Between-Center Variation in Outcome After Endovascular Treatment of Acute Stroke: Analysis of Two Nationwide Registries
Language English Country United States Media print-electronic
Document type Journal Article, Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
PubMed
35094522
PubMed Central
PMC8920023
DOI
10.1161/circoutcomes.121.008180
Knihovny.cz E-resources
- Keywords
- hospitals, multicenter study, quality improvement, stroke, thrombectomy,
- MeSH
- Stroke * diagnosis etiology therapy MeSH
- Endovascular Procedures * adverse effects MeSH
- Ischemic Stroke * MeSH
- Brain Ischemia * diagnosis etiology therapy MeSH
- Humans MeSH
- Registries MeSH
- Treatment Outcome MeSH
- Check Tag
- Humans MeSH
- Publication type
- Journal Article MeSH
- Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't MeSH
BACKGROUND: Insight in differences in patient outcomes between endovascular thrombectomy (EVT) centers can help to improve stroke care. We assessed between-center variation in functional outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke who were treated with EVT. We analyzed to what extent this variation may be explained by modifiable center characteristics. METHODS: We used nationwide registry data of patients with stroke treated with EVT in the Netherlands and in the Czech Republic. Primary outcome was modified Rankin Scale score at 90 days as an indicator of disability. We used multilevel ordinal logistic regression to quantify the between-center variation in outcomes and the impact of patient and center characteristics. Between-center variation was expressed as the relative difference in odds of a more favorable modified Rankin Scale score between a relatively better performing center (75th percentile) and a relatively worse performing center (25th percentile). RESULTS: We included a total of 4518 patients treated in 33 centers. Adjusted for patient characteristics, the odds of a more favorable outcome in a center at the 75th percentile of the outcome distribution were 1.46 times higher (95% CI, 1.31-1.70) than the odds in a center at the 25th percentile. Adjustment for center characteristics, including the median time between stroke onset and reperfusion per center, decreased this relative difference in odds to 1.30 (95% CI, 1.18-1.50, P=0.01). This translates into an absolute difference in likelihood of good functional outcome of 8% after adjustment for patient characteristics and to 5% after further adjustment for modifiable center characteristics. CONCLUSIONS: The considerable between-center variation in patient outcomes after EVT for acute ischemic stroke could be largely explained by center-specific characteristics, such as time to reperfusion. Improvement of these parameters may likely result in a decrease in center-specific differences, and an overall improvement in outcome of patients with acute ischemic stroke.
Charles University Faculty of Medicine in Hradec Králové Hradec Králové Czech Republic
Comprehensive Stroke Center University Hospital Hradec Králové Czech Republic
Department of Neurology Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands
Department of Neurology University Hospital Ostrava Czech Republic
Department of Public Health Erasmus MC University Medical Center Rotterdam the Netherlands
Faculty of Medicine at Masaryk University Brno Czech Republic
Faculty of Medicine at University Ostrava Czech Republic
Regional Hospital Liberec Neurocenter Liberec Czech Republic
See more in PubMed
Goyal M, Menon BK, van Zwam WH, Dippel DW, Mitchell PJ, Demchuk AM, Dávalos A, Majoie CB, van der Lugt A, de Miquel MA, et al. . Endovascular thrombectomy after large-vessel ischaemic stroke: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from five randomised trials. Lancet. 2016;387:1723–1731. PubMed
Bettger JP, Thomas L, Liang L, Xian Y, Bushnell CD, Saver JL, Fonarow GC, Peterson ED. Hospital variation in functional recovery after stroke. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10:e002391. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.115.002391 PubMed
