The use of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation (FMT) in Europe: A Europe-wide survey
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Velká Británie, Anglie Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
34693388
PubMed Central
PMC8513118
DOI
10.1016/j.lanepe.2021.100181
PII: S2666-7762(21)00158-7
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- Abbreviations: CDI, Clostridioides difficile infection, Clostridioides difficile, ECDC, European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control, FMT, FMT, Faecal microbiota transplantation, Faecal microbiota transplantation, IQR, Interquartile range, REDCap, Research Data Capture software, SARS-CoV-2, Severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2, Stool banking, UEG, United Gastroenterology European,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
BACKGROUND: Faecal microbiota transplantation (FMT) is an emerging treatment modality, but its current clinical use and organisation are unknown. We aimed to describe the clinical use, conduct, and potential for FMT in Europe. METHODS: We invited all hospital-based FMT centres within the European Council member states to answer a web-based questionnaire covering their clinical activities, organisation, and regulation of FMT in 2019. Responders were identified from trials registered at clinicaltrials.gov and from the United European Gastroenterology (UEG) working group for stool banking and FMT. FINDINGS: In 2019, 31 FMT centres from 17 countries reported a total of 1,874 (median 25, quartile 10-64) FMT procedures; 1,077 (57%) with Clostridioides difficile infection (CDI) as indication, 791 (42%) with experimental indications, and 6 (0•3%) unaccounted for. Adjusted to population size, 0•257 per 100,000 population received FMT for CDI and 0•189 per 100,000 population for experimental indications. With estimated 12,400 (6,100-28,500) annual cases of multiple, recurrent CDI and indication for FMT in Europe, the current European FMT activity covers approximately 10% of the patients with indication. The participating centres demonstrated high safety standards and adherence to international consensus guidelines. Formal or informal regulation from health authorities was present at 21 (68%) centres. INTERPRETATION: FMT is a widespread routine treatment for multiple, recurrent CDI and an experimental treatment. Embedded within hospital settings, FMT centres operate with high standards across Europe to provide safe FMT. A significant gap in FMT coverage suggests the need to raise clinical awareness and increase the FMT activity in Europe by at least 10-fold to meet the true, indicated need. FUNDING: NordForsk under the Nordic Council and Innovation Fund Denmark (j.no. 8056-00006B).
Clinic of Gastroenterology Tsaritsa Yoanna University Hospital Sofia Bulgaria
Department 1 of Internal Medicine University of Cologne Cologne Germany
Department of Clinical Immunology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark
Department of Clinical Research University of Southern Denmark Odense Denmark
Department of Gastroenterology Ghent University Hospital Ghent Belgium
Department of Gastroenterology Haaglanden Medical Center The Hague the Netherlands
Department of Gastroenterology Helsinki University Hospital and Helsinki University Helsinki Finland
Department of Gastrointestinal Surgery Aalborg University Hospital Aalborg Denmark
Department of Infectious Diseases Copenhagen University Hospital Hvidovre Denmark
Department of Internal Medicine 4 Jena University Hospital Jena Germany
Department of Internal Medicine and Digestive Diseases IRD Toulouse 3 University Toulouse France
Department of Medical Microbiology Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands
Department of Medicine Zealand University Hospital Køge Denmark
Department of Transplantation Medicine Oslo University Hospital Oslo Norway
Digestive Disease Center CEMAD Fondazione Policlinico Universitario Gemelli IRCCS Rome Italy
Division of Clinical Microbiology Linköping University Hospital Linköping Sweden
Division of Gastroenterology and Hepatology Medical University of Graz Graz Austria
ESCMID Study Group for Host and Microbiota Interaction Basel Switzerland
French Group of Faecal Microbiota Transplantation Paris France
Gastroenterology Department Centre Hospitalier de Thiers Thiers France
German Centre for Infection Research Partner site Bonn Cologne Germany
Human Microbiome Research Program Faculty of Medicine University of Helsinki Helsinki Finland
INRA UMR1319 Micalis AgroParisTech Jouy en Josas France
Institute of Health and Society University of Oslo Oslo Norway
National Institute for Public Health and the Environment Bilthoven the Netherlands
Netherlands Donor Feces Bank Leiden University Medical Center Leiden the Netherlands
Servicio de Gastroenterología y Hepatología Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal Madrid Spain
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Allegretti J.R., Mullish B.H., Kelly C., Fischer M. The evolution of the use of faecal microbiota transplantation and emerging therapeutic indications. Lancet. 2019;394:420–431. PubMed
Baunwall S.M.D., Lee M.M., Eriksen M.K. Faecal microbiota transplantation for recurrent Clostridioides difficile infection: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;29-30 PubMed PMC
Cammarota G., Ianiro G., Kelly C.R. International consensus conference on stool banking for faecal microbiota transplantation in clinical practice. Gut. 2019;68:2111–2121. PubMed PMC
Keller J.J., Ooijevaar R.E., Hvas C.L. A standardised model for stool banking for faecal microbiota transplantation: a consensus report from a multidisciplinary UEG working group. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2021;9:229–247. 2050640620967898. PubMed PMC
