Here, we provide unique photo documentation and observational evidence of rescue behaviour described for the first time in wild boar. Rescue behaviour represents an extreme form of prosocial behaviour that has so far only been demonstrated in a few species. It refers to a situation when one individual acts to help another individual that finds itself in a dangerous or stressful situation and it is considered by some authors as a complex form of empathy. We documented a case in which an adult female wild boar manipulated wooden logs securing the door mechanism of a cage trap and released two entrapped young wild boars. The whole rescue was fast and particular behaviours were complex and precisely targeted, suggesting profound prosocial tendencies and exceptional problem-solving capacities in wild boar. The rescue behaviour might have been motivated by empathy because the rescuer female exhibited piloerection, a sign of distress, indicating an empathetic emotional state matching or understanding the victims. We discuss this rescue behaviour in the light of possible underlying motivators, including empathy, learning and social facilitation.

Department of Game Management and Wildlife Biology Faculty of Forestry and Wood Sciences Czech University of Life Sciences Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Nowbahari E, Hollis KL. Distinguishing between rescue, cooperation and other forms of altruistic behavior. Commun. Integr. Biol. 2010;3:77–79. doi: 10.4161/cib.3.2.10018. PubMed DOI PMC

Nowbahari E, Scohier A, Durand JL, Hollis KL. Ants, Cataglyphis cursor, use precisely directed rescue behavior to free entrapped relatives. PLoS ONE. 2009;4:e6573. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0006573. PubMed DOI PMC

Ben-Ami Bartal I, Decety J, Mason P. Empathy and pro-social behavior in rats. Science. 2011;334:1427–1430. doi: 10.1126/science.1210789. PubMed DOI PMC

Yamamoto S, Humle T, Tanaka M. Chimpanzees’ flexible targeted helping based on an understanding of conspecifics’ goals. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA. 2012;109:3588–3592. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1108517109. PubMed DOI PMC

Its ultimate and proximate bases Preston, S. D. & Waal, F. B. M. De. Empathy. Behav. Brain Sci. 2002;25:1–72. doi: 10.1017/S0140525X02000018. PubMed DOI

de Waal FBM, Preston SD. Mammalian empathy: Behavioural manifestations and neural basis. Nat. Rev. Neurosci. 2017;18:498–509. doi: 10.1038/nrn.2017.72. PubMed DOI

Yamamoto S. Primate Empathy: three factors and their combinations for empathy-related phenomena. Wiley Interdiscip. Rev. Cogn. Sci. 2017;8:1. doi: 10.1002/wcs.1431. PubMed DOI

Vasconcelos M, Hollis K, Nowbahari E, Kacelnik A. Pro-sociality without empathy. Biol. Lett. 2012;8:910–912. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2012.0554. PubMed DOI PMC

Adriaense JEC, Koski SE, Huber L, Lamm C. Challenges in the comparative study of empathy and related phenomena in animals. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2020;112:62–82. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2020.01.021. PubMed DOI

Schwartz LP, Silberberg A, Casey AH, Kearns DN, Slotnick B. Does a rat release a soaked conspecific due to empathy? Anim. Cogn. 2017;20:299–308. doi: 10.1007/s10071-016-1052-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Hollis KL, Nowbahari E. A comparative analysis of precision rescue behaviour in sand-dwelling ants. Anim. Behav. 2013;85:537–544. doi: 10.1016/j.anbehav.2012.12.005. DOI

Hachiga Y, Silberberg A, Slotnick B, Gomez M. Rats (Rattus norvegicus) find occupancy of a restraint tube rewarding. J. Exp. Anal. Behav. 2020;113:644–656. doi: 10.1002/jeab.596. PubMed DOI

Sato N, Tan L, Tate K, Okada M. Rats demonstrate helping behavior toward a soaked conspecific. Anim. Cogn. 2015;18:1039–1047. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0872-2. PubMed DOI

Silberberg A, et al. Desire for social contact, not empathy, may explain ‘rescue’ behavior in rats. Anim. Cogn. 2014;17:609–618. doi: 10.1007/s10071-013-0692-1. PubMed DOI

