Final analysis of the phase III non-inferiority COLUMBA study of subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma
Jazyk angličtina Země Itálie Médium electronic
Typ dokumentu časopisecké články, randomizované kontrolované studie, práce podpořená grantem
Grantová podpora
P30 CA008748
NCI NIH HHS - United States
PubMed
35354247
PubMed Central
PMC9521240
DOI
10.3324/haematol.2021.279459
Knihovny.cz E-zdroje
- MeSH
- dexamethason MeSH
- intravenózní podání MeSH
- lidé MeSH
- lokální recidiva nádoru farmakoterapie MeSH
- mnohočetný myelom * farmakoterapie MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky MeSH
- protokoly antitumorózní kombinované chemoterapie škodlivé účinky MeSH
- výsledek terapie MeSH
- Check Tag
- lidé MeSH
- Publikační typ
- časopisecké články MeSH
- práce podpořená grantem MeSH
- randomizované kontrolované studie MeSH
- Názvy látek
- daratumumab MeSH Prohlížeč
- dexamethason MeSH
- monoklonální protilátky MeSH
In the primary analysis of the phase III COLUMBA study, daratumumab by subcutaneous administration (DARA SC) demonstrated non-inferiority to intravenous administration (DARA IV) for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). Here, we report the final analysis of efficacy and safety from COLUMBA after a median of 29.3 months follow-up (additional 21.8 months after the primary analysis). In total, 522 patients were randomized (DARA SC, n=263; DARA IV, n=259). With longer follow-up, DARA SC and DARA IV continued to show consistent efficacy and maximum trough daratumumab concentration as compared with the primary analysis. The overall response rate was 43.7% for DARA SC and 39.8% for DARA IV. The maximum mean (standard deviation [SD]) trough concentration (cycle 3, day 1 pre-dose) of serum DARA was 581 (SD, 315) μg/mL for DARA SC and 496 (SD, 231) μg/mL for DARA IV. Median progression-free survival was 5.6 months for DARA SC and 6.1 months for DARA IV; median overall survival was 28.2 months and 25.6 months, respectively. Grade 3/4 treatment-emergent adverse events occurred in 50.8% of patients in the DARA SC group and 52.7% in the DARA IV group; the most common (≥10%) were thrombocytopenia (DARA SC, 14.2%; DARA IV, 13.6%), anemia (13.8%; 15.1%), and neutropenia (13.1%; 7.8%). The safety profile remained consistent with the primary analysis after longer follow-up. In summary, DARA SC and DARA IV continue to demonstrate similar efficacy and safety, with a low rate of infusion-related reactions (12.7% vs. 34.5%, respectively) and shorter administration time (3-5 minutes vs. 3-7 hours) supporting DARA SC as a preferable therapeutic choice. (Clinicaltrials gov. Identifier: NCT03277105.
Arnie Charbonneau Cancer Research Institute University of Calgary Calgary AB
Center of Oncology of the Lublin Region St Jana z Dukli Lublin
Clinica Medica São Germano São Paulo
Dalhousie University and Queen Elizabeth 2 Health Science Centre Halifax NS
Department of Hematology and Oncology Dana Farber Cancer Institute Harvard Medical School Boston MA
Department of Hematology Hôpital Haut Lévêque Pessac
Department of Internal Medicine Falun General Hospital Falun
Hematology Department University Hospital Hôtel Dieu Nantes
Janssen Research and Development LLC Raritan NJ
Janssen Research and Development LLC Spring House PA
Kiev Center for Bone Marrow Transplantation Kiev
Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center New York NY
S P Botkin City Clinical Hospital Moscow Russian Federation
University Hospital of Salamanca IBSAL Cancer Research Center IBMCC Salamanca
Zobrazit více v PubMed
de Weers M, Tai YT, van der Veer MS, et al. . Daratumumab, a novel therapeutic human CD38 monoclonal antibody, induces killing of multiple myeloma and other hematological tumors. J Immunol. 2011;186(3):1840-1848. PubMed
Lammerts van Bueren J, Jakobs D, Kaldenhoven N, et al. . Direct in vitro comparison of daratumumab with surrogate analogs of CD38 antibodies MOR03087, SAR650984 and Ab79. Blood. 2014;124(21):3474.
