A Multi‑Center, Open‑Label, Single‑Arm Trial to Evaluate the Efficacy, Pharmacokinetics, and Safety and Tolerability of IGSC 20% in Subjects with Primary Immunodeficiency
Jazyk angličtina Země Nizozemsko Médium print-electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, multicentrická studie, práce podpořená grantem
PubMed
34973143
PubMed Central
PMC9016006
DOI
10.1007/s10875-021-01181-6
PII: 10.1007/s10875-021-01181-6
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- 20% immunoglobulin, GTI1503, Primary immunodeficiency, immunoglobulin replacement therapy, subcutaneous,
- MeSH
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- imunoglobulin G terapeutické užití MeSH
- imunologické faktory terapeutické užití MeSH
- intravenózní imunoglobuliny MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- subkutánní infuze MeSH
- syndromy imunologické nedostatečnosti * diagnóza farmakoterapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- dítě MeSH
- dospělí MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mladiství MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- multicentrická studie MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- Názvy látek
- imunoglobulin G MeSH
- imunologické faktory MeSH
- intravenózní imunoglobuliny MeSH
PURPOSE: The purpose of this phase 3 study was to evaluate the efficacy, pharmacokinetics (PK), and safety of Immune Globulin Subcutaneous (Human), 20% Caprylate/Chromatography Purified (IGSC 20%) in patients with primary immunodeficiency (PI). METHODS: Immunoglobulin treatment-experienced subjects with PI received 52 weeks of IGSC 20% given weekly at the same dose as the subject's previous IgG regimen (DAF 1:1); the minimum dose was 100 mg/kg/week. The primary endpoint was serious bacterial infections (SBIs [null vs alternative hypothesis: SBI rate per person per year ≥ 1 vs < 1]). IgG subclasses and specific pathogen antibody levels were also measured. RESULTS: Sixty-one subjects (19 children [≤ 12 years], 10 adolescents [> 12-16 years], and 32 adults) were enrolled. The rate of SBIs per person per year was 0.017. The 1-sided 99% upper confidence limit was 0.036 (< 1), and the null hypothesis was rejected. The rate of hospitalization due to infection per person per year was 0.017 (2-sided 95% confidence interval: 0.008-0.033) overall. The mean trough total IgG concentrations were comparable to the previous IgG replacement regimen. The average of the individual mean trough ratios (IGSC 20%:previous regimen) was 1.078 (range: 0.83-1.54). The average steady-state mean trough IgG concentrations were 947.64 and 891.37 mg/dL, respectively. Seven subjects had serious treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs); none was drug-related. The rate of all TEAEs, including local infusion site reactions, during 3045 IGSC 20% infusions was 0.135. Most TEAEs were mild or moderate. CONCLUSIONS: IGSC 20% demonstrated efficacy and good safety and tolerability in subjects with PI.
