Autonomy is a key characteristic of attachment relations that varies as a function of attachment orientations and is also a key personality characteristic of leadership perceptions. In the presented research, we reasoned that the relationship between attachment and autonomy-related preference for specific leaders and leadership behavior would be a function of individuals' insecure attachment strategies. We tested our hypotheses in two studies. Study 1 used Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes (MIMIC) modeling to test expectations based on a cross-sectional design, while Study 2 utilized a vignette-based experimental design. We find that anxious individuals attributed less positive evaluations to an autonomous leadership style (Study 1), while avoidant persons attributed higher leader competence to an autonomous leader description (Study 2). Compared to less anxious participants, highly anxious participants attributed lower competence to the autonomous leader description. By examining how individual differences in attachment orientations can indirectly influence the ideal leader categorization process, the present set of studies lends support to the importance of attachment orientations and related working models in leader perception and contribute to the literature on leader-follower fit. Using a survey and experimental approach, we examine how followers' attachment schemas can shape the leader influence process, specifically concerning a preference for an autonomous leadership style.

Palacky University Olomouc Czechia

School of Business Maynooth University Maynooth Ireland

School of Fine Arts Aristotle University Thessaloniki Greece

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Allen J. P., Hauser S. T. (1996). Autonomy and relatedness in adolescent-family interactions as predictors of young adults’ states of mind regarding attachment. Dev. Psychopathol. 8, 793–809. doi: 10.1017/S0954579400007434 DOI

Allen J. P., Hauser S. T., O’Connor T. G., Bell K. L. (2002). Prediction of peer-rated adult hostility from autonomy struggles in adolescent–family interactions. Dev. Psychopathol. 14, 123–137. doi: 10.1017/S0954579402001074, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Bartholomew K., Horowitz L. M. (1991). Attachment styles among young adults: a test of a four-category model. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 61, 226–244. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.226, PMID: PubMed DOI

Bauer D. J., Curran P. J. (2005). Probing interactions in fixed and multilevel regression: inferential and graphical techniques. Multivar. Behav. Res. 40, 373–400. doi: 10.1207/s15327906mbr4003_5, PMID: PubMed DOI

Bentler P. M. (1990). Comparative fit indexes in structural models. Psychol. Bull. 107, 238–246. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.107.2.238, PMID: PubMed DOI

Bentler P. M., Bonett D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol. Bull. 88, 588–606. doi: 10.1037/0033-2909.88.3.588 DOI

Brennan K. A., Clark C. L., Shaver P. R. (1998). “Self-Report Measurement of Adult Attachment,” Attachment Theory and Close Relationships, 46–76.

Chiniara M., Bentein K. (2016). Linking servant leadership to individual performance: differentiating the mediating role of autonomy, competence and relatedness need satisfaction. Leadersh. Q. 27, 124–141. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2015.08.004 DOI

Collins N. L., Feeney B. C. (2004). Working models of attachment shape perceptions of social support: evidence from experimental and observational studies. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 87, 363–383. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.87.3.363, PMID: PubMed DOI

Cronshaw S. F., Lord R. G. (1987). Effects of categorization, attribution, and encoding processes on Leadership perceptions. J. Appl. Psychol. 72, 97–106. doi: 10.1037/0021-9010.72.1.97 DOI

DeRue D. S., Ashford S. J. (2010). Who will lead and who will follow? A social process of leadership identity construction in organizations. Acad. Manag. Rev. 35, 627–647. doi: 10.5465/amr.35.4.zok627 DOI

DeSimone J. A., Harms P. D., DeSimone A. J. (2015). Best practice recommendations for data screening. J. Organ. Behav. 36, 171–181. doi: 10.1002/job.1962 DOI

Dorfman P., Javidan M., Hanges P., Dastmalchian A., House R. (2012). GLOBE: A twenty year journey into the intriguing world of culture and leadership. J. World Bus. 47, 504–518. doi: 10.1016/j.jwb.2012.01.004 DOI

