Clinical practice recommendations on the management of perioperative cardiac arrest: A report from the PERIOPCA Consortium
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, přehledy
PubMed
34325723
PubMed Central
PMC8323279
DOI
10.1186/s13054-021-03695-2
PII: 10.1186/s13054-021-03695-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Cardiac arrest, PERIOPCA, Perioperative, Resuscitation,
- MeSH
- delfská metoda MeSH
- konsensus MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- perioperační období trendy MeSH
- srdeční zástava etiologie terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- přehledy MeSH
BACKGROUND: Perioperative cardiac arrest is a rare complication with an incidence of around 1 in 1400 cases, but it carries a high burden of mortality reaching up to 70% at 30 days. Despite its specificities, guidelines for treatment of perioperative cardiac arrest are lacking. Gathering the available literature may improve quality of care and outcome of patients. METHODS: The PERIOPCA Task Force identified major clinical questions about the management of perioperative cardiac arrest and framed them into the therapy population [P], intervention [I], comparator [C], and outcome [O] (PICO) format. Systematic searches of PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Library for articles published until September 2020 were performed. Consensus-based treatment recommendations were created using the Grading of Recommendations, Assessment, Development, and Evaluation (GRADE) system. The strength of consensus among the Task Force members about the recommendations was assessed through a modified Delphi consensus process. RESULTS: Twenty-two PICO questions were addressed, and the recommendations were validated in two Delphi rounds. A summary of evidence for each outcome is reported and accompanied by an overall assessment of the evidence to guide healthcare providers. CONCLUSIONS: The main limitations of our work lie in the scarcity of good quality evidence on this topic. Still, these recommendations provide a basis for decision making, as well as a guide for future research on perioperative cardiac arrest.
Center for Research and Development University Hospital Hradec Kralove Czech Republic
Department of Anesthesiology Faculty of Medicine University of Thessaly Larisa Greece
Department of Anesthesiology University Hospital of Larisa Biopolis Mezourlo 41110 Larisa Greece
Department of Health Sciences European University Cyprus Nicosia Cyprus
Department of Medical Sciences and Public Health University of Cagliari Cagliari Italy
Department of Pathophysiology and Transplantation University of Milan Milan Italy
Hellenic Society of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation Athens Greece
Novosibirsk State University Novosibirsk Russian Federation
Outcomes Research Consortium Cleveland OH 44195 USA
School of Medicine European University Cyprus Nicosia Cyprus
University Paris Saclay UVSQ INSERM CESP Team «PsyDev» Villejuif France
Zobrazit více v PubMed
An JX, Zhang LM, Sullivan EA, Guo QL, Williams JP. Intraoperative cardiac arrest during anesthesia: a retrospective study of 218,274 anesthetics undergoing non-cardiac surgery. Chin Med J (Engl) 2011;124:227–232. PubMed
Charapov I, Eipe N. Cardiac arrest in the operating room requiring prolonged resuscitation. Can J Anaesth. 2012;59:578–585. doi: 10.1007/s12630-012-9698-4. PubMed DOI
Truhlář A, Deakin CD, Soar J, et al. Cardiac arrest in special circumstances section Collaborators. European Resuscitation Council Guidelines for Resuscitation 2015: Section 4. Cardiac arrest in special circumstances. Resuscitation. 2015;95:148–201. doi: 10.1016/j.resuscitation.2015.07.017. PubMed DOI
Hinkelbein J, Andres J, Thies KC, Robertis DE, E. Perioperative cardiac arrest in the operating room environment: a review of the literature. Minerva Anestesiol. 2017;83:1190–1198. doi: 10.23736/S0375-9393.17.11802-X. PubMed DOI
Kazaure HS, Roman SA, Rosenthal RA, Sosa JA. Cardiac arrest among surgical patients: an analysis of incidence, patient characteristics, and outcomes in ACS-NSQIP. JAMA Surg. 2013;148:14–21. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2013.671. PubMed DOI
Nunnally ME, O'Connor MF, Kordylewski H, Westlake B, Dutton RP. The incidence and risk factors for perioperative cardiac arrest observed in the national anesthesia clinical outcomes registry. Anesth Analg. 2015;120:364–370. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000000527. PubMed DOI
Constant AL, Montlahuc C, Grimaldi D, et al. Predictors of functional outcome after intraoperative cardiac arrest. Anesthesiology. 2014;121:482–491. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000313. PubMed DOI
Kaiser HA, Saied NN, Kokoefer AS, Saffour L, Zoller JK, Helwani MA. Incidence and prediction of intraoperative and postoperative cardiac arrest requiring cardiopulmonary resuscitation and 30-day mortality in non-cardiac surgical patients. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:e0225939. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0225939. PubMed DOI PMC
O’Connor D, Green S, Higgins JPT. Chapter 5: Defining the review question and developing criteria for including studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S, editors. Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 (updated March 2011): The Cochrane Collaboration; 2011. http://www.handbook.cochrane.org. Accessed 25 July 2020.
