In the 21st century, rural communities face many challenges, including implications of dynamic population aging, a lack of social care services, and the occurrence of abandoned post-agricultural brownfields. This paper is methodologically based on the findings derived from a set of qualitative in-depth interviews with the key rural stakeholders, explores the decisive factors and limits, accelerators, and barriers governing successful regeneration of the post-agricultural brownfield in the post-socialist environment. We are using the case of the regeneration project of a large-scale former communist agricultural cooperative, located in Vranovice, the Czech Republic, to illuminate how complex and challenging the redevelopment of a post-agricultural brownfield into a social care facility for elderly people is. A wide agreement among the experts in the field of community development exists that this regeneration project can serve as a model example for other rural municipalities that are sharing similar local development issues. Our findings illustrate how important and challenging at the same time are the matters of good governance, the active and long-term participation of stakeholders in the regeneration project, and the real-life introduction of the public-private partnership concept, particularly in immensely transforming the post-socialist countryside.

Department of Environmental Geography Institute of Geonics of the Czech Academy of Sciences Drobného 28 CZ 60200 Brno Czech Republic

Faculty of Regional Development and International Studies Mendel University in Brno Třída Generála Píky 2005 7 CZ 61300 Brno Czech Republic

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Naumann M., Rudolph D. Conceptualizing rural energy transitions: Energizing rural studies, ruralizing energy research. J. Rural Stud. 2020;73:97–104. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2019.12.011. DOI

Hewitt R.J., De Boer C., Flacke J. Participatory development of digital support tools for local-scale energy transitions: Lessons from two European case studies. Glob. Transit. 2020;2:138–149. doi: 10.1016/j.glt.2020.07.003. DOI

Johnson K.M., Lichter D.T. Rural depopulation: Growth and decline processes over the past century. Rural Sociol. 2019;84:3–27. doi: 10.1111/ruso.12266. DOI

Sikorski D., Latocha A., Szmytkie R., Kajdanek K., Miodońska P., Tomczak P. Functional changes in peripheral mountainous areas in east central Europe between 2004 and 2016 as an aspect of rural revival? Kłodzko County case study. Appl. Geogr. 2020;122:102223. doi: 10.1016/j.apgeog.2020.102223. DOI

Bresnihan P., Hesse A. Political ecologies of infrastructural and intestinal decay. Environ. Plan. E Nat. Space. 2021;4:778–798. doi: 10.1177/2514848620902382. DOI

Scoones I., Edelman M., Borras S.M., Jr., Hall R., Wolford W., White B. Emancipatory rural politics: Confronting authoritarian populism. J. Peasant Stud. 2018;45:1–20. doi: 10.1080/03066150.2017.1339693. DOI

Navrátil J., Krejčí T., Martinát S., Frazier R.J., Klusáček P., Pícha K., Škrabal J., Osman R. Variation in brownfield reuse of derelict agricultural premises in diverse rural spaces. J. Rural Stud. 2021;87:124–136. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2021.09.004. DOI

Lowe P., Phillipson J., Proctor A., Gkartzios M. Expertise in rural development: A conceptual and empirical analysis. World Dev. 2019;116:28–37. doi: 10.1016/j.worlddev.2018.12.005. DOI

Hadžić A.P. Institutional cooperation in the brownfield regeneration process: Experiences from Central and Eastern European countries. Eur. Spat. Res. Policy. 2016;23:21–46.

Klusáček P., Alexandrescu F., Osman R., Malý J., Kunc J., Dvořák P., Frantál B., Havlíček M., Krejčí T., Martinát S., et al. Good governance as a strategic choice in brownfield regeneration: Regional dynamics from the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy. 2018;73:29–39. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.01.007. DOI

Bianchi C., Bereciartua P., Vignieri V., Cohen A. Enhancing urban brownfield regeneration to pursue sustainable community outcomes through dynamic performance governance. Int. J. Public Adm. 2021;44:100–114. doi: 10.1080/01900692.2019.1669180. DOI

Bartke S., Martinát S., Klusáček P., Pizzol L., Alexandrescu F., Frantál B., Critto A., Zabeo A. Targeted selection of brownfields from portfolios for sustainable regeneration: User experiences from five cases testing the Timbre Brownfield Prioritization Tool. J. Environ. Manag. 2016;184:94–107. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2016.07.037. PubMed DOI

