Animal experimental models of ischemic wounds - A review of literature

. 2022 Mar ; 30 (2) : 268-281. [epub] 20220209

Jazyk angličtina Země Spojené státy americké Médium print-electronic

Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, práce podpořená grantem, přehledy

Perzistentní odkaz   https://www.medvik.cz/link/pmid35138685

Critical limb ischemia is a serious form of peripheral arterial disease (PAD). The consequences of lower limb ischemia are pain, claudication and chronic non-healing wounds. Patients with diabetes are especially at a high risk for developing non-healing ulcers. The most serious complication is major amputation. For this reason, there is a significant medical requirement to develop new therapies in order to prevent the progression of PAD. For research purposes, it is crucial to find an appropriate model of chronic ischemia to explore the processes of wound healing. According to recently acquired information, rodents are currently the most commonly used animals in these types of studies. The main advantage of using small animals is the low financial cost due to the relatively small demand for food, water and living space. The disadvantage is their anatomy, which is different from that of humans. Larger animals have a more human-like anatomy and physiology, but they require more expense and space for housing. A bipedicle skin flap and its modifications are popular models for ischemic wounds. In order to secure healing through re-epithelisation, as opposed to contraction in rodents, there is a need to remove the panniculus carnosus muscle. Wounds in other experimental animals heal primarily through re-epithelisation. The application of a silicone mesh underneath the flap prevents vascular regrowth in ischemic tissue. There is an ongoing effort to create in vivo diabetic models for chronic ulcer research. This work presents an overview of existing animal models of ischemic wounds.

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Wang P-H, Huang B-S, Horng H-CH, Yeh C-C, Chen Y-J. Wound healing. J Chin Med Assoc. 2018;81(2):94-101.

Han G, Ceilley R. Chronic wound healing: a review of current management and treatments. Adv Ther. 2017;34(3):599-610.

Zhao R, Liang H, Clarke E, Jackson C, Xue M. Inflammation in chronic wounds. Int J Mol Sci. 2016;17(12):2085.

Uccioli L, Meloni M, Izzo V, Giurato L, Merolla S, Gandini R. Critical limb ischemia: current challenges and future prospects. Vasc Health Risk Manag. 2018;14:63-74.

Wernick B, Nahirniak P, Stawicki SP. Impaired wound healing. StatPearls. StatPearls Publishing; 2020.

Uccioli L, Izzo V, Meloni M, Vainieri E, Ruotolo V, Giurato L. Non-healing foot ulcers in diabetic patients: general and local interfering conditions and management options with advanced wound dressings. J Wound Care. 2015;24(4 Suppl):35-42.

Prompers L, Schaper N, Apelqvist J, et al. Prediction of outcome in individuals with diabetic foot ulcers: focus on the differences between individuals with and without peripheral arterial disease. The EURODIALE Study. Diabetologia. 2008;51(5):747-755.

Pysna A, Bem R, Nemcova A, et al. Endothelial progenitor cells biology in diabetes mellitus and peripheral arterial disease and their therapeutic potential. Stem Cell Rev Rep. 2019;15(2):157-165.

McFarlane RM, Deyoung G, Henry RA. The design of a pedicle flap in the rat to study necrosis and its prevention. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1965;35:177-182.

Quirinia A, Jensen FT, Viidik A. Ischemia in wound healing. I: design of a flap model--changes in blood flow. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1992;26(1):21-28.

Quirinia A, Viidik A. Ischemia in wound healing. II: design of a flap model--biomechanical properties. Scand J Plast Reconstr Surg Hand Surg. 1992;26(2):133-139.

Quirinia A, Viidik A. The influence of age on the healing of normal and ischemic incisional skin wounds. Mech Ageing Dev. 1991;58(2-3):221-232.

Schwarz DA, Lindblad WJ, Rees RR. Altered collagen metabolism and delayed healing in a novel model of ischemic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 1995;3(2):204-212.

Kamler M, Lehr HA, Barker JH, Saetzler RK, Galla TJ, Messmer K. Impact of ischemia on tissue oxygenation and wound healing: intravital microscopic studies on the hairless mouse ear model. Eur Surg Res. 1993;25(1):30-37.

Gould LJ, Leong M, Sonstein J, Wilson S. Optimization and validation of an ischemic wound model. Wound Repair Regen. 2005;13(6):576-582.

Moor AN, Tummel E, Prather JL, et al. Consequences of age on ischemic wound healing in rats: altered antioxidant activity and delayed wound closure. Age (Dordr). 2014;36(2):733-748.

Mogford JE, Sisco M, Bonomo SR, Robinson AM, Mustoe TA. Impact of aging on gene expression in a rat model of ischemic cutaneous wound healing. J Surg Res. 2004;118(2):190-196.

Yang P, Pei Q, Yu T, et al. Compromised wound healing in ischemic type 2 diabetic rats. Plos One. 2016;11(3):e0152068.

Chen C, Schultz GS, Bloch M, Edwards PD, Tebes S, Mast BA. Molecular and mechanistic validation of delayed healing rat wounds as a model for human chronic wounds. Wound Repair Regen. 1999;7(6):486-494.