Fonarow GC, Smith EE, Reeves MJ, Pan W, Olson D, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Schwamm LH; Get With The Guidelines Steering Committee and Hospitals. Hospital-level variation in mortality and rehospitalization for medicare beneficiaries with acute ischemic stroke. Stroke. 2011;42:159–166. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.110.601831 PubMed
Lingsma HF, Dippel DW, Hoeks SE, Steyerberg EW, Franke CL, van Oostenbrugge RJ, de Jong G, Simoons ML, Scholte Op Reimer WJ; Netherlands Stroke Survey investigators. Variation between hospitals in patient outcome after stroke is only partly explained by differences in quality of care: results from the Netherlands Stroke Survey. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry. 2008;79:888–894. doi: 10.1136/jnnp.2007.137059 PubMed
Thompson MP, Zhao X, Bekelis K, Gottlieb DJ, Fonarow GC, Schulte PJ, Xian Y, Lytle BL, Schwamm LH, Smith EE, et al. . Regional variation in 30-day ischemic stroke outcomes for medicare beneficiaries treated in get with the guidelines-stroke hospitals. Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes. 2017;10:e003604. doi: 10.1161/CIRCOUTCOMES.117.003604 PubMed
Berkhemer OA, Fransen PS, Beumer D, van den Berg LA, Lingsma HF, Yoo AJ, Schonewille WJ, Vos JA, Nederkoorn PJ, Wermer MJ, et al. ; MR CLEAN Investigators. A randomized trial of intraarterial treatment for acute ischemic stroke. N Engl J Med. 2015;372:11–20. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1411587 PubMed
Jansen IGH, Mulder MJHL, Goldhoorn RB; MR CLEAN Registry investigators. Endovascular treatment for acute ischaemic stroke in routine clinical practice: prospective, observational cohort study (MR CLEAN Registry). BMJ. 2018;360:k949. doi: 10.1136/bmj.k949 PubMed PMC
Volny O, Krajina A, Belaskova S, Bar M, Cimflova P, Herzig R, Sanak D, Tomek A, Köcher M, Rocek M, et al. . Mechanical thrombectomy performs similarly in real world practice: a 2016 nationwide study from the Czech Republic. J Neurointerv Surg. 2018;10:741–745. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2017-013534 PubMed
von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP; STROBE Initiative. The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Lancet. 2007;370:1453–1457. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(07)61602-X PubMed
Lingsma HF, Roozenbeek B, Li B, Lu J, Weir J, Butcher I, Marmarou A, Murray GD, Maas AI, Steyerberg EW. Large between-center differences in outcome after moderate and severe traumatic brain injury in the international mission on prognosis and clinical trial design in traumatic brain injury (IMPACT) study. Neurosurgery. 2011;68:601–7. discussion 607. doi: 10.1227/NEU.0b013e318209333b PubMed
Donders AR, van der Heijden GJ, Stijnen T, Moons KG. Review: a gentle introduction to imputation of missing values. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1087–1091. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.014 PubMed
Moons KG, Donders RA, Stijnen T, Harrell FE., Jr. Using the outcome for imputation of missing predictor values was preferred. J Clin Epidemiol. 2006;59:1092–1101. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinepi.2006.01.009 PubMed
Saver JL, Goyal M, van der Lugt A, Menon BK, Majoie CB, Dippel DW, Campbell BC, Nogueira RG, Demchuk AM, Tomasello A, et al. ; HERMES Collaborators. Time to treatment with endovascular thrombectomy and outcomes from ischemic stroke: a meta-analysis. JAMA. 2016;316:1279–1288. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.13647 PubMed
Benardete EA, Nair AK. Endovascular stroke therapy results improve over time: the ‘learning curve’ at a new comprehensive stoke center. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra. 2014;4:235–242. doi: 10.1159/000370060 PubMed PMC
Eesa M, Burns PA, Almekhlafi MA, Menon BK, Wong JH, Mitha A, Morrish W, Demchuk AM, Goyal M. Mechanical thrombectomy with the Solitaire stent: is there a learning curve in achieving rapid recanalization times? J Neurointerv Surg. 2014;6:649–651. doi: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2013-010906 PubMed
