Genomic selection is an attractive strategy for apple breeding that could reduce the length of breeding cycles. A possible limitation to the practical implementation of this approach lies in the creation of a training set large and diverse enough to ensure accurate predictions. In this study, we investigated the potential of combining two available populations, i.e., genetic resources and elite material, in order to obtain a large training set with a high genetic diversity. We compared the predictive ability of genomic predictions within-population, across-population or when combining both populations, and tested a model accounting for population-specific marker effects in this last case. The obtained predictive abilities were moderate to high according to the studied trait and small increases in predictive ability could be obtained for some traits when the two populations were combined into a unique training set. We also investigated the potential of such a training set to predict hybrids resulting from crosses between the two populations, with a focus on the method to design the training set and the best proportion of each population to optimize predictions. The measured predictive abilities were very similar for all the proportions, except for the extreme cases where only one of the two populations was used in the training set, in which case predictive abilities could be lower than when using both populations. Using an optimization algorithm to choose the genotypes in the training set also led to higher predictive abilities than when the genotypes were chosen at random. Our results provide guidelines to initiate breeding programs that use genomic selection when the implementation of the training set is a limitation.

Department of Agricultural Sciences University of Bologna Bologna Italy

Department of Plant Breeding Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences Kristianstad Sweden

Plant Breeding and Biodiversity Centre Wallon de Recherches Agronomiques Gembloux Belgium

Univ Angers INRAE Institut Agro IRHS SFR QuaSaV F 49000 Angers France

Výzkumný a Šlechtitelský ústav Ovocnářský Holovousy s r o Holovousy Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Akdemir D, Sanchez JI, Jannink J-L.. 2015. Optimization of genomic selection training populations with a genetic algorithm. Genet Sel Evol. 47:10.1186/s12711-015-0116-6 PubMed DOI PMC

Bernardo R. 2014. Genomewide Selection when Major Genes Are Known. Crop Sci. 54:68–75. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2013.05.0315. DOI

Bianco L, Cestaro A, Sargent DJ, Banchi E, Derdak S, Di Guardo M, Salvi S, Jansen J, Viola R, Gut I,. et al. 2014. Development and Validation of a 20K Single Nucleotide Polymorphism (SNP) Whole Genome Genotyping Array for Apple (Malus × domestica Borkh). PLoS ONE. 9:e110377.10.1371/journal.pone.0110377 PubMed DOI PMC

Bianco L, Cestaro A, Linsmith G, Muranty H, Denancé C, et al.2016. Development and validation of the Axiom ® Apple480K SNP genotyping array. Plant J. 86:62–74. doi: 10.1111/tpj.13145. PubMed DOI

Brandariz SP, Bernardo R.. 2019. Small ad hoc versus large general training populations for genomewide selection in maize biparental crosses. Theor Appl Genet. 132:347–353. 10.1007/s00122-018-3222-3 PubMed DOI

Browning SR, Browning BL.. 2007. Rapid and Accurate Haplotype Phasing and Missing-Data Inference for Whole-Genome Association Studies By Use of Localized Haplotype Clustering. The American Journal of Human Genetics. 81:1084–1097. 10.1086/521987 PubMed DOI PMC

Ceci AT, Bassi M, Guerra W, Oberhuber M, Robatscher P, et al.2021. Metabolomic characterization of commercial, old, and Red-Fleshed apple varieties. Metabolites. 11:378. doi:10.3390/metabo11060378. PubMed DOI PMC

Chagné D, Kirk C, How N, Whitworth C, Fontic C. et al. 2016. A functional genetic marker for apple red skin coloration across different environments. Tree Genetics & Genomes. 12:Doi:10.1007/s11295-016-1025-8. DOI

Clark SA, Hickey JM, Daetwyler HD, van der Werf JHJ.. 2012. The importance of information on relatives for the prediction of genomic breeding values and the implications for the makeup of reference data sets in livestock breeding schemes. Genet Sel Evol. 44:4. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-44-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Crossa J, Jarquín D, Franco J, Pérez-Rodríguez P, Burgueño J, et al.2016. Genomic prediction of gene bank wheat landraces. G3 (Bethesda). 6:1819–1834. doi:10.1534/g3.116.029637. PubMed DOI PMC

