Cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy vs external beam radiotherapy in high-risk Hispanic/Latino prostate cancer patients
Language English Country Netherlands Media print-electronic
Document type Comparative Study, Journal Article
PubMed
34783982
PubMed Central
PMC8732979
DOI
10.1007/s11255-021-03055-7
PII: 10.1007/s11255-021-03055-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- Cancer-specific survival, External beam radiotherapy, High-risk prostate cancer, Hispanic–Latino race/ethnicity, Radical prostatectomy,
- MeSH
- Hispanic or Latino MeSH
- Risk Assessment MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Prostatic Neoplasms mortality radiotherapy therapy MeSH
- Prostatectomy MeSH
- Retrospective Studies MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Check Tag
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Comparative Study MeSH
PURPOSE: To test for differences in cancer-specific mortality (CSM) rates in Hispanic/Latino prostate cancer patients according to treatment type, radical prostatectomy (RP) vs external beam radiotherapy (EBRT). METHODS: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2010-2016), we identified 2290 NCCN (National Comprehensive Cancer Network) high-risk (HR) Hispanic/Latino prostate cancer patients. Of those, 893 (39.0%) were treated with RP vs 1397 (61.0%) with EBRT. First, cumulative incidence plots and competing risks regression models tested for CSM differences after adjustment for other cause mortality (OCM). Second, cumulative incidence plots and competing risks regression models were refitted after 1:1 propensity score matching (according to age, PSA, biopsy Gleason score, cT-stage, cN-stage). RESULTS: In NCCN HR patients, 5-year CSM rates for RP vs EBRT were 2.4 vs 4.7%, yielding a multivariable hazard ratio of 0.37 (95% CI 0.19-0.73, p = 0.004) favoring RP. However, after propensity score matching, the hazard ratio of 0.54 was no longer statistically significant (95% CI 0.21-1.39, p = 0.2). CONCLUSION: Without the use of strictest adjustment for population differences, NCCN high-risk Hispanic/Latino prostate cancer patients appear to benefit more of RP than EBRT. However, after strictest adjustment for baseline patient and tumor characteristics between RP and EBRT cohorts, the apparent CSM benefit of RP is no longer statistically significant. In consequence, in Hispanic/Latino NCCN high-risk patients, either treatment modality results in similar CSM outcome.
Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences University of Genova Genova Italy
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas TX USA
Department of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
Martini Klinik Prostate Cancer Center University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
See more in PubMed
Emam A, Hermann G, Attwood K, Ji W, James G, Kuettel M, et al. Oncologic outcome of radical prostatectomy versus radiotherapy as primary treatment for high and very high risk localized prostate cancer. Prostate. 2021;81(4):223–230. doi: 10.1002/pros.24089. PubMed DOI PMC
Reichard CA, Nyame YA, Sundi D, Tosoian J, Wilkins L, Alam R, et al. Does time from diagnosis to treatment of high- or very-high-risk prostate cancer affect outcome? BJU Int. 2019;124(2):282–289. doi: 10.1111/bju.14671. PubMed DOI
Tward JD, O’Neil B, Boucher K, Kokeny K, Lowrance WT, Lloyd S, et al. Metastasis, mortality, and quality of life for men with NCCN high and very high risk localized prostate cancer after surgical and/or combined modality radiotherapy. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2020;18(4):274–283.e5. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.11.023. PubMed DOI
Tilki D, Chen M-H, Wu J, Huland H, Graefen M, Braccioforte M, et al. Surgery vs radiotherapy in the management of biopsy Gleason Score 9–10 prostate cancer and the risk of mortality. JAMA Oncol. 2019;5(2):213–220. doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4836. PubMed DOI PMC
Knipper S, Palumbo C, Pecoraro A, Rosiello G, Tian Z, Briganti A, et al. Survival outcomes of radical prostatectomy vs. external beam radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients with Gleason Score 9–10 at biopsy: a population-based analysis. Urol Oncol. 2020;38(3):79.e9–79.e14. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2019.09.015. PubMed DOI
Chierigo F, Wenzel M, Würnschimmel C, Flammia RS, Horlemann B, Tian Z et al (2021) Survival after radical prostatectomy vs. radiation therapy in high-risk and very high-risk prostate cancer. J Urol. http://www.jurology.com/doi/10.1097/JU.0000000000002250. Accessed 12 Oct 2021 PubMed DOI
