If securely attached individuals typically exhibit more desirable attributes, can insecure individuals be perceived positively when working in teams despite their interpersonal disadvantages? In an exploratory study, using both a vignette based experimental research design (n = 636) and a round-robin study of professionals working on a team task for nine consecutive weeks (k = 648), we examined the evolving impressions of insecurely attached individuals over time. We find that while anxiously attached individuals are perceived more positively in initial interactions, this initial positive effect for anxious attachment disappeared over time as individuals within teams gained more relational knowledge about their team members. We also found a stable and negative effect of avoidant attachment. We discuss possible reasons for the temporal underpinnings of this effect and compare our findings to previous literature.

Facultad de Administración y Economía Universidad de Santiago Santiago Chile

Katedra Psychologie Palacký University Olomuc Czechia

School of Business Maynooth University Maynooth Ireland

School of Fine Arts Aristotle University of Thessaloniki Thessaloniki Greece

Western Governors University Salt Lake City UT United States

Zobrazit více v PubMed

Beckes L., Coan J. A. (2011). Social baseline theory: the role of social proximity in emotion and economy of action. Soc. Pers. Psychol. Comp. 5 976–988. 10.1111/j.1751-9004.2011.00400.x DOI

Berson Y., Dan O., Yammarino F. J. (2006). Attachment style and individual differences in leadership perceptions and emergence. J. Soc. Psychol. 146 165–182. 10.3200/SOCP.146.2.165-182 PubMed DOI

Brennan K. A., Clark C. L., Shaver P. R. (1998). “Self-report measurement of adult romantic attachment: an integrative overview,” in Attachment Theory and Close Relationships, eds Simpson J. A., Rholes W. S. (New York, NY: Guilford Press; ), 46–76. 10.1016/j.pain.2006.07.020 DOI

Brumbaugh C. C., Fraley R. C. (2010). Adult attachment and dating strategies: how do insecure people attract mates? Pers. Relat. 17 599–614. 10.1111/j.1475-6811.2010.01304.x DOI

Davidovitz R., Mikulincer M., Shaver P. R., Izsak R., Popper M. (2007). Leaders as attachment figures: leaders’ attachment orientations predict leadership-related mental representations and followers’ performance and mental health. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 93:632. 10.1037/0022-3514.93.4.632 PubMed DOI

Eisenkraft N., Elfenbein H. A. (2010). The way you make me feel: evidence for individual differences in affective presence. Psychol. Sci. 21 505–510. 10.1177/0956797610364117 PubMed DOI

Fraley R. C., Hudson N. W., Heffernan M. E., Segal N. (2015). Are adult attachment styles categorical or dimensional? A taxometric analysis of general and relationship-specific attachment orientations. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 109 354–368. 10.1037/pspp0000027 PubMed DOI

Game A. M. (2008). Negative emotions in supervisory relationships: the role of relational models. Hum. Relat. 61 355–393. 10.1177/0018726708088998 DOI

Game A. M. (2011). “Leadership and attachment theory: understanding interpersonal dynamics in leader-follower relations,” in The Sage Handbook of Leadership, eds Bryman A., Collinson D., Grint K., Jackson B., Uhl-Bien M. (London: Sage Publications; ), 326–337.

Game A. M., West M. A., Thomas G. (2016). “The role of attachment and leader caregiving in followers’ negative affective experiences,” in Emotions and Organizational Governance, eds Ashkanasy N. M., Hartel C. E. J., Zerbe W. J. (Bingley: Emerald Group Publishing Limited; ).

Geller D., Bamberger P. (2009). Bringing avoidance and anxiety to the job: attachment style and instrumental helping behavior among co-workers. Hum. Relat. 62 1803–1827. 10.1177/0018726709337524 DOI

Goldberg L. R., Johnson J. A., Eber H. W., Hogan R., Ashton M. C., Cloninger C. R., et al. (2006). The international personality item pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. J. Res. Pers. 40 84–96. 10.1016/j.jrp.2005.08.007 DOI

Gruda D., Kafetsios K. (2020). Attachment orientations guide the transfer of leadership judgments: culture matters. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 46 525–546. 10.1177/0146167219865514 PubMed DOI

Gruda D., Kafetsios K. (2021). I need a doctor, call me a doctor: attachment and the evaluation of general practitioners before and during the COVID-19 Pandemic. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health 18:7914. 10.3390/ijerph18157914 PubMed DOI PMC

Gruda D., Kafetsios K. (2022). From ideal to real: attachment orientations guide preference for an autonomous leadership style. Front. Psychol. 13:728343. 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.728343 PubMed DOI PMC

Gruda D., Ojo A. (2021). “Inferring the relationship between anxiety and extraversion from tweets during COVID19–A linguistic analytics approach,” in Proceedings of the 54th Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences.