Asklepios Kinderklinik Sankt Augustin Sankt Augustin Germany
Department of Immunology and Allergy The Royal Melbourne Hospital Melbourne VIC Australia
Department of Immunology Children's Memorial Health Institute Warsaw Poland
Department of Immunology The Royal London Hospital Barts Health NHS Trust London UK
Department of Medicine The University of Melbourne Melbourne VIC Australia
Department of Medicine University of Cambridge Cambridge UK
Grifols Bioscience Research Group Research Triangle Park NC USA
Grifols Bioscience Research Group Sant Cugat del Vallès Barcelona Spain
Immunology Department Sullivan Nicolaides Pathology Brisbane Australia
Institut de Recerca Sant Joan de Déu Barcelona Spain
Klinikum St Georg GmbH Klinik für Kinder und Jugendmedizin Leipzig Germany
Peninsula Immunology and Allergy Service University Hospitals Plymouth Plymouth UK
Servicio de Inmunología Hospital Clínico San Carlos Madrid Spain
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Buckley RH, Schiff RI. The use of intravenous immune globulin in immunodeficiency diseases. N Engl J Med. 1991;325(2):110–117. doi: 10.1056/nejm199107113250207. PubMed DOI
Sacher RA. Intravenous immunoglobulin consensus statement. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2001;108(4 Suppl):S139–S146. doi: 10.1067/mai.2001.118640. PubMed DOI
Gardulf A. Immunoglobulin treatment for primary antibody deficiencies: advantages of the subcutaneous route. BioDrugs. 2007;21(2):105–116. doi: 10.2165/00063030-200721020-00005. PubMed DOI
Helbert M, Farragher A. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin for patients with antibody deficiency. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2007;68(4):206–10. doi: 10.12968/hmed.2007.68.4.206. PubMed DOI
Ochs HD, Gupta S, Kiessling P, Nicolay U, Berger M. Safety and efficacy of self-administered subcutaneous immunoglobulin in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases. J Clin Immunol. 2006;26(3):265–273. doi: 10.1007/s10875-006-9021-7. PubMed DOI
Boyle M, Scalchunes C. Impact of intervenous immunoglobulin (IVIG) treatment among patients with Primary Immunodeficiency diseases. Pharmaceuticals Policy and Law. 2008;10:133–146.
Berger M. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement in primary immunodeficiencies. Clin Immunol. 2004;112(1):1–7. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2004.02.002. PubMed DOI
Chapel HM, Spickett GP, Ericson D, Engl W, Eibl MM, Bjorkander J. The comparison of the efficacy and safety of intravenous versus subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement therapy. J Clin Immunol. 2000;20(2):94–100. doi: 10.1023/a:1006678312925. PubMed DOI
Chinen J, Shearer WT. Subcutaneous immunoglobulins: alternative for the hypogammaglobulinemic patient? J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114(4):934–935. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.07.045. PubMed DOI
Chouksey A, Duff K, Wasserbauer N, Berger M. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin-g replacement therapy with preparations currently available in the United States for intravenous or intramuscular use: reasons and regimens. Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol. 2005;1(3):120–130. doi: 10.1186/1710-1492-1-3-120. PubMed DOI PMC
Gardulf A, Andersen V, Bjorkander J, Ericson D, Froland SS, Gustafson R, et al. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin replacement in patients with primary antibody deficiencies: safety and costs. Lancet. 1995;345(8946):365–369. doi: 10.1016/s0140-6736(95)90346-1. PubMed DOI
Gardulf A, Nicolay U, Math D, Asensio O, Bernatowska E, Bock A, et al. Children and adults with primary antibody deficiencies gain quality of life by subcutaneous IgG self-infusions at home. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2004;114(4):936–942. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2004.06.053. PubMed DOI
Gardulf A, Nicolay U. Replacement IgG therapy and self-therapy at home improve the health-related quality of life in patients with primary antibody deficiencies. Curr Opin Allergy Clin Immunol. 2006;6(6):434–442. doi: 10.1097/01.all.0000246619.49494.41. PubMed DOI
Gardulf A, Nicolay U, Asensio O, Bernatowska E, Bock A, Carvalho BC, et al. Rapid subcutaneous IgG replacement therapy is effective and safe in children and adults with primary immunodeficiencies–a prospective, multi-national study. J Clin Immunol. 2006;26(2):177–185. doi: 10.1007/s10875-006-9002-x. PubMed DOI