Mullish B.H., Quraishi M.N., Segal J.P. The use of faecal microbiota transplant as treatment for recurrent or refractory Clostridium difficile infection and other potential indications: joint British Society of Gastroenterology (BSG) and Healthcare Infection Society (HIS) guidelines. J Hosp Infect. 2018;100(Suppl 1):S1–s31. PubMed
Ianiro G., Eusebi L.H., Black C.J., Gasbarrini A., Cammarota G., Ford A.C. Systematic review with meta-analysis: efficacy of faecal microbiota transplantation for the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2019;50:240–248. PubMed
Ghani R., Mullish B.H., McDonald J.A.K. Disease prevention not decolonization - a model for fecal microbiota transplantation in patients colonized with multidrug-resistant organisms. Clin Infect Dis. 2021;72:1444–1447. PubMed PMC
Bajaj J.S., Salzman N.H., Acharya C. Fecal microbial transplant capsules are safe in hepatic encephalopathy: a phase 1, randomized, placebo-controlled trial. Hepatology. 2019;70:1690–1703. PubMed PMC
van Nood E., Vrieze A., Nieuwdorp M. Duodenal infusion of donor feces for recurrent Clostridium difficile. N Engl J Med. 2013;368:407–415. PubMed
Terveer E.M., van Beurden Y.H., Goorhuis A. How to: establish and run a stool bank. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2017;23:924–930. PubMed
Nakov R., Lyutakov I., Mitkova A. Establishment of the first stool bank in an Eastern European country and the first series of successful fecal microbiota transplantations in Bulgaria. Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci. 2021;25:390–396. PubMed
Costello S.P., Tucker E.C., La Brooy J., Schoeman M.N., Andrews J.M. Establishing a fecal microbiota transplant service for the treatment of clostridium difficile infection. Clin Infect Dis. 2016;62:908–914. PubMed
Jorgensen S.M.D., Hansen M.M., Erikstrup C., Dahlerup J.F., Hvas C.L. Faecal microbiota transplantation: establishment of a clinical application framework. Eur J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2017;29:e36–e45. PubMed
McCune V.L., Quraishi M.N., Manzoor S. Results from the first English stool bank using faecal microbiota transplant as a medicinal product for the treatment of Clostridioides difficile infection. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;20 PubMed PMC
Rode A.A., Bytzer P., Pedersen O.B., Engberg J. Establishing a donor stool bank for faecal microbiota transplantation: methods and feasibility. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2019;38:1837–1847. PubMed
Kragsnaes M.S., Nilsson A.C., Kjeldsen J. How do I establish a stool bank for fecal microbiota transplantation within the blood- and tissue transplant service? Transfusion. 2020;60:1135–1141. PubMed
McDonald L.C., Gerding D.N., Johnson S. Clinical practice guidelines for Clostridium difficile Infection in adults and children: 2017 update by the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) and Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America (SHEA) Clin Infect Dis. 2018;66:e1–e48. PubMed PMC
Debast S.B., Bauer M.P., Kuijper E.J. European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases: update of the treatment guidance document for Clostridium difficile infection. Clin Microbiol Infect. 2014;20(Suppl 2):1–26. PubMed
ECDC. Annual epidemiological report for 2016. ECDC; Stockholm: 2018. European centre for disease prevention and control. Clostridium difficile infections.
Smits W.K., Lyras D., Lacy D.B., Wilcox M.H., Kuijper E.J. Clostridium difficile infection. Nat Rev Dis Primers. 2016;2:16020. PubMed PMC
Louie T.J., Miller M.A., Mullane K.M. Fidaxomicin versus vancomycin for Clostridium difficile infection. N Engl J Med. 2011;364:422–431. PubMed
Quraishi M.N., Segal J., Mullish B. National survey of practice of faecal microbiota transplantation for Clostridium difficile infection in the UK. J Hosp Infect. 2017;95:444–445. PubMed
Jørgensen S.M.D., Hvas C.L., Dahlerup J.F. Banking feces: a new frontier for public blood banks? Transfusion. 2019;59:2776–2782. PubMed PMC
Kao D., Roach B., Silva M. Effect of oral capsule- vs colonoscopy-delivered fecal microbiota transplantation on recurrent Clostridium difficile infection: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA. 2017;318:1985–1993. PubMed PMC
Staley C., Hamilton M.J., Vaughn B.P. Successful resolution of recurrent Clostridium difficile infection using freeze-dried, encapsulated fecal microbiota; pragmatic cohort study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2017;112:940–947. PubMed PMC
Bisschops R., Rutter M.D., Areia M. Overcoming the barriers to dissemination and implementation of quality measures for gastrointestinal endoscopy: European Society of Gastrointestinal Endoscopy (ESGE) and United European Gastroenterology (UEG) position statement. Endoscopy. 2021;53:196–202. PubMed
Vendrik K.E.W., Terveer E.M., Kuijper E.J. Periodic screening of donor faeces with a quarantine period to prevent transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms during faecal microbiota transplantation: a retrospective cohort study. Lancet Infect Dis. 2021;21:711–721. PubMed
Kuijper E.J., Allegretii J., Hawkey P. A necessary discussion after transmission of multidrug-resistant organisms through faecal microbiota transplantations. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019;19:1161–1162. PubMed
Keller J.J., Vehreschild M.J., Hvas C.L. Stool for fecal microbiota transplantation should be classified as a transplant product and not as a drug. United Eur Gastroenterol J. 2019;7:1408–1410. PubMed PMC
Hvas C.L., Baunwall S.M.D., Erikstrup C. Faecal microbiota transplantation: a life-saving therapy challenged by commercial claims for exclusivity. EClinicalMedicine. 2020;24 PubMed PMC
Ianiro G., Mullish B.H., Kelly C.R. Reorganisation of faecal microbiota transplant services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Gut. 2020;69:1555–1563. PubMed PMC
Ianiro G., Mullish B.H., Hvas C.L. SARS-CoV-2 vaccines and donor recruitment for FMT. Lancet Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2021;6:264–266. PubMed PMC