Dunning D., Hayes A. F. (1996). Evidence for egocentric comparison in social judgment. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 71, 213–229. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.213 DOI

Epitropaki O., Sy T., Martin R., Tram-Quon S., Topakas A. (2013). Implicit Leadership and followership theories “in the wild”: taking stock of information-processing approaches to leadership and followership in organizational settings. Leadersh. Q. 24, 858–881. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.10.005 DOI

Foti R. J., Bray B. C., Thompson N. J., Allgood S. F. (2012). Know thy self, know thy leader: contributions of a pattern-oriented approach to examining leader perceptions. Leadersh. Q. 23, 702–717. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.007 DOI

Fraley R. C., Hudson N. W., Heffernan M. E., Segal N. (2015). Are adult attachment styles categorical or dimensional? A taxometric analysis of general and relationship-specific attachment orientations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 109, 354–368. doi: 10.1037/pspp0000027, PMID: PubMed DOI

Gillath O., Hart J. (2010). The effects of psychological security and insecurity on political attitudes and leadership preferences. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 40, 122–134. doi: 10.1002/ejsp.614 DOI

Goldberg L. R., Johnson J. A., Eber H. W., Hogan R., Ashton M. C., Cloninger C. R., et al. . (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. J. Res. Pers. 40, 84–96. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007 DOI

Gruda D., Kafetsios K. (2020). Attachment orientations guide the transfer of Leadership judgments: culture matters. Personal. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 46, 525–546. doi: 10.1177/0146167219865514, PMID: PubMed DOI

Gruda D., Kafetsios K. (2021). I need a doctor, call me a doctor: attachment and the evaluation of general practitioners before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18:7914. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18157914, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Hansbrough T. K. (2012). The construction of a transformational leader: follower attachment and Leadership perceptions. J. Appl. Soc. Psychol. 42, 1533–1549. doi: 10.1111/j.1559-1816.2012.00913.x DOI

Harms P. D. (2011). Adult attachment styles in the workplace. Hum. Resour. Manag. Rev. 21, 285–296. doi: 10.1016/j.hrmr.2010.10.006 DOI

House R. J., Hanges P. J., Javidan M., Dorfman P. W., Gupta V. (2004). Culture, Leadership, and Organizations: The GLOBE Study of 62 Societies, California: Sage publications.

Jackson E. M., Johnson R. E. (2012). When opposites do (and do not) attract: interplay of leader and follower self-identities and its consequences for leader–member exchange. Leadersh. Q. 23, 488–501. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2011.12.003 DOI

Jöreskog K. G., Goldberger A. S. (1975). Estimation of a model with multiple indicators and multiple causes of a single latent variable. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 70, 631–639.

Junker N. M., van Dick R. (2014). Implicit theories in organizational settings: A systematic review and research agenda of implicit leadership and followership theories. Lead. Q. 25, 1154–1173. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2014.09.002 DOI

Kafetsios K. (2021). Collective reactions to epidemic threat: attachment and cultural orientations predict early Covid-19 infection and mortality rates and trajectories. Social Psychol. Personal. Sci. 461. doi: 10.1177/19485506211053461 DOI

Kafetsios K. G., Gruda D. (2018). Interdependent followers prefer avoidant leaders: followers’ cultural orientation moderates leaders’ avoidance relationships with followers’ work outcomes. Front. Commun. 3:9. doi: 10.3389/fcomm.2018.00009 DOI

Keller T. (1999). Images of the familiar: individual differences and implicit leadership theories. Leadersh. Q. 10, 589–607. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(99)00033-8 DOI

Keller T. (2003). Parental images as a guide to leadership sensemaking: an attachment perspective on implicit leadership theories. Leadersh. Q. 14, 141–160. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(03)00007-9 DOI

Lord R. G., Brown D. J., Harvey J. L., Hall R. J. (2001). Contextual constraints on prototype generation and their multilevel consequences for leadership perceptions. Lead. Q. 12, 311–338. doi: 10.1016/S1048-9843(01)00081-9 DOI

Martin R., Guillaume Y., Thomas G., Lee A., Epitropaki O. (2016). Leader–member exchange (LMX) and performance: a meta-analytic review. Pers. Psychol. 69, 67–121. doi: 10.1111/peps.12100 DOI

McElhaney K., Allen J., Stephenson J., Hare A., Lerner R., Steinberg L. (2009). “Handbook of Adolescent Psychology”. New Jersey: John Wiley & son.