Hansen S, Gustafson R, Smith CI, Gardulf A. Express subcutaneous IgG infusions: decreased time of delivery with maintained safety. Clin Immunol. 2002;104(3):237–241. doi: 10.1006/clim.2002.5215. PubMed DOI
Nicolay U, Haag S, Eichmann F, Herget S, Spruck D, Gardulf A. Measuring treatment satisfaction in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases receiving lifelong immunoglobulin replacement therapy. Qual Life Res. 2005;14(7):1683–1691. doi: 10.1007/s11136-005-1746-x. PubMed DOI
Hagan JB, Fasano MB, Spector S, Wasserman RL, Melamed I, Rojavin MA, et al. Efficacy and safety of a new 20% immunoglobulin preparation for subcutaneous administration, IgPro20, in patients with primary immunodeficiency. J Clin Immunol. 2010;30(5):734–745. doi: 10.1007/s10875-010-9423-4. PubMed DOI PMC
Jolles S, Bernatowska E, de Gracia J, Borte M, Cristea V, Peter HH, et al. Efficacy and safety of Hizentra((R)) in patients with primary immunodeficiency after a dose-equivalent switch from intravenous or subcutaneous replacement therapy. Clin Immunol. 2011;141(1):90–102. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2011.06.002. PubMed DOI
Jolles S, Borte M, Nelson RP, Jr, Rojavin M, Bexon M, Lawo JP, et al. Long-term efficacy, safety, and tolerability of Hizentra(R) for treatment of primary immunodeficiency disease. Clin Immunol. 2014;150(2):161–169. doi: 10.1016/j.clim.2013.10.008. PubMed DOI
Radinsky S, Bonagura VR. Subcutaneous immunoglobulin infusion as an alternative to intravenous immunoglobulin. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2003;112(3):630–633. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(03)01781-0. PubMed DOI
Stiehm ER, Casillas AM, Finkelstein JZ, Gallagher KT, Groncy PM, Kobayashi RH, et al. Slow subcutaneous human intravenous immunoglobulin in the treatment of antibody immunodeficiency: use of an old method with a new product. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1998;101(6 Pt 1):848–849. doi: 10.1016/s0091-6749(98)70314-8. PubMed DOI
Borte M, Krivan G, Derfalvi B, Marodi L, Harrer T, Jolles S, et al. Efficacy, safety, tolerability and pharmacokinetics of a novel human immune globulin subcutaneous, 20%: a Phase 2/3 study in Europe in patients with primary immunodeficiencies. Clin Exp Immunol. 2017;187(1):146–159. doi: 10.1111/cei.12866. PubMed DOI PMC
Suez D, Stein M, Gupta S, Hussain I, Melamed I, Paris K, et al. Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of a novel human immune globulin subcutaneous, 20 % in patients with primary immunodeficiency diseases in North America. J Clin Immunol. 2016;36(7):700–712. doi: 10.1007/s10875-016-0327-9. PubMed DOI PMC
Thomas MJ, Brennan VM, Chapel HH. Rapid subcutaneous immunoglobulin infusions in children. Lancet. 1993;342(8884):1432–1433. doi: 10.1016/0140-6736(93)92798-x. PubMed DOI
Sleasman JW, Lumry WR, Hussain I, Wedner HJ, Harris JB, Courtney KL, et al. Immune globulin subcutaneous, human - klhw 20% for primary humoral immunodeficiency: an open-label. Phase III study Immunotherapy. 2019;11(16):1371–1386. doi: 10.2217/imt-2019-0159. PubMed DOI
European Medicines Agency. Guideline on the clinical investigation of human normal immunoglobulin for subcutaneous and/or intramuscular administration (SCIg/IMIg). Available at: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/scientific-guideline/guideline-clinical-investigation-human-normal-immunoglobulin-subcutaneous/intramuscular-administration-scig/imig_en.pdf. Accessed November 3, 2021.
Seidel MG, Kindle G, Gathmann B, Quinti I, Buckland M, van Montfrans J, et al. The European Society for Immunodeficiencies (ESID) registry working definitions for the clinical diagnosis of inborn errors of immunity. J Allergy Clin Immunol Pract. 2019;7(6):1763–1770. doi: 10.1016/j.jaip.2019.02.004. PubMed DOI
US Department of Health and Human Services, Food and Drug Administration, and Center for Biologics Evaluation and Research. Guidance for industry: safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetic studies to support marketing of immune globulin intravenous (human) as replacement therapy for primary humoral immunodeficiency. June 2008. Available at: https://www.fda.gov/media/124333/download. Accessed November 3, 2021.
