Practical guide on left atrial appendage closure for the non-implanting physician: an international consensus paper

. 2024 Mar 30 ; 26 (4) : .

Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid38291925

Grantová podpora
Boston Scientific

A significant proportion of patients who suffer from atrial fibrillation (AF) and are in need of thromboembolic protection are not treated with oral anticoagulation or discontinue this treatment shortly after its initiation. This undertreatment has not improved sufficiently despite the availability of direct oral anticoagulants which are associated with less major bleeding than vitamin K antagonists. Multiple reasons account for this, including bleeding events or ischaemic strokes whilst on anticoagulation, a serious risk of bleeding events, poor treatment compliance despite best educational attempts, or aversion to drug therapy. An alternative interventional therapy, which is not associated with long-term bleeding and is as effective as vitamin K anticoagulation, was introduced over 20 years ago. Because of significant improvements in procedural safety over the years, left atrial appendage closure, predominantly achieved using a catheter-based, device implantation approach, is increasingly favoured for the prevention of thromboembolic events in patients who cannot achieve effective anticoagulation. This management strategy is well known to the interventional cardiologist/electrophysiologist but is not more widely appreciated within cardiology or internal medicine. This article introduces the devices and briefly explains the implantation technique. The indications and device follow-up are more comprehensively described. Almost all physicians who care for adult patients will have many with AF. This practical guide, written within guideline/guidance boundaries, is aimed at those non-implanting physicians who may need to refer patients for consideration of this new therapy, which is becoming increasingly popular.

1st Department of Cardiology Poznan University School of Medical Sciences Poznan Poland

Berlin Institute of Health Center for Regenerative Therapies Berlin Germany

Cardioangiologisches Centrum Bethanien Agaplesion Markus Krankenhaus Frankfurt Germany

Cardioangiology Center Bethanien CCB Frankfurt Germany

Cardiologie Clinique Pasteur Brussels University VUB Brussels Belgium

Cardiology Department St Antonius Hospital Nieuwegein Amsterdam University Medical Centers Amsterdam Netherlands

Cardiology Division Department of Biomedical Metabolic and Neural Sciences University of Modena and Reggio Emilia Policlinico di Modena Modena Italy

Cardiology Heart Rhythm Management Department Clinique Pasteur Toulouse France

Cardiovascular Center Aalst OLV Hospital Aalst Belgium

Center for Vascular Research Munich Germany

Centro Cardiologico Monzino IRCCS Department of Clinical Electrophysiology and Cardiac Pacing Department of Biomedical Surgical and Dental Sciences University of Milan Milan Italy

Danish Center for Health Services Research Department of Clinical Medicine Aalborg University Aalborg Denmark

Department of Cardiology Aarhus University Hospital Aarhus Denmark

Department of Cardiology Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine Deutsches Herzzentrum Charité Charité University Medicine Berlin

Department of Cardiology University Heart and Vascular Centre Hamburg Hamburg Germany

Department of Cardiology University Hospital Kralovske Vinohrady Charles University Prague Czech Republic

Department of Neurology Universitätsklinikum Würzburg Würzburg Germany

Department of Surgery Oncology and Gastroenterology University Hospital of Padua Padua Italy

Deutsches Herzzentrum der Charité Campus Virchow Klinikum Berlin Germany

Division of Cardiology European Georges Pompidou Hospital AP HP Paris France

Division of Nephrology Miull General Hospital Acquaviva delle Fonti Italy

EuDial Working Group of the European Renal Association Acquaviva delle Fonti Italy

Genetic and Cardiovascular Sciences Institute Cardiology Academic Group St George's University of London Cranmer Terrace London SW190RE UK

German Centre for Cardiovascular Research partner site Berlin Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin Germany

German Centre for Cardiovascular Research Partner Site Hamburg Kiel Lübeck Hamburg Germany

German Heart Center Charite Campus Mitte Berlin Germany

Ippokrateio Hospital of Thessaloniki Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Greece

Istituto Auxologico Italiano IRCCS Milan Italy

Leicester NIHR BRU University of Leicester Glenfield Hospital Leicester UK

Liverpool Centre for Cardiovascular Science at University of Liverpool Liverpool John Moores University and Liverpool Heart and Chest Hospital Liverpool UK