Daetwyler HD, Pong-Wong R, Villanueva B, Woolliams JA.. 2010. The impact of genetic architecture on genome-wide evaluation methods. Genetics. 185:1021–1031. doi:10.1534/genetics.110.116855. PubMed DOI PMC

DoVale JC, Carvalho HF, Sabadin F, Fritsche-Neto R.. 2021. Reduction of genotyping marker density for genomic selection is not an affordable approach to long-term breeding in cross-pollinated crops. biorXiv. doi: 10.1101/2021.03.05.434084 DOI

Duan N, Bai Y, Sun H, Wang N, Ma Y, et al.2017. Genome re-sequencing reveals the history of apple and supports a two-stage model for fruit enlargement. Nat Commun. 8:249. doi:10.1038/s41467-017-00336-7. PubMed DOI PMC

Edwards SM, Buntjer JB, Jackson R, Bentley AR, Lage J, et al.2019. The effects of training population design on genomic prediction accuracy in wheat. Theor Appl Genet. 132:1943–1952. doi:10.1007/s00122-019-03327-y. PubMed DOI PMC

Endelman JB. 2011. Ridge regression and other kernels for genomic selection with R package rrBLUP. Plant Genome. 4:250–255. doi:10.3835/plantgenome2011.08.0024. DOI

Erbe M, Hayes BJ, Matukumalli LK, Goswami S, Bowman PJ, et al.2012. Improving accuracy of genomic predictions within and between dairy cattle breeds with imputed high-density single nucleotide polymorphism panels. J Dairy Sci. 95:4114–4129. doi:10.3168/jds.2011-5019. PubMed DOI

Fritsche-Neto R, Galli G, Borges KLR, Costa-Neto G, Alves FC, et al.2021. Optimizing genomic-enabled prediction in small-scale maize hybrid breeding programs: a roadmap review. Front Plant Sci. 12:658267. doi:10.3389/fpls.2021.658267. PubMed DOI PMC

Gessler C, Pertot I.. 2012. Vf scab resistance of Malus. Trees. 26:95–108. doi:10.1007/s00468-011-0618-y. DOI

Goudet J. 2005. hierfstat, a package for r to compute and test hierarchical F-statistics. Mol Ecol Notes. 5:184–186. doi:10.1111/j.1471-8286.2004.00828.x. DOI

Hayes BJ, Bowman PJ, Chamberlain AC, Verbyla K, Goddard ME.. 2009. Accuracy of genomic breeding values in multi-breed dairy cattle populations. Genet Sel. Evol. 41:51. PubMed PMC

Hickey JM, Dreisigacker S, Crossa J, Hearne S, Babu R, et al.2014. Evaluation of genomic selection training population designs and genotyping strategies in plant breeding programs using simulation. Crop Sci. 54:1476–1488. doi:10.2135/cropsci2013.03.0195. DOI

Howard NP, Albach DC, Lubby JJ.. 2018. The identification of apple pedigree information on a large diverse set of apple germplasm and its application in apple breeding using new genetic tools. In: Foerdergemeinschaft Oekologischer Obstbau e. V. (FOEKO). Hohenheim: Germany.

Ibánez-Escriche N, Fernando RL, Toosi A, Dekkers JCM.. 2009. Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance. Genet Sel Evol. 41:12. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-41-12. PubMed DOI PMC

Ibánẽz-Escriche N, Fernando RL, Toosi A, Dekkers JC.. Genomic selection of purebreds for crossbred performance. Genet Sel Evol. 2009;41(1):10.1186/1297-9686-41-12 PubMed DOI PMC

Isidro J, Jannink J-L, Akdemir D, Poland J, Heslot N, et al.2015. Training set optimization under population structure in genomic selection. Theor Appl Genet. 128:145–158. doi:10.1007/s00122-014-2418-4. PubMed DOI PMC

Janick J, Moore JN, editors. 1975. Advances in Fruit Breeding. West Lafayette, IN: Purdue University Press.

