Improvement in overall and cancer-specific survival in contemporary, metastatic prostate cancer chemotherapy exposed patients
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
34523162
DOI
10.1002/pros.24235
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- chemotherapy, contemporary, metastatic prostate cancer, survival,
- MeSH
- adenokarcinom * farmakoterapie mortalita patologie MeSH
- hodnocení rizik metody MeSH
- Kaplanův-Meierův odhad MeSH
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- metastázy nádorů diagnóza MeSH
- mortalita trendy MeSH
- nádory prostaty * farmakoterapie mortalita patologie MeSH
- prognóza MeSH
- program SEER statistika a číselné údaje MeSH
- proporcionální rizikové modely MeSH
- prostatický specifický antigen analýza MeSH
- protokoly protinádorové kombinované chemoterapie aplikace a dávkování MeSH
- staging nádorů MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé středního věku MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mužské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- Názvy látek
- prostatický specifický antigen MeSH
INTRODUCTION: Over the last decade, multiple clinical trials demonstrated improved survival after chemotherapy for metastatic prostate cancer (mPCa). However, real-world data validating this effect within large-scale epidemiological data sets are scarce. We addressed this void. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Men with de novo mPCa were identified and systemic chemotherapy status was ascertained within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2004-2016). Patients were divided between historical (2004-2013) versus contemporary (2014-2016). Chemotherapy rates were plotted over time. Kaplan-Meier plots and Cox regression models with additional multivariable adjustments addressed overall and cancer-specific mortality. All tests were repeated in propensity-matched analyses. RESULTS: Overall, 19,913 patients had de novo mPCa between 2004 and 2016. Of those, 1838 patients received chemotherapy. Of 1838 chemotherapy-exposed patients, 903 were historical, whereas 905 were contemporary. Chemotherapy rates increased from 5% to 25% over time. Median overall survival was not reached in contemporary patients versus was 24 months in historical patients (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.55, p < 0.001). After propensity score matching and additional multivariable adjustment (age, prostate-specific antigen, GGG, cT-stage, cN-stage, cM-stage, and local treatment) a HR of 0.55 (p < 0.001) was recorded. Analyses were repeated for cancer-specific mortality after adjustment for other cause mortality in competing risks regression models and recorded virtually the same findings before and after propensity score matching (HR: 0.55, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In mPCa patients, chemotherapy rates increased over time. A concomitant increase in survival was also recorded.
Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences University of Genova Genova Italy
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas Texas USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York New York USA
Martini Klinik Prostate Cancer Center University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Cornford P, Bellmunt J, Bolla M, et al. EAU-ESTRO-SIOG guidelines on prostate cancer. Part II: treatment of relapsing, metastatic, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2017;71(4):630-642.
Miyake H, Sakai I, Harada K, Muramaki M, Fujisawa M. Significance of docetaxel-based chemotherapy as treatment for metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer in Japanese men over 75 years old. Int Urol Nephrol. 2012;44(6):1697-1703.
Aparicio J, Maroto P, García Del Muro X, et al. Prognostic factors for relapse in stage I seminoma: a new nomogram derived from three consecutive, risk-adapted studies from the Spanish Germ Cell Cancer Group (SGCCG). Ann Oncol. 2014;25(11):2173-2178.
Tannock IF, De Wit R, Berry WR, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(15):1502-1512.
Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MH, et al. Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mitoxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351(15):1513-1520.
Wenzel M, Preisser F, Hoeh B, et al. Impact of time to castration resistance on survival in metastatic hormone sensitive prostate cancer patients in the era of combination therapies. Front Oncol. 2021;11:659135.
Scher HI, Fizazi K, Saad F, et al. Increased survival with enzalutamide in prostate cancer after chemotherapy. Cabot RC, Harris NL, Rosenberg ES, Shepard J-AO, Cort AM, Ebeling SH, et al., editors. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(13):1187-1197.
Fizazi K, Scher HI, Molina A, et al. Abiraterone acetate for treatment of metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer: final overall survival analysis of the COU-AA-301 randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled phase 3 study. Lancet Oncol. 2012;13(10):983-992.
Wenzel M, Würnschimmel C, Nocera L, et al. Overall survival after systemic treatment in high-volume versus low-volume metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer: systematic review and network meta-analysis. Eur Urol Focus. Published online April 11, 2021.
Bandini M, Pompe RS, Marchioni M, et al. Improved cancer-specific free survival and overall free survival in contemporary metastatic prostate cancer patients: a population-based study. Int Urol Nephrol. 2018;50(1):71-78.
Cattrini C, Soldato D, Rubagotti A, et al. Epidemiological characteristics and survival in patients with de novo metastatic prostate cancer. Cancers. 2020;12(10):2855.
About the SEER Program. SEER. 2021. Accessed April 20, 2021. https://seer.cancer.gov/about/overview.html
RCT R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://wwwr-projectorg. 2017.
Jin S, Wei J, Wang J, et al. Prognostic value of local treatment in prostate cancer patients with different metastatic sites: a population based retrospective study. Front Oncol. 2020;10:527952.
Harris V, Lloyd K, Forsey S, Rogers P, Roche M, Parker C. A population-based study of prostate cancer chemotherapy. Clin Oncol. 2011;23(10):706-708.
Lissbrant IF, Garmo H, Widmark A, Stattin P. Population-based study on use of chemotherapy in men with castration resistant prostate cancer. Acta Oncol. 2013;52(8):1593-1601.
Sweeney CJ, Chen Y-H, Carducci M, et al. Chemohormonal therapy in metastatic hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(8):737-746.
Sweeney C, Chen Y-H, Carducci MA, et al. Impact on overall survival (OS) with chemohormonal therapy versus hormonal therapy for hormone-sensitive newly metastatic prostate cancer (mPrCa): An ECOG-led phase III randomized trial. JCO. 2014;32(18_suppl):LBA2.
Hoeh B, Preisser F, Mandel P, et al. Inverse stage migration in radical prostatectomy-a sustaining phenomenon. Front Surg. 2021;8:612813.
Budäus L, Spethmann J, Isbarn H, et al. Inverse stage migration in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy: results of 8916 European patients treated within the last decade: inverse stage migration in patients undergoing radical prostatectomy. BJU Int. 2011;108(8):1256-1261.