Clinical and microbiological outcomes, by causative pathogen, in the ASPECT-NP randomized, controlled, Phase 3 trial comparing ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem for treatment of hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia
Jazyk angličtina Země Anglie, Velká Británie Médium print
Typ dokumentu klinické zkoušky, fáze III, časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
U19 AI135964
NIAID NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
35022730
PubMed Central
PMC9432134
DOI
10.1093/jac/dkab494
PII: 6505114
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- antibakteriální látky * terapeutické užití MeSH
- bakteriální pneumonie * farmakoterapie MeSH
- cefalosporiny terapeutické užití MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- mechanické ventilátory MeSH
- meropenem terapeutické užití MeSH
- mikrobiální testy citlivosti MeSH
- nemocnice MeSH
- prospektivní studie MeSH
- Pseudomonas aeruginosa MeSH
- tazobaktam terapeutické užití MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- klinické zkoušky, fáze III MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- antibakteriální látky * MeSH
- cefalosporiny MeSH
- ceftolozane MeSH Prohlížeč
- meropenem MeSH
- tazobaktam MeSH
OBJECTIVES: In the ASPECT-NP trial, ceftolozane/tazobactam was non-inferior to meropenem for treating nosocomial pneumonia; efficacy outcomes by causative pathogen were to be evaluated. METHODS: Mechanically ventilated participants with hospital-acquired/ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia were randomized to 3 g ceftolozane/tazobactam (2 g ceftolozane/1 g tazobactam) q8h or 1 g meropenem q8h. Lower respiratory tract (LRT) cultures were obtained ≤36 h before first dose; pathogen identification and susceptibility were confirmed at a central laboratory. Prospective secondary per-pathogen endpoints included 28 day all-cause mortality (ACM), and clinical and microbiological response at test of cure (7-14 days after the end of therapy) in the microbiological ITT (mITT) population. RESULTS: The mITT population comprised 511 participants (264 ceftolozane/tazobactam, 247 meropenem). Baseline LRT pathogens included Klebsiella pneumoniae (34.6%), Pseudomonas aeruginosa (25.0%) and Escherichia coli (18.2%). Among baseline Enterobacterales isolates, 171/456 (37.5%) were ESBL positive. For Gram-negative baseline LRT pathogens, susceptibility rates were 87.0% for ceftolozane/tazobactam and 93.3% for meropenem. For Gram-negative pathogens, 28 day ACM [52/259 (20.1%) and 62/240 (25.8%)], clinical cure rates [157/259 (60.6%) and 137/240 (57.1%)] and microbiological eradication rates [189/259 (73.0%) and 163/240 (67.9%)] were comparable with ceftolozane/tazobactam and meropenem, respectively. Per-pathogen microbiological eradication for Enterobacterales [145/195 (74.4%) and 129/185 (69.7%); 95% CI: -4.37 to 13.58], ESBL-producing Enterobacterales [56/84 (66.7%) and 52/73 (71.2%); 95% CI: -18.56 to 9.93] and P. aeruginosa [47/63 (74.6%) and 41/65 (63.1%); 95% CI: -4.51 to 19.38], respectively, were also comparable. CONCLUSIONS: In mechanically ventilated participants with nosocomial pneumonia owing to Gram-negative pathogens, ceftolozane/tazobactam was comparable with meropenem for per-pathogen 28 day ACM and clinical and microbiological response.
General Hospital of Kolin Zizkova 146 Kolin 3 280 00 Czech Republic
Hiroshima University 1 2 3 Kasumi Minami ku Hiroshima 734 8551 Japan
Merck and Co Inc 2000 Galloping Hill Rd Kenilworth NJ 07033 USA
North Estonia Medical Centre Foundation Sütiste tee 19 Tallinn Harjumaa 13419 Estonia
St James's Hospital Trinity College Dublin James Street Dublin 8 Ireland
UMR 1137 IAME Université Paris Diderot F75018 Paris France
Universidade Federal do Paraná Rua XV de Novembro 1299 Centro Curitiba PR 80060 000 Brazil
Universitat de Barcelona IDIBAPS CIBERes Barcelona Spain
Washington University School of Medicine 4523 Clayton Ave Campus Box 8052 St Louis MO 63110 USA
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Kalil AC, Metersky ML, Klompas M et al. Management of adults with hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia: 2016 clinical practice guidelines by the Infectious Diseases Society of America and the American Thoracic Society. Clin Infect Dis 2016; 63: e61–111. PubMed PMC
