Racial/ethnic disparities in the distribution and effect of type and number of high-risk criteria on mortality in prostate cancer patients treated with radiotherapy
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium electronic-ecollection
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
37521449
PubMed Central
PMC10373609
DOI
10.1080/2090598x.2022.2148867
PII: 2148867
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- CSM, D’Amico high-risk criteria, SEER, race/ethnicity, radiotherapy,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
OBJECTIVE: To assess differences in the distribution of type and number of D'Amico high-risk criteria (DHRCs) according to race/ethnicity (R/E) and their effect on cancer-specific mortality (CSM) in prostate cancer (PCa) patients treated with external beam radiotherapy (RT). METHODS: In the SEER database (2004-2016), we identified 31,002 PCa patients treated with RT with at least one DHRCs, namely PSA >20 ng/dL, biopsy Gleason Grade Group 4-5, and clinical T stage ≥T2c. Competing risks regression (CRR) model tested the association between DHRCs and 5-year CSM in all R/E subgroups. RESULTS: Of 31,002 patients, 20,894 (67%) were Caucasian, 5256 (17%) were African American, 2868 (9.3%) were Hispanic-Latino, and 1984 (6.4%) were Asian. The distributions of individual DHRCs and combinations of two DHRCs differed according to R/E, but not for the combination of three DHRCs. The effect related to the presence of a single DHRC, and combinations of two or three DHRCs on absolute CSM rates was lowest in Asians (1.2-6.8%), followed by in African Americans (2.3-12.2%) and Caucasians (2.3-12.1%), and highest in Hispanic/Latinos (1.7-13.8%). However, the opposite effect was observed in CRR, where hazard ratios were highest in Asians vs. other R/Es: Asians 1.00-2.59 vs. others 0.5-1.83 for one DHRC, Asians 3.4-4.75 vs. others 0.66-3.66 for two DHRCs, and Asians 7.22 vs. others 3.03-4.99 for all three DHRCs. CONCLUSIONS: R/E affects the proportions of DHRCs. Moreover, within the four examined R/E groups, the effect of DHRCs on absolute and relative CSM metrics also differed. Therefore, R/E-specific considerations may be warranted in high-risk PCa patients treated with RT.
Department of Surgical and Diagnostic Integrated Sciences University of Genova Genova Italy
Department of Urology 2nd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague Czech Republic
Department of Urology Comprehensive Cancer Center Medical University of Vienna Vienna Austria
Department of Urology IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino Genova Italy
Department of Urology University Hospital Frankfurt Frankfurt am Main Germany
Department of Urology University of Texas Southwestern Dallas Texas USA
Department of Urology University of Verona Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata di Verona
Departments of Urology Weill Cornell Medical College New York NY USA
Martini Klinik Prostate Cancer Center University Hospital Hamburg Eppendorf Hamburg Germany
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Av DA, W R, Sb M, et al. Biochemical outcome after radical prostatectomy, external beam radiation therapy, or interstitial radiation therapy for clinically localized prostate cancer. JAMA. 1998. August;280(11):969–974. PubMed
Cooperberg MR, Cowan J, Broering JM, et al. High-risk prostate cancer in the United States, 1990-2007. World J Urol. 2008. June;26(3):211–218. PubMed PMC
van den Bergh R, Gandaglia G, Tilki D, et al. Trends in radical prostatectomy risk group distribution in a European multicenter analysis of 28 572 patients: towards tailored treatment. Eur Urol Focus. 2019. March;5(2):171–178. PubMed
Mahal BA, Berman RA, Taplin ME, et al. Prostate cancer-specific mortality across Gleason scores in black vs nonblack men. JAMA. 2018. December;320(23):2479–2481. PubMed
Steele CB, Li J, Huang B, et al. Prostate cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001-2009): findings from the Concord-2 study. Cancer. 2017. December;123(Suppl 24):5160–5177. PubMed PMC
Würnschimmel C, Wenzel M, Collà Ruvolo C, et al. Life expectancy in metastatic prostate cancer patients according to racial/ethnic groups. Int J Urol. 2021;28(8):862–869. PubMed
Hoeh B, Würnschimmel C, Flammia RS, et al. Cancer-specific survival after radical prostatectomy versus external beam radiotherapy in high-risk and very high-risk African American prostate cancer patients. Prostate. 2021;82:120–131. PubMed
Hoeh B, Hohenhorst JL, Flammia R, et al. Cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy vs external beam radiotherapy in high-risk Hispanic/Latino prostate cancer patients. Int Urol Nephrol. 2021. November;54:81–87. PubMed PMC
Würnschimmel C, Wenzel M, Chierigo F, et al. External beam radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy are associated with better survival in Asian prostate cancer patients. Int J Urol. 2021;29:17–24. PubMed
About the SEER Program.
