Conservative Management of Asymptomatic Adnexal Masses Classified as Benign by the IOTA ADNEX Model: A Prospective Multicenter Portuguese Study

. 2021 Oct 27 ; 11 (11) : . [epub] 20211027

Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid34829339
Odkazy

PubMed 34829339
PubMed Central PMC8625719
DOI 10.3390/diagnostics11111992
PII: diagnostics11111992
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje

This prospective multicentric study aiming to determine the incidence of complications (malignant transformation, torsion or rupture) during conservative management of adnexal masses was performed in two Portuguese tertiary referral hospitals. It included ≥18-year-old, non-pregnant patients with asymptomatic adnexal masses (associated IOTA ADNEX risk of malignancy < 10%) sonographically diagnosed between January 2016 and December 2020. Conservative patient management consisted of serial clinical and ultrasound assessment up to 60 months of follow-up, spontaneous resolution of the formation or surgical excision (median follow-up: 17.8; range 9-48 months). From the 573 masses monitored (328 premenopausal and 245 postmenopausal adnexal masses), no complications were observed in 99.5%. The annual lesion growth rates and increases in morphological complexity were similar in the premenopausal and postmenopausal patients. Spontaneous resolution, evidenced in 16.4% of the patients, was more common in the premenopausal group (p < 0.05). Surgical intervention was performed in 18.4% of the cases; one borderline and one invasive FIGO IA stage cancer were diagnosed. There was an isolated case of ovary torsion (0.17%). These data support conservative management as a safe option for sonographically benign, stable and asymptomatic adnexal masses before and after menopause and highlight the need for expedite treatment of symptomatic or increased-morphological-complexity lesions.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

May T., Oza A. Conservative management of adnexal masses. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:326–327. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30939-2. PubMed DOI

American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Practice bulletin No. 174: Evaluation and management of adnexal masses. Obstet. Gynecol. 2016;128:e210–e226. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001768. PubMed DOI

Froyman W., Landolfo C., Cock B., Wynants L., Sladkevicius P., Testa A.C., Van Holsbeke C., Domali E., Fruscio R., Epstein E., et al. Risk of complications in patients with conservatively managed ovarian tumours (IOTA5): A 2-year interim analysis of a multicentre, prospective, cohort study. Lancet Oncol. 2019;20:448–458. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(18)30837-4. PubMed DOI

Henderson J.T., Webber E.M., Sawaya G.F. Screening for ovarian cancer: Updated evidence report and systematic review for the US preventive services task force. JAMA. 2018;319:595–606. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.21421. PubMed DOI

Jacobs I.J., Menon U., Ryan A., Gentry-Maharaj A., Burnell M., Kalsi J., Amso N.N., Apostolidou S., Benjamin E., Cruickshank D., et al. Ovarian cancer screening and mortality in the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening (UKCTOCS): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2016;387:945–956. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)01224-6. PubMed DOI PMC

Buys S.S., Partridge E., Black A., Johnson C., Lamerato L., Isaacs C., Reding D.J., Greenlee R.T., Yokochi L.A., Kessel B., et al. Effect of screening on ovarian cancer mortality: The prostate, lung, colorectal and ovarian (PLCO) cancer screening randomized controlled trial. JAMA. 2011;305:2295–2303. doi: 10.1001/jama.2011.766. PubMed DOI

Menon U., Gentry-Maharaj A., Burnell M., Singh N., Ryan R., Karpinskyj C., Carlino G., Taylor J., Massingham S.K., Raikou M., et al. Ovarian cancer population screening and mortality after long-term follow-up in the UK collaborative trial of ovarian cancer screening (UKCTOCS): A randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2021;397:2182–2193. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00731-5. PubMed DOI PMC

Glanc P., Benacerraf B., Bourne T., Brown D., Coleman B., Crum C., Dodge J., Levine D., Pavlik E., Timmerman D., et al. First international consensus report on adnexal masses: Management recommendations. J. Ultrasound Med. 2017;36:849–863. doi: 10.1002/jum.14197. PubMed DOI

Reade C.J., Riva J.J., Busse J., Goldsmith C.H., Elit L. Risks and benefits of screening asymptomatic women for ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Gynecol. Oncol. 2013;130:674–681. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2013.06.029. PubMed DOI

Timmerman D., Planchamp F., Bourne T., Landolfo C., Bois A., Chiva L. ESGO/ISUOG/IOTA/ESGE consensus statement on preoperative diagnosis of ovarian tumors. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2021;58:148–168. doi: 10.1002/uog.23635. PubMed DOI

Education and Pratical Standards Committee European federation of societies for ultrasound in medicine and biology. Minimum training recommendations for the practice of medical ultrasound. Ultraschall Med. 2006;27:79–105. doi: 10.1055/s-2006-933605. PubMed DOI

Yazbek J., Raju S., Ben-Nagi J., Holland T., Hillaby K., Jurkovic D. Effect of quality of gynaecological ultrasonography on management of patients with suspected ovarian cancer: A randomised controlled trial. Lancet Oncol. 2008;9:124–131. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(08)70005-6. PubMed DOI

Timmerman D., Valentin T., Bourne T.H., Collins W.P., Verrelst H., Vergore I. Terms, definitions and measurements to describe the sonographic features of adnexal tumors: A consensus opinion from the international ovarian tumor analysis (IOTA) group. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2000;16:500–505. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2000.00287.x. PubMed DOI