Limasset E., Pizzol L., Merly C., Gatchett A.M., Le Guern C., Martinát S., Klusáček P., Bartke S. Points of attention in designing tools for regional brownfield prioritization. Sci. Total Environ. 2018;622:997–1008. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.11.168. PubMed DOI PMC

Pizzol L., Zabeo A., Klusáček P., Giubilato E., Critto A., Frantál B., Martinát S., Kunc J., Osman R., Bartke S. Timbre Brownfield Prioritization Tool to support effective brownfield regeneration. J. Environ. Manag. 2016;116:178–192. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2015.09.030. PubMed DOI

Kernecker M., Knierim A., Wurbs A., Kraus T., Borges F. Experience versus expectation: Farmers’ perceptions of smart farming technologies for cropping systems across Europe. Precis. Agric. 2020;21:34–50. doi: 10.1007/s11119-019-09651-z. DOI

Frantál B., Kunc J., Nováková E., Klusáček P., Martinát S., Osman R. Location Matters! Expploring Brownfields regeneration in a Spatial Context (Case Study of the South Moravian Region, Czech Republic) Morav. Geogr. Rep. 2013;21:5–19.

Netrdová P., Nosek V. Spatial patterns of unemployment in Central Europe: Emerging development axes beyond the Blue Banana. J. Maps. 2016;12:701–706. doi: 10.1080/17445647.2015.1063467. DOI

Squires G., Hutchison N. Barriers to affordable housing on brownfield sites. Land Use Policy. 2021;102:105276. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2020.105276. DOI

Lange D., McNeil S. Clean it and they will come? Defining successful brownfield development. J. Urban Plan. Dev. 2004;130:101–108. doi: 10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9488(2004)130:2(101). DOI

Skála J., Vácha R., Čechmánková J., Horváthová V. Various Aspects of the Genesis and Perspectives on Agricultural Brownfields in the Czech Republic. Morav. Geogr. Rep. 2013;21:46–55. doi: 10.2478/mgr-2013-0010. DOI

Osman R., Frantál B., Klusáček P., Kunc J., Martinát S. Factors affecting brownfield regeneration in post-socialist space: The case of the Czech Republic. Land Use Policy. 2015;48:309–316. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.06.003. DOI

Frantál B., Kunc J., Klusáček P., Martinát S. Assessing Success Factors of Brownfields Regeneration: Inter-national and Inter-stakeholder Perspective. Transylv. Rev. Adm. Sci. 2015;44E:91–107.

Thornton G., Franz M., Edwards D., Pahlen G., Nathanail P. The challenge of sustainability: Incentives for brownfield regeneration in Europe. Environ. Sci. Policy. 2007;10:116–134. doi: 10.1016/j.envsci.2006.08.008. DOI

Alexandrescu F., Osman R., Klusáček P., Malý J. Taming the genius loci? Contesting post-socialist creative industries in the case of Brno’s former prison. Cities. 2020;98:102578. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2019.102578. DOI

Malý J., Alexandrescu F., Osman R., Klusáček P. Rebuilding a community ‘centre’ under free-market pressure: The post-socialist experience with local brownfield management. Territ. Politics Gov. 2021:1–21. doi: 10.1080/21622671.2021.1916580. DOI

Klusáček P., Krejčí T., Martinát S., Kunc J., Osman R., Frantál B. Regeneration of agricultural brownfields in the Czech Republic: Case study of the South Moravian Region. Acta Univ. Agric. Silvic. Mendel. Brun. 2013;61:547–561. doi: 10.11118/actaun201361020549. DOI

Bostenaru Dan M., Bostenaru-Dan M.M. Greening the Brownfields of Thermal Power Plants in Rural Areas, an Example from Romania, Set in the Context of Developments in the Industrialized Country of Germany. Sustainability. 2021;13:3800. doi: 10.3390/su13073800. DOI

Gregorová B., Hronček P., Tometzová D., Molokáč M., Čech V. Transforming Brownfields as Tourism Destinations and Their Sustainability on the Example of Slovakia. Sustainability. 2020;12:10569. doi: 10.3390/su122410569. DOI

