External beam radiotherapy and radical prostatectomy are associated with better survival in Asian prostate cancer patients

. 2022 Jan ; 29 (1) : 17-24. [epub] 20210922

Jazyk angličtina Země Austrálie Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid34553428

OBJECTIVES: To test the effect of race/ethnicity on cancer-specific mortality after radical prostatectomy or external beam radiotherapy in localized prostate cancer patients. METHODS: In the Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results database 2004-2016, we identified intermediate-risk and high-risk white (n = 151 632), Asian (n = 11 189), Hispanic/Latino (n = 20 077) and African American (n = 32 550) localized prostate cancer patients, treated with external beam radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy. Race/ethnicity-stratified cancer-specific mortality analyses relied on competing risks regression, after propensity score matching for patient and cancer characteristics. RESULTS: Compared with white patients, Asian intermediate- and high-risk external beam radiotherapy patients showed lower cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio 0.58 and 0.70, respectively, both P ≤ 0.02). Additionally, Asian high-risk radical prostatectomy patients also showed lower cancer-specific mortality than white patients (hazard ratio 0.72, P = 0.04), but not Asian intermediate-risk radical prostatectomy patients (P = 0.08). Conversely, compared with white patients, African American intermediate-risk radical prostatectomy patients showed higher cancer-specific mortality (hazard ratio 1.36, P = 0.01), but not African American high-risk radical prostatectomy or intermediate- and high-risk external beam radiotherapy patients (all P ≥ 0.2). Finally, compared with white people, no cancer-specific mortality differences were recorded for Hispanic/Latino patients after external beam radiotherapy or radical prostatectomy, in both risk levels (P ≥ 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: Relative to white patients, an important cancer-specific mortality advantage applies to intermediate-risk and high-risk Asian prostate cancer patients treated with external beam radiotherapy, and to high-risk Asian patients treated with radical prostatectomy. These observations should be considered in pretreatment risk stratification and decision-making.

Komentář v

PubMed

Komentář v

PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Mahal BA, Berman RA, Taplin M-E et al. Prostate cancer-specific mortality across Gleason Scores in Black vs Nonblack Men. JAMA 2018; 320: 2479.

Steele CB, Li J, Huang B et al. Prostate cancer survival in the United States by race and stage (2001-2009): findings from the CONCORD-2 study. Cancer 2017; 123: 5160-77.

Gray PJ, Lin CC, Cooperberg MR et al. Temporal trends and the impact of race, insurance, and socioeconomic status in the management of localized prostate cancer. Eur. Urol. 2017; 71: 729-37.

Man A, Pickles T, Chi KN. Asian race and impact on outcomes after radical radiotherapy for localized prostate cancer. J. Urol. 2003; 170: 901-4.

Chinea FM, Patel VN, Kwon D et al. Ethnic heterogeneity and prostate cancer mortality in Hispanic/Latino men: a population-based study. Oncotarget 2017; 8: 69709-21.

Chao GF, Krishna N, Aizer AA et al. Asian Americans and prostate cancer: a nationwide population-based analysis. Urol. Oncol. Semin. Orig. Investig. 2016; 34: 233.e7-233.e15.

Deuker M, Stolzenbach LF, Pecoraro A et al. PSA, stage, grade and prostate cancer specific mortality in Asian American patients relative to Caucasians according to the United States Census Bureau race definitions. World J. Urol. 2021; 39: 787-96.

Wang C, Kamrava M, King C et al. Racial disparity in prostate cancer-specific mortality for high-risk prostate cancer: a population-based study. Cureus 2017; 9: e961.

Dess RT, Hartman HE, Mahal BA et al. Association of black race with prostate cancer-specific and other-cause mortality. JAMA Oncol. 2019; 5: 975.

Fine JP, Gray RJ. A proportional Hazards model for the subdistribution of a competing risk. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 1999; 94: 496-509.

Dignam JJ, Zhang Q, Kocherginsky M. The use and interpretation of competing risks regression models. Clin. Cancer Res. 2012; 18: 2301-8.

R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing. Vienna, Austria. 2013. [Cited 30 Mar 2021.] Available from URL: http://www.r-project.org/

Lichtensztajn DY, Gomez SL, Sieh W et al. Prostate cancer risk profiles of Asian-American Men: disentangling the effects of immigration status and race/ethnicity. J. Urol. 2014; 191: 952-6.

Howlader N, Noone A, Krapcho M et al. SEER Cancer Statistics Review, 1975-2016, National Cancer Institute. Bethesda, MD. 2018. Based on November 2018 SEER data submission, posted to the SEER web site, April 2019. [30 Mar 2021.] Available from URL: https://seer.cancer.gov

Nemirovsky A, Huang H, Al Kibria GM et al. Surgery associated with increased survival compared to radiation in clinically localized Gleason 9-10 prostate cancer: a SEER analysis. World J. Urol. 2021; 39: 415-23.

Pompe RS, Davis-Bondarenko H, Zaffuto E et al. Population-based validation of the 2014 ISUP Gleason Grade Groups in patients treated with radical prostatectomy, brachytherapy, external beam radiation, or no local treatment. Prostate 2017; 77: 686-93.

Cooperberg MR, Hinotsu S, Namiki M et al. Trans-Pacific variation in outcomes for men treated with primary androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) for prostate cancer. BJU Int. 2016; 117: 102-9.

Fukagai T, Namiki TS, Carlile RG et al. Comparison of the clinical outcome after hormonal therapy for prostate cancer between Japanese and Caucasian men. BJU Int. 2006; 97: 1190-3.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...