The Value of Preoperative Plasma VEGF Levels in Urothelial Carcinoma of the Bladder Treated with Radical Cystectomy

. 2022 Jul ; 8 (4) : 972-979. [epub] 20210826

Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid34454852
Odkazy

PubMed 34454852
DOI 10.1016/j.euf.2021.08.006
PII: S2405-4569(21)00221-2
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

BACKGROUND: Elevated preoperative plasma levels of the angiogenesis-related marker VEGF have been associated with worse oncological outcomes in various malignancies. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the predictive/prognostic role of VEGF in patients with urothelial carcinoma of the bladder (UCB) treated with radical cystectomy (RC). DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: VEGF plasma levels were measured preoperatively in 1036 patients with UCB who underwent RC. OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: The correlation between plasma VEGF levels and pathological and survival outcomes was assessed using logistic regression and Cox regression analyses. Discrimination was assessed using the concordance index (C index). The clinical net benefit was evaluated using decision curve analysis (DCA). RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: Patients with higher pretreatment plasma VEGF levels had poorer recurrence-free survival (RFS), cancer-specific survival (CSS), and overall survival (OS) according to log-rank tests (all p < 0.001). Higher VEGF levels were not independently associated with higher risk of lymph node metastasis, ≥pT3 disease, or non-organ-confined disease (all p > 0.05). Preoperative plasma VEGF levels were independently associated with RFS, CSS, and OS in preoperative and postoperative multivariable models. However, in all cases the C index increased by <0.02 and there was no improvement in net benefit on DCA. A limitation is that none of the patients received current elements of standard of care such as neoadjuvant chemotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: Elevated plasma VEGF levels were associated with features of biologically and clinically aggressive disease such as worse survival outcomes among patients with UCB treated with RC. However, VEGF appears to have relatively limited incremental additive value in clinical use. Further study of VEGF for UCB prognostication is warranted before routine use in clinical algorithms. PATIENT SUMMARY: Currently available models for predicting outcomes in bladder cancer are less than optimal. A protein called vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF), which is a marker of the formation of blood vessels (angiogenesis), may have a role in predicting survival outcomes in bladder cancer.

Cancer Prognostics and Health Outcomes Unit University of Montreal Health Centre Montreal Canada

Department of Pathology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Surgery S H Ho Urology Centre The Chinese University of Hong Kong Hong Kong China

Department of Urology Landesklinikum Wiener Neustadt Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology and Division of Experimental Oncology Urological Research Institute Vita Salute San Raffaele University Milan Italy

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology King Fahad Specialist Hospital Dammam Saudi Arabia

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology King Faisal Medical City Abha Saudi Arabia

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology Medical University of Silesia Zabrze Poland

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology Okayama University Graduate School of Medicine Dentistry and Pharmaceutical Sciences Okayama Japan

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Department of Urology University Medical Center Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Institute for Urology and Reproductive Health Sechenov University Moscow Russia; Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA; Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA; Research Division of Urology Department of Special Surgery The University of Jordan Amman Jordan; Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic; Karl Landsteiner Institute of Urology and Andrology Vienna Austria

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Klinik für Urologie Luzerner Kantonsspital Lucerne Switzerland

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Men's Health and Reproductive Health Research Center Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences Tehran Iran

Department of Urology Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria; Research Center for Evidence Based Medicine Tabriz University of Medical Sciences Tabriz Iran

Department of Urology Semmelweis University Budapest Hungary

Department of Urology The Jikei University School of Medicine Tokyo Japan

Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA

Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA

Division of Urology Department of Surgical Sciences University of Studies of Torino Turin Italy

Citace poskytuje Crossref.org

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...