Kantor-Pietraga I., Zdyrko A., Bednarczyk J. Semi-Natural Areas on Post-Mining Brownfields as an Opportunity to Strengthen the Attractiveness of a Small Town. An Example of Radzionków in Southern Poland. Land. 2021;10:761. doi: 10.3390/land10070761. DOI

Lai Y., Jiang L., Xu X. Exploring Spatio-Temporal Patterns of Urban Village Redevelopment: The Case of Shenzhen, China. Land. 2021;10:976. doi: 10.3390/land10090976. DOI

Sardinha I.D., Craveiro D., Milheiras S. A sustainability framework for redevelopment of rural brownfields: Stakeholder participation at SÃO DOMINGOS mine, Portugal. J. Clean. Prod. 2013;57:200–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2013.05.042. DOI

Klusáček P., Martinát S., Krejčí T., Bartke S. Re-development of a former military training area—The case of Brdy told from a local actors’ perspective. Land Use Policy. 2019;82:147–157. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2018.11.045. DOI

Klusáček P., Martinát S., Krejčí T., Kunc J., Hercik J., Havlíček M., Skokanová H. Return of the Local Democracy to the Territory of the Military Training Areas (Case Study the Czech Republic) Communist Post-Communist Stud. 2020;53:191–213. doi: 10.1525/cpcs.2020.53.2.191. DOI

Navrátil J., Martinát S., Krejčí T., Pícha K., Klusáček P., Škrabal J., Osman R. The fate of socialist agricultural premises: To agricultural ‘brownfields’ and back again? Morav. Geogr. Rep. 2019;27:207–216. doi: 10.2478/mgr-2019-0016. DOI

Szmytkie R. Suburbanisation processes within and outside the city: The development of intra-urban suburbs in Wrocław, Poland. Morav. Geogr. Rep. 2021;29:149–165. doi: 10.2478/mgr-2021-0012. DOI

Pénzes J., Demeter G. Peripheral areas and their distinctive characteristics: The case of Hungary. Morav. Geogr. Rep. 2021;29:217–230. doi: 10.2478/mgr-2021-0016. DOI

Alexandrescu F., Martinát S., Klusáček P., Bartke S. The Path from Passivity Toward Entrepreneurship: Public Sector Actors in Brownfield Regeneration Processes in Central and Eastern Europe. Organ. Environ. 2014;27:181–201. doi: 10.1177/1086026614529436. DOI

Fernandes A., Figueira de Sousa J., Costa J.P., Neves B. Mapping stakeholder perception on the challenges of brownfield sites’ redevelopment in waterfronts: The Tagus Estuary. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2020;28:2447–2464. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2020.1722985. DOI

Navrátil J., Krejčí T., Martinát S., Pasqualetti M.J., Klusáček P., Frantál B., Tocháčkova K. Brownfields do not “only live twice”: The possibilities for heritage preservation and the enlargement of leisure time activities in Brno, the Czech Republic. Cities. 2018;74:52–63. doi: 10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.003. DOI

Galčanová L., Staveník A. Ageing in the changing countryside: The experience of rural Czechs. Sociol. Rural. 2020;60:329–356. doi: 10.1111/soru.12292. DOI

Glumac B., Han Q., Schaefer W., Krabben E. Negotiation issues in forming public–private partnerships for brownfield redevelopment: Applying a game theoretical experiment. Land Use Policy. 2015;47:66–77. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2015.03.018. DOI

Adams D., Disberry A., Hutchison N., Munjoma T. Taxes, Subsidies and the behaviour of brownfield owners. Land Use Policy. 2020;17:135–145. doi: 10.1016/S0264-8377(00)00003-X. DOI

Ženka J., Šťastná S., Pavlik A. The role of manufacturing in the development of rural regions: Evidence from a highly industrialised Moravian region. Morav. Geogr. Rep. 2021;29:39–52. doi: 10.2478/mgr-2021-0004. DOI

Turečková K., Nevima J., Duda D., Tuleja P. Latent structures of brownfield regeneration: A case study of regions of the Czech Republic. J. Clean. Prod. 2021;311:127478. doi: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2021.127478. DOI

Vojvodíková B., Fojtík R., Tichá I. Design and Verification of a Simple Approach to Brownfields Categorization. Sustainability. 2021;13:11206. doi: 10.3390/su132011206. DOI