Hachiga Y, et al. Does a Rat Free a Trapped Rat Due to Empathy or for Sociality? J Exp Anal Behav. 2018;110:267–274. doi: 10.1002/jeab.464. PubMed DOI PMC

Ueno H, et al. Rescue-like Behaviour in Mice is Mediated by Their Interest in the Restraint Tool. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:10648. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-46128-5. PubMed DOI PMC

Ben-Ami Bartal I, et al. Anxiolytic treatment impairs helping behavior in rats. Front. Psychol. 2016;7:850. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00850. PubMed DOI PMC

Cox SS, Reichel CM. Rats display empathic behavior independent of the opportunity for social interaction. Neuropsychopharmacology. 2020;45:1097–1104. doi: 10.1038/s41386-019-0572-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Hammers M, Brouwer L. Rescue behaviour in a social bird: Removal of sticky ‘bird-catcher tree’ seeds by group members. Behaviour. 2017;154:403–411. doi: 10.1163/1568539X-00003428. DOI

Duhoo T, Durand JL, Hollis KL, Nowbahari E. Organization of rescue behaviour sequences in ants, Cataglyphis cursor, reflects goal-directedness, plasticity and memory. Behav. Processes. 2017;139:12–18. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2017.02.006. PubMed DOI

Van Bourg J, Patterson JE, Wynne CDL. Pet dogs (Canis lupus familiaris) release their trapped and distressed owners: Individual variation and evidence of emotional contagion. PLoS ONE. 2020;15:1742. PubMed PMC

Vogel ER, Fuentes-Jiménez A. Rescue behavior in white-faced capuchin monkeys during an intergroup attack: Support for the infanticide avoidance hypothesis. Am. J. Primatol. 2006;68:1012–1016. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20286. PubMed DOI

Amati S, Babweteera F, Wittig RM. Snare removal by a chimpanzee of the Sonso community, Budongo Forest (Uganda) Pan Africa News. 2008;15:6–8. doi: 10.5134/143488. DOI

Bates LA, et al. Do elephants show empathy? J. Conscious. Stud. 2008;15:204–225.

Carballo F, et al. Do dogs rescue their owners from a stressful situation? A behavioral and physiological assessment. Anim. Cogn. 2020;23:389–403. doi: 10.1007/s10071-019-01343-5. PubMed DOI

Rood JP. Banded mongoose rescues pack member from eagle. Anim. Behav. 1983;31:1261–1262. doi: 10.1016/S0003-3472(83)80036-0. DOI

Pitman RL, et al. Humpback whales interfering when mammal-eating killer whales attack other species: Mobbing behavior and interspecific altruism? Mar. Mammal Sci. 2017;33:7–58. doi: 10.1111/mms.12343. DOI

Teixeira DS, et al. Fatal attack on black-tufted-ear marmosets (Callithrix penicillata) by a Boa constrictor: a simultaneous assault on two juvenile monkeys. Primates. 2016;57:123–127. doi: 10.1007/s10329-015-0495-x. PubMed DOI

Perry S, Manson JH, Dower G, Wikberg E. White-faced capuchins cooperate to rescue a groupmate from a Boa constrictor. Folia Primatol. 2003;74:109–111. doi: 10.1159/000070008. PubMed DOI

Jack KM, et al. Cooperative rescue of a juvenile capuchin (Cebus imitator) from a Boa constrictor. Sci. Rep. 2020;10:16814. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-73476-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Eberle M, Rappeler PM. Mutualism, reciprocity, or kin selection? Cooperative rescue of a conspecific from a boa in a nocturnal solitary forager the gray mouse lemur. Am. J. Primatol. 2008;70:410–414. doi: 10.1002/ajp.20496. PubMed DOI

Tokuyama N, Emikey B, Bafike B. Bonobos apparently search for a lost member injured by a snare. Primates. 2012;53:215–219. doi: 10.1007/s10329-012-0298-2. PubMed DOI

