• This record comes from PubMed

Post-collection acidification of spot urine sample is not needed before measurement of electrolytes

. 2022 Jun 15 ; 32 (2) : 020702. [epub] 20220415

Language English Country Croatia Media print-electronic

Document type Journal Article

INTRODUCTION: Kidney stone formers can have higher oxalate and phosphate salt amounts in their urine than healthy people and we hypothesized that its acidification may be useful. The study aims to compare results of urine concentrations of calcium, magnesium, and inorganic phosphorus in the midstream portion of first voided morning urine samples without (FMU) and with post-collection acidification (FMUa) in kidney stone patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a prospective single center study. A total of 138 kidney stone patients with spot urine samples were included in the study. Urine concentrations of calcium, magnesium and inorganic phosphorus were measured with and without post-collection acidification. Acidification was performed by adding 5 µL of 6 mol/L HCl to 1 mL of urine. RESULTS: The median age (range) of all participants was 56 (18-87) years. The median paired differences between FMU and FMUa concentrations of calcium, magnesium, and inorganic phosphorus were: - 0.040 mmol/L, 0.035 mmol/L, and 0.060 mmol/L, respectively. They were statistically different: P < 0.001, P < 0.001, P = 0.004, respectively. These differences are not clinically significant because biological variations of these markers are much higher. CONCLUSIONS: No clinically significant differences in urinary calcium, magnesium, and inorganic phosphorus concentrations between FMU and FMUa in patients with kidney stones were found.

See more in PubMed

Ziemba JB, Matlaga BR. Epidemiology and economics of nephrolithiasis. Investig Clin Urol. 2017;58:299–306. 10.4111/icu.2017.58.5.299 PubMed DOI PMC

Fisang C, Anding R, Müller SC, Latz S, Laube N. Urolithiasis-an Interdisciplinary Diagnostic, Therapeutic and Secondary Preventive Challenge. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2015;112:83–91. 10.3238/arztebl.2015.0083 PubMed DOI PMC

European Association of Urology (EAU). EAU guidelines on urolithiasis. Available from: https://uroweb.org/guideline/urolithiasis/#4. Accessed: July 2nd 2021.

Strohmaier WL, Hoelz KJ, Bichler KH. Spot urine samples for the metabolic evaluation of urolithiasis patients. Eur Urol. 1997;32:294–300. 10.1159/000480828 PubMed DOI

Šálek T. Extreme diet without calcium may lead to hyperoxaluria and kidney stone recurrence-A case study. J Clin Lab Anal. 2020;34:e23512. 10.1002/jcla.23512 PubMed DOI PMC

Wu W, Yang D, Tiselius H-G, Ou L, Mai Z, Chen K, et al. Collection and storage of urine specimens for measurement of urolithiasis risk factors. Urology. 2015;85:299–303. 10.1016/j.urology.2014.10.030 PubMed DOI

Daudon M, Frochot V. Crystalluria. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2015;53:s1479–87. 10.1515/cclm-2015-0860 PubMed DOI

Sodi R, Godber IM. Effect of refrigeration, centrifugation, acidification, heat treatment and storage on urine calcium, magnesium and phosphate. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2016;54:e379–81. 10.1515/cclm-2016-0064 PubMed DOI

Chenevier-Gobeaux C, Rogier M, Dridi-Brahimi I, Koumakis E, Cormier C, Borderie D. Pre-, post- or no acidification of urine samples for calcium analysis: does it matter? Clin Chem Lab Med. 2019;58:33–9. 10.1515/cclm-2019-0606 PubMed DOI

Feres MC, Bini R, De Martino MC, Biagini SP, de Sousa AL, Campana PG, et al. Implications for the use of acid preservatives in 24-hour urine for measurements of high demand biochemical analytes in clinical laboratories. Clin Chim Acta. 2011;412:2322–5. 10.1016/j.cca.2011.08.033 PubMed DOI

Ricós C, Alvarez V, Cava F, García-Lario JV, Hernández A, Jiménez CV, et al. Current databases on biological variation: pros, cons and progress. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 1999;59:491–500. 10.1080/00365519950185229 PubMed DOI

Ennis JL, Asplin JR. The role of the 24-h urine collection in the management of nephrolithiasis. Int J Surg. 2016;36:633–7. 10.1016/j.ijsu.2016.11.020 PubMed DOI

Simundic AM. Practical recommendations for statistical analysis and data presentation in Biochemia Medica journal. Biochem Med (Zagreb). 2012;22:15–23. 10.11613/BM.2012.003 PubMed DOI PMC

Larcher L, Lefevre G, Bailleul S, Daudon M, Frochot V. Importance of pre-analytical for urinalysis with urinary crystals. Ann Biol Clin (Paris). 2017;75:525–30. 10.1684/abc.2017.1278 PubMed DOI

Yilmaz G, Yilmaz FM, Hakligör A, Yücel D. Are preservatives necessary in 24-hour urine measurements? Clin Biochem. 2008;41:899–901. 10.1016/j.clinbiochem.2008.03.002 PubMed DOI

Williams JC, Gambaro G, Rodgers A, Asplin J, Bonny O, Costa-Bauzá A, et al. Urine and stone analysis for the investigation of the renal stone former: a consensus conference. Urolithiasis. 2021;49:1–16. 10.1007/s00240-020-01217-3 PubMed DOI PMC

Darn SM, Sodi R, Ranganath LR, Roberts NB, Duffield JR. Experimental and computer modelling speciation studies of the effect of pH and phosphate on the precipitation of calcium and magnesium salts in urine. Clin Chem Lab Med. 2006;44:185–91. 10.1515/CCLM.2006.034 PubMed DOI

Find record

Citation metrics

Loading data ...

Archiving options

Loading data ...