Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are an emerging paradigm in clinical research and healthcare, aiming to capture the patient's self-assessed health status in order to gauge efficacy of treatment from their perspective. As these patient-generated health data provide insights into the effects of healthcare processes in real-life settings beyond the clinical setting, they can also be viewed as a resolution beyond what can be gleaned directly by the clinician. To this end, patients are identified as a key stakeholder of the healthcare decision making process, instead of passively following their doctor's guidance. As this joint decision-making process requires constant and high-quality communication between the patient and his/her healthcare providers, novel methodologies and tools have been proposed to promote richer and preemptive communication to facilitate earlier recognition of potential complications. To this end, as PROs can be used to quantify the patient impact (especially important for chronic conditions such as cancer), they can play a prominent role in providing patient-centric care. In this paper, we introduce the MyPal platform that aims to support adults suffering from hematologic malignancies, focusing on the technical design and highlighting the respective challenges. MyPal is a Horizon 2020 European project aiming to support palliative care for cancer patients via the electronic PROs (ePROs) paradigm, building upon modern eHealth technologies. To this end, MyPal project evaluate the proposed eHealth intervention via clinical studies and assess its potential impact on the provided palliative care. More specifically, MyPal platform provides specialized applications supporting the regular answering of well-defined and standardized questionnaires, spontaneous symptoms reporting, educational material provision, notifications etc. The presented platform has been validated by end-users and is currently in the phase of pilot testing in a clinical study to evaluate its feasibility and its potential impact on the quality of life of palliative care patients with hematologic malignancies.

Atlantis Healthcare London United Kingdom

Center for Molecular Medicine Central European Institute of Technology Masaryk University Brno Czechia

Department of Hematology University Hospital of Heraklion Heraklion Greece

Institute for Biomedical Engineering Sulzbach Germany

Institute of Applied Biosciences Centre for Research and Technology Hellas Thessaloniki Greece

Institute of Computer Science Foundation for Research and Technology Hellas Heraklion Greece

Universita Vita Salute San Raffaele Milan Italy

Zobrazit více v PubMed

World Health Organization . World Health Organization Definition of Palliative Care. World Health Organization; (2014). Available online at: http://www.who.int/cancer/palliative/definition/en

Karamanidou C, Natsiavas P, Koumakis L, Marias K, Schera F, Schäfer M, et al. . Electronic patient-reported outcome-based interventions for palliative cancer care: a systematic and mapping review. JCO Clin Cancer Informatics. (2020) 4:647–56. 10.1200/CCI.20.00015 PubMed DOI PMC

Finucane AM, O'Donnell H, Lugton J, Gibson-Watt T, Swenson C, Pagliari C. Digital health interventions in palliative care: a systematic meta-review. NPJ Dig Med. (2021) 4:64. 10.1038/s41746-021-00430-7 PubMed DOI PMC

Wright AA, Raman N, Staples P, Schonholz S, Cronin A, Carlson K, et al. . The HOPE pilot study: harnessing patient-reported outcomes and biometric data to enhance cancer care. JCO Clin Cancer Inform. (2018) 2:1–12. 10.1200/CCI.17.00149 PubMed DOI PMC

Maguire R, Ream E, Richardson A, Connaghan J, Johnston B, Kotronoulas G, et al. . Development of a novel remote patient monitoring system: the advanced symptom management system for radiotherapy to improve the symptom experience of patients with lung cancer receiving radiotherapy. Cancer Nurs. (2015) 38:E37–47. 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000150 PubMed DOI

Sundberg K, Wengström Y, Blomberg K, Hälleberg-Nyman M, Frank C, Langius-Eklöf A. Early detection and management of symptoms using an interactive smartphone application (Interaktor) during radiotherapy for prostate cancer. Support Care Cancer. (2017) 25:2195–204. 10.1007/s00520-017-3625-8 PubMed DOI PMC

Kondylakis H, Bucur A, Crico C, Dong F, Graf N, Hoffman S, et al. . Patient empowerment for cancer patients through a novel ICT infrastructure. J Biomed Inform. (2020) 101:103342. 10.1016/j.jbi.2019.103342 PubMed DOI

Bucur A, Van Leeuwen J, Christodoulou N, Sigdel K, Argyri K, Koumakis L, et al. . Workflow-driven clinical decision support for personalized oncology. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. (2016) 16:87. 10.1186/s12911-016-0314-3 PubMed DOI PMC

Schwaber K. SCRUM development process. In: Sutherland J, Casanave C, Miller J, Patel P, Hollowell G. editors. Business Object Design and Implementation. London: Springer; (1997). p. 117–134. 10.1007/978-1-4471-0947-1 DOI

Hustinx P. Privacy by design: delivering the promises. Identity Inf Soc. (2010) 3:253–5. 10.1007/s12394-010-0061-z DOI

Fayers P, Bottomley A. Quality of life research within the EORTC - the EORTC QLQ-C30. Eur J Cancer. (2002) 38 (Suppl. 4):S125–33. 10.1016/S0959-8049(01)00448-8 PubMed DOI

