Impact of Delaying the Addition of Anti-EGFR in First Line of RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Propensity-Weighted Pooled Data Analysis
Status PubMed-not-MEDLINE Jazyk angličtina Země Švýcarsko Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články
PubMed
35326562
PubMed Central
PMC8946276
DOI
10.3390/cancers14061410
PII: cancers14061410
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- Klíčová slova
- RAS status, anti-EGFR, bevacizumab, metastatic colorectal cancer,
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
The first-line therapy of patients with RAS wild-type (WT) non-resectable metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) is usually 5-fluorouracil-based chemotherapy with either bevacizumab or an anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR). The addition of anti-EGFR antibodies is commonly delayed in clinical practice because of late RAS testing results. Our objective was to evaluate the impact on overall survival (OS) of a delayed anti-EGFR introduction strategy. This study pooled the data of two large retrospective studies. Patients with RAS WT non-resectable mCRC, treated in first line by a doublet chemotherapy with an anti-EGFR introduced with a delay of 2 to 4 cycles, were compared to an anti-EGFR and to an anti-VEGF that was introduced immediately. Patients numbering 305 in the delayed anti-EGFR group, 401 in the immediate anti-EGFR group, and 129 in the immediate anti-VEGF group were analyzed. After propensity scoring, there was no difference between the characteristics of the three groups. Median OS was 28.6 months (95% CI: 23.5-34.1) in the immediate anti-EGFR group, 35.1 (95% CI: 29.9-43.5) in the delayed anti-EGFR group, and 32.4 (95% CI: 25.4-44.8) in the immediate anti-VEGF group. There was no significant difference concerning median OS (p = 0.24) or progression-free survival (p = 0.56). This study suggests that delaying the introduction of an anti-EGFR has no deleterious impact on survival compared to the immediate introduction of an anti-VEGF or of an anti-EGFR.
Biomedical Center Faculty of Medicine in Pilsen Charles University 32300 Pilsen Czech Republic
Faculté de Médecine Paris Centre Université de Paris 75006 Paris France
Faculté de Médecine Université Paris Saclay 94043 Le Kremlin Bicêtre France
Hôpital Bicêtre AP HP 78 rue du General Leclerc 94043 Le Kremlin Bicêtre France
Zobrazit více v PubMed
Sung H., Ferlay J., Siegel R.L., Laversanne M., Soerjomataram I., Jemal A., Bray F. Global Cancer Statistics 2020: GLOBOCAN Estimates of Incidence and Mortality Worldwide for 36 Cancers in 185 Countries. CA Cancer J. Clin. 2021;71:209–249. doi: 10.3322/caac.21660. PubMed DOI
Van Cutsem E., Cervantes A., Adam R., Sobrero A., Van Krieken J.H., Aderka D., Aranda Aguilar E., Bardelli A., Benson A., Bodoky G., et al. ESMO consensus guidelines for the management of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. Ann. Oncol. 2016;27:1386–1422. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdw235. PubMed DOI
Venook A.P., Niedzwiecki D., Lenz H.-J., Innocenti F., Fruth B., Meyerhardt J.A., Schrag D., Greene C., O’Neil B.H., Atkins J.N., et al. Effect of First-Line Chemotherapy Combined With Cetuximab or Bevacizumab on Overall Survival in Patients With KRAS Wild-Type Advanced or Metastatic Colorectal Cancer: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017;317:2392–2401. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.7105. PubMed DOI PMC
Heinemann V., von Weikersthal L.F., Decker T., Kiani A., Vehling-Kaiser U., Al-Batran S.-E., Heintges T., Lerchenmüller C., Kahl C., Seipelt G., et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab as first-line treatment for patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): A randomised, open-label, phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15:1065–1075. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(14)70330-4. PubMed DOI