Timmerman D., Testa A.C., Bourne T., Ameye L., Jurkovic D., Holsbeke A., Paladini D., van Calster B., Vergote I., van Huffel S., et al. Simple ultrasound-based rules for the diagnosis of ovarian cancer. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2008;31:681–690. doi: 10.1002/uog.5365. PubMed DOI

Timmerman D., Ameye L., Fischerova D., Epstein E., Melis G., Guerriero S., Van Holsbeke C., Savelli L., Fruscio R., Lissoni A.A., et al. Simple ultrasound rules to distinguish between benign and malignant adnexal masses before surgery: Prospective validation by IOTA group. BMJ. 2010;341:c6839. doi: 10.1136/bmj.c6839. PubMed DOI PMC

Van Calster B., Hoorde K., Valentin L., Testa A.C., Fischerosa D., Holsbeke C., Savelli L., Franchi D., Epstein E., Kaijser J., et al. Evaluating the risk of ovarian cancer before surgery using the ADNEX model to differentiate between benign, borderline, early and advanced stage invasive, and secondary metastatic tumours: Prospective multicentre diagnostic study. BMJ. 2014;349:g5920. doi: 10.1136/bmj.g5920. PubMed DOI PMC

Jeong S.Y., Park B., Lee Y., Kim T. Validation of IOTA-ADNEX model in discriminating characteristics of adnexal masses: A comparison with subjective assessment. J. Clin. Med. 2020;9:2010. doi: 10.3390/jcm9062010. PubMed DOI PMC

Timmerman D. The use of mathematical models to evaluate pelvic masses; can they beat an expert operator? Best Pract. Res. Clin. Obstet. Gynaecol. 2004;18:91–104. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2003.09.009. PubMed DOI

Meys E.M., Kaijser J., Kruitwagen R., Slangen B., Calster V., Aertgeerts B., Verbakel J.Y., Timmerman D., van Gorp T. Subjective assessment versus ultrasound models to diagnose ovarian cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur. J. Cancer. 2016;58:17–29. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.01.007. PubMed DOI

Valentin L., Hagen B., Tingulstad S., Eik-Nes S. Comparison of ‘pattern recognition’ and logistic regression models for discrimination between benign and malignant pelvic masses: A prospective cross validation. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2001;18:357–365. doi: 10.1046/j.0960-7692.2001.00500.x. PubMed DOI

Van Calster B., Valentin L., Froyman W., Landolfo C., Ceusters J., Testa A., Wynants L., Sladkevicius P., van Holsbeke C., Domali E., et al. Validation of models to diagnose ovarian cancer in patients managed surgically or conservatively: Multicentre cohort study. BMJ. 2020;370:m2614. doi: 10.1136/bmj.m2614. PubMed DOI PMC

Andreotti R.F., Timmerman D., Benacerraf B., Bennett G., Bourne T., Brown D., Coleman B.G., Frates M.C., Froyman W., Goldstein S.R., et al. Ovarian-adnexal reporting lexicon for ultrasound: A white paper of the ACR ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system committee. J. Am. Coll. Radiol. 2018;15:1415–1429. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2018.07.004. PubMed DOI

Andreotti R.F., Timmerman D., Strachowski L.M., Froyman W., Benacerraf B., Bennett G., Bourne T., Brown D.L., Coleman B.G., Frates M.C., et al. O-RADS US risk stratification and management system: A consensus guideline from the ACR ovarian-adnexal reporting and data system committee. Radiology. 2020;294:168–185. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2019191150. PubMed DOI

Valentin L., Akrawi D. The natural history of adnexal cysts incidentally detected at transvaginal ultrasound examination in postmenopausal women. Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2002;20:174–180. doi: 10.1046/j.1469-0705.2002.00709.x. PubMed DOI

Crayford T.J., Campbell S., Bourne T., Rawson H., Collins W. Benign ovarian cysts and ovarian cancer: A cohort study with implications for screening. Lancet. 2000;355:1060–1063. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02038-9. PubMed DOI

Alcázar J.L., Castillo G., Jurado M., García G. Is expectant management of sonographically benign adnexal cysts an option in selected asymptomatic premenopausal women? Hum. Reprod. 2005;20:3231–3234. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dei206. PubMed DOI

Castillo G., Alcázar J.L., Jurado M. Natural history of sonographically detected simple unilocular adnexal cysts in asymptomatic postmenopausal women. Gynecol. Oncol. 2004;92:965–969. doi: 10.1016/j.ygyno.2003.11.029. PubMed DOI

Pascual M.A., Graupera B., Pedrero C., Rodriguez I., Ajossa S., Guerriero S., Alcazar J.L. Long-term results for expectant management of ultrasonographically diagnosed benign ovarian teratomas. Obstet. Gynecol. 2017;130:1244–1250. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000002327. PubMed DOI

Hoo W.L., Yazbek J., Mavrelos D., Tong E., Jurkovic D. Expectant management of ultrasonically diagnosed ovarian dermoid cysts: Is it possible to predict outcome? Ultrasound Obstet. Gynecol. 2010;36:235–240. doi: 10.1002/uog.7610. PubMed DOI

Horiuchi A., Itoh K., Shimizu M., Nakai I., Yamazaki T., Kimura K., Suzuki A., Shiozawa I., Ueda N., Konishi I., et al. Toward understanding the natural history of ovarian carcinoma development: A clinicopathological approach. Gynecol. Oncol. 2003;88:309–317. doi: 10.1016/S0090-8258(02)00104-X. PubMed DOI

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...