Jarquin D, Specht J, Lorenz A.. 2016. Prospects of genomic prediction in the USDA soybean germplasm collection: historical data creates robust models for enhancing selection of accessions. G3 (Bethesda). 6:2329–2341. doi:10.1534/g3.116.031443. PubMed DOI PMC

Jung M, Keller B, Roth M, Aranzana MJ, Auwerkerken A, et al.2021. Genetic architecture and genomic prediction accuracy of apple quantitative traits across environments. biorXiv. doi:10.1101/2021.11.29.470309. PubMed DOI PMC

Jung M, Roth M, Aranzana MJ, Auwerkerken A, Bink M, et al.2020. The apple REFPOP-a reference population for genomics-assisted breeding in apple. Hortic Res. 7:189. doi:10.1038/s41438-020-00408-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Karoui S, Carabaño MJ, Díaz C, Legarra A.. 2012. Joint genomic evaluation of French dairy cattle breeds using multiple-trait models. Genet Sel Evol. 44:39. doi:10.1186/1297-9686-44-39. PubMed DOI PMC

Khan SA, Tikunov Y, Chibon P-Y, Maliepaard C, Beekwilder J, et al.2014. Metabolic diversity in apple germplasm. Plant Breed. 133:281–290. doi:10.1111/pbr.12134. DOI

Kouassi AB, Durel C-E, Costa F, Tartarini S, van de Weg E, et al.2009. Estimation of genetic parameters and prediction of breeding values for apple fruit-quality traits using pedigreed plant material in Europe. Tree Genet Genomes. 5:659–672. doi:10.1007/s11295-009-0217-x. DOI

Kumar S, Bink MCAM, Volz RK, Bus VGM, Chagné D.. 2012a. Towards genomic selection in apple (Malus × domestica Borkh.) breeding programmes: prospects, challenges and strategies. Tree Genet Genomes. 8:1–14. doi:10.1007/s11295-011-0425-z. DOI

Kumar S, Chagné D, Bink MCAM, Volz RK, Whitworth C, et al.2012b. Genomic selection for fruit quality traits in apple (Malus×domestica Borkh.), (T. Zhang, Ed.). PLoS One. 7:e36674. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036674. PubMed DOI PMC

Kumar S, Hilario E, Deng CH, Molloy C.. 2020. Turbocharging introgression breeding of perennial fruit crops: a case study on apple. Hortic Res. 7:47. doi:10.1038/s41438-020-0270-z. PubMed DOI PMC

Kumar S, Molloy C, Muñoz P, Daetwyler H, Chagné D, et al.2015. Genome-enabled estimates of additive and nonadditive genetic variances and prediction of apple phenotypes across environments. G3 (Bethesda). 5:2711–2718. doi:10.1534/g3.115.021105. PubMed DOI PMC

Laurens F, Aranzana MJ, Arus P, Bassi D, Bink M, et al.2018. An integrated approach for increasing breeding efficiency in apple and peach in Europe. Hortic Res. 5:11. doi:10.1038/s41438-018-0016-3. PubMed DOI PMC

Lehermeier C, Krämer N, Bauer E, Bauland C, Camisan C, et al.2014. Usefulness of multiparental populations of maize (Zea mays L.) for genome-based prediction. Genetics. 198:3–16. doi:10.1534/genetics.114.161943. PubMed DOI PMC

Lehermeier C, Schön C-C, de los Campos G.. 2015. Assessment of genetic heterogeneity in structured plant populations using multivariate whole-genome regression models. Genetics. 201:323–337. doi:10.1534/genetics.115.177394. PubMed DOI PMC

Lenth RV. 2021. emmeans: estimated Marginal Means, aka Least-Squares Means. R package version 1.6.0.

Liao L, Zhang W, Zhang B, Fang T, Wang X-F, et al.2021. Unraveling a genetic roadmap for improved taste in the domesticated apple. Mol Plant. 14:1454–1471. doi:10.1016/j.molp.2021.05.018. PubMed DOI

Lorenz AJ, Smith KP.. 2015. Adding genetically distant individuals to training populations reduces genomic prediction accuracy in barley. Crop Sci. 55:2657–2667. doi:10.2135/cropsci2014.12.0827. DOI

Lund MS, van den Berg I, Ma P, Brøndum RF, Su G.. 2016. Review: how to improve genomic predictions in small dairy cattle populations. Animal. 10:1042–1049. doi:10.1017/S1751731115003031. PubMed DOI