Cercek A., Braghiroli M.I., Chou J.F., Hechtman J.F., Kemeny N., Saltz L., Capanu M., Yaeger R. Clinical Features and Outcomes of Patients with Colorectal Cancers Harboring NRAS Mutations. Clin. Cancer Res. 2017;23:4753–4760. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-17-0400. PubMed DOI PMC
Lièvre A., Bachet J.-B., Boige V., Cayre A., Le Corre D., Buc E., Ychou M., Bouché O., Landi B., Louvet C., et al. KRAS mutations as an independent prognostic factor in patients with advanced colorectal cancer treated with cetuximab. J. Clin. Oncol. 2008;26:374–379. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.12.5906. PubMed DOI
Lièvre A., Bachet J.-B., Le Corre D., Boige V., Landi B., Emile J.-F., Côté J.-F., Tomasic G., Penna C., Ducreux M., et al. KRAS mutation status is predictive of response to cetuximab therapy in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 2006;66:3992–3995. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-06-0191. PubMed DOI
Douillard J.-Y., Oliner K.S., Siena S., Tabernero J., Burkes R., Barugel M., Humblet Y., Bodoky G., Cunningham D., Jassem J., et al. Panitumumab–FOLFOX4 Treatment and RAS Mutations in Colorectal Cancer. N. Engl. J. Med. 2013;369:1023–1034. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1305275. PubMed DOI
Allegra C.J., Rumble R.B., Hamilton S.R., Mangu P.B., Roach N., Hantel A., Schilsky R.L. Extended RAS Gene Mutation Testing in Metastatic Colorectal Carcinoma to Predict Response to Anti–Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor Monoclonal Antibody Therapy: American Society of Clinical Oncology Provisional Clinical Opinion Update 2015. JCO. 2016;34:179–185. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2015.63.9674. PubMed DOI
Lièvre A., Merlin J.-L., Sabourin J.-C., Artru P., Tong S., Libert L., Audhuy F., Gicquel C., Moureau-Zabotto L., Ossendza R.-A., et al. RAS mutation testing in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer in French clinical practice: A status report in 2014. Dig. Liver Dis. 2018;50:507–512. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2017.12.029. PubMed DOI
Fiala O., Veskrnova V., Chloupkova R., Poprach A., Kiss I., Kopeckova K., Dusek L., Slavicek L., Kohoutek M., Finek J., et al. Impact of Delayed Addition of Anti-EGFR Monoclonal Antibodies on the Outcome of First-Line Therapy in Metastatic Colorectal Cancer Patients: A Retrospective Registry-Based Analysis. Target Oncol. 2018;13:735–743. doi: 10.1007/s11523-018-0597-7. PubMed DOI
Palmieri L.-J., Mineur L., Tougeron D., Rousseau B., Granger V., Gornet J.-M., Smith D., Lievre A., Galais M.-P., Doat S., et al. Withholding the Introduction of Anti-Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor: Impact on Outcomes in RAS Wild-Type Metastatic Colorectal Tumors: A Multicenter AGEO Study (the WAIT or ACT Study) Oncologist. 2020;25:e266–e275. doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2019-0328. PubMed DOI PMC
Eisenhauer E.A., Therasse P., Bogaerts J., Schwartz L.H., Sargent D., Ford R., Dancey J., Arbuck S., Gwyther S., Mooney M., et al. New response evaluation criteria in solid tumours: Revised RECIST guideline (version 1.1) Eur. J. Cancer. 2009;45:228–247. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2008.10.026. PubMed DOI
Sterne J.A.C., White I.R., Carlin J.B., Spratt M., Royston P., Kenward M.G., Wood A.M., Carpenter J.R. Multiple imputation for missing data in epidemiological and clinical research: Potential and pitfalls. BMJ. 2009;338:b2393. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2393. PubMed DOI PMC
Leyrat C., Seaman S.R., White I.R., Douglas I., Smeeth L., Kim J., Resche-Rigon M., Carpenter J.R., Williamson E.J. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used? Stat. Methods Med. Res. 2019;28:3–19. doi: 10.1177/0962280217713032. PubMed DOI PMC