U.S. Census Bureau (2019) V2019. Retrieved from https://www.census.gov/quickfacts/fact/table/US/RHI725219#RHI725219. Accessed 15 July 2021
White A, Coker AL, Du XL, Eggleston KS, Williams M. Racial/ethnic disparities in survival among men diagnosed with prostate cancer in Texas. Cancer. 2011;117(5):1080–1088. doi: 10.1002/cncr.25671. PubMed DOI PMC
Chavez-MacGregor M, Unger JM, Moseley A, Ramsey SD, Hershman DL. Survival by Hispanic ethnicity among patients with cancer participating in SWOG clinical trials: cancer survival by Hispanic ethnicity. Cancer. 2018;124(8):1760–1769. doi: 10.1002/cncr.31241. PubMed DOI PMC
Sánchez BE, Aguayo A, Martínez B, Rodríguez F, Marmolejo M, Svyryd Y, et al. Using genetic and epigenetic markers to improve differential diagnosis of prostate cancer and benign prostatic hyperplasia by noninvasive methods in Mexican patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2018;16(4):e867–e877. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.02.004. PubMed DOI
Moses KA, Orom H, Brasel A, Gaddy J, Underwood W. Racial/ethnic disparity in treatment for prostate cancer: does cancer severity matter? Urology. 2017;99:76–83. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2016.07.045. PubMed DOI PMC
Porter KR, Hsu J-WY, Chien GW, Xiang AH, Jung H, Chao C, et al. Racial and ethnic differences in time to treatment for patients with localized prostate cancer. Urology. 2013;81(2):283–287. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.11.002. PubMed DOI
About the SEER Program [Internet]. SEER. https://seer.cancer.gov/about/overview.html. Accessed 20 Apr 2021
Mohler JL, Antonarakis ES, Armstrong AJ, D’Amico AV, Davis BJ, Dorff T, et al. Prostate cancer, version 2.2019, NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology. J Natl Compr Cancer Netw. 2019;17(5):479–505. doi: 10.6004/jnccn.2019.0023. PubMed DOI
Edge SB, Compton CC. The American Joint Committee on Cancer: the 7th edition of the AJCC cancer staging manual and the future of TNM. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010;17(6):1471–1474. doi: 10.1245/s10434-010-0985-4. PubMed DOI
Collaborative stage derived AJCC 6th and 7th edition staging. https://seer.cancer.gov/seerstat/variables/seer/ajcc-stage/derived-ajcc.html. Accessed 6 July 2021
RCT (2017) R: a language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-projectorg2017. Accessed 15 July 2021
National Cancer Database. http://ncdbpuf.facs.org/. Accessed 05 Jul 2021
Suresh T, Sharma J, Goel S, Kovac E, Gao Q, Gartrell B. Patient characteristics at prostate cancer diagnosis in different races at an academic center serving a diverse population. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019;17(2):139–144. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2018.12.003. PubMed DOI
Knipper S, Pecoraro A, Palumbo C, Rosiello G, Luzzago S, Tian Z, et al. A 25-year period analysis of other-cause mortality in localized prostate cancer. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2019;17(5):395–401. doi: 10.1016/j.clgc.2019.07.008. PubMed DOI
Abdollah F, Sun M, Thuret R, Jeldres C, Tian Z, Briganti A, et al. A competing-risks analysis of survival after alternative treatment modalities for prostate cancer patients: 1988–2006. Eur Urol. 2011;59(1):88–95. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2010.10.003. PubMed DOI
Wilt TJ, Brawer MK, Jones KM, Barry MJ, Aronson WJ, Fox S, et al. Radical prostatectomy versus observation for localized prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2012;367(3):203–213. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1113162. PubMed DOI PMC
Bernard B, Muralidhar V, Chen Y-H, Sridhar SS, Mitchell EP, Pettaway CA, et al. Impact of ethnicity on the outcome of men with metastatic, hormone-sensitive prostate cancer. Cancer. 2017;123(9):1536–1544. doi: 10.1002/cncr.30503. PubMed DOI PMC
Stranne J, Brasso K, Brennhovd B, Johansson E, Jäderling F, Kouri M, et al. SPCG-15: a prospective randomized study comparing primary radical prostatectomy and primary radiotherapy plus androgen deprivation therapy for locally advanced prostate cancer. Scand J Urol. 2018;52(5–6):313–320. doi: 10.1080/21681805.2018.1520295. PubMed DOI
Abouot SEER-Medicare Linked Database. https://healthcaredelivery.cancer.gov/seermedicare/. Accessed 05 Jul 2021
Bandini M, Preisser F, Nazzani S, Marchioni M, Tian Z, Mazzone E, et al. The effect of other-cause mortality adjustment on access to alternative treatment modalities for localized prostate cancer among African American patients. Eur Urol Oncol. 2018;1(3):215–222. doi: 10.1016/j.euo.2018.03.007. PubMed DOI