Lyra DH, Granato ÍSC, Morais PPP, Alves FC, dos Santos ARM, et al.2018. Controlling population structure in the genomic prediction of tropical maize hybrids. Mol Breed. 38. doi:10.1007/s11032-018-0882-2. DOI

Mangin B, Rincent R, Rabier C-E, Moreau L, Goudemand-Dugue E.. 2019. Training set optimization of genomic prediction by means of EthAcc. PLoS One. 14:e0205629. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0205629. PubMed DOI PMC

McClure KA, Gardner KM, Douglas GM, Song J, Forney CF, et al.2018. A genome-wide association study of apple quality and scab resistance. Plant Genome. 11:170075. doi:10.3835/plantgenome2017.08.0075. PubMed DOI

Meuwissen TH, Hayes BJ, Goddard ME.. 2001. Prediction of total genetic value using genome-wide dense marker maps. Genetics. 157:1819–1829. PubMed PMC

Migicovsky Z, Gardner KM, Money D, Sawler J, Bloom JS, et al.2016. Genome to phenome mapping in apple using historical data. Plant Genome. 9. doi:10.3835/plantgenome2015.11.0113. PubMed DOI

Migicovsky Z, Yeats TH, Watts S, Song J, Forney CF, et al.2021. Apple ripening is controlled by a NAC transcription factor. Front Genet. 12:671300. doi:10.3389/fgene.2021.671300. PubMed DOI PMC

Minamikawa MF, Kunihisa M, Noshita K, Moriya S, Abe K, et al.2021. Tracing founder haplotypes of Japanese apple varieties: application in genomic prediction and genome-wide association study. Hortic Res. 8:49. doi:10.1038/s41438-021-00485-3. PubMed DOI PMC

Muranty H, Denancé C, Feugey L, Crépin J-L, Barbier Y, et al.2020. Using whole-genome SNP data to reconstruct a large multi-generation pedigree in apple germplasm. BMC Plant Biol. 20:2. doi:10.1186/s12870-019-2171-6. PubMed DOI PMC

Muranty H, Troggio M, Sadok IB, Rifaï MA, Auwerkerken A, et al.2015. Accuracy and responses of genomic selection on key traits in apple breeding. Hortic Res. 2:15060. doi:10.1038/hortres.2015.60. PubMed DOI PMC

Myles S. 2013. Improving fruit and wine: what does genomics have to offer? Trends Genet. 29:190–196. doi:10.1016/j.tig.2013.01.006. PubMed DOI

Noiton DAM, Alspach PA.. 1996. Founding clones, inbreeding, coancestry, and status number of modern apple cultivars. J Am Soc Hortic Sci. 121:773–782. doi:10.21273/JASHS.121.5.773. DOI

Nsibi M, Gouble B, Bureau S, Flutre T, Sauvage C, et al.2020. Adoption and optimization of genomic selection to sustain breeding for apricot fruit quality. G3 (Bethesda). 10:4513–4529. doi:10.1534/g3.120.401452. PubMed DOI PMC

Nybom H, Sehic J, Garkava-Gustavsson L.. 2008. Modern apple breeding is associated with a significant change in the allelic ratio of the ethylene production gene Md-ACS1. J Hortic Sci Biotechnol. 83:673–677. doi:10.1080/14620316.2008.11512442. DOI

Olatoye MO, Clark LV, Labonte NR, Dong H, Dwiyanti MS, et al.2020. Training population optimization for genomic selection in Miscanthus. G3 (Bethesda). 10:2465–2476. doi:10.1534/g3.120.401402. PubMed DOI PMC

Ou J-H, Liao C-T.. 2019. Training set determination for genomic selection. Theor Appl Genet. 132:2781–2792. doi:10.1007/s00122-019-03387-0. PubMed DOI

Purcell S, Neale B, Todd-Brown K, Thomas L, Ferreira MAR, et al.2007. PLINK: a tool set for whole-genome association and population-based linkage analyses. Am J Hum Genet. 81:559–575. doi:10.1086/519795. PubMed DOI PMC

Ramstein GP, Casler MD.. 2019. Extensions of BLUP models for genomic prediction in heterogeneous populations: application in a diverse switchgrass sample. G3 (Bethesda). 9:789–805. doi:10.1534/g3.118.200969. PubMed DOI PMC