Melsen WG, Rovers MM, Groenwold RHH et al. Attributable mortality of ventilator-associated pneumonia: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomised prevention studies. Lancet Infect Dis 2013; 13: 665–71. PubMed
Talbot GH, Das A, Cush S et al. Evidence-based study design for hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. J Infect Dis 2019; 10: 1536–44. PubMed PMC
Borgatta B, Gattarello S, Mazo CA et al. The clinical significance of pneumonia in patients with respiratory specimens harbouring multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa: a 5-year retrospective study following 5667 patients in four general ICUs. Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis 2017; 36: 2155–63. PubMed
Tedja R, Nowacki A, Fraser T et al. The impact of multidrug resistance on outcomes in ventilator-associated pneumonia. Am J Infect Control 2014; 42: 542–5. PubMed
Timsit J-F, Pilmis B, Zahar J-R. How should we treat hospital-acquired and ventilator-associated pneumonia caused by extended-spectrum β-lactamase-producing Enterobacteriaceae? Semin Respir Crit Care Med 2017; 38: 287–300. PubMed
Kaye KS, Pogue JM. Infections caused by resistant Gram-negative bacteria: epidemiology and management. Pharmacotherapy 2015; 35: 949–62. PubMed
Carvalhaes CG, Castanheira M, Sader HS et al. Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam tested against gram-negative contemporary (2015-2017) isolates from hospitalized patients with pneumonia in US medical centers. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2019; 94: 93–102. PubMed
Sader HS, Castanheira M, Mendes RE et al. Frequency and antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative bacteria isolated from patients with pneumonia hospitalized in ICUs of US medical centres (2015–17). J Antimicrob Chemother 2018; 73: 3053–9. PubMed
Sader HS, Castanheira M, Flamm RK. Antimicrobial activity of ceftazidime-avibactam against Gram-negative bacteria isolated from patients hospitalized with pneumonia in U.S. medical centers, 2011 to 2015. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2017; 61: e02083-16. PubMed PMC
Rosenthal VD, Al-Abdely HM, El-Kholy AA et al. International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium report, data summary of 50 countries for 2010-2015: device-associated module. Am J Infect Control 2016; 44: 1495–504. PubMed
Rosenthal VD, Maki DG, Mehta Y et al. International Nosocomial Infection Control Consortium (INICC) report, data summary of 43 countries for 2007-2012. Device-associated module. Am J Infect Control 2014; 42: 942–56. PubMed
Sader HS, Farrell DJ, Flamm RK et al. Antimicrobial susceptibility of Gram-negative organisms isolated from patients hospitalised with pneumonia in US and European hospitals: results from the SENTRY Antimicrobial Surveillance Program, 2009-2012. Int J Antimicrob Agents 2014; 43: 328–34. PubMed
Vincent J-L, Sakr Y, Singer M et al. Prevalence and outcomes of infection among patients in intensive care units in 2017. JAMA 2020; 323: 1478–87. PubMed PMC
Kumar A, Ellis P, Arabi Y et al. Initiation of inappropriate antimicrobial therapy results in a fivefold reduction of survival in human septic shock. Chest 2009; 136: 1237–48. PubMed
Funk DJ, Kumar A. Antimicrobial therapy for life-threatening infections: speed is life. Crit Care Clin 2011; 27: 53–76. PubMed
Kethireddy S, Bilgili B, Sees A et al. Culture-negative septic shock compared with culture-positive septic shock: a retrospective cohort study. Crit Care Med 2018; 46: 506–12. PubMed
Kelly DN, Martin-Loeches I. Comparing current US and European guidelines for nosocomial pneumonia. Curr Opin Pulm Med 2019; 25: 263–70. PubMed
Torres A, Niederman MS, Chastre J et al. International ERS/ESICM/ESCMID/ALAT guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia and ventilator-associated pneumonia: guidelines for the management of hospital-acquired pneumonia (HAP)/ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) of the European Respiratory Society (ERS), European Society of Intensive Care Medicine (ESICM), European Society of Clinical Microbiology and Infectious Diseases (ESCMID) and Asociacion Latinoamericana del Torax (ALAT). Eur Respir J 2017; 50: 1700582. PubMed
ZERBAXA® (ceftolozane and tazobactam) for injection, for intravenous use . Prescribing Information. Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp, 2020. https://www.merck.com/product/usa/pi_circulars/z/zerbaxa/zerbaxa_pi.pdf.