Boesch C. The effects of leopard predation on grouping patterns in forest chimpanzees. Behaviour. 1991;117:220–242. doi: 10.1163/156853991X00544. DOI

Marzec AM, et al. The dark side of the red ape: male-mediated lethal female competition in Bornean orangutans. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 2016;70:459–466. doi: 10.1007/s00265-015-2053-3. DOI

Gardner CJ, Radolalaina P, Rajerison M, Greene HW. Cooperative rescue and predator fatality involving a group-living strepsirrhine, Coquerel’s sifaka (Propithecus coquereli), and a Madagascar ground boa (Acrantophis madagascariensis) Primates. 2015;56:127–129. doi: 10.1007/s10329-015-0462-6. PubMed DOI

Tello NS, Huck M, Heymann EW. Boa constrictor Attack and Successful Group Defence in Moustached Tamarins, Saguinus mystax. Folia Primatol. 2002;73:146–148. doi: 10.1159/000064795. PubMed DOI

Silva PRR, et al. Are There Multiple Motivators for Helping Behavior in Rats? Front. Psychol. 2020;11:1795. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01795. PubMed DOI PMC

Ben-Ami Bartal I, Rodgers DA, Bernardez Sarria MSO, Decety J, Mason P. Pro-social behavior in rats is modulated by social experience. Elife. 2014;3:e01385. doi: 10.7554/eLife.01385. PubMed DOI PMC

Havlik JL, et al. The bystander effect in rats. Sci. Adv. 2020;6:4205. doi: 10.1126/sciadv.abb4205. PubMed DOI PMC

Ueno H, et al. Helping-Like Behaviour in Mice Towards Conspecifics Constrained Inside Tubes. Sci. Rep. 2019;9:5817. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-42290-y. PubMed DOI PMC

Czechowski W, Godzińska EJ, Kozłowski MW. Rescue behaviour shown by workers of Formica sanguinea latr, F. fusca L. and F. cinerea mayr (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) in response to their nestmates caught by an ant lion larva. Ann. Zool. 2002;52:423–431.

Kwapich CL, Hölldobler B. Destruction of spiderwebs and rescue of ensnared nestmates by a granivorous desert ant (Veromessor pergandei) Am. Nat. 2019;194:395–404. doi: 10.1086/704338. PubMed DOI

Fahlman Å, et al. Wild boar behaviour during live-trap capture in a corral-style trap: implications for animal welfare. Acta Vet. Scand. 2020;62:59. doi: 10.1186/s13028-020-00557-9. PubMed DOI PMC

Lavelle MJ, et al. When pigs fly: Reducing injury and flight response when capturing wild pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2019;215:21–25. doi: 10.1016/j.applanim.2019.03.014. DOI

Torres-Blas I, et al. Assessing methods to live-capture wild boars (Sus scrofa) in urban and peri-urban environments. Vet. Rec. 2020;187:85. doi: 10.1136/vr.105766. PubMed DOI

Garcia M, et al. Structural classification of wild boar (Sus scrofa) Vocalizations. Ethology. 2016;122:329–342. doi: 10.1111/eth.12472. PubMed DOI PMC

Hamilton AWD. The evolution of altruistic behavior. Am. Nat. 1963;97:354–356. doi: 10.1086/497114. DOI

Focardi S, Morimando F, Capriotti S, Ahmed A, Genov P. Cooperation improves the access of wild boars (Sus scrofa) to food sources. Behav. Processes. 2015;121:80–86. doi: 10.1016/j.beproc.2015.10.019. PubMed DOI

Podgórski T, Lusseau D, Scandura M, Sönnichsen L, Jȩdrzejewska B. Long-lasting, kin-directed female interactions in a spatially structured wild boar social network. PLoS ONE. 2014;9:e99875. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0099875. PubMed DOI PMC

Kornum BR, Knudsen GM. Cognitive testing of pigs (Sus scrofa) in translational biobehavioral research. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 2011;35:437–451. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2010.05.004. PubMed DOI