R: The R Project for Statistical Computing.
Zelic R, Garmo H, Zugna D, et al. Predicting prostate cancer death with different pretreatment risk stratification tools: a head-to-head comparison in a nationwide cohort study. Eur Urol. 2020. February;77(2):180–188. PubMed
Xu J, Janisse J, Ruterbusch J, et al. Racial differences in treatment decision-making for men with clinically localized prostate cancer: a population-based study. J Racial Ethn Health Disparities. 2016. May;3(1):35. PubMed PMC
Chornokur G, Dalton K, Borysova ME, et al. Disparities at presentation, diagnosis, treatment and survival in African American men, affected by prostate cancer. Prostate. 2011. June;71(9):985. PubMed PMC
Moses KA, Paciorek AT, Penson DF, et al. Impact of ethnicity on primary treatment choice and mortality in men with prostate cancer: data from capsure. J Clin Oncol. 2010. February;28(6):1069. PubMed PMC
Knipper S, Palumbo C, Pecoraro A, et al. Survival outcomes of radical prostatectomy vs. external beam radiation therapy in prostate cancer patients with Gleason Score 9-10 at biopsy: a population-based analysis. J Urol Oncol. 2020. April;38(3):79.e9–79.e14. PubMed
Tsao CK, Gray KP, Nakabayashi M, et al. Patients with biopsy Gleason 9 and 10 prostate cancer have significantly worse outcomes compared to patients with Gleason 8 disease. J Urol. 2015;194(1):91–97. PubMed
Wenzel M, Würnschimmel C, Chierigo F, et al. Pattern of biopsy Gleason grade group 5 (4 + 5 vs 5 + 4 vs 5 + 5) predicts survival after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiation therapy. Eur Urol Focus. 2022. May;8(3):710–717. PubMed
Flammia RS, Hoeh B, Sorce G, et al. Contemporary seminal vesicle invasion rates in NCCN high-risk prostate cancer patients. Prostate. 2022. June;82(10):1051–1059. PubMed PMC
Chierigo F, Borghesi M, Würnschimmel C, et al. Contemporary pathological stage distribution after radical prostatectomy in North American high-risk prostate cancer patients. Clin Genitourin Cancer. 2022. October;20(5):e380–e389. PubMed
Milonas D, Ruzgas T, Venclovas Z, et al. Impact of grade groups on prostate cancer-specific and other-cause mortality: competing risk analysis from a large single institution series. Cancers (Basel). 2021. March;13(8):1963. PubMed PMC
Tilki D, Würnschimmel C, Preisser F, et al. The significance of primary biopsy Gleason 5 in patients with grade group 5 prostate cancer. Eur Urol Focus. 2020. April;6(2):255–258. PubMed
Würnschimmel C, Wenzel M, Collà Ruvolo C, et al. Survival advantage of Asian metastatic prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy over other races/ethnicities. World J Urol. 2021. October;39(10):3781–3787. PubMed PMC
About the National Cancer Database.
Nocera L, Wenzel M, Collà Ruvolo C, et al. The effect of race/ethnicity on active treatment rates among septuagenarian or older low risk prostate cancer patients. Urol Oncol. 2021. November;39(11):785.e11–785.e17. PubMed
Nocera L, Wenzel M, Collà Ruvolo C, et al. The impact of race/ethnicity on upstaging and/or upgrading rates among intermediate risk prostate cancer patients treated with radical prostatectomy. World J Urol. 2021;206(Supplement 3). DOI:10.1097/JU.0000000000002076.14. PubMed DOI
Collà Ruvolo C, Würnschimmel C, Nocera L, et al. Stage and cancer-specific mortality differ within specific Asian ethnic groups for upper tract urothelial carcinoma: North American population-based study. Int J Urol. 2021;28(12):1247–1252. PubMed
Wenzel M, Nocera L, Collà Ruvolo C, et al. Racial/ethnic disparities in tumor characteristics and treatments in favorable and unfavorable intermediate risk prostate cancer. J Urol. 2021. July;206(1):69–79. PubMed
Stolzenbach LF, Rosiello G, Deuker M, et al. The impact of race and age on distribution of metastases in patients with prostate cancer. J Urol. 2020. November;204(5):962–968. PubMed
Chierigo F, Borghesi M, Würnschimmel C, et al. Life expectancy in metastatic urothelial bladder cancer patients according to race/ethnicity. Int Urol Nephrol. 2022. Jul;54(7):1521–1527. PubMed