Castanheira M, Duncan LR, Mendes RE et al. Activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam against Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Enterobacteriaceae isolates collected from respiratory tract specimens of hospitalized patients in the United States during 2013 to 2015. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2018; 62: e02125-17. PubMed PMC
Shortridge D, Pfaller MA, Castanheira M et al. Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane-tazobactam tested against Enterobacteriaceae and Pseudomonas aeruginosa collected from patients with bloodstream infections isolated in United States hospitals (2013-2015) as part of the Program to Assess Ceftolozane-Tazobactam Susceptibility (PACTS) surveillance program. Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2018; 92: 158–63. PubMed
Karlowsky JA, Lob SH, Young K et al. Activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against Gram-negative isolates from patients with lower respiratory tract infections - SMART United States 2018-2019. BMC Microbiol 2021; 21: 74. PubMed PMC
Karlowsky JA, Kazmierczak KM, Young K et al. In vitro activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam against phenotypically defined extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-positive isolates of Escherichia coli and Klebsiella pneumoniae isolated from hospitalized patients (SMART 2016). Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis 2020; 96: 114925. PubMed
Chandorkar G, Huntington JA, Gotfried MH et al. Intrapulmonary penetration of ceftolozane/tazobactam and piperacillin/tazobactam in healthy adult subjects. J Antimicrob Chemother 2012; 67: 2463–9. PubMed
Caro L, Nicolau DP, De Waele JJ et al. Lung penetration, bronchopulmonary pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic profile and safety of 3 g of ceftolozane/tazobactam administered to ventilated, critically ill patients with pneumonia. J Antimicrob Chemother 2020; 75: 1546–53. PubMed PMC
Kollef MH, Novacek M, Kivistik U et al. Ceftolozane-tazobactam versus meropenem for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia (ASPECT-NP): a randomised, controlled, double-blind, phase 3, non-inferiority trial. Lancet Infect Dis 2019; 19: 1299–311. PubMed
Xiao AJ, Miller BW, Huntington JA et al. Ceftolozane/tazobactam pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic-derived dose justification for phase 3 studies in patients with nosocomial pneumonia. J Clin Pharmacol 2016; 56: 56–66. PubMed PMC
Rodvold KA, Hope WW, Boyd SE. Considerations for effect site pharmacokinetics to estimate drug exposure: concentrations of antibiotics in the lung. Curr Opin Pharmacol 2017; 36: 114–23. PubMed
Puzniak L, Dillon R, Palmer T et al. Systematic literature review of real-world evidence of ceftolozane/tazobactam for the treatment of respiratory infections. Infect Dis Ther 2021; 10: 1227–52. PubMed PMC
CLSI . Methods for Dilution Antimicrobial Susceptibility Tests for Bacteria that Grow Aerobically—Eleventh Edition: M07. 2018.
CLSI . Performance Standards for Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing—Twenty-Eighth Edition: M100. 2018.
Castanheira M, Johnson MG, Yu B et al. Molecular characterization of baseline Enterobacterales and Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from a phase 3 nosocomial pneumonia (ASPECT-NP) clinical trial. Antimicrob Agents Chemother 2021; 65: e02461-20. PubMed PMC
Johnson MG, Bruno C, Castanheira M et al. Evaluating the emergence of nonsusceptibility among Pseudomonas aeruginosa respiratory isolates from a phase-3 clinical trial for treatment of nosocomial pneumonia (ASPECT-NP). Int J Antimicrob Agents 2021; 57: 106278. PubMed
Jones RN. Microbial etiologies of hospital-acquired bacterial pneumonia and ventilator-associated bacterial pneumonia. Clin Infect Dis 2010; 51 Suppl 1: S81–7. PubMed
Weiner LM, Webb AK, Limbago B et al. Antimicrobial-resistant pathogens associated with healthcare-associated infections: summary of data reported to the National Healthcare Safety Network at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2011-2014. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2016; 37: 1288–301. PubMed PMC
Shortridge D, Pfaller MA, Arends SJR et al. Comparison of the in vitro susceptibility of ceftolozane-tazobactam with the cumulative susceptibility rates of standard antibiotic combinations when tested against Pseudomonas aeruginosa from ICU patients with bloodstream infections or pneumonia. Open Forum Infect Dis 2019; 6: ofz240. PubMed PMC
Shortridge D, Pfaller MA, Streit JM et al. Antimicrobial activity of ceftolozane/tazobactam tested against contemporary (2015-2017) Pseudomonas aeruginosa isolates from a global surveillance programme. J Glob Antimicrob Resist 2020; 21: 60–4. PubMed
Mikamo H, Monden K, Miyasaka Y et al. The efficacy and safety of tazobactam/ceftolozane in combination with metronidazole in Japanese patients with complicated intra-abdominal infections. J Infect Chemother 2019; 25: 111–6. PubMed
Solomkin J, Hershberger E, Miller B et al. Ceftolozane/tazobactam plus metronidazole for complicated intra-abdominal infections in an era of multidrug resistance: results from a randomized, double-blind, phase 3 trial (ASPECT-cIAI). Clin Infect Dis 2015; 60: 1462–71. PubMed PMC
Wagenlehner FM, Umeh O, Steenbergen J et al. Ceftolozane-tazobactam compared with levofloxacin in the treatment of complicated urinary-tract infections, including pyelonephritis: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial (ASPECT-cUTI). Lancet 2015; 385: 1949–56. PubMed
Pogue JM, Heil EL. Laces out Dan! The role of tazobactam based combinations for invasive ESBL infections in a post-MERINO world. Expert Opin Pharmacother 2019; 20: 2053–57. PubMed
Harris PNA, Tambyah PA, Lye DC et al. Effect of piperacillin-tazobactam vs meropenem on 30-day mortality for patients with E coli or Klebsiella pneumoniae bloodstream infection and ceftriaxone resistance: a randomized clinical trial. JAMA 2018; 320: 984–94. PubMed PMC