Nishi H, Ishii A, Nakahara I, Matsumoto S, Sadamasa N, Kai Y, Ishibashi R, Yamamoto M, Morita S, Nagata I. Different learning curves between stent retrieval and a direct aspiration first-pass technique for acute ischemic stroke. J Neurosurg. 2018;129:1456–1463. doi: 10.3171/2017.6.JNS17872 PubMed
Janssen PM, Venema E, Dippel DWJ. Effect of workflow improvements in endovascular stroke treatment. Stroke. 2019;50:665–674. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.118.021633 PubMed
Menon BK, Xu H, Cox M, Saver JL, Goyal M, Peterson E, Xian Y, Matsuoka R, Jehan R, Yavagal D, et al. . Components and trends in door to treatment times for endovascular therapy in get with the guidelines-stroke hospitals. Circulation. 2019;139:169–179. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.118.036701 PubMed
Kapral MK, Fang J, Chan C, Alter DA, Bronskill SE, Hill MD, Manuel DG, Tu JV, Anderson GM. Neighborhood income and stroke care and outcomes. Neurology. 2012;79:1200–1207. doi: 10.1212/WNL.0b013e31826aac9b PubMed PMC
Marshall IJ, Wang Y, Crichton S, McKevitt C, Rudd AG, Wolfe CD. The effects of socioeconomic status on stroke risk and outcomes. Lancet Neurol. 2015;14:1206–1218. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(15)00200-8 PubMed
Skyrud KD, Vikum E, Hansen TM, Kristoffersen DT, Helgeland J. Hospital variation in 30-day mortality for patients with stroke; the impact of individual and municipal socio-demographic status. J Am Heart Assoc. 2019;8:e010148. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.118.010148 PubMed PMC
Vivanco-Hidalgo RM, Ribera A, Abilleira S. Association of socioeconomic status with ischemic stroke survival. Stroke. 2019;50:3400–3407. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.119.026607 PubMed
Allen NB, Kaltenbach L, Goldstein LB, Olson DM, Smith EE, Peterson ED, Schwamm L, Lichtman JH. Regional variation in recommended treatments for ischemic stroke and TIA: Get with the Guidelines–Stroke 2003-2010. Stroke. 2012;43:1858–1864. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.112.652305 PubMed
Kolte D, Khera S, Aronow WS, Mujib M, Palaniswamy C, Ahmed A, Frishman WH, Fonarow GC. Regional variation across the United States in management and outcomes of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: analysis of the 2003 to 2010 nationwide inpatient sample database. Clin Cardiol. 2014;37:204–212. doi: 10.1002/clc.22250 PubMed PMC
Laskey W, Spence N, Zhao X, Mayo R, Taylor R, Cannon CP, Hernandez AF, Peterson ED, Fonarow GC. Regional differences in quality of care and outcomes for the treatment of acute coronary syndromes: an analysis from the get with the guidelines coronary artery disease program. Crit Pathw Cardiol. 2010;9:1–7. doi: 10.1097/HPC.0b013e3181cdb5a5 PubMed
Vallabhajosyula S, Patlolla SH, Dunlay SM, Prasad A, Bell MR, Jaffe AS, Gersh BJ, Rihal CS, Holmes DR, Jr, Barsness GW. Regional variation in the management and outcomes of acute myocardial infarction with cardiogenic shock in the United States. Circ Heart Fail. 2020;13:e006661. doi: 10.1161/CIRCHEARTFAILURE.119.006661 PubMed PMC
Greene NH, Kernic MA, Vavilala MS, Rivara FP. Variation in adult traumatic brain injury outcomes in the United States. J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2018;33:E1–E8. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000306 PubMed PMC
Mikulík R, Caso V, Bornstein NM, Svobodová V, Pezzella FR, Grecu A, Simsic S, Gdovinova Z, Członkowska A, Mishchenko TS, et al. . Enhancing and accelerating stroke treatment in Eastern European region: methods and achievement of the ESO EAST program. Eur Stroke J. 2020;5:204–212. doi: 10.1177/2396987319897156 PubMed PMC
Den Hartog SJ, Amini M, van Leeuwen N, Kuhrij LS, Nederkoorn PJ, Lingsma HF, van der Lugt AAD, Dippel DWJ, Roozenbeek B. Performance feedback on quality of care in hospitals performing thrombectomy for ischemic stroke (PERFEQTOS trial). European Stroke Journal. 2019;4:790–821. PubMed
Venema E, Burke JF, Roozenbeek B, Nelson J, Lingsma HF, Dippel DWJ, Kent DM. Prehospital triage strategies for the transportation of suspected stroke patients in the United States. Stroke. 2020;51:3310–3319. doi: 10.1161/STROKEAHA.120.031144 PubMed PMC