Mikulincer M., Shaver P. R. (2007). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change. New York: Guilford Press.

Muthén B. O. (1989). Latent variable modeling in heterogeneous populations. Psychometrika 54, 557–585. doi: 10.1007/BF02296397 DOI

Noftle E. E., Shaver P. R. (2006). Attachment dimensions and the big five personality traits: associations and comparative ability to predict relationship quality. J. Res. Pers. 40, 179–208. doi: 10.1016/j.jrp.2004.11.003 DOI

Paolacci G., Chandler J. (2014). Inside the Turk: Understanding Mechanical Turk as a participant pool. Curr. Dir. Psychol. Sci. 23, 184–188. doi: 10.1177/0963721414531598 DOI

Popper M., Amit K. (2009). Attachment and leader’s development via experiences. Leadersh. Q. 20, 749–763. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2009.06.005 DOI

Rholes W. S., Simpson J. A., Blakely B. S. (1995). Adult attachment styles and mothers’ relationships with their young children. Pers. Relat. 2, 35–54. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-6811.1995.tb00076.x DOI

Richards D. A., Hackett R. D. (2012). Attachment and emotion regulation: compensatory interactions and leader-member exchange. Leadersh. Q. 23, 686–701. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2012.03.005 DOI

Richards D. A., Schat A. (2011). Attachment at (not to) work: applying attachment theory to explain individual behavior in organizations. J. Appl. Psychol. 96, 169–182. doi: 10.1037/a0020372 PubMed DOI

Rom E., Mikulincer M. (2003). Attachment theory and group processes: The association between attachment style and group-related representations, goals, memories, and functioning. J. Person. Soc. Psychol. 84, 1220–1235. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.84.6.1220 PubMed DOI

Schyns B., Kiefer T., Kerschreiter R., Tymon A. (2011). teaching implicit Leadership theories to develop leaders and Leadership: how and why it can make a difference. Acad. Manag. Learn. Edu. 10, 397–408. doi: 10.5465/amle.2010.0015 DOI

Schyns B., Schilling J. (2010). Implicit Leadership theories: think leader, think effective? J. Manag. Inq. 20, 141–150. doi: 10.1177/1056492610375989 DOI

Shondrick S. J., Dinh J. E., Lord R. G. (2010). Developments in implicit leadership theory and cognitive science: applications to improving measurement and understanding alternatives to hierarchical leadership. Leadersh. Q. 21, 959–978. doi: 10.1016/j.leaqua.2010.10.004 DOI

Stapel D. A., Suls J. (2007). “Several answers to four questions: reflections and conclusions,” in Assimilation and Contrast in Social Psychology (New York, NY: psychology press; ), 313–327.

Wood D., Harms P., Lowman G. H., DeSimone J. A. (2017). Response speed and response consistency as mutually validating indicators of data quality in online samples. Soc. Psychol. Personal. Sci. 8, 454–464. doi: 10.1177/1948550617703168 DOI

Woods C. M., Oltmanns T. F., Turkheimer E. (2009). Illustration of MIMIC-model DIF testing with the schedule for nonadaptive and adaptive personality. J. Psychopathol. Behav. Assess. 31, 320–330. doi: 10.1007/s10862-008-9118-9, PMID: PubMed DOI PMC

Yip J., Ehrhardt K., Black H., Walker D. O. (2018). Attachment theory at work: a review and directions for future research. J. Organ. Behav. 39, 185–198. doi: 10.1002/job.2204 DOI

Time After Time: Attachment Orientations and Impression Formation in Initial and Longer-Term Team Interactions