Blalock TD, Varela JC, Gowda S, et al. Ischemic skin wound healing models in rats. Wounds. 2001;13(1):35-44.

Trujillo AN, Kesl SL, Sherwood J, Wu M, Gould LJ. Demonstration of the rat ischemic skin wound model. J Vis Exp. 2015;1(98):e252637.

Yu CO, Leung KS, Fung KP, et al. The characterization of a full-thickness excision open foot wound model in n5-streptozotocin (STZ)-induced type 2 diabetic rats that mimics diabetic foot ulcer in terms of reduced blood circulation, higher C-reactive protein, elevated inflammation, and reduced cell proliferation. Exp Anim. 2017;66(3):259-269.

Hofmann AT, Neumann S, Ferguson J, Redl H, Mittermayr R. * A Rodent Excision Model for ischemia-impaired wound healing. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2017;23(12):995-1002.

Constantine BE, Bolton LL. A wound model for ischemic ulcers in the Guinea pig. Arch Dermatol Res. 1986;278(5):429-431.

Tur E, Bolton L, Constantine BE. Topical hydrogen peroxide treatment of ischemic ulcers in the Guinea pig: blood recruitment in multiple skin sites. J Am Acad Dermatol. 1995;33(2 Pt 1):217-221.

Ahn ST, Mustoe TA. Effects of ischemia on ulcer wound healing: a new model in the rabbit ear. Ann Plast Surg. 1990;24(1):17-23.

Sisco M, Mustoe TA. Animal models of ischemic wound healing. Toward an approximation of human chronic cutaneous ulcers in rabbit and rat. Methods Mol Med. 2003;78:55-65.

Chien S. Ischemic rabbit ear model created by minimally invasive surgery. Wound Repair Regen. 2007;15(6):928-935.

Chien S, Wilhelmi BJ. A simplified technique for producing an ischemic wound model. J Vis Exp. 2012;2(63):e3341.

Roy S, Biswas S, Khanna S, et al. Characterization of a preclinical model of chronic ischemic wound. Physiol Genomics. 2009;37(3):211-224.

Velander P, Theopold C, Hirsch T, et al. Impaired wound healing in an acute diabetic pig model and the effects of local hyperglycemia. Wound Repair Regen. 2008;16(2):288-293.

Singer AJ, Toussaint J, Chung WT, et al. Development of a contaminated ischemic porcine wound model and the evaluation of bromelain based enzymatic debridement. Burns. 2018;44(4):896-904.

Patil P, Martin JR, Sarett SM, et al. Porcine ischemic wound-healing model for preclinical testing of degradable biomaterials. Tissue Eng Part C Methods. 2017;23(11):754-762.

Jung Y, Son D, Kwon S, Kim J, Han K. Experimental pig model of clinically relevant wound healing delay by intrinsic factors. Int Wound J. 2013;10(3):295-305.

d'Audiffret A, Roethle S, Tretinyak A, Santilli S. Use of a non-contact radiant heat bandage on ischemic dermal infections in an ovine model. Med Sci Monit. 2002;8(8):BR289-BR292.

Lee ES, Caldwell MP, Talarico PJ, Kuskowski MA, Santilli SM. Use of a noncontact radiant heat bandage and Staphylococcus aureus dermal infections in an ovine model. Wound Repair Regen. 2000;8(6):562-566.

Trøstrup H, Thomsen K, Calum H, Høiby N, Moser C. Animal models of chronic wound care: the application of biofilms in clinical research. Chronic Wound Care Manag Res. 2016;3:123-132.

Nunan R, Harding KG, Martin P. Clinical challenges of chronic wounds: searching for an optimal animal model to recapitulate their complexity. Dis Model Mech. 2014;7(11):1205-1213.

Bayat M, Chien S. Comparison and evaluation of seven animal models of ischemic skin wound: a review article. J Pharm Res Int. 2019;25(6):1-37.

Thanigaimani S, Phie J, Golledge J. Animal models of ischemic limb ulcers: a systematic review and meta-analysis. BMJ Open Diabetes Res Care. 2020;8(1):e001676.

Perez R, Davis SC. Relevance of animal models for wound healing. Wounds. 2008;20(1):3-8.

Seaton M, Hocking A, Gibran NS. Porcine models of cutaneous wound healing. ILAR J. 2015;56(1):127-138.

Ye P, Cheah IK, Halliwell B. High fat diets and pathology in the Guinea pig. Atherosclerosis or liver damage? Biochim Biophys Acta. 2013;1832(2):355-364.

Myers WT, Gould LJ. Animal models of tissue ischemia to evaluate the importance of oxygen in the wound healing environment. Wounds. 2008;20(1):9-17.

Ribitsch I, Baptista PM, Lange-Consiglio A, et al. Large animal models in regenerative medicine and tissue engineering: to do or not to do. Front Bioeng Biotechnol. 2020;13(8):972.

Najít záznam

Citační ukazatele

Nahrávání dat ...

Možnosti archivace

Nahrávání dat ...