Raymond B, Bouwman AC, Wientjes YCJ, Schrooten C, Houwing-Duistermaat J, et al.2018. Genomic prediction for numerically small breeds, using models with pre-selected and differentially weighted markers. Genet Sel Evol. 50:49. doi:10.1186/s12711-018-0419-5. PubMed DOI PMC

Rincent R, Laloë D, Nicolas S, Altmann T, Brunel D, et al.2012. Maximizing the reliability of genomic selection by optimizing the calibration set of reference individuals: comparison of methods in two diverse groups of maize inbreds (Zea mays L.). Genetics. 192:715–728. doi:10.1534/genetics.112.141473. PubMed DOI PMC

Rincent R, Charcosset A, Moreau L.. 2017. Predicting genomic selection efficiency to optimize calibration set and to assess prediction accuracy in highly structured populations. Theor Appl Genet. 130:2231–2247. doi:10.1007/s00122-017-2956-7. PubMed DOI PMC

Rio S, Moreau L, Charcosset A, Mary-Huard T.. 2020. Accounting for Group-Specific Allele Effects and Admixture in Genomic Predictions: Theory and Experimental Evaluation in Maize. Genetics. 216:27–41. doi: 10.1534/genetics.120.303278. PubMed DOI PMC

Rio S, Mary-Huard T, Moreau L, Charcosset A.. 2019. Genomic selection efficiency and a priori estimation of accuracy in a structured dent maize panel. Theor Appl Genet. 132:81–96. doi:10.1007/s00122-018-3196-1. PubMed DOI

Rodríguez-Álvarez MX, Boer MP, van Eeuwijk FA, Eilers PHC.. 2018. Correcting for spatial heterogeneity in plant breeding experiments with P-splines. Spat Stat. 23:52–71. doi:10.1016/j.spasta.2017.10.003. DOI

de Roos APW, Hayes BJ, de Goddard ME.. 2009. Reliability of genomic predictions across multiple populations. Genetics. 183:1545–1553. doi:10.1534/genetics.109.104935. PubMed DOI PMC

de Roos APW, de Hayes BJ, Spelman RJ, Goddard ME.. 2008. Linkage disequilibrium and persistence of phase in Holstein–Friesian, Jersey and Angus cattle. Genetics. 179:1503–1512. doi:10.1534/genetics.107.084301. PubMed DOI PMC

Roth M, Muranty H, Guardo MD, Guerra W, Patocchi A, et al.2020. Genomic prediction of fruit texture and training population optimization towards the application of genomic selection in apple. Hortic Res. 7:148. doi:10.1038/s41438-020-00370-5. PubMed DOI PMC

Sarinelli JM, Murphy JP, Tyagi P, Holland JB, Johnson JW, et al.2019. Training population selection and use of fixed effects to optimize genomic predictions in a historical USA winter wheat panel. Theor Appl Genet. 132:1247–1261. doi: 10.1007/s00122-019-03276-6. PubMed DOI PMC

Schulz-Streeck T, Ogutu JO, Karaman Z, Knaak C, Piepho HP. 2012. Genomic Selection using Multiple Populations. Crop Science. 52:2453–2461. doi: 10.2135/cropsci2012.03.0160. DOI

Singh A, Dubey PK, Chaurasia R, Dubey RK, Pandey KK, et al.2019. Domesticating the undomesticated for global food and nutritional security: four steps. Agronomy. 9:491. doi:10.3390/agronomy9090491. DOI

Song H, Ye S, Jiang Y, Zhang Z, Zhang Q, et al.2019. Using imputation-based whole-genome sequencing data to improve the accuracy of genomic prediction for combined populations in pigs. Genet Sel Evol. 51:58. doi:10.1186/s12711-019-0500-8. PubMed DOI PMC

Sood S, Lin Z, Caruana B, Slater AT, Daetwyler HD.. 2020. Making the most of all data: combining non‐genotyped and genotyped potato individuals with HBLUP. Plant Genome. 13:e20056. doi:10.1002/tpg2.20056. PubMed DOI

Sverrisdóttir E, Sundmark EHR, Johnsen HØ, Kirk HG, Asp T, et al.2018. The value of expanding the training population to improve genomic selection models in tetraploid potato. Front Plant Sci. 9:1118. doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01118. PubMed DOI PMC