Overdijk MB, Verploegen S, Bogels M, et al. . Antibody-mediated phagocytosis contributes to the anti-tumor activity of the therapeutic antibody daratumumab in lymphoma and multiple myeloma. MAbs. 2015;7(2):311-321. PubMed PMC
Overdijk MB, Jansen JH, Nederend M, et al. . The therapeutic CD38 monoclonal antibody daratumumab induces programmed cell death via Fcγ receptor-mediated cross-linking. J Immunol. 2016;197(3):807-813. PubMed
Krejcik J, Casneuf T, Nijhof IS, et al. . Daratumumab depletes CD38+ immune-regulatory cells, promotes T-cell expansion, and skews T-cell repertoire in multiple myeloma. Blood. 2016;128(3):384-394. PubMed PMC
Adams HC III, Stevenaert F, Krejcik J, et al. . High-parameter mass cytometry evaluation of relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma patients treated with daratumumab demonstrates immune modulation as a novel mechanism of action. Cytometry A. 2019;95(3):279-289. PubMed PMC
Casneuf T, Adams HC III, van de Donk NWCJ, et al. . Deep immune profiling of patients treated with lenalidomide and dexamethasone with or without daratumumab. Leukemia. 2020;35(2):573-584. PubMed PMC
DARZALEX® (daratumumab) injection, for intravenous use [packet insert]. Horsham, PA: Janssen Biotech, Inc.; October 2021.
European Medicines Agency. Darzalex 20 mg/mL concentrate for solution for infusion. Summary of product characteristics. http://www.ema.europa.eu/docs/en_GB/document_library/EPAR_-_Product_Information/human/004077/WC500207296.pdf. Accessed 11 March 2021.
Mateos MV, Nahi H, Legiec W, et al. . Subcutaneous versus intravenous daratumumab in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (COLUMBA): a multicentre, open-label, non-inferiority, randomised, phase 3 trial. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7(5):e370-e380. PubMed
DARZALEX FASPRO™ (daratumumab and hyaluronidase-fihj) [package insert]. Horsham, PA: Janssen Biotech, Inc; November 2021.
Xu XS, Yan X, Puchalski T, et al. . Clinical implications of complex pharmacokinetics for daratumumab dose regimen in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2017;101(6):721-724. PubMed PMC
Rajkumar SV, Dimopoulos MA, Palumbo A, et al. . International Myeloma Working Group updated criteria for the diagnosis of multiple myeloma. Lancet Oncol. 2014;15(12):e538-e548. PubMed
Rajkumar SV, Harousseau JL, Durie B, et al. . Consensus recommendations for the uniform reporting of clinical trials: report of the International Myeloma Workshop Consensus Panel 1. Blood. 2011;117(18):4691-4695. PubMed PMC
Lokhorst HM, Plesner T, Laubach JP, et al. . Targeting CD38 with daratumumab monotherapy in multiple myeloma. N Engl J Med. 2015;373(13):1207-1219. PubMed
Lonial S, Weiss BM, Usmani S, et al. . Daratumumab monotherapy in patients with treatment-refractory multiple myeloma (SIRIUS): an open-label, randomised, phase 2 trial. Lancet. 2016;387(10027):1551-1560. PubMed
Usmani SZ, Nahi H, Plesner T, et al. . Daratumumab monotherapy in patients with heavily pretreated relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: final results from the phase 2 GEN501 and SIRIUS trials. Lancet Haematol. 2020;7(6):e447-e455. PubMed
Mateos MV, Usmani SZ, Grosicki S, et al. . Randomized, open-label, non-inferiority, phase 3 study of subcutaneous (SC) versus intravenous (IV) daratumumab (DARA) administration in patients (Pts) with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): body weight subgroup analysis of COLUMBA. Blood. 2019;134(Suppl 1):S1906.
Usmani SZ, Mateos MV, Hungria V, et al. . Greater treatment satisfaction in patients receiving daratumumab subcutaneous vs. intravenous for relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma: COLUMBA clinical trial results. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2021;147(2):619-631. PubMed
ClinicalTrials.gov
NCT03277105