Schünemann H, Brożek J, Guyatt G, Oxman AJAfgoh. GRADE handbook for grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. Updated October 2013. The GRADE Working Group, 2013. 2013.
Higgins JPT, Thomas J, Chandler J, Cumpston M, Li T, Page MJ, Welch VA. Cochrane handbook for systematic reviews of interventions version 6.1 (updated September 2020). Cochrane, 2020. http://www.training.cochrane.org/handbook. Accessed 25 July 2020.
Whiting PF, Rutjes AW, Westwood ME, et al. QUADAS-2: a revised tool for the quality assessment of diagnostic accuracy studies. Ann Intern Med. 2011;155:529–536. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-155-8-201110180-00009. PubMed DOI
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Vist G, et al. GRADE guidelines: 4. Rating the quality of evidence–study limitations (risk of bias) J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:407–415. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2010.07.017. PubMed DOI
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Sultan S, et al. GRADE Working Group. GRADE guidelines: 9. Rating up the quality of evidence. J Clin Epidemiol. 2011;64:1311–1316. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2011.06.004. PubMed DOI
Guyatt GH, Oxman AD, Santesso N, et al. GRADE guidelines: 12. Preparing summary of findings tables-binary outcomes. J Clin Epidemiol. 2013;66:158–172. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2012.01.012. PubMed DOI
GRADEpro GJMU. GRADEpro guideline development tool [software]. 2015.
Halperin JL, Levine GN, Al-Khatib SM, et al. Further evolution of the ACC/AHA clinical practice guideline recommendation classification system: a report of the American college of cardiology/American heart association task force on clinical practice guidelines. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2016;67:1572–1574. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2015.09.001. PubMed DOI
Jacobs AK, Anderson JL, Halperin JL, ACC/AHA TASK FORCE MEMBERS, Anderson JL, Halperin JL, Albert NM, et al. The evolution and future of ACC/AHA clinical practice guidelines: a 30-year journey: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on practice guidelines. Circulation 2014;130:1208–17. PubMed
Anderson JL, Heidenreich PA, Barnett PG, et al; ACC/AHA Task Force on Performance Measures; ACC/AHA Task Force on Practice Guidelines. ACC/AHA statement on cost/value methodology in clinical practice guidelines and performance measures: a report of the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association Task Force on Performance Measures and Task Force on Practice Guidelines. Circulation 2014;129:2329–45. PubMed
Mahawar KK, Himpens J, Shikora SA, et al. The first consensus statement on one anastomosis/mini gastric bypass (OAGB/MGB) using a modified delphi approach. Obes Surg. 2018;28:303–312. doi: 10.1007/s11695-017-3070-2. PubMed DOI
Mahawar KK, Himpens JM, Shikora SA, et al. The first consensus statement on revisional bariatric surgery using a modified Delphi approach. Surg Endosc. 2020;34:1648–1657. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-06937-1. PubMed DOI
Albury C, Strain WD, Brocq SL, Logue J, Lloyd C, Tahrani A. Language Matters working group. The importance of language in engagement between health-care professionals and people living with obesity: a joint consensus statement. Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2020;8:447–455. doi: 10.1016/S2213-8587(20)30102-9. PubMed DOI
Zuercher M, Ummenhofer W. Cardiac arrest during anesthesia. Curr Opin Crit Care. 2008;14:269–274. doi: 10.1097/MCC.0b013e3282f948cd. PubMed DOI
Sprung J, Warner ME, Contreras MG, Schroeder DR, Beighley CM, Wilson GA, Warner DO. Predictors of survival following cardiac arrest in patients undergoing noncardiac surgery: a study of 518,294 patients at a tertiary referral center. Anesthesiology. 2003;99:259–269. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200308000-00006. PubMed DOI
Pouwels S, Omar I, Aggarwal S, Aminian A, Angrisani L, Balibrea JM, Bhandari M, Biter LU, Blackstone RP, Carbajo MA, Copaescu CA, Dargent J, Elfawal MH, Fobi MA, Greve JW, Hazebroek EJ, Herrera MF, Himpens JM, Hussain FA, Kassir R, Kerrigan D, Khaitan M, Kow L, Kristinsson J, Kurian M, Lutfi RE, Moore RL, Noel P, Ozmen MM, Ponce J, Prager G, Purkayastha S, Rafols JP, Ramos AC, Ribeiro RJS, Sakran N, Salminen P, Shabbir A, Shikora SA, Singhal R, Small PK, Taylor CJ, Torres AJ, Vaz C, Yashkov Y, Mahawar K. The first modified delphi consensus statement for resuming bariatric and metabolic surgery in the COVID-19 times. Obes Surg. 2021;31:451–456. doi: 10.1007/s11695-020-04883-9. PubMed DOI PMC