Technow F, Totir LR.. 2015. Using Bayesian multilevel whole genome regression models for partial pooling of training sets in genomic prediction. G3 (Bethesda). 5:1603–1612. doi:10.1534/g3.115.019299. PubMed DOI PMC

Tiezzi F, Maltecca C.. 2015. Accounting for trait architecture in genomic predictions of US Holstein cattle using a weighted realized relationship matrix. Genet Sel Evol. 47:24. doi:10.1186/s12711-015-0100-1. PubMed DOI PMC

van Nocker S, Gardiner SE.. 2014. Breeding better cultivars, faster: applications of new technologies for the rapid deployment of superior horticultural tree crops. Hortic Res. 1:14022. doi:10.1038/hortres.2014.22. PubMed DOI PMC

VanRaden PM. 2008. Efficient methods to compute genomic predictions. J Dairy Sci. 91:4414–4423. doi:10.3168/jds.2007-0980. PubMed DOI

Verma S, Evans K, Guan Y, Luby JJ, Rosyara UR, et al.2019. Two large-effect QTLs, Ma and Ma3, determine genetic potential for acidity in apple fruit: breeding insights from a multi-family study. Tree Genetics & Genomes. 15: Doi:10.1007/s11295-019-1324-y. DOI

Voss-Fels KP, Cooper M, Hayes BJ.. 2019. Accelerating crop genetic gains with genomic selection. Theor Appl Genet. 132:669–686. doi:10.1007/s00122-018-3270-8. PubMed DOI

Watkins R, Smith RA.. 1982. International board for plant genetic resources, commission of the European communities, and committee on disease resistance breeding and use of Genebanks. In: Descriptor List for Apple (Malus.). Brussels; Rome: CEC Secretariat ; IBPGR Secretariat.

Watts S, Migicovsky Z, McClure KA, Amyotte B, et al.2021. Quantifying apple diversity: a phenomic characterization of Canada’s apple biodiversity collection. Plants People Planet. 10211. doi:10.1002/ppp3.10211. DOI

Wedger MJ, Schumann AC, Gross BL.. 2021. Candidate genes and signatures of directional selection on fruit quality traits during apple domestication. Am J Bot. 108:616–627. doi:10.1002/ajb2.1636. PubMed DOI

Wientjes Y, Veerkamp RF, Bijma P, Bovenhuis H, Schrooten C, et al.2015. Empirical and deterministic accuracies of across-population genomic prediction. Genet Sel Evol. 47:5. doi:10.1186/s12711-014-0086-0. PubMed DOI PMC

Wientjes YCJ, Bijma P, Veerkamp RF, Calus MPL.. 2016. An equation to predict the accuracy of genomic values by combining data from multiple traits, populations, or environments. Genetics. 202:799–823. doi:10.1534/genetics.115.183269. PubMed DOI PMC

Wimmer V, Lehermeier C, Albrecht T, Auinger H-J, Wang Y, et al.2013. Genome-wide prediction of traits with different genetic architecture through efficient variable selection. Genetics. 195:573–587. doi:10.1534/genetics.113.150078. PubMed DOI PMC

Xu Y, Liu X, Fu J, Wang H, Wang J, et al.2020. Enhancing genetic gain through genomic selection: from livestock to plants. Plant Commun. 1:100005. doi:10.1016/j.xplc.2019.100005. PubMed DOI PMC

Yao J-L, Xu J, Cornille A, Tomes S, Karunairetnam S, et al.2015. A microRNA allele that emerged prior to apple domestication may underlie fruit size evolution. Plant J. 84:417–427. doi:10.1111/tpj.13021. PubMed DOI

Yu X, Li X, Guo T, Zhu C, Wu Y, et al.2016. Genomic prediction contributing to a promising global strategy to turbocharge gene banks. Nat Plants. 2:16150. doi:10.1038/nplants.2016.150. PubMed DOI

Zhang A, Wang H, Beyene Y, Semagn K, Liu Y, et al.2017. Effect of trait heritability, training population size and marker density on genomic prediction accuracy estimation in 22 bi-parental tropical maize populations. Front Plant Sci. 8:1916. doi:10.3389/fpls.2017.01916. PubMed DOI PMC