Medical Faculty University of Belgrade Belgrade Serbia

Nephrology and Dialysis Unit ASL Toscana NordOvest Livorno Italy

Ospedale del Cuore Fondazione CNR Regione Toscana G Monasterio Pisa Italy

School of Medicine and Surgery University of Milano Bicocca Nephrology Clinic Monza Italy

Structural and Congenital Heart Disease European Interbalkan Medical Centre Thessaloniki Greece

University Clinical Centre of Serbia Belgrade Serbia

Erratum v

PubMed

Zobrazit více v PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed DOI

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed DOI

PubMed

Bayer . A study to learn how well the study treatment asundexian works and how safe it is compared to apixaban to prevent stroke or systemic embolism in people with irregular and often rapid heartbeat (atrial fibrillation), and at risk for stroke. 2022. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05643573 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

Anthos Therapeutics Inc., The TIMI Study Group, Laboratory Corporation of America . Safety and tolerability of abelacimab (MAA868) vs. rivaroxaban in patients with atrial fibrillation. 2021. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04755283 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

Anthos Therapeutics Inc . Study to evaLuate the effIcacy and aafety of abeLacimab in high-risk patients with Atrial fibrillation who have been deemed unsuitable for oral antiCoagulation (LILAC-TIMI 76). 2022. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05712200 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

Janssen Research Development LLC, Bristol-Myers Squibb . A study of Milvexian versus apixaban in participants with atrial fibrillation. 2023. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05757869 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

Boston Scientific Corporation . Assessment of the WATCHMAN™ device in patients unsuitable for oral anticoagulation. 2017. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02928497 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

Charite University Berlin Germany, Deutsches Zentrum für Herz-Kreislauf-Forschung, Atrial Fibrillation Network, Stiftung Institut fuer Herzinfarktforschung . Left atrial appendage CLOSURE in patients with atrial fibrillation compared to medical therapy. 2018. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03463317 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

Karolinska Institutet, Abbott Medical Devices . Prevention of stroke by left atrial appendage closure in atrial fibrillation patients after intracerebral hemorrhage. 2017. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02830152 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

Jena University Hospital . Comparison of LAA-closure vs oral anticoagulation in patients with NVAF and status post intracranial bleeding. 2020. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04298723 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

PubMed

R&D Cardiologie, Research ZTNOfH, Development . Left atrial appendage occlusion for AF patients unable to use oral anticoagulation therapy. 2021. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04676880 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

Eitel  I. Left atrial appendage closure in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and end-stage chronic KIDNEY disease. 2022. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05204212 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

PubMed

Boston Scientific Corporation . Comparison of anticoagulation with left atrial appendage closure after AF ablation. 2019. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03795298 (8 February 2024, last date accessed).

PubMed

Abbott Medical Devices . Amplatzer Amulet LAAO vs. NOAC. 2020. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT04226547 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

University of Aarhus Aarhus University Hospital Aalborg University Hospital Odense University Hospital Sahlgrenska University Hospital Sweden Karolinska University Hospital, et al. Left atrial appendage occlusion versus novel oral anticoagulation for stroke prevention in atrial fibrillation. 2019. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03642509 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed PMC

Juhl Madsen  O, Lamberts  MK, Fosboel  EL, Gislason  G, Olesen  JB, Strange  JE. Trends in percutaneous left atrial appendage occlusion and 1-year mortality: a nationwide cohort study. Eur Heart J  2022;43:ehac544.2137.

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

Population Health Research Institute . NOACs for stroke prevention in patients with atrial fibrillation and previous ICH. 2019. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02998905 (8 February 2024, date last assessed).

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed

Population Health Research Institute . EdoxabaN foR IntraCranial Hemorrhage survivors with atrial fibrillation (ENRICH-AF). 2019. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03950076 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

Imperial College London Wuerzburg University Hospital Julius-Maximilians University Medical University of Graz University of Liverpool King’s College London, et al. PREvention of STroke in Intracerebral haemorrhaGE survivors with atrial fibrillation. 2019. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03996772 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

University Hospital Lille, Ministry of Health France, Institut National de la Santé Et de la Recherche Médicale France . Avoiding anticoagulation after intracerebral haemorrhage. 2019. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03243175 (8 February 2024, date last accsessed).