Rabin R, Gudex C, Selai C, Herdman M. From translation to version management: a history and review of methods for the cultural adaptation of the euroqol five-dimensional questionnaire. Value Health. (2014) 17:70–6. 10.1016/j.jval.2013.10.006 PubMed DOI

Hearn J, Higginson IJ. Development and validation of a core outcome measure for palliative care: the palliative care outcome scale. Qual Health Care. (1999) 10.1037/t53248-000 PubMed DOI PMC

Bruera E, Kuehn N, Miller MJ, Selmser P, Macmillan K. The edmonton symptom assessment system (ESAS): a simple method for the assessment of palliative care patients. J Palliat Care. (1991) 20:20–32. 10.1037/t07978-000 PubMed DOI

Cleeland CS, Ryan KM. Pain assessment: global use of the Brief Pain Inventory. Ann Acad Med Singap. (1994) 23:129–38. PubMed

Mitchell AJ, Baker-Glenn EA, Granger L, Symonds P. Can the distress thermometer be improved by additional mood domains? Part I. Initial validation of the emotion thermometers tool. Psychooncology. (2010) 19:125–33. 10.1037/t29937-000 PubMed DOI

Brédart A, Anota A, Young T, Tomaszewski KA, Arraras JI, Moura De Albuquerque Melo H, et al. . Phase III study of the European organisation for research and treatment of cancer satisfaction with cancer care core questionnaire (EORTC PATSAT-C33) and specific complementary outpatient module (EORTC OUT-PATSAT7). Eur J Cancer Care. (2018) 27:e12786. 10.1111/ecc.12786 PubMed DOI

Meyerheim M, Karamanidou C, Payne S, Garani-Papadatos T, Sander A, Downing J, et al. . MyPal-Child study protocol: an observational prospective clinical feasibility study of the MyPal ePRO-based early palliative care digital system in paediatric oncology patients. BMJ Open. (2021) 11:e045226. 10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045226 PubMed DOI PMC

Sfakianaki P, Koumakis L, Sfakianakis S, Iatraki G, Zacharioudakis G, Graf N, et al. . Semantic biomedical resource discovery: a natural language processing framework. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. (2015) 15:77. 10.1186/s12911-015-0200-4 PubMed DOI PMC

Koumakis L, Kondylakis H, Katehakis DG, Iatraki G, Argyropaidas P, Hatzimina M, et al. . A content-aware analytics framework for open health data. In: IFMBE Proceedings (Singapore: ). (2018). 10.1007/978-981-10-7419-6_10 DOI

Kondylakis H, Koumakis L, Psaraki M, Troullinou G, Chatzimina M, Kazantzaki E, et al. . Semantically-enabled personal medical information recommender. In: CEUR Workshop Proceedings (Pennsylvania: ) (2015).

Lewis JR. IBM computer usability satisfaction questionnaires: psychometric evaluation and instructions for use. Int J Hum Comput Interact. (1995) 7:57–78. 10.1080/10447319509526110 DOI

PDQ Supportive and Palliative Care Editorial Board . Communication in Cancer Care (PDQ®): Patient Version. PDQ Supportive and Palliative Care Editorial Board (2002). New York, NY: National Cancer Institute (US).

Leventhal H, Meyer D, Nerenz D, Rachman S. The common sense representation of illness danger. Contribut Med Psychol. (1980) 2:7–30.

Ernst J, Kuhnt S, Schwarzer A, Aldaoud A, Niederwieser D, Mantovani-Löffler L, et al. . The desire for shared decision making among patients with solid and hematological cancer. Psychooncology. (2011) 29:1723–33. 10.1002/pon.1723 PubMed DOI

Parker PA, Aaron J, Baile WF. Breast cancer: unique communication challenges and strategies to address them. Breast J. (2009) 15:69–75. 10.1111/j.1524-4741.2008.00673.x PubMed DOI

Poon CCY, Zhang Y-T. Perspectives on high technologies for low-cost healthcare. IEEE Eng Med Biol Mag. (2008) 27:42–7. 10.1109/MEMB.2008.923955 PubMed DOI

Giguere A, Légaré F, Grad R, Pluye P, Haynes RB, Cauchon M, et al. . Decision boxes for clinicians to support evidence-based practice and shared decision making: the user experience. Implement Sci. (2012) 7:70. 10.1186/1748-5908-7-72 PubMed DOI PMC

O'Connor AM, Rostom A, Fiset V, Tetroe J, Entwistle V, Llewellyn-Thomas H, et al. . Decision aids for patients facing health treatment or screening decisions: systematic review. Bmj. 319, 731–4. PubMed PMC

Forbat L, Maguire R, McCann L, Illingworth N, Kearney N. The use of technology in cancer care: applying foucault's ideas to explore the changing dynamics of power in health care. J Adv Nurs. (2009) 65:306–15. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04870.x PubMed DOI