Kubeš J., Chvojková A. Back to peripheries based on remoteness. Human capital in the peripheral municipalities of South Bohemia. J. Rural Stud. 2020;79:116–124. doi: 10.1016/j.jrurstud.2020.08.045. DOI

Konečný O., Šilhan Z., Chaloupková M., Svobodová H. Area-based approaches are losing the essence of local targeting: LEADER/CLLD in the Czech Republic. Eur. Plan. Stud. 2021;29:619–636. doi: 10.1080/09654313.2020.1764913. DOI

Siemiatycki M. Public-private partnership networks: Exploring business-government relationships in United Kingdom transportation projects. Econ. Geogr. 2011;87:309–334. doi: 10.1111/j.1944-8287.2011.01115.x. DOI

Klijn E.H., Teisman G.R. Institutional and strategic barriers to public—private partnership: An analysis of Dutch cases. Public Money Manag. 2003;23:137–146. doi: 10.1111/1467-9302.00361. DOI

Hodge G., Greve C. Public-private partnerships: Governance scheme or language game? Aust. J. Public Adm. 2010;69:S8–S22. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2009.00659.x. DOI

Linder S.H. Coming to terms with the public-private partnership: A grammar of multiple meanings. Am. Behav. Sci. 1999;43:35–51. doi: 10.1177/00027649921955146. DOI

Chin J.T. The shifting role of public–private partnerships in vacant property redevelopment. Land Use Policy. 2021;105:105430. doi: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2021.105430. DOI

Population of Municipalities (2021): Czech Statistical office. [(accessed on 17 November 2021)]. Available online: https://www.czso.cz/csu/czso/population-of-municipalities-1-january-2021.

Helikar J. Revitalizace Bývalého Zemědělského Družstva ve Vranovicích. 2019. [(accessed on 17 November 2021)]. Available online: https://www.rrajm.cz/projekty-rrajm/brownfieldy/seminare/regenerace-brownfieldu-v-jihomoravskem-kraji-2019/

Regenerace Brownfieldů RRAJM. 2016. [(accessed on 1 July 2021)]. Available online: https://www.rrajm.cz/projekty-rrajm/brownfieldy/publikace/

Brownfieldy Jihomoravského Kraje RRAJM. 2018. [(accessed on 29 November 2021)]. Available online: https://www.rrajm.cz/projekty-rrajm/brownfieldy/publikace/

Public Database Czech Statistical Office. 2021. [(accessed on 17 April 2021)]. Available online: https://vdb.czso.cz/vdbvo2/faces/en/index.jsf?page=vystup-objekt-vyhledavani&pvo=RSO36&vyhltext=Vranovice&bkvt=VnJhbm92aWNl&z=T&f=TABULKA&katalog=all&pvokc=65&pvoch=6213&c=v371~2__RP2020MP12DP31.

Dům Pro Seniory Vranovice Jak se Stavěl Dům. DPS Vranovice. 2021. [(accessed on 16 April 2021)]. Available online: https://dpsvranovice.cz/fotogalerie/jak-se-stavel-dum-4/

Obec Vranovice Dům pro Seniory–Nejlepší Stavba Roku 2014 pro Sociální Bydlení. Vranovice. 2014. [(accessed on 16 April 2021)]. Available online: https://vranovice.eu/dum-pro-seniory-nejlepsi-stavba-roku-2014-pro-socialni-bydleni/

Historical Orthophotomaps 2003. Mapy.cz. 2021. [(accessed on 4 April 2021)]. Available online: https://mapy.cz/letecka-2003?x=16.6099080&y=48.9639462&z=18.

Historical Orthophotomaps 2015. Mapy.cz. 2021. [(accessed on 4 April 2021)]. Available online: https://mapy.cz/letecka-2015?x=16.6099080&y=48.9639462&z=18.

Stavba Roku 2014. 2015. [(accessed on 25 September 2021)]. Available online: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BkHtpP1hAgo.

McCarthy L. The brownfield dual land-use policy challenge: Reducing barriers to private redevelopment while connecting reuse to broader community goals. Land Use Policy. 2002;19:287–296. doi: 10.1016/S0264-8377(02)00023-6. DOI

Cuthill M., Fien J. Capacity building: Facilitating citizen participation in local governance. Aust. J. Public Adm. 2005;64:63–80. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8500.2005.00465a.x. DOI