Oslo University Hospital . Study of antithrombotic treatment after intracerebral haemorrhage. 2018. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03186729 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

Yale University, National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke . Anticoagulation in ICH survivors for stroke prevention and recovery. 2022. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03907046  (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

PubMed

PubMed

National Institute of Cardiology Warsaw Poland, Medical Research Agency Poland . Optimal antiplatelet therapy following left atrial appendage closure in dialyzed patients. 2022. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05660811 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

Maarse  M, Seiffge  D, Fierro  N, Tondo  C, Pracon  R, De Backer  O, et al.  Left atrial appendage occlusion versus standard of care in patients with atrial fibrillation and a prior thrombo-embolic event despite oral anticoagulant therapy: a propensity score matched comparison. Eur Heart J  2022;43:ehac544.632.

Hamilton Health Sciences Corporation, McMaster University, Population Health Research Institute, Boston Scientific Corporation . The fourth left atrial appendage occlusion study. 2023. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05963698 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

Insel Gruppe AG University Hospital Bern . Early closure of left atrial appendage for patients with atrial fibrillation and ischemic stroke despite anticoagulation therapy. 2024. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05976685 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

PubMed

Nippon Medical School, Daiichi Sankyo Co. Ltd . STroke secondary prevention with catheter ABLation and EDoxaban for patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation: STABLED study. 2018. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03777631 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

PubMed PMC

Javelin Medical, Population Health Research Institute . Carotid implants for PreveNtion of STrokE ReCurrEnce from large vessel occlusion in atrial fibrillation patients treated with oral anticoagulation. 2023. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05723926 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed

Fundación EPIC . Left atrial appendage occlusion with WATCHMAN® device in patients with non-valvular atrial fibrillation and end-stage chronic kidney disease on hemodialysis. 2018. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03446794 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

University of Magdeburg . Left atrial appendage occlusion vs. usual care in patients with atrial fibrillation and severe chronic kidney disease. 2014. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02039167 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

Population Health Research Institute . The Strategy to Prevent Hemorrhage Associated with Anticoagulation in Renal Disease Management (STOP HARM) trial. 2016. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02885545 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

Meshalkin Research Institute of Pathology of Circulation, Boston Scientific Corporation . Left atrial appendage closure compared to standard antiplatelet therapy in patients with AF who underwent PCI. 2015. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02492230 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

Yonsei University . Safety and efficacy of left atrial appendage closure versus antithrombotic therapy in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing drug-eluting stent implantation due to complex coronary artery disease. 2016. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02606552 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

Ottawa Heart Institute Research Corporation, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Bayer, Biotronik Canada Inc . Optimal anticoagulation for higher risk patients post-catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation trial. 2016. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT02168829 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

PubMed PMC

Wilber  DJ. PowerPoint presentation (acc.org). 2021. https://www.acc.org/education-and-meetings/image-and-slide-gallery/~/media/B4DF9BAC740A46198403DBE12AB7E193.pdf (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

Freeman  J, Hsu  JC, Kapadia  S, Yeh  R, Price  M, Nair  DG, et al.  Ce-452771-4 outcomes with different postprocedural antithrombotic therapy regimens following left atrial appendage occlusion. Heart Rhythm  2023;20:S36–7.

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita, Abbott Medical Devices . Head-to-head comparison of single versus dual antiplatelet treatment strategy after percutaneous left atrial appendage closure: a multicenter, randomized study. 2021. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05554822 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

PubMed PMC

PubMed

Freixa  X. Apixaban vs Dual Antiplatet Therapy Study After Left Atrial Appendage Occlosure (ADALA). 2019. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT05632445 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

Freixa  X, Cruz-González  I, Cepas-Guillén  P, Millan  X, Flores-Umanzor  E, Asmarats  L, et al. A39887XF. Low dose direct oral anticoagulation vs. DAPT after LAAO EuroPCR. 2023. https://eposter.europa-organisation.com/2023/europcr/index/slide/abstract/620 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

Centre de Recherche de l’Institut Universitaire de Cardiologie et de Pneumologie de Quebec, Institut universitaire de cardiologie et de pneumologie de Québec University Laval . Short-term anticoagulation versus antiplatelet therapy for preventing device thrombosis following left atrial appendage closure. 2018. https://classic.clinicaltrials.gov/show/NCT03568890 (8 February 2024, date last accessed).

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed

PubMed PMC

PubMed

PubMed

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat...