOI

Ekman P. Universal facial expressions of emotion. Calif. Ment. Health Res. Dig. 1970;8:151–158.

Fridlund A.J., Cacioppo J.T. Guidelines for Human Electromyographic Research. Psychophysiology. 1986;23:567–589. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-8986.1986.tb00676.x. PubMed DOI

N. I. Technology Face Reader. [(accessed on 5 June 2021)];2007 Available online: http://noldus.com/facereader.

Research/Products/Facereader iMotions Facial Expression Analysis: The Definitive Guide. [(accessed on 5 June 2021)];2016 Available online: https://imotions.com/facialexpression-guide-ebook/

Beringer M., Spohn F., Hildebrandt A., Wacker J., Recio G. Reliability and Validity of Machine Vision for the Assessment of Facial Expressions. Cogn. Syst. Res. 2019;56:119–132. doi: 10.1016/j.cogsys.2019.03.009. DOI

Kulke L., Feyerabend D., Schacht A. A Comparison of the Affectiva iMotions Facial Expression Analysis Software with EMG for Identifying Facial Expressions of Emotion. Front. Psychol. 2020;11:329. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.00329. PubMed DOI PMC

Del Líbano M., Calvo M.G., Fernández-Martín A., Recio G. Discrimination between Smiling Faces: Human Observers vs. Automated Face Analysis. Acta Psychol. 2018;187:19–29. doi: 10.1016/j.actpsy.2018.04.019. PubMed DOI

Joye Y., Bolderdijk J.W. An Exploratory Study into the Effects of Extraordinary Nature on Emotions, Mood, and Prosociality. Front. Psychol. 2015;5:1577. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2014.01577. PubMed DOI PMC

Daniel T.C., Boster R.S. Measuring Landscape Esthetics: The Scenic Beauty Estimation Method. U.S. Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Rocky Mountain Range and Experiment Station; Fort Collins, CO, USA: 1976. Res. Pap. RM-RP-167.

Otamendi F.J., Sutil Martín D.L. The Emotional Effectiveness of Advertisement. Front. Psychol. 2020;11:2088. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.02088. PubMed DOI PMC

Facial Expressions and Self-Reported Emotions When Viewing Nature Images