Pérez-Manrique A, Gomila A. The comparative study of empathy: sympathetic concern and empathic perspective-taking in non-human animals. Biol. Rev. 2018;93:248–269. doi: 10.1111/brv.12342. PubMed DOI

de Waal FBM. Putting the altruism back into altruism: The evolution of empathy. Annu. Rev. Psychol. 2008;59:279–300. doi: 10.1146/annurev.psych.59.103006.093625. PubMed DOI

Erdtmann D, Keuling O. Behavioural patterns of free roaming wild boar in a spatiotemporal context. PeerJ. 2020;8:e10409. doi: 10.7717/peerj.10409. PubMed DOI PMC

Dardaillon M, Teillaud P. Éthogramme du sanglier adulte et du marcassin (Sus scrofa L.) Monit. Zool. Ital. - Ital. J. Zool. 1987;21:41–68.

Moberg, G. P. Biological Response to Stress: Key to Assessment of Animal Well-Being? Anim. Stress 27–49 (1985).

Reimert I, Bolhuis JE, Kemp B, Rodenburg TB. Indicators of positive and negative emotions and emotional contagion in pigs. Physiol. Behav. 2013;109:42–50. doi: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2012.11.002. PubMed DOI

Reimert I, Bolhuis JE, Kemp B, Rodenburg TB. Emotions on the loose: emotional contagion and the role of oxytocin in pigs. Anim. Cogn. 2014;18:517–532. doi: 10.1007/s10071-014-0820-6. PubMed DOI PMC

Norscia I, Coco E, Robino C, Chierto E, Cordoni G. Yawn contagion in domestic pigs (Sus scrofa) Sci. Rep. 2021;11:1851. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80545-1. PubMed DOI PMC

Goumon S, Špinka M. Emotional contagion of distress in young pigs is potentiated by previous exposure to the same stressor. Anim. Cogn. 2016;19:501–511. doi: 10.1007/s10071-015-0950-5. PubMed DOI

Held S, Mendl M, Devereux C, Byrne RW. Behaviour of domestic pigs in a visual perspective taking task. Behaviour. 2001;138:1337–1354. doi: 10.1163/156853901317367627. DOI

Poteaux C, et al. Socio-genetic structure and mating system of a wild boar population. J. Zool. 2009;278:116–125. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-7998.2009.00553.x. DOI

Kaminski G, Brandt S, Baubet E, Baudoin C. Life-history patterns in female wild boars (Sus scrofa): Mother-daughter postweaning associations. Can. J. Zool. 2005;83:474–480. doi: 10.1139/z05-019. DOI

Arnold LC, Habe M, Troxler J, Nowack J, Vetter SG. Rapid establishment of teat order and allonursing in wild boar (Sus scrofa) Ethology. 2019;125:940–948. doi: 10.1111/eth.12950. DOI

Decety, J., Ben-Ami Bartal, I., Uzefovsky, F. & Knafo-Noam, A. Empathy as a driver of prosocial behaviour: Highly conserved neurobehavioural mechanisms across species. Philos. Trans. R. Soc. B Biol. Sci.371, 20150077 (2016). PubMed PMC

Decety, J. & Lamm, C. Empathy versus Personal Distress: Recent Evidence from Social Neuroscience. in The Social Neuroscience of Empathy (eds. Decety, J. & Ickes, W.) (MIT Press, 2009).

Byrne RW, Bates LA. Cognition in the wild: Exploring animal minds with observational evidence. Biol. Lett. 2011;7:619–622. doi: 10.1098/rsbl.2011.0352. PubMed DOI PMC

Barasona JA, López-Olvera JR, Beltrán-Beck B, Gortázar C, Vicente J. Trap-effectiveness and response to tiletamine-zolazepam and medetomidine anaesthesia in Eurasian wild boar captured with cage and corral traps. BMC Vet. Res. 2013;9:107. doi: 10.1186/1746-6148-9-107. PubMed DOI PMC

du Sert, N. P. et al. Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the arrive guidelines 2.0. PLoS Biol.18, e3000411 (2020). PubMed PMC