Ability of dog owners to identify their dogs by smell
Language English Country England, Great Britain Media electronic
Document type Journal Article
PubMed
34815506
PubMed Central
PMC8610967
DOI
10.1038/s41598-021-02238-7
PII: 10.1038/s41598-021-02238-7
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- MeSH
- Smell physiology MeSH
- Discrimination, Psychological physiology MeSH
- Child MeSH
- Pets * MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Surveys and Questionnaires MeSH
- Dogs MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Ownership statistics & numerical data MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Check Tag
- Child MeSH
- Adult MeSH
- Middle Aged MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Adolescent MeSH
- Young Adult MeSH
- Male MeSH
- Child, Preschool MeSH
- Dogs MeSH
- Aged MeSH
- Female MeSH
- Animals MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
Several studies report that olfactory cues play an important role in human life; humans are essentially able to recognize other family members and friends by their odors. Moreover, recent studies report that humans are also able to identify odors of non-conspecifics. The aim of this study was to determine whether dog owners are able to identify their dogs by smell and distinguish the odor of their own dogs from those of other dogs. A total of 53 dog owners (40 females and 13 males of different ages) volunteered to take part in this study. A number of the participants (17) owned 2 dogs; these owners took part in the study twice (i.e., working with only one dog at a time). Sterile gauze pads were used to collect odor samples from the dogs. Each pad was placed in its own sterile glass jar (750 ml) with a twist off lid until the experiment commenced. Participants were asked to identify their own dog´s odor from a line-up of 6 glass containers. This experiment demonstrated that dog owners are capable of identifying their dogs by smell on a significant level. Results of this study additionally suggested that male owners outperformed their female counterparts in the identification process. Moreover, dog owners whose dogs were housed outside had a higher success rate in identification than did participants who kept their dogs indoors with them. The dog owners found it easier to identify dogs that had been neutered, fed dry dog food and bathed less frequently. In general, younger dog owners tended to have more success when attempting to identify their dogs than did their older counterparts.
See more in PubMed
McGann JP. Poor human olfaction is a 19th-century myth. Science (80-.). 2017;356:100. PubMed PMC
Marshall DA, Moulton DG. Olfactory sensitivity to α-ionone in humans and dogs. Chem. Senses. 1981;6:53–61.
Krestel D, Passe D, Smith JC, Jonsson L. Behavioral determination of olfactory thresholds to amyl acetate in dogs. Neurosci. Biobehav. Rev. 1984;8:169–174. PubMed
Walker DB, et al. Naturalistic quantification of canine olfactory sensitivity. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 2006;97:241–254.
Sarrafchi A, Odhammer AME, Hernandez Salazar LT, Laska M. Olfactory sensitivity for six predator odorants in CD-1 mice, human subjects, and spider monkeys. PLoS One. 2013;8:10. PubMed PMC
Güven S, Laska M. Olfactory sensitivity and odor structure-activity relationships for aliphatic carboxylic acids in CD-1 mice. PLoS ONE. 2012;7:1–9. PubMed PMC
Kavoi BM, Jameela H. Comparative Morphometry of the Olfactory Bulb, Tract and Stria in the Human, Dog and Goat. Int. J. Morphol. 2011;29:939–946.
Gilad Y, et al. Linked references are available on JSTOR for this article: Human specific loss of olfactory receptor genes. Sci. Rep. 2016;100:3324–3327. PubMed PMC
Gilad Y, Wiebe V, Przeworski M, Lancet D, Pääbo S. Loss of olfactory receptor genes coincides with the acquisition of full trichromatic vision in primates. PLoS Biol. 2004;2:120–126. PubMed PMC
Lo GKH, Macpherson K, MacDonald H, Roberts WA. A comparative study of memory for olfactory discriminations: dogs (Canis familiaris), rats (Rattus norvegicus), and humans (Homo sapiens) J. Comp. Psychol. 2020;134:170–179. PubMed
Olsson SB, Barnard J, Turri L. Olfaction and identification of unrelated individuals: examination of the mysteries of human odor recognition. J. Chem. Ecol. 2006;32:1635–1645. PubMed
Laska, M. Human and Animal Olfactory Capabilities Compared. in Handbook of Odor 675–689 (2017). 10.1007/978-3-319-26932-0.
Craven BA, Paterson EG, Settles GS. The fluid dynamics of canine olfaction: unique nasal airflow patterns as an explanation of macrosmia. J. R. Soc. Interface. 2010;7:933–943. PubMed PMC
Neuhaus W. Über die Riechscharfe des Hundes für Fettsauren. Vergl. Physiol. 1953;4:527–552.
Moulton DG, Ashton EH, Eayrs JT. Studies in olfactory acuity. 4. Relative detectability of n-aliphatic acids by the dog. Anim. Behav. 1960;8:117–128.
Kaise H. Olfactory studies in the dog. The KITAKANTO Med. J. 1969;19:396–408.
Becker RF, King JE, Markee JE. Studies on olfactory discrimination in dogs: dogs to turn to the right or the left in response to olfactory cues at a choice point in a variety of modified T mazes. Performance was per-functory. The dogs were more concerned with learning the avenues O. Sci. Rep. 1962;55:773–780.
