BACKGROUND: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure (LAAC) is accompanied by a high risk of complications. Due to the complex anatomy of the LAA and the oval-shaped ostium, the proper sizing of the device is often difficult. PURPOSE: To assess individualized fluoroscopy viewing angles using pre-procedural CT analysis and to compare the results of landing zone measurements obtained from CT, transesophageal echocardiography (TEE), intracardiac echocardiography (ICE), and fluoroscopy. METHODS: Patients with indications for LAAC were enrolled. Cardiac CT and TEE were done before the procedure; ICE and fluoroscopy measurements were done peri-procedurally. Multiplanar reconstruction of CT images, using FluoroCT software, was done, and optimal "personalized" viewing angles for fluoroscopy were determined. Moreover, a mean (using multiplanar CT reconstruction, derived from the LAA perimetr) amd maximum (using all four imaging modalitities) landing zone (LZ) of the LAA were masured. RESULTS: Twenty-five patients were analyzed. Despite significant correlation between LZs obtained from different imaging modalities, the values of LZs differed significantly; the mean LZ diameter on CT was 20.60 ± 3.42 mm, the maximum diameters were 21.99 ± 4.03 mm (CT), 18.72 ± 2.44 mm (TEE), 18.20 ± 2.68 mm (ICE), and 17.76 ± 3.24 mm (fluoroscopy). The mean CT diameter matched with the final device selection in 92% patients, while fluoroscopy or TEE maximum diameters in only 72% patients. Optimal viewing angles differed significantly from the fluoroscopy projections usually recommended by the manufacturer in 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: CT provides the best measurement of the LZ and the best prediction of the optimum fluoroscopy projections for the implantation procedure.

Cardiocenter Dept of cardiology 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady Prague Czech Republic

Cardiocenter Karlovy Vary Regional Hospital Karlovy Vary Czech Republic

Dept of Radiology 3rd Faculty of Medicine Charles University Prague and University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady Prague Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Turagam Mohit K, Osmancik Pavel, Neuzil Petr, Dukkipati Srinivas R, Reddy Vivek Y. Left Atrial Appendage Closure Versus Oral Anticoagulants in Atrial Fibrillation: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Trials. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Dec 08;76 (23):2795–2797. PubMed

Widimsky Petr, Osmancik Pavel. Left atrial appendage closure - ready for widespread clinical use? EuroIntervention. 2020 Oct 09;16 (9):e701–e702. PubMed

Korsholm Kasper, Jensen Jesper Møller, Nielsen-Kudsk Jens Erik. Cardiac Computed Tomography for Left Atrial Appendage Occlusion: Acquisition, Analysis, Advantages, and Limitations. Interv Cardiol Clin. 2018 Apr;7 (2):229–242. PubMed

Thériault-Lauzier Pascal, Andalib Ali, Martucci Giuseppe, Mylotte Darren, Cecere Renzo, Lange Rüediger, Tchétché Didier, Modine Thomas, van Mieghem Nicolas, Windecker Stephan, Buithieu Jean, Piazza Nicolo. Fluoroscopic anatomy of left-sided heart structures for transcatheter interventions: insight from multislice computed tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2014 Sep;7 (9):947–57. PubMed

Clemente Alberto, Avogliero Francesco, Berti Sergio, Paradossi Umberto, Jamagidze Giuli, Rezzaghi Marco, Della Latta Daniele, Chiappino Dante. Multimodality imaging in preoperative assessment of left atrial appendage transcatheter occlusion with the Amplatzer Cardiac Plug. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2015 Nov;16 (11):1276–87. PubMed

Saw Jacqueline, Fahmy Peter, Spencer Ryan, Prakash Roshan, McLaughlin Patrick, Nicolaou Savvas, Tsang Michael. Comparing Measurements of CT Angiography, TEE, and Fluoroscopy of the Left Atrial Appendage for Percutaneous Closure. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2016 Apr;27 (4):414–22. PubMed

Goitein Orly, Fink Noam, Hay Ilan, Di Segni Elio, Guetta Victor, Goitein David, Brodov Yafim, Konen Eli, Glikson Michael. Cardiac CT Angiography (CCTA) predicts left atrial appendage occluder device size and procedure outcome. Int J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 May;33 (5):739–747. PubMed

Rajwani Adil, Nelson Adam J, Shirazi Masoumeh G, Disney Patrick J S, Teo Karen S L, Wong Dennis T L, Young Glenn D, Worthley Stephen G. CT sizing for left atrial appendage closure is associated with favourable outcomes for procedural safety. Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2017 Dec 01;18 (12):1361–1368. PubMed

Wong Dennis T L, Bertaso Angela G, Liew Gary Y H, Thomson Viji S, Cunnington Michael S, Richardson James D, Gooley Robert, Lockwood Siobhan, Meredith Ian T, Worthley Matthew I, Worthley Stephen G. Relationship of aortic annular eccentricity and paravalvular regurgitation post transcatheter aortic valve implantation with CoreValve. J Invasive Cardiol. 2013 Apr;25 (4):190–5. PubMed

Budge Loren P, Shaffer Katherine M, Moorman J Randall, Lake Douglas E, Ferguson John D, Mangrum J Michael. Analysis of in vivo left atrial appendage morphology in patients with atrial fibrillation: a direct comparison of transesophageal echocardiography, planar cardiac CT, and segmented three-dimensional cardiac CT. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2008 Nov;23 (2):87–93. PubMed

Chow Danny Hf, Bieliauskas Gintautas, Sawaya Fadi J, Millan-Iturbe Oscar, Kofoed Klaus F, Søndergaard Lars, De Backer Ole. A comparative study of different imaging modalities for successful percutaneous left atrial appendage closure. Open Heart. 2017 Aug 2;4 (2) PubMed PMC

Ismail Tevfik Fehmi, Panikker Sandeep, Markides Vias, Foran John P, Padley Simon, Rubens Michael B, Wong Tom, Nicol Edward. CT imaging for left atrial appendage closure: a review and pictorial essay. J Cardiovasc Comput Tomogr. 2015 Mar 31;9 (2):89–102. PubMed

Shee Vikram, He Liwei, Liu Shenrong, Huang Xingfu, Chen Yanyu, Xie Liangzhen, Deng Xiaojiang, Peng Jian. Personalized Fluoroscopic Angles in Watchman™ Left Atrial Appendage Closure Landing Zone Assessment: A Three-Dimensional Printed Simulation Study. Cureus. 2020 Jun 23;12 (6) PubMed PMC

Wang Yan, Di Biase Luigi, Horton Rodney P, Nguyen Tuan, Morhanty Prasant, Natale Andrea. Left atrial appendage studied by computed tomography to help planning for appendage closure device placement. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2010 Sep;21 (9):973–82. PubMed

Practical guide on left atrial appendage closure for the non-implanting physician: an international consensus paper