Racial/ethnic disparities in the distribution and effect of type and number of high-risk criteria on mortality in prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy

. 2023 ; 21 (3) : 135-141. [epub] 20221121

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid37521449

OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in the distribution of type and number of D'Amico high-risk criteria (DHRCs) according to race/ethnicity (R/E) and their effect on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: In the SEER database (2004-2016), we identified 31,002 PCa patients treated with RT with at least one DHRCs, namely PSA >20 ng/dL, biopsy Gleason Grade Group 4-5, and clinical T stage ≥T2c. Competing risks regression (CRR) model tested the association between DHRCs and 5-year CSM in all R/E subgroups. RESULTS: Of 31,002 patients, 20,894 (67%) were Caucasian, 5256 (17%) were African American, 2868 (9.3%) were Hispanic-Latino, and 1984 (6.4%) were Asian. The distributions of individual DHRCs and combinations of two DHRCs differed according to R/E, but not for the combination of three DHRCs. The effect related to the presence of a single DHRC, and combinations of two or three DHRCs on absolute CSM rates was lowest in Asians (1.2-6.8%), followed by in African Americans (2.3-12.2%) and Caucasians (2.3-12.1%), and highest in Hispanic/Latinos (1.7-13.8%). However, the opposite effect was observed in CRR, where hazard ratios were highest in Asians vs. other R/Es: Asians 1.00-2.59 vs. others 0.5-1.83 for one DHRC, Asians 3.4-4.75 vs. others 0.66-3.66 for two DHRCs, and Asians 7.22 vs. others 3.03-4.99 for all three DHRCs. CONCLUSIONS: R/E affects the proportions of DHRCs. Moreover, within the four examined R/E groups, the effect of DHRCs on absolute and relative CSM metrics also differed. Therefore, R/E-specific considerations may be warranted in high-risk PCa patients treated with RT.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Av DA, W R, Sb M, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998. August;280(11):969–974. PubMed

Cooperberg MR, Cowan J, Broering JM, et al. High-risk prostate cancer in the United States, 1990-2007. World J Urol. 2008. June;26(3):211–218. PubMed PMC

van den Bergh R, Gandaglia G, Tilki D, et al. Trends in radical prostatectomy risk group distribution in a European multicenter analysis of 28 572 patients: towards tailored treatment. Eur Urol Focus. 2019. March;5(2):171–178. PubMed

Mahal BA, Berman RA, Taplin ME, et al. Prostate cancer-specific mortality across Gleason scores in black vs nonblack men. JAMA. 2018. December;320(23):2479–2481. PubMed

Steele CB, Li J, Huang B, et al. Prostate cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001-2009): findings from the Concord-2 study. Cancer. 2017. December;123(Suppl 24):5160–5177. PubMed PMC

Würnschimmel C, Wenzel M, Collà Ruvolo C, et al. Life expectancy in metastatic prostate cancer patients according to racial/ethnic groups. Int J Urol. 2021;28(8):862–869. PubMed

Hoeh B, Würnschimmel C, Flammia RS, et al. Cancer-specific survival after radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy in high-risk and very high-risk African American prostate cancer patients. Prostate. 2021;82:120–131. PubMed

Hoeh B, Hohenhorst JL, Flammia R, et al. Cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy vs external beam radiotherapy in high-risk Hispanic/Latino prostate cancer patients. Int Urol Nephrol. 2021. November;54:81–87. PubMed PMC

Würnschimmel C, Wenzel M, Chierigo F, et al. External beam radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy are associated with better survival in Asian prostate cancer patients. Int J Urol. 2021;29:17–24. PubMed

About the SEER Program.

R: The R Project for Statistical Computing.

Zelic R, Garmo H, Zugna D, et al. Predicting prostate cancer death with different pretreatment risk stratification tools: a head-to-head comparison in a nationwide cohort study. Eur Urol. 2020. February;77(2):180–188. PubMed

Xu J, Janisse J, Ruterbusch J, et al. Racial differences in treatment decision-making for men with clinically localized prostate cancer: a population-based study. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016. May;3(1):35. PubMed PMC

Chornokur G, Dalton K, Borysova ME, et al. Disparities at presentation, diagnosis, treatment and survival in African American men, affected by prostate cancer. Prostate. 2011. June;71(9):985. PubMed PMC

Moses KA, Paciorek AT, Penson DF, et al. Impact of ethnicity on primary treatment choice and mortality in men with prostate cancer: data from capsure. J Clin Oncol. 2010. February;28(6):1069. PubMed PMC

Knipper S, Palumbo C, Pecoraro A, et al. Survival outcomes of radical prostatectomy vs. external beam radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients with Gleason Score 9-10 at biopsy: a population-based analysis. J Urol Oncol. 2020. April;38(3):79.e9–79.e14. PubMed

Tsao CK, Gray KP, Nakabayashi M, et al. Patients with biopsy Gleason 9 and 10 prostate cancer have significantly worse outcomes compared to patients with Gleason 8 disease. J Urol. 2015;194(1):91–97. PubMed

Wenzel M, Würnschimmel C, Chierigo F, et al. Pattern of biopsy Gleason grade group 5 (4 + 5 vs 5 + 4 vs 5 + 5) predicts survival after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy. Eur Urol Focus. 2022. May;8(3):710–717. PubMed

Flammia RS, Hoeh B, Sorce G, et al. Contemporary seminal vesicle invasion rates in NCCN high-risk prostate cancer patients. Prostate. 2022. June;82(10):1051–1059. PubMed PMC

Chierigo F, Borghesi M, Würnschimmel C, et al. Contemporary pathological stage distribution after radical prostatectomy in North American high-risk prostate cancer patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022. October;20(5):e380–e389. PubMed

Milonas D, Ruzgas T, Venclovas Z, et al. Impact of grade groups on prostate cancer-specific and other-cause mortality: competing risk analysis from a large single institution series. Cancers (Basel). 2021. March;13(8):1963. PubMed PMC

Tilki D, Würnschimmel C, Preisser F, et al. The significance of primary biopsy Gleason 5 in patients with grade group 5 prostate cancer. Eur Urol Focus. 2020. April;6(2):255–258. PubMed

Würnschimmel C, Wenzel M, Collà Ruvolo C, et al. Survival advantage of Asian metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy over other races/ethnicities. World J Urol. 2021. October;39(10):3781–3787. PubMed PMC

About the National Cancer Database.

Nocera L, Wenzel M, Collà Ruvolo C, et al. The effect of race/ethnicity on active treatment rates among septuagenarian or older low risk prostate cancer patients. Urol Oncol. 2021. November;39(11):785.e11–785.e17. PubMed

Nocera L, Wenzel M, Collà Ruvolo C, et al. The impact of race/ethnicity on upstaging and/or upgrading rates among intermediate risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2021;206(Supplement 3). DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000002076.14. PubMed DOI

Collà Ruvolo C, Würnschimmel C, Nocera L, et al. Stage and cancer-specific mortality differ within specific Asian ethnic groups for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: North American population-based study. Int J Urol. 2021;28(12):1247–1252. PubMed

Wenzel M, Nocera L, Collà Ruvolo C, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in tumor characteristics and treatments in favorable and unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2021. July;206(1):69–79. PubMed

Stolzenbach LF, Rosiello G, Deuker M, et al. The impact of race and age on distribution of metastases in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol. 2020. November;204(5):962–968. PubMed

Chierigo F, Borghesi M, Würnschimmel C, et al. Life expectancy in metastatic urothelial bladder cancer patients according to race/ethnicity. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022. Jul;54(7):1521–1527. PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...