Nicolini P. Olfactory stimulation and its recession (in Italian) Arch. Ital Sci. Farm. 1954;4:109–172. PubMed
Wackermannová M, Pinc L, Jebavý L. Olfactory sensitivity in mammalian species. Physiol. Res. 2016;65:369–390. PubMed
Sarafoleanu C, Mella C, Georgescu M, Perederco C. The importance of the olfactory sense in the human behavior and evolution. J. Med. Life. 2009;2:196–198. PubMed PMC
Zou LQ, et al. What does the nose know? Olfactory function predicts social network size in human. Sci. Rep. 2016;6:4–9. PubMed PMC
Pause BM. Processing of body odor signals by the human brain. Chemosens. Percept. 2012;5:55–63. PubMed PMC
Semin GR, Groot JHBD. The chemical bases of human sociality. Trends Cogn. Sci. 2013;17:427–429. PubMed
Chen D, Katdare A, Lucas N. Chemosignals of fear enhance cognitive performance in humans. Chem. Senses. 2006;31:415–423. PubMed
Peeke HVS, Russell MJ, Mendelson T. Mothers ’ Identification of their Infant ’ s Odors. Sci. Rep. 1983;31:29–31.
Kaitz M, Eidelman AI. Smell-recognition of newborns by women who are not mothers. Chem. Sens. 1992;17:225–229.
Porter RH, Balogh RD, Cernoch JM, Franchi C. Recognition of kin through characteristic body odors. Chem. Senses. 1986;11:389–395.
Alho L, et al. Nosewitness identification: Effects of negative emotion. PLoS ONE. 2015;10:1–10. PubMed PMC
Mitro S, Gordon AR, Olsson MJ, Lundström JN. The smell of age: Perception and discrimination of body odors of different ages. PLoS One. 2012;7:12. PubMed PMC
Zuniga A, Stevenson RJ, Mahmut MK, Stephen ID. Diet quality and the attractiveness of male body odor. Evol. Hum. Behav. 2017;38:136–143.
Havlicek J, Lenochova P. The effect of meat consumption on body odor attractiveness. Chem. Senses. 2006;31:747–752. PubMed
Doty RL, Ford G, Preti G, Huggins GR. Changes in the intensity and pleasantness of human vaginal odors during the menstrual cycle. Science (80-.). 1975;190:1314–1318. PubMed
Olsson MJ, et al. The scent of disease: human body odor contains an early chemosensory cue of sickness. Psychol. Sci. 2014;25:817–823. PubMed
Schaal B, Hummel T, Soussignan R. Olfaction in the fetal and premature infant: functional status and clinical implications. Clin. Perinatol. 2004;31:261–285. PubMed
Romantshik O, Porter RH, Tillmann V, Varendi H. Preliminary evidence of a sensitive period for olfactory learning by human newborns. Acta Paediatr. Int. J. Paediatr. 2007;96:372–376. PubMed
Schaal B. Olfaction in infants and children: Developmental and functional perspectives. Chem. Sens. 1988;13:145–190.
Bader AP, Phillips RD. Father’s recognition of their newborns by visual-facial and olfactory cues. Psychol. Men Masculinity. 2002;3:79–84.
Dubas JS, Heijkoop M, van Aken MAG. A preliminary investigation of parent-progeny olfactory recognition and parental investment. Hum. Nat. 2009;20:80–92.
Roberts SC, et al. Body odor similarity in noncohabiting twins. Chem. Senses. 2005;30:651–656. PubMed
Gilbert AN, Yamazaki K, Beauchamp GK, Thomas L. Olfactory discrimination of mouse strains (Mus musculus) and major histocompatibility types by humans (Homo sapiens) J. Comp. Psychol. 1986;100:262–265. PubMed
Hepper PG, Wells DL. Individually identifiable body odors are produced by the gorilla and discriminated by humans. Chem. Sens. 2010;35:263–268. PubMed
Wells DL, Hepper PG. The discrimination of dog odours by humans. Perception. 2000;29:111–115. PubMed
Courtney N, Wells DL. Last but not least. Perception. 2002;31:511–512. PubMed
Cain WS. Odor identification by males and females: predictions vs performance. Chem. Sens. 1982;7:129–142.
Sorokowski P, et al. Sex differences in human olfaction: a meta-analysis. Front. Psychol. 2019;10:1–9. PubMed PMC
Brand G, Millot JL. Sex differences in human olfaction: Between evidence and enigma. Q. J. Exp. Psychol. Sect. B Comp. Physiol. Psychol. 2001;54:259–270. PubMed
Köster, E. P. Olfactory Adaptation. in The Human sense of Smell (eds. Laing, D. G., Doty, R. L. & Breipohl, W.) 395 (Springer, 1991).
Lenochova P, Roberts SC, Havlicek J. Methods of human body odor sampling: the effect of freezing. Chem. Sens. 2009;34:127–138. PubMed
Hummel T, Barz S, Pauli E, Kobal G. Chemosensory event-related potentials change with age. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 1998;108:208–217. PubMed
Doty RL, Kamath V. The influences of age on olfaction: a review. Front. Psychol. 2014;5:1–20. PubMed PMC
du Sert NP, et al. Reporting animal research: Explanation and elaboration for the arrive guidelines 2.0. PLoS Biol. 2020;18:120. PubMed PMC
Straus, J. & Kloubek, M. Kriminalistická odorologie. (Vydavatelství a nakladatelství Aleš Čeněk, 2010).
Pinc L, Bartoš L, Reslová A, Kotrba R. Dogs discriminate identical twins. PLoS ONE. 2011;6:4–7. PubMed PMC
Vyplelová P, et al. Individual human odor fallout as detected by trained canines. Forensic Sci. Int. 2014;234:13–15. PubMed