ARUP Laboratories. Diphtheria, Tetanus, and H. Influenzae b Antibodies, IgG. Available at: https://ltd.aruplab.com/Tests/Pub/0050779. Accessed November 3, 2021.
Gowin E, Wysocki J, Kaluzna E, Swiatek-Koscielna B, Wysocka-Leszczynska J, Michalak M, et al. Does vaccination ensure protection? Assessing diphtheria and tetanus antibody levels in a population of healthy children: a cross-sectional study. Medicine (Baltimore) 2016;95(49):e5571. doi: 10.1097/md.0000000000005571. PubMed DOI PMC
Boyle J, Shearer W. Immune Globulin Potency in the 21st Century. Session III: Immune Globulin Potency Testing -- The Future. Rockville, Maryland. Thursday, November 9, 2017 Available at: https://www.fda.gov/media/112673/download. Accessed November 3, 2021.
Abghari PF, Poowuttikul P, Secord E. Pneumococcal antibody titers: a comparison of patients receiving intravenous immunoglobulin versus subcutaneous immunoglobulin. Glob Pediatr Health. 2017;4:2333794x16689639. doi: 10.1177/2333794x16689639. PubMed DOI PMC
Feavers I, Knezevic I, Powell M, Griffiths E. Challenges in the evaluation and licensing of new pneumococcal vaccines, 7–8 July 2008, Ottawa. Canada Vaccine. 2009;27(28):3681–3688. doi: 10.1016/j.vaccine.2009.03.087. PubMed DOI
Orange JS, Ballow M, Stiehm ER, Ballas ZK, Chinen J, De La Morena M, et al. Use and interpretation of diagnostic vaccination in primary immunodeficiency: a working group report of the Basic and Clinical Immunology Interest Section of the American Academy of Allergy, Asthma & Immunology. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2012;130(3 Suppl):S1–24. doi: 10.1016/j.jaci.2012.07.002. PubMed DOI
Wasserman RL, Irani AM, Tracy J, Tsoukas C, Stark D, Levy R, et al. Pharmacokinetics and safety of subcutaneous immune globulin (human), 10% caprylate/chromatography purified in patients with primary immunodeficiency disease. Clin Exp Immunol. 2010;161(3):518–526. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2249.2010.04195.x. PubMed DOI PMC
Heimall J, Chen J, Church JA, Griffin R, Melamed I, Kleiner GI. Pharmacokinetics, Safety, and Tolerability of Subcutaneous Immune Globulin Injection (Human), 10 % Caprylate/Chromatography Purified (GAMUNEX(R)-C) in Pediatric Patients with Primary Immunodeficiency Disease. J Clin Immunol. 2016;36(6):600–609. doi: 10.1007/s10875-016-0311-4. PubMed DOI
Wasserman RL, Melamed I, Kobrynski L, Strausbaugh SD, Stein MR, Sharkhawy M, et al. Efficacy, safety, and pharmacokinetics of a 10% liquid immune globulin preparation (GAMMAGARD LIQUID, 10%) administered subcutaneously in subjects with primary immunodeficiency disease. J Clin Immunol. 2011;31(3):323–331. doi: 10.1007/s10875-011-9512-z. PubMed DOI
Kobayashi RH, Gupta S, Melamed I, Mandujano JF, Kobayashi AL, Ritchie B, et al. Clinical efficacy, safety and tolerability of a new subcutaneous immunoglobulin 16.5% (Octanorm [Cutaquig®]) in the treatment of patients with primary immunodeficiencies. Front Immunol. 2019;10:40. doi: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.00040. PubMed DOI PMC
Abolhassani H, Azizi G, Sharifi L, Yazdani R, Mohsenzadegan M, Delavari S, et al. Global systematic review of primary immunodeficiency registries. Expert Rev Clin Immunol. 2020;16(7):717–732. doi: 10.1080/1744666x.2020.1801422. PubMed DOI