McCaffrey D.F., Griffin B.A., Almirall D., Slaughter M.E., Ramchand R., Burgette L.F. A tutorial on propensity score estimation for multiple treatments using generalized boosted models. Statist. Med. 2013;32:3388–3414. doi: 10.1002/sim.5753. PubMed DOI PMC
Austin P.C. An Introduction to Propensity Score Methods for Reducing the Effects of Confounding in Observational Studies. Multivar. Behav. Res. 2011;46:399–424. doi: 10.1080/00273171.2011.568786. PubMed DOI PMC
Austin P.C., Stuart E.A. Moving towards best practice when using inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) using the propensity score to estimate causal treatment effects in observational studies. Statist. Med. 2015;34:3661–3679. doi: 10.1002/sim.6607. PubMed DOI PMC
R Core Team . R: A Language and Environment for Statistical Computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing; Vienna, Austria: 2013. [(accessed on 21 January 2021)]. Available online: http://www.R-project.org/
Stintzing S., Modest D.P., Rossius L., Lerch M.M., von Weikersthal L.F., Decker T., Kiani A., Vehling-Kaiser U., Al-Batran S.-E., Heintges T., et al. FOLFIRI plus cetuximab versus FOLFIRI plus bevacizumab for metastatic colorectal cancer (FIRE-3): A post-hoc analysis of tumour dynamics in the final RAS wild-type subgroup of this randomised open-label phase 3 trial. Lancet Oncol. 2016;17:1426–1434. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30269-8. PubMed DOI
Schwartzberg L.S., Rivera F., Karthaus M., Fasola G., Canon J.-L., Hecht J.R., Yu H., Oliner K.S., Go W.Y. PEAK: A randomized, multicenter phase II study of panitumumab plus modified fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (mFOLFOX6) or bevacizumab plus mFOLFOX6 in patients with previously untreated, unresectable, wild-type KRAS exon 2 metastatic colorectal cancer. J. Clin. Oncol. 2014;32:2240–2247. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2013.53.2473. PubMed DOI
Heinemann V., Stintzing S., Modest D.P., Giessen-Jung C., Michl M., Mansmann U.R. Early tumour shrinkage (ETS) and depth of response (DpR) in the treatment of patients with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) Eur. J. Cancer. 2015;51:1927–1936. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2015.06.116. PubMed DOI
Holch J.W., Ricard I., Stintzing S., Modest D.P., Heinemann V. The relevance of primary tumour location in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: A meta-analysis of first-line clinical trials. Eur. J. Cancer. 2017;70:87–98. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2016.10.007. PubMed DOI
Vidal J., Muinelo L., Dalmases A., Jones F., Edelstein D., Iglesias M., Orrillo M., Abalo A., Rodríguez C., Brozos E., et al. Plasma ctDNA RAS mutation analysis for the diagnosis and treatment monitoring of metastatic colorectal cancer patients. Ann. Oncol. 2017;28:1325–1332. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx125. PubMed DOI PMC
Bachet J.B., Bouché O., Taieb J., Dubreuil O., Garcia M.L., Meurisse A., Normand C., Gornet J.M., Artru P., Louafi S., et al. RAS mutation analysis in circulating tumor DNA from patients with metastatic colorectal cancer: The AGEO RASANC prospective multicenter study. Ann. Oncol. 2018;29:1211–1219. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy061. PubMed DOI
Normanno N., Esposito Abate R., Lambiase M., Forgione L., Cardone C., Iannaccone A., Sacco A., Rachiglio A.M., Martinelli E., Rizzi D., et al. RAS testing of liquid biopsy correlates with the outcome of metastatic colorectal cancer patients treated with first-line FOLFIRI plus cetuximab in the CAPRI-GOIM trial. Ann. Oncol. 2018;29:112–118. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdx417. PubMed DOI