European Society of Gynaecological Oncology quality indicators for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma
Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
34795020
DOI
10.1136/ijgc-2021-003178
PII: S1048-891X(25)00109-4
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- endometrial neoplasms, surgical oncology,
- MeSH
- konsensus MeSH
- lékařská onkologie normy MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- nádory endometria chirurgie MeSH
- společnosti lékařské MeSH
- ukazatele kvality zdravotní péče * MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- ženské pohlaví MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Geografické názvy
- Evropa MeSH
BACKGROUND: Quality of surgical care as a crucial component of a comprehensive multi-disciplinary management improves outcomes in patients with endometrial carcinoma, notably helping to avoid suboptimal surgical treatment. Quality indicators (QIs) enable healthcare professionals to measure their clinical management with regard to ideal standards of care. OBJECTIVE: In order to complete its set of QIs for the surgical management of gynecological cancers, the European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO) initiated the development of QIs for the surgical treatment of endometrial carcinoma. METHODS: QIs were based on scientific evidence and/or expert consensus. The development process included a systematic literature search for the identification of potential QIs and documentation of the scientific evidence, two consensus meetings of a group of international experts, an internal validation process, and external review by a large international panel of clinicians and patient representatives. QIs were defined using a structured format comprising metrics specifications, and targets. A scoring system was then developed to ensure applicability and feasibility of a future ESGO accreditation process based on these QIs for endometrial carcinoma surgery and support any institutional or governmental quality assurance programs. RESULTS: Twenty-nine structural, process and outcome indicators were defined. QIs 1-5 are general indicators related to center case load, training, experience of the surgeon, structured multi-disciplinarity of the team and active participation in clinical research. QIs 6 and 7 are related to the adequate pre-operative investigations. QIs 8-22 are related to peri-operative standards of care. QI 23 is related to molecular markers for endometrial carcinoma diagnosis and as determinants for treatment decisions. QI 24 addresses the compliance of management of patients after primary surgical treatment with the standards of care. QIs 25-29 highlight the need for a systematic assessment of surgical morbidity and oncologic outcome as well as standardized and comprehensive documentation of surgical and pathological elements. Each QI was associated with a score. An assessment form including a scoring system was built as basis for ESGO accreditation of centers for endometrial cancer surgery.
Clinical Research Unit Institut Bergonie Bordeaux France
Department of Gynaecologic Oncology Imperial College London Faculty of Medicine London UK
Department of Gynecologic Oncology Nairi Medical Center Yerevan Armenia
Department of Gynecologic Oncology VKV American Hospital Istambul Turkey
Department of Gynecology and Gynecological Oncology Evangelische Kliniken Essen Mitte Essen Germany
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics Technische Universität Dresden Dresden Germany
Department of Gynecology and Obstetrics; Innsbruck Medical Univeristy Innsbruck Austria
Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology University Hospital Munich Munich Germany
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Innsbruck Medical University Innsbruck Austria
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Koç University School of Medicine Ankara Turkey
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology Skåne University Hospital Lund Sweden
Department of Surgery Institut Gustave Roussy Villejuif France
German Cancer Research Center Heidelberg Germany
Gynecologic Oncology Unit La Paz University Hospital IdiPAZ Madrid Spain
Helmholtz Zentrum Dresden Rossendorf Dresden Germany
Lund University Faculty of Medicine Clinical Sciences Lund Sweden
Citace poskytuje Crossref.org