Gruda D., Ojo A. (2022). All about that trait: examining extraversion and state anxiety during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic using a machine learning approach. Pers. Individ. Dif. 188:111461. 10.1016/j.paid.2021.111461 PubMed DOI PMC

Gruda D., Ojo A., Psychogios A. (2021). “Examining anxiety contagion in computer-mediated communication using machine learning,” in Proceedings of the Academy of Management, (Briarcliff Manor, NY: Academy of Management; ).

Gruda D., Ojo A., Psychogios A. (2022). Don’t you tweet me badly: anxiety contagion between leaders and followers in computer-mediated communication during COVID-19. PLoS One 17:e0264444. 10.1371/journal.pone.0264444 PubMed DOI PMC

Hatfield E., Cacioppo J. T., Rapson R. L. (1994). Emotional Contagion: Studies in Emotion and Social Interaction. Editions de la Maison des Sciences de L’homme. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Jehn K. A., Mannix E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Acad. Manage. J. 44 238–251. 10.5465/3069453 PubMed DOI

Judge T. A., Bono J. E., Ilies R., Gerhardt M. W. (2002). Personality and leadership: a qualitative and quantitative review. J. Appl. Psychol. 87 765–780. 10.1037//0021-9010.87.4.765 PubMed DOI

Kafetsios K. G., Gruda D. (2018). Interdependent followers prefer avoidant leaders: followers’ cultural orientation moderates leaders’ avoidance relationships with followers’ work outcomes. Front. Commun. 3:9. 10.3389/fcomm.2018.00009 DOI

Kafetsios K., Nezlek J. B. (2002). Attachment styles in everyday social interaction. Eur. J. Soc. Psychol. 32 719–735. 10.1002/ejsp.130 DOI

Kafetsios K., Athanasiadou M., Dimou N. (2014). Leaders’ and subordinates’ attachment orientations, emotion regulation capabilities and affect at work: a multilevel analysis. Leadersh. Q. 25 512–527. 10.1016/j.leaqua.2013.11.010 DOI

Kenny D. A. (1994). Interpersonal Perception: A Social Relations Analysis. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Kenny D. A., Lavoie L. (1984). “The social-relations model,” in Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 18 ed. Berkowitz L. (Amsterdam: Elsevier; ), 141–182.

Mayseless O., Popper M. (2019). Attachment and leadership: review and new insights. Curr. Opin. Psychol. 25 157–161. 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.08.003 PubMed DOI

McClure M. J., Lydon J. E. (2014). Anxiety doesn’t become you: how attachment anxiety compromises relational opportunities. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 106:89. 10.1037/a0034532 PubMed DOI

Mikulincer M., Nachshon O. (1991). Attachment styles and patterns of self-disclosure. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 61:321. 10.1037/0022-3514.61.2.321 DOI

Mikulincer M., Shaver P. R. (2007). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change. New York, NY: Guilford Press.

Nestler S., Geukes K., Hutteman R., Back M. D. (2017). Tackling longitudinal round-robin data: a social relations growth model. Psychometrika 82 1162–1181. 10.1007/s11336-016-9546-5 PubMed DOI

Richards D. A., Schat A. C. (2011). Attachment at (not to) work: applying attachment theory to explain individual behavior in organizations. J. Appl. Psychol. 96 169–182. 10.1037/a0020372 PubMed DOI

Spielmann S. S., Maxwell J. A., MacDonald G., Baratta P. L. (2013). Don’t get your hopes up: avoidantly attached individuals perceive lower social reward when there is potential for intimacy. Pers. Soc. Psychol. Bull. 39 219–236. 10.1177/0146167212472541 PubMed DOI

Strand P. S. (2020). The security-seeking impulse and the unification of attachment and culture. Psychol. Rev. 127:778. 10.1037/rev0000194 PubMed DOI

Thompson E. R. (2007). Development and validation of an internationally reliable short-form of the positive and negative affect schedule (PANAS). J. Cross Cult. Psychol. 38 227–242. 10.1177/0022022106297301 DOI

Turan B. (2016). Processing information about support exchanges in close relationships: the role of a knowledge structure. Front. Psychol. 7:259. 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.00259 PubMed DOI PMC

Watson D., Clark L. A., Tellegen A. (1988). Development and validation of brief measures of positive and negative affect: the PANAS scales. J. Pers. Soc. Psychol. 54:1063. 10.1037/0022-3514.54.6.1063 PubMed DOI

Yip J., Ehrhardt K., Black H., Walker D. O. (2018). Attachment theory at work: a review and directions for future research. J. Organ. Behav. 39